Teaching dietary counseling skills to residents: patient and physician outcomes. The CADRE Study Group.

Our objective was to determine whether an educational intervention and prompting intervention for physicians improved dietary counseling of patients with high blood cholesterol and resulted in beneficial changes in patients' diets and cholesterol levels. We instituted a factorial design, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to test two interventions. We tested the trial at continuity care clinics of internal medicine residents at seven community and university medical centers in the northern and eastern United States. Our participants were 130 internal medicine residents and 254 adult outpatients with blood cholesterol levels of 240-300 mg/dL. Interventions included an educational program for resident physicians designed to improve their skills and confidence in dietary counseling (two one-hour sessions with specially prepared printed materials for use in counseling) and a prompting intervention, which was a fingerstick blood cholesterol determination prior to the patient's clinic visit. Resident physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported behaviors were assessed prior to the intervention and 10 months later using chart audits and questionnaires. Residents' behaviors were also assessed by exit interviews with patients. Patients' knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and fingerstick blood cholesterol levels were measured at baseline and 10 months later. The educational program increased the percentage of physicians who were confident in providing effective dietary counseling (baseline of 26% to 67%-78%; P < .01). The prompting intervention approximately doubled the frequency of physician counseling (P = .0005) and increased the likelihood that patients would try to change their diets. When both interventions were combined, most outcomes were better, although not statistically significant. Cholesterol levels, however, decreased only marginally and were no different among groups at 10-month follow-up. Despite success in changing physicians' attitudes and behaviors and increasing patients' willingness to change their diets, there was no significant change in patients' cholesterol levels. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH): randomized controlled trial; cholesterol; patient education; behavior therapy; education, medical; diet.

The discussion of end-of-life medical care by primary care patients and physicians: a multicenter study using structured qualitative interviews. The EOL Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: To identify primary care patients' and physicians' beliefs, attitudes, preferences, and expectations regarding discussions of end-of-life medical care, and to identify factors limiting the quality and frequency of these discussions. DESIGN: Descriptive study using audiotaped, structured, qualitative interviews. SETTING: Ambulatory care clinics and offices at eight medical centers in six states. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-three primary care physicians and 47 ambulatory outpatients. RESULTS: The patients expressed strong feelings about having end-of-life discussions early in their medical courses while they were competent. They desired straightforward and honest discussions and were less concerned than the physicians about damaging hope. The patients wanted their physicians to play central roles in discussions and both the patients and the physicians noted the impact of the patient-physician relationship on these discussions. The patients desired information focusing more on expected outcomes than on medical processes. The physicians expressed feelings of ambiguity when their desire to save lives clashed with their belief that aggressive life-sustaining treatments were futile. The physicians described their roles in end-of-life discussions in five major categories; lifesaver, neutral scientist, guide, counselor, and intimate confidant. The physicians considered living wills excellent "icebreakers" for starting discussions but of limited utility otherwise. CONCLUSIONS: Patients prefer end-of-life discussions earlier and with greater honesty than physicians may perceive. These discussions are inseparably linked with the patient-physician relationship. Physicians can better address patients' desires in end-of-life discussions by altering their timing, content, and delivery.