Short- and long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This retrospective study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery in patients with superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We investigated consecutive patients with SNADETs > 10 mm in size who underwent ESD (ESD group) or LECS (LECS group) between January 2015 and March 2021. The data was used to analyze the clinical course, management, survival status, and recurrence between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 113 patients (100 and 13 in the ESD and LECS groups, respectively) were investigated. The rates of en bloc resection and curative resection were 100% vs. 100% and 93.0% vs. 77.0% in the ESD and LECS groups, respectively, with no significant difference. The ESD group had shorter resection and suturing times than the LECS group, but there were no significant difference after propensity score matching. There were also no differences in the rates of postoperative adverse event (7.0% vs. 23.1%; P = 0.161). The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was high in both the ESD and LECS groups (97.6% vs. 100%; P = 0.334). One patient in the ESD group experienced recurrence due to liver metastasis; however, no deaths related to SNADETs were observed. CONCLUSION: ESD and LECS are both acceptable treatments for SNADETs in terms of a high OS rate and a low long-term recurrence rate, thereby achieving a comparable high rate of curative resection. Further studies are necessary to compare the outcomes of ESD and LECS for SNADETs once both techniques are developed further.

Underwater clip closure method for mucosal defects after duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video).

Conventional clip closure of mucosal defects after duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection decreases the incidence of delayed adverse events, but may result in incomplete closure, depending on size or location. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the underwater clip closure method for complete duodenal defect closure without the difficulties associated with conventional closure methods. We investigated 19 patients with 20 lesions who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection of the duodenum and subsequent mucosal defect closure in underwater conditions at our facility between February 2021 and January 2022. The success rate of the underwater clip closure method was defined as the complete endoscopic closure of the mucosal defect; a success rate of 100% was achieved. The median resected specimen size was 34.3 mm, the median procedure time for mucosal defect closure was 14 min, and the median number of clips used per patient was 12. No delayed adverse events were observed. The underwater clip closure method is a feasible option for complete closure of mucosal defects, regardless of the size or location of a duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Conventional versus underwater endoscopic resection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumours.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Several endoscopic resection methods have been developed as less invasive treatments for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumours. This study aimed to compare outcomes of conventional endoscopic mucosal resection and underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumours, including resection depth and rate of the muscularis mucosa contained under the lesion. METHODS: This single-centre retrospective cohort study conducted from January 2009 to December 2021 enrolled patients who underwent conventional endoscopic mucosal resection and underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumours and investigated their clinicopathological outcomes using propensity score matching. RESULTS: Of the 285 superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumours, 98 conventional endoscopic mucosal resections and 187 underwater endoscopic mucosal resections were included. After propensity score matching, 64 conventional endoscopic mucosal resections and 64 underwater endoscopic mucosal resections were analysed. The R0 resection rate was significantly higher in underwater endoscopic mucosal resection cases than in conventional endoscopic mucosal resection cases (70.3% vs. 50.0%; P = 0.030). In the multivariate analysis, a lesion diameter > 10 mm (odds ratio 7.246; P = 0.001), being in the 1st-50th treatment period (odds ratio 3.405; P = 0.008), and undergoing conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (odds ratio 3.617; P = 0.016) were associated with RX/R1 resection. Furthermore, in underwater endoscopic mucosal resection cases, the R0 rate was significantly higher for lesions diameter ≤10 mm than >10 mm, and was significantly higher in the 51st-treatment period than in the 1st-50th period. Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection and underwater endoscopic mucosal resection cases showed no significant difference in resection depth and muscularis mucosa containing rate. CONCLUSIONS: Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection may be more acceptable than conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumours ≤ 10 mm. A steep early learning curve may be acquired for underwater endoscopic mucosal resection. Large multicentre prospective studies need to be conducted to confirm the effectiveness of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection.

[A case of sarcomatoid intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma that was difficult to diagnose].

A 70-year-old man presented to our hospital with fever and abdominal pain. A mass was found in the left lobe of his liver. Three months later, disseminated peritoneal nodules and ascites appeared. Liver biopsy and review laparoscopy did not lead to a diagnosis. Approximately five months later, a pathological autopsy was performed, and a final diagnosis of sarcomatoid intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was made. Differentiating sarcomatoid cholangiocarcinoma from sarcomatoid malignant peritoneal mesothelioma was difficult due to the similarity of clinical and pathological findings. Because the two diseases are treated differently, being able to differentiate them is a challenge in the future.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for protruding Helicobacter pylori-negative mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma of the stomach: a case report.

Gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphomas have various endoscopic appearances. We report a case of Helicobacter pylori-negative gastric MALT lymphoma with a protruding morphology similar to that of submucosal tumors. A 51-year-old man with a protruding tumor in the gastric cardia was referred to our hospital. Biopsy specimens showed no malignant epithelial tumors or lymphoid hyperplasia. Endoscopic submucosal dissection was performed and the patient was diagnosed with gastric MALT lymphoma. Lymphoma cells were present in the lamina propria mucosae and the submucosa under the non-atrophic fundic gland mucosa, with a feature of homogenous and monotonous growths, which was speculated to have resulted in a protruding morphology similar to that of submucosal tumors. Endoscopic submucosal dissection can be an alternative diagnostic option for gastric MALT lymphoma when the initial pathological diagnosis based on biopsy specimens is difficult.