ABSTRACT
The increased demand for cladding in high-rise buildings has prompted engineers to explore alternative products utilizing recycled materials. However, ensuring fire compliance in these alternative claddings, which are predominantly composed of low-volume polymer-based composites, poses a critical challenge. Traditional experimental methods for fire evaluation are costly, time consuming, and environmentally impactful. Considering this, a numerical approach was proposed for evaluating the fire performance of glass-polymer composite materials, which contain a high proportion of recycled glass and a lower percentage of rigid polyurethane. A cone calorimeter test was simulated using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software to investigate the flammability of the novel glass-polymer composite material. This validated numerical model was employed to assess the combustibility of the glass-polyurethane composite materials and identify influential parameters using the Design of Experiments (DoE) method. Statistical analysis revealed that three material properties, namely, the heat of combustion, the absorption coefficient, and the heat of reaction, significantly influenced the peak heat release rate (pHRR) of the glass-polyurethane composite materials compared to other properties. Based on these findings, an empirical equation was proposed that demonstrates a reasonable correlation with the pHRR of low-polymer recycled glass composite materials. The outcomes of this study hold considerable importance for understanding and predicting the combustibility behaviour of low-polymer-glass composites. By providing a validated numerical model and identifying critical material properties, this research contributes to the development of sustainable fire safety solutions for buildings, enabling the use of recycled materials and reducing reliance on conventional claddings.
ABSTRACT
Expansive clays are found in many countries worldwide, and they exhibit inherent volume change during the seasonal moisture variation causing cracks, heaves, and damages to the overlying pavements. Chemical stabilisation is one of the most used approaches to treat the expansive clay subgrades. Cement, Lime and Fly ash are the most commonly used stabilisers, in which fly is cheaper and a by-product obtained from the coal power plant. This paper reviews fly ash stabilisation on various clay types, including low plasticity clays, high plasticity clays, silty clays, organic clays, and peats. The review begins with the properties of fly ash, followed by the characteristics of fly ash stabilised subgrades. The micro-level mechanism, physical, mechanical, and hydraulic characteristics of stabilised pavements are presented graphically for the Class C, and F fly ashes. The micro-level studies reveal that the pozzolanic reaction is stronger than the cation exchange during the fly ash stabilisation. The unconfined compressive strength (UCS), California bearing ratio (CBR) and resilient modulus (Mr) increased with the fly ash addition and curing time for most soft soils except peat clays. Based on the mechanical and hydraulic characteristics, using 15% class C fly ash with 7 days of curing is recommended for optimum performance. Although few research studies confirm that the leachate limit of stabilised soil is within the acceptable limit, further studies are required to investigate the uptake of heavy metals and other certain carcinogenic contaminants. This study will provide key information for researchers and Engineers on the selection of fly ash stabilisation measures for expansive subgrades.
