Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Comput Methods Programs Biomed ; 81(1): 56-65, 2006 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16310282

ABSTRACT

The most frequent symptoms of ductal carcinoma recognised by mammography are clusters of microcalcifications. Their detection from mammograms is difficult, especially for glandular breasts. We present a new computer-aided detection system for small field digital mammography in planning of breast biopsy. The system processes the mammograms in several steps. First, we filter the original picture with a filter that is sensitive to microcalcification contrast shape. Then, we enhance the mammogram contrast by using wavelet-based sharpening algorithm. Afterwards, we present to radiologist, for visual analysis, such a contrast-enhanced mammogram with suggested positions of microcalcification clusters. We have evaluated the usefulness of the system with the help of four experienced radiologists, who found that it significantly improves the detection of microcalcifications in small field digital mammography.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Calcinosis/pathology , Mammography/methods , Algorithms , Breast Diseases/diagnosis , Cluster Analysis , Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , ROC Curve , Radiographic Image Enhancement , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Reproducibility of Results
2.
Comput Methods Programs Biomed ; 79(2): 135-49, 2005 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15925425

ABSTRACT

We have employed two pattern recognition methods used commonly for face recognition in order to analyse digital mammograms. The methods are based on novel classification schemes, the AdaBoost and the support vector machines (SVM). A number of tests have been carried out to evaluate the accuracy of these two algorithms under different circumstances. Results for the AdaBoost classifier method are promising, especially for classifying mass-type lesions. In the best case the algorithm achieved accuracy of 76% for all lesion types and 90% for masses only. The SVM based algorithm did not perform as well. In order to achieve a higher accuracy for this method, we should choose image features that are better suited for analysing digital mammograms than the currently used ones.


Subject(s)
Breast/abnormalities , Mammography/methods , Pattern Recognition, Automated , Algorithms , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...