Prognostic implications of chronic kidney disease and anemia after percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction patients.

Anemia is a common complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD), and a few studies suggest that both CKD and anemia have a marked impact on the prognosis of patients with cardiovascular disease. We retrospectively analyzed the prevalence of CKD and anemia in 312 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The patients were divided into four groups according to the presence of CKD and anemia. Chronic kidney disease was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2), and anemia was defined according to the World Health Organization definition. Of 312 AMI patients, 166 (53.2%) had CKD and 87 (27.8%) had anemia. A powerful relationship was observed between both CKD and anemia and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) or death by any cause. After adjustment for comorbidities, the hazard ratio (HR) for MACCE was significantly higher in the anemia-only group (HR 5.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.38-21.27, P = 0.015), the CKD-only group (HR 6.4, 95% CI 2.09-19.58, P = 0.001), and the CKD and anemia group (HR 11.61, 95% CI 3.65-36.89, P < 0.001). With respect to death by any cause, the HR was significantly higher in the CKD-only group (HR 2.68, 95% CI 1.02-7.02, P = 0.045) and the CKD and anemia group (HR 4.40, 95% CI 1.56-12.43, P = 0.005). One-half of the patients with AMI had CKD as well. Furthermore, when anemia coexisted with CKD, these conditions had a multiplicative amplification effect on the risk of MACCE and death by any cause in patients with AMI.

Tolvaptan reduces the risk of worsening renal function in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in high-risk population.

BACKGROUND: Although tolvaptan is a recently approved drug for heart failure and causes aquaresis without affecting renal function, its clinical efficacy for patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is yet to be elucidated. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a prospective observational study in patients with ADHF and high risk for worsening renal function (WRF). Risk stratification for WRF was done by scoring system. Of 174 patients, 114 patients were included as high-risk population for WRF. Incidence of WRF, urine output within 24h and 48 h, and changes in brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) were recorded in 44 patients treated with tolvaptan plus conventional therapy, and 70 patients with only conventional therapy. Urine output at 24h and 48 h after admission were both significantly higher in the tolvaptan group (p=0.001 and <0.001, respectively), and changes in BNP were not significantly different (p=0.351). However, the incidence of WRF was significantly lower in the tolvaptan group compared to the conventional group (22.7% vs 41.4%, p=0.045). Logistic regression analysis showed that treatment with tolvaptan was an independent factor for reducing WRF (hazard ratio 0.28, 95% confidence interval; 0.10-0.84; p=0.023). CONCLUSION: In patients with ADHF with high risk of WRF, treatment with tolvaptan could prevent WRF compared to conventional therapy.

Prevalence and prognostic implications of pre-diabetic state in patients with heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a risk factor of poor prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF). The prevalence and prognostic impact of the pre-diabetic state, however, are not well understood. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-six consecutive patients admitted due to HF were included in this prospective study. The 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed in all patients without known DM, and patients were classified into normal glucose tolerance (NGT), impaired fasting glucose (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and DM groups. Forty-two of the 136 patients had previously been diagnosed with diabetes. Of the remaining 94 patients without known diabetes, 35 (37.2%) patients were classified as NGT, 9 (9.6%) as having IFG, 37 (39.4%) were classified as having IGT, and 13 (13.8%) were newly diagnosed with DM. During follow-up, patients with DM or IGT had significantly lower major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE)-free rates than NGT patients (P=0.006, P=0.036, respectively). IFG, however, was not significantly related to increased MACCE risk. The presence of IGT (hazard ratio [HR], 4.51; P=0.011) and DM (HR, 4.74; P=0.005) were independent predictors of MACCE even after multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: IGT and DM contribute to adverse prognosis in patients with HF. It is feasible to perform diabetes screening using OGTT in patients with HF for risk stratification.

Endothelial dysfunction in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation as a prothrombotic state. Comparison with permanent/persistent atrial fibrillation.

AIM: Atrial fibrillation (AF), regardless of subtype, is associated with a prothrombotic state, which is related to endothelial dysfunction (ED).We hypothesized that paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) patients have endothelial dysfunction, and this may partially explain the high thromboembolic risk and poorer outcome in this category of patients. METHODS: The study population consisted of 100 consecutive outpatients with AF (mean age 65.9±7.9 years; 68 (68%) male) and 21 characteristics and comorbidity matched control subjects (mean age 64.8±7.0 years; 13 (61.9%) male). AF patients were divided into the PAF group (n=50) and permanent/persistent AF (PeAF) group (n=50).Reactive hyperemia pulse amplitude tonometry index (RHI) was measured to evaluate endothelial function. RESULTS: RHI was significantly lower in the PAF (1.67±0.30) and PeAF (1.63±0.28) groups in comparison with control subjects (2.12±0.40, both p< 0.001). There was no significant difference in RHI between the PAF and PeAF groups (p= 0.88). On linear regression analysis, both PeAF and PAF are significant independent predictors of RHI. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, ED in PAF patients was comparable to PeAF patients, and the presence of PAF itself is a contributing factor for ED independent of other coexisting comorbidities. This may provide a mechanism explaining why the risk of thromboembolism in PAF is comparable with PeAF patients.