Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: Does response in the breast predict axillary node response?

INTRODUCTION: Determining the extent of residual disease in the breast and axilla following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is vital for surgical planning. Traditionally patients with incomplete radiological response in the breast after NACT undergo axillary node clearance, regardless of axillary clinical and radiological response. The aim of this study was to determine whether radiological and/or pathological response in the breast to NACT were predictive of axillary response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients with operable breast cancer with histologically proven axillary lymph node involvement who received NACT and underwent definitive surgical treatment between 1/1/2016 and 31/12/2018 were included. All had MRI and/or US of the breast and axilla before, mid-treatment and at the end of NACT. RESULTS: The 83 patients had a median age of 50 years (range 25-77). MRI had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 52.6% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 81.8% for breast pathological complete response (pCR). For axillary pCR, US had a PPV of 60.0% and NPV of 89.6%. Only 71% of patients had radiological concordance; 15.9% had radiological complete response (rCR) in breast and axilla whilst 55.1% had neither breast nor axillary rCR. 85.6% of patients had pathological concordance (20.5% with breast and axillary pCR: 65.1% with residual disease in both). CONCLUSION: Radiological and pathological response in the breast to NACT does not accurately predict axillary response. The axilla and the breast should be viewed and assessed as two separate entities for treatment plans.

Sentinel lymph node localization with contrast-enhanced ultrasound and an I-125 seed: an ideal prospective development study.

INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to evaluate the development of microbubble-enhanced sentinel lymph node (SLN) localization with placement of an I-125 seed in breast cancer patients as a potential alternative for SLN localization with nanocolloid. The study is conducted and reported following the IDEAL recommendations for evaluation of a new technique at Stage 2a (Prospective Development Study). METHODS: Fourteen consecutive patients with 15 lesions underwent microbubble-enhanced SLN localization with placement of an I-125 seed after the standard SLN localization (nanocolloid). We placed an I-125 seed within or near the SLN following its identification using intradermally injected microbubbles. The SLN was excised guided by nanocolloid and the SLN containing the I-125 seed was searched for. All technical modifications are described and standardized outcomes measured. RESULTS: Twelve (80%) microbubble procedures with I-125 seed placements were technically successful. In three cases no microbubble-enhancing lymph node could be detected. Intraoperatively, we found nine I-125 seeds within 0.5 cm of the nanocolloid confirmed SLN. One I-125 seed was found next to a non-SLN and two I-125 seeds were not near any lymph node. Overall, the procedure was successful in 60% (9 out of 15) of the cases. CONCLUSION: Given the low success rate, we conclude that microbubble-enhanced SLN is not a viable alternative to the standard SLN procedure. Modifications to this technique did not improve its performance. Planned study (NTR3690 http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=3690) was stopped early due to this conclusion and results reported in order to provide a full and transparent record of the evolution of technique.

Sentinel node identification using microbubbles and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has become the recommended method for surgical staging of the axilla in patients with breast cancer. Grey-scale axillary ultrasonography (US) combined with US-guided biopsy is a widely used preoperative staging procedure but has limited sensitivity. US contrast agent "microbubbles", when injected intradermally, have been shown to have the potential to enter the breast lymphatics, travel rapidly to the axilla, and visualize the putative SLNs. This review illustrates the SLN identification technique using intradermal injection of microbubbles and contrast-enhanced US. The injection method, lymphatic visualization techniques, grey-scale and contrast-enhanced US images of the putative SLNs are reviewed and exemplified.

Scar formation after stereotactic vacuum-assisted core biopsy of benign breast lesions.

AIM: To evaluate scar formation of impalpable breast lesions with benign histological outcome using stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted core biopsy (VACB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and ten lesions with benign histology for which follow-up mammograms were available, were assessed for scar formation at the biopsy site. All biopsies were performed using stereotactic VACB with 11-gauge needle. The incidence of post-biopsy scar formation and the number of specimens removed were determined. RESULTS: In 4.3% (9/210) of the lesions for which a biopsy was performed with 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted technique, the follow-up mammogram revealed a scar formation. Of these, six were minimal scars, two were moderate scars and one was a marked scar. Minimal and moderate scars were diagnosed on imaging only. However, the case with marked scar formation required tissue diagnosis to rule out malignancy. CONCLUSION: Although uncommon, scar formation can be seen in the follow-up mammograms after percutaneous breast biopsies. It is important that the radiologist interpreting follow-up mammograms is aware of the features of this lesion and its relationship to the biopsy procedure.

A comparison of aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy in the evaluation of breast lesions.

BACKGROUND: Several arguments are used for choosing either fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) or core needle biopsy (CNB) in the evaluation of breast lesions. Comparison of published data on both methods is complicated by differences in study design, calculations, and operator experience. The objective of this study was to make a direct comparison of both methods. METHODS: In 286 breast lesions (cysts and microcalcifications without a soft tissue mass excluded), both ultrasound-guided FNAC and CNB were performed in the same session by the same operator. Histologic follow-up was collected, and for those lesions that were not excised the results of the most recent mammography was used. A combination of the findings of both FNAC and CNB were evaluated. RESULTS: Core needle biopsy and FNAC do equally well for sensitivity (88% vs. 92%), positive predictive value for malignancy (99% vs. 100%), and inadequate rate (7% vs. 7%). However, statistical differences are found for the specificity (CNB, 90%; FNAC, 82%). In addition, differences are found in the positive predictive value of both suspicious (CNB, 100%; FNAC, 78%) and atypia (CNB, 80%; FNAC, 18%) and for the suspicious rate (CNB, 5%; FNAC, 13%) reflecting difficulties in interpreting some FNACs. Combining the findings of both FNAC and CNB results in an increase in absolute sensitivity, a decrease in the positive predictive value of atypia compared with FNAC and CNB per se, and a decrease in the inadequate rate for cancers. CONCLUSIONS: For the lesions selected in this study, FNAC and CNB are comparable for most parameters, but CNB has a higher specificity and lower suspicious rate. Combining results of FNAC and CNB leads to an increase in absolute sensitivity without affecting specificity and a decrease in the inadequate rate for cancers.