Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Intern Med J ; 40(3): 201-8, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19460063

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Androgen ablation is the standard treatment for advanced prostate cancer. However, most patients will eventually develop progressive hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). The aim of the Pacl-Vin study was to determine the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel in combination with vinorelbine in patients with HRPC, following from a phase I trial. METHODS: Thirty castrate patients with progressive, metastatic prostate cancer were enrolled. Patients were treated with paclitaxel 40 mg/m2, vinorelbine 20 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 and day 8 of a 21-day cycle. RESULTS: Two patients demonstrated a partial response and seven patients had stable disease from a cohort of 10 patients with measurable disease. Of 30 patients assessable for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, 19 showed stable disease, which was maintained for at least 4 weeks, while six (20%) experienced>or=50% decline in PSA levels. Median overall survival was 7.3 months (interquartile range (IQR): 4.7-9.9 months). Median progression-free survival was 3.3 months (IQR: 2.5-7.0 months). Improvement in quality of life measures was noted after three cycles of therapy. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were: neutropenia 8%, febrile neutropenia 4%, infection 2%, anaemia 3%, lethargy 1% and somnolescence 1%. One patient died as a result of neutropenic sepsis. CONCLUSION: In a poor prognostic cohort of patients paclitaxel and vinorelbine is a tolerable regimen, with a 20% PSA and objective response rate. The majority of patients achieved PSA stability. Furthermore, quality of life parameters, such as pain, were improved. However, the low level of activity of this regimen precludes its further testing.


Subject(s)
Drug Delivery Systems/methods , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Tubulin/blood , Vinblastine/analogs & derivatives , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/secondary , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Therapy, Combination , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Vinblastine/administration & dosage , Vinorelbine
2.
Australas Radiol ; 43(4): 558-61, 1999 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10901983

ABSTRACT

Tattooing is routinely employed prior to radiotherapy treatment but allergies to tattoos are rare. New information on the incidence of tattoo allergy at St George Hospital is presented with details of two clinical cases. The literature on tattoo allergy has been unable to estimate the incidence of allergic reaction to tattoos because the total number of patients treated is unknown and not all patients were followed up. Our radiation oncology population for the first time has provided a known denominator, but wide confidence intervals prevent an accurate estimate of the incidence. Salient issues about tattoo allergy are highlighted based on a review of the published literature from 1966 to 1998.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Dermatitis, Atopic/etiology , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Tattooing/adverse effects , Adult , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Pigments, Biological/adverse effects , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...