[CORRELATION BETWEEN MRI AND ARTHROSCOPIC FINDINGS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF KNEE PATHOLOGY IN YOUNG AND ADULT PATIENTS].

BACKGROUND: MRI is increasingly used as a diagnostic tool for sports injuries involving the knees before referral to arthroscopy. OBJECTIVES: Since degenerative changes increase with age, we aimed to evaluate whether age affects the accuracy of MRI. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients with knee injury whose evaluation included both MRI and arthroscopy. Two age groups were defined: young adults (18-39 years) and adults (40 years and above). RESULTS: Of 966 patients undergoing knee arthroscopy, 132 had preoperative MRI: 48.5% young adults and 51.5% adults. Arthroscopy identified a meniscus tear in 85% and a ligament tear in 21%. Seventeen percent had combined tears and no injury was identified in 4%. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI for ligament tears was 59%, 95%, and for meniscus tears was 91%, and 40%. The sensitivity for bucket handle tears was 86%. The sensitivity of MRI for combined injury was low, 41%. In 8% of patients no pathology was identified by MRI, which was confirmed by arthroscopy in only 4%. One patient with normal MRI had a bucket handle menisceal tear and one other patient had a tear of the anterior cruciate ligament. MRI in adults and young adults revealed that sensitivities for the different types of lesions were similar for both age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although degenerative changes increase with age, our hypothesis that MRI will be less sensitive in adults was proven wrong. In the presence of appropriate signs and symptoms, older age should not be considered a factor affecting decisions concerning preoperative imaging workup.

Hemodynamic consequences of extremity injuries following a terrorist bombing attack: retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Extremities are commonly injured following bomb explosions. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of hemorrhagic shock (HS) in victims of explosion suffering from extremity injuries. METHODS: Retrospective study based on a cohort of patient records maintained in one hospital's mass casualty registry. RESULTS: Sixty-six victims of explosion who were hospitalized with extremity injuries were identified and evaluated. Sixteen (24.2%) of these were hemodynamically unstable during the first 24 h of treatment. HS could be attributed to associated injuries in seven of the patients. In the other nine patients, extremity injury was the only injury that could explain HS in seven patients and the extremity injury was a major contributor to HS together with another associated injury in two patients. In those 9 patients, in whom the extremity injury was the sole or major contributor to HS, a median of 10 (range 2-22) pRBC was transfused during the first 24 h of treatment. Six of the nine patients were in need of massive transfusion. Fractures in both upper and lower extremities, Gustilo IIIb-c open fractures and AIS 3-4 were found to be risk factors for HS. CONCLUSIONS: Ample consideration should be given to patients with extremity injuries due to explosions, as these may be immediately life threatening. Tourniquet use should be encouraged in the pre-hospital setting. Before undertaking surgery, emergent HS should be considered in these patients and prevented by appropriate resuscitation.

Femoral versus Multiple Nerve Blocks for Analgesia after Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The PROSPECT (Procedure-Specific Postoperative Pain Management) Group recommended a single injection femoral nerve block in 2008 as a guideline for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty. Other authors have recommended the addition of sciatic and obturator nerve blocks. The lateral femoral cutaneous nerve is also involved in pain syndrome following total knee arthroplasty. We hypothesized that preoperative blocking of all four nerves would offer superior analgesia to femoral nerve block alone. METHODS: This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, and observer-blinded clinical study. A total of 107 patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: a femoral nerve block group, a multiple nerve block group, and a control group. All patients were treated postoperatively using patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with morphine. Pain intensity at rest, during flexion and extension, and morphine consumption were compared between groups over three days. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients completed the study protocol. Patients who received multiple nerve blocks experienced superior analgesia and had reduced morphine consumption during the postoperative period compared to the other two groups. Pain intensity during flexion was significantly lower in the "blocks" groups versus the control group. Morphine consumption was significantly higher in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Pain relief after total knee arthroplasty immediately after surgery and on the first postoperative day was significantly superior in patients who received multiple blocks preoperatively, with morphine consumption significantly lower during this period. A preoperative femoral nerve block alone produced partial and insufficient analgesia immediately after surgery and on the first postoperative day. (Clinical trial registration number (NIH): NCT01303120).

Comparison of the Supraclavicular, Infraclavicular and Axillary Approaches for Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block for Surgical Anesthesia.

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that ultrasound (US)-guided technique of the supra- and infraclavicular and axillary approaches of brachial plexus block (BPB) will produce a high quality of surgical anesthesia for operations below the shoulder independently of the approach and body mass index (BMI). Intercostobrachial and medial brachial cutaneous nerves will be blocked separately because they are not a part of the brachial plexus. METHODS: This is a prospective randomized observer-blinded study. The three approaches of the US-guided BPB without neurostimulation were compared for quality, performance time, and correlation between performance time and BMI. Intercostobrachial and medial brachial cutaneous nerve blocks were used in all patients. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients were randomized into three groups: SCL (supraclavicular), ICL (infraclavicular), and AX (axillary). Seven patients were excluded due to various factors. All three groups were similar in demographic data, M:F proportion, preoperative diagnosis and type of surgery, anesthesiologists who performed the block, and surgical staff that performed the surgical intervention. The time between the end of the block performance and the start of the operation was also similar. The quality of the surgical anesthesia and discomfort during the operation were identical following comparison between groups. No direct positive correlation was observed between BMI and the block performance time. The time for the axillary block was slightly longer than the time for the supra- and infraclavicular approaches, but it had no practical clinical significance. Transient Horner syndrome was observed in three patients in the SCL group. No other adverse effects or complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: All three approaches can be used for US-guided BPB with similar quality of surgical anesthesia for operations of below the shoulder. A block of the intercostobrachial and medial brachial cutaneous nerves is recommended. Obesity is not a significant factor in relation to the time of US-guided BPB performance, or the quality of surgical anesthesia. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01442558.).

Surgical treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following hip arthroplasty: our institutional experience.

PURPOSE: Periprosthetic fractures are one of the most serious complications after hip replacement. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of surgical treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty using treatment algorithm of the Vancouver classification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty six periprosthetic femoral fractures operated on during the period December 2004-September 2013 were followed-up retrospectively. There were 40 women and 16 men with mean age at the time of surgery 64.7 years (41-88 years). The mean follow-up for the group was 5 years (range, 1-10 years). Periprosthetic fractures were classified according to the Vancouver classification. The clinical evaluation was performed with the Harris hip score, the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Short Form 8 (SF-8). Bone healing, implant survival, pain, function and complications were recorded. Bone healing and implant stability were evaluated clinically and on plain radiographs. RESULTS: Uneventful bone healing was achieved in 52 cases. In two fractures (one type B1, one type C) nonunion and plate failure occurred. Two cemented stems were revised for aseptic loosening 6.5 and 7 years after fracture fixation. Uncontrollable prosthesis infection and sepsis in a rheumatoid (immunocompromised) patient required disarticulation of the involved extremity. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Periprosthetic femoral fractures are difficult to treat and require complex treatment approach according to risk assessment, fracture type, implant stability, bone stock and medical status of the patient. Using a treatment protocol of the Vancouver classification we obtained satisfactory outcome.

Is routine portable pelvic X-ray in stable multiple trauma patients always justified in a high technology era?

INTRODUCTION: According to the Advanced Trauma Life Support, portable pelvis radiography (PXR) is mandatory in multiple trauma patients, and is performed following initial clinical evaluation. The purpose of an early PXR is to identify pelvic fractures that may have haemodynamic consequences. Today, ultrafast multi-detector CT scanners (MDCT) are readily available and widely used in the evaluation of stable trauma patients. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of PXR in stable blunt multiple trauma patients, who required CT scan for full evaluation of the abdomen and pelvis. METHODS: A retrospective review of all stable blunt trauma patients, suffering from pelvic fractures was performed from January 2001 until December 2004 at two high volume Trauma Centres. Patients' demographics and Injury Severity Scores (ISS) were abstracted from our trauma registry. Two certified radiologists and two certified orthopaedic surgeons retrospectively evaluated and compared PXR films and CT angiographies (CTA) of the abdomen and pelvis. We recorded each case when the management policy was altered due to the results of imaging and compared the clinical impact of both modalities. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-nine stable blunt multiple trauma patients with pelvic fractures underwent CTA of the abdomen and pelvis during their initial evaluation. Mean ISS was 16.5. Average Glasgow Coma Scale on arrival was 13.2 (range 3-15). Compared to CTA, sensitivity and specificity of the PXR was 64.4 and 90.0%, respectively. CTA diagnosed 35.6% more pelvic fractures than PXR (p<0.05). No changes in the therapeutic policy were observed following PXR results. In 19 (14.7%) patients, CTA findings led to pelvic angiography. CONCLUSIONS: PXR in stable blunt multiple trauma patients did not change the therapeutic policy in our patients. CTA of the abdomen and pelvis is the imaging modality of choice in blunt multiple trauma, regardless of the findings of PXR. Benefit of routine PXR is questionable in hospitals where MDCT is available. Based on our results, we suggest re-evaluating the current practice of routine mandatory portable pelvis radiography.