Cognitive effects of individual anticholinergic drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Anticholinergics (ACs) are among the most prescribed drugs. Investigating the impaired cognitive domains due to individual ACs usage is associated with controversial findings. Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of individual ACs on different aspects of cognitive function based on clinical trial studies. Methods: This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA statement. A systematic search was performed in Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed by the Joanna Briggs Institute checklists and the meta-analysis was performed using the CMA software. Results: Out of 3,026 results of searching, 138 studies were included. A total of 38 studies that assess the cognitive impacts of scopolamine were included in the meta-analysis. Included studies reported cognitive effects of scopolamine, mecamylamine, atropine, biperiden, oxybutynin, trihexyphenidyl, benzhexol, and dicyclomine; however, glycopyrrolate, trospium, tolterodine, darifenacin, fesoterodine, tiotropium, and ipratropium were not associated with cognitive decline. Based on the meta-analyses, scopolamine was associated with reduced recognition (SDM -1.84; 95%CI -2.48 to -1.21; p<0.01), immediate recall (SDM -1.82; 95%CI -2.35 to -1.30; p<0.01), matching to sample (SDM -1.76; 95%CI -2.57 to -0.96; p<0.01), delayed recall (SDM -1.54; 95%CI -1.97 to -1.10; p<0.01), complex memory tasks (SDM -1.31; 95%CI -1.78 to -0.84; p<0.01), free recall (SDM -1.18; 95%CI -1.63 to -0.73; p<0.01), cognitive function (SDM -0.95; 95%CI -1.46 to -0.44; p<0.01), attention (SDM -0.85; 95%CI -1.38 to -0.33; p<0.01), and digit span (SDM -0.65; 95%CI -1.21 to -0.10; p=0.02). There was a high RoB in our included study, especially in terms of dealing with possible cofounders. Conclusion: The limitations of this study suggest a need for more well-designed studies with a longer duration of follow-up on this topic to reach more reliable evidence.

Os anticolinérgicos (ACs) estão entre os medicamentos mais prescritos. Investigar os domínios cognitivos prejudicados devido ao uso individual de ACs está associado a achados controversos. Objetivo: Investigar os efeitos de ACs individuais em diferentes aspectos da função cognitiva, com base em estudos de ensaios clínicos. Métodos: Esta revisão sistemática foi realizada em acordo com a declaração PRISMA. Uma busca sistemática foi realizada nos bancos de dados Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus e Web of Science. O risco de viés (risk of bias - RoB) foi avaliado pelas listas de verificação do Joanna Briggs Institute e a meta-análise foi realizada através do software CMA. Resultados: Foram incluídos 138 estudos dos 3.026 resultados da pesquisa. Trinta e oito estudos que avaliam os impactos cognitivos da escopolamina foram incluídos na meta-análise. Os estudos incluídos relataram efeitos cognitivos de escopolamina, mecamilamina, atropina, biperideno, oxibutinina, triexifenidil, benzhexol, diciclomina; no entanto, glicopirrolato, tróspio, tolterodina, darifenacina, fesoterodina, tiotrópio e ipratrópio não foram associados ao declínio cognitivo. Com base nas meta-análises, a escopolamina foi associada a reconhecimento reduzido (DPM -1,84; IC95% -2,48 a -1,21; p<0,01), recordação imediata (DPM -1,82; IC95% -2,35 a -1,30; p<0,01), correspondência com a amostra (DPM -1,76; IC95% -2,57 a -0,96; p<0,01), recordação atrasada (DPM -1,54; IC95% -1,97 a -1,10; p <0,01), tarefas de memória complexas (DPM -1,31; IC95% -1,78 a -0,84; p<0,01), recordação livre (DPM -1,18; IC95% -1,63 a -0,73; p<0,01), função cognitiva (DPM -0,95; IC95% -1,46 a -0,44; p<0,01), atenção (DPM -0,85; IC95% -1,38 a -0,33; p<0,01) e amplitude de memória de dígitos (DPM -0,65; IC95% -1,21 a -0,10; p=0,02). Houve um alto RoB em nosso estudo, especialmente quanto aos possíveis confundidores. Conclusão: As limitações deste estudo sugerem a necessidade de estudos mais bem delineados e com maior duração de acompanhamento sobre o tema para alcançar evidências mais confiáveis.

Metformin: new applications for an old drug.

Metformin is a biguanide, evolved as one of the most widely used medicines. The applications of this component include but are not limited to reducing blood glucose, weight loss, and polycystic ovary syndrome. Studies about other probable indications have emerged, indicating that this agent can also be utilized for other purposes. In this review, applications of metformin are noticed based on the current evidence. Metformin commonly is used as an off-label drug in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), but it worsens inflammation and should not be used for this purpose, according to the latest research. Metformin decreased the risk of death in patients with liver cirrhosis. It is an effective agent in the prevention and improvement of survival in patients suffering hepatocellular carcinoma. There is evidence of the beneficial effects of metformin in colorectal cancer, early-stage prostate cancer, breast cancer, urothelial cancer, blood cancer, melanoma, and bone cancer, suggesting metformin as a potent anti-tumor agent. Metformin shows neuroprotective effects and provides a potential therapeutic benefit for mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease (AD). It also has been shown to improve mental function and reduce the incidence of dementia. Another condition that metformin has been shown to slow the progression of is Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Regarding infectious diseases, tuberculosis (TB) and coronavirus disease (COVID-19) are among the conditions suggested to be affected by metformin. The beneficial effects of metformin in cardiovascular diseases were also reported in the literature. Concerning renal function, studies showed that daily oral administration of metformin could ameliorate kidney fibrosis and normalize kidney structure and function. This study reviewed the clinical and preclinical evidence about the possible benefits of metformin based on recent studies. Numerous questions like whether these probable indications of metformin can be observed in non-diabetics, need to be described by future basic experiments and clinical studies.

Cognitive effects of individual anticholinergic drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis / Efeitos cognitivos de drogas anticolinérgicas individuais: uma revisão sistemática e meta-análise

ABSTRACT. Anticholinergics (ACs) are among the most prescribed drugs. Investigating the impaired cognitive domains due to individual ACs usage is associated with controversial findings. Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of individual ACs on different aspects of cognitive function based on clinical trial studies. Methods: This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA statement. A systematic search was performed in Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed by the Joanna Briggs Institute checklists and the meta-analysis was performed using the CMA software. Results: Out of 3,026 results of searching, 138 studies were included. A total of 38 studies that assess the cognitive impacts of scopolamine were included in the meta-analysis. Included studies reported cognitive effects of scopolamine, mecamylamine, atropine, biperiden, oxybutynin, trihexyphenidyl, benzhexol, and dicyclomine; however, glycopyrrolate, trospium, tolterodine, darifenacin, fesoterodine, tiotropium, and ipratropium were not associated with cognitive decline. Based on the meta-analyses, scopolamine was associated with reduced recognition (SDM -1.84; 95%CI -2.48 to -1.21; p<0.01), immediate recall (SDM -1.82; 95%CI -2.35 to -1.30; p<0.01), matching to sample (SDM -1.76; 95%CI -2.57 to -0.96; p<0.01), delayed recall (SDM -1.54; 95%CI -1.97 to -1.10; p<0.01), complex memory tasks (SDM -1.31; 95%CI -1.78 to -0.84; p<0.01), free recall (SDM -1.18; 95%CI -1.63 to -0.73; p<0.01), cognitive function (SDM -0.95; 95%CI -1.46 to -0.44; p<0.01), attention (SDM -0.85; 95%CI -1.38 to -0.33; p<0.01), and digit span (SDM -0.65; 95%CI -1.21 to -0.10; p=0.02). There was a high RoB in our included study, especially in terms of dealing with possible cofounders. Conclusion: The limitations of this study suggest a need for more well-designed studies with a longer duration of follow-up on this topic to reach more reliable evidence.

RESUMO. Os anticolinérgicos (ACs) estão entre os medicamentos mais prescritos. Investigar os domínios cognitivos prejudicados devido ao uso individual de ACs está associado a achados controversos. Objetivo: Investigar os efeitos de ACs individuais em diferentes aspectos da função cognitiva, com base em estudos de ensaios clínicos. Métodos: Esta revisão sistemática foi realizada em acordo com a declaração PRISMA. Uma busca sistemática foi realizada nos bancos de dados Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus e Web of Science. O risco de viés (risk of bias - RoB) foi avaliado pelas listas de verificação do Joanna Briggs Institute e a meta-análise foi realizada através do software CMA. Resultados: Foram incluídos 138 estudos dos 3.026 resultados da pesquisa. Trinta e oito estudos que avaliam os impactos cognitivos da escopolamina foram incluídos na meta-análise. Os estudos incluídos relataram efeitos cognitivos de escopolamina, mecamilamina, atropina, biperideno, oxibutinina, triexifenidil, benzhexol, diciclomina; no entanto, glicopirrolato, tróspio, tolterodina, darifenacina, fesoterodina, tiotrópio e ipratrópio não foram associados ao declínio cognitivo. Com base nas meta-análises, a escopolamina foi associada a reconhecimento reduzido (DPM -1,84; IC95% -2,48 a -1,21; p<0,01), recordação imediata (DPM -1,82; IC95% -2,35 a -1,30; p<0,01), correspondência com a amostra (DPM -1,76; IC95% -2,57 a -0,96; p<0,01), recordação atrasada (DPM -1,54; IC95% -1,97 a -1,10; p <0,01), tarefas de memória complexas (DPM -1,31; IC95% -1,78 a -0,84; p<0,01), recordação livre (DPM -1,18; IC95% -1,63 a -0,73; p<0,01), função cognitiva (DPM -0,95; IC95% -1,46 a -0,44; p<0,01), atenção (DPM -0,85; IC95% -1,38 a -0,33; p<0,01) e amplitude de memória de dígitos (DPM -0,65; IC95% -1,21 a -0,10; p=0,02). Houve um alto RoB em nosso estudo, especialmente quanto aos possíveis confundidores. Conclusão: As limitações deste estudo sugerem a necessidade de estudos mais bem delineados e com maior duração de acompanhamento sobre o tema para alcançar evidências mais confiáveis.

The association of apolipoprotein E (ApoE) genotype and cognitive outcomes in multiple sclerosis; a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neuroinflammatory disorder commonly seen in young female adults. Cognitive impairment is one of the widespread symptoms of MS. In recent years multiple studies sought the possible risk factors for MS-related cognitive deficit. Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) genotype is one of the genetic factors which correlated significantly with cognitive status and it is a well-known risk factor for Alzheimer's Disease. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we collected the current evidence to evaluate the association between the ApoE genotype and the cognitive outcomes in patients with MS. METHOD: Results of searches through Medline via PubMed, Scopus, and ISI web of science, as well as hand searching, were screened in the title/abstract and full-text stages. English observational studies in which the association between ApoE and cognitive outcomes, in patients with MS were included in this systematic review. Animal studies, conference abstracts, reviews, clinical trials, case reports, letters and withdrawn studies, were not included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools and the meta-analysis was conducted with Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA.2) software. The numbers of patients with impairment in both ApoE4+ and ApoE4- groups were utilized for the calculation of the odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and a 0.05 level of significance for p-value. RESULT: Out of 224 results of searching, 13 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in our systematic review, and 5 of them were included in the quantitative synthesis. Eleven studies assessed the cognitive status of patients with MS in two groups of ApoE4+ and ApoE4- while 2 rests, reported the rate of ApoE4+ patients in cognitively impaired and non-impaired groups. The phenotype of MS was only Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in 3 studies and in the other 10 studies, it was a mixture of RRMS, clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), and progressive MS. Most of the reports did not find a significant association between ApoE genotype and cognitive outcomes in patients with MS. Contrary to the expectations, patients in ApoE4- group were more likely to have impairment in Judgment of Line Orientation (JLO) (OR: 0.405; 95% CI: 0.173 to 0.949, p-value:0.038), while ApoE4+ patients had more rate of impairment in SRT (OR:1.901; 95%CI: 1.237 to 2.920; p-value:0.003). Appropriate identifying and dealing with cofounding factors were the most common source of bias in our included studies. CONCLUSION: ApoE may have a domain-specific association with cognitive impairment in MS patients. ApoE4 patients had more delayed responses to stimuli, but the rate of impaired visuospatial perception is lower in these patients. Based on the current evidence, there is a doubt about the clinical significance of this association.

Probiotics in Critically Ill Patients: An Umbrella Review.

Objectives: Probiotics are live microorganisms which when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host. Because of the wide usage of antibiotics, acute changes in diet, and the stress of illness, critically ill patients' homeostasis of the gut microbiome can be disrupted during intensive care unit (ICU) confinement; probiotics are suggested as a beneficial intervention in critically ill patients. We tried to give an overview of the effects of probiotic supplements in critically ill patients based on published systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs). Data sources: A systematic search was performed in four databases as well as hand searching. Study selection: The results were independently screened in two title/abstracts and full-text stages. Data extraction: Any reported outcomes in each study were extracted, using a data extraction table. Data synthesis: A wide range of outcomes of using probiotic supplements in critically ill patients have been reported in 20 included studies. Based on the current knowledge, we can say that probiotics may reduce the rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia, nosocomial pneumonia, the overall infection rate, duration of mechanical ventilation, and antibiotic use in critically ill patients, but there is not a significant association between using the probiotics and mortality, length of hospitalization, and incidence of diarrhea. Conclusion: Despite the various beneficial effects of probiotics in critically ill patients, there is not yet much evidence supporting the routine use of these supplements and further well-designed multicenter trials are needed to provide "evidence-based" recommendations. How to cite this article: Naseri A, Seyedi-Sahebari S, Mahmoodpoor A, Sanaie S. Probiotics in Critically Ill Patients: An Umbrella Review. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(3):339-360.

Efficacy of percutaneous and transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation on idiopathic overactive bladder and interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous and transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS and TTNS) showed a promising effect on overactive bladder (OAB) and interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome. We aimed to give a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of these therapeutic methods as well. METHODS: We searched studies available on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science, and ProQuest on March 31, 2021, to find both published and unpublished studies. The retrieved articles were screened by two independent researchers and then the selected studies were critically appraised by Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials, and Joanna Briggs Institute's checklist for quasi-experimental studies. Finally, the results of studies were synthesized using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4 statistical software when the data were homogenous. The meta-analysis was performed by calculating the effect size (mean difference) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Of the total 3194 publications, 68 studies were included in our qualitative evaluation and 9 studies (11 trials) in the quantitative stage. When TTNS or PTNS were compared to sham, placebo, no treatment, or conservative management, a decrease in frequency of urination was observed in both TTNS (mean difference [MD]: -3.18, 95% CI: -4.42 to -1.94, and p < 0.00001), and PTNS (MD: -2.84, 95% CI: -4.22 to -1.45, and p < 0.00001), and overall TTNS or PTNS (MD: -2.95, 95% CI: -4.01 to -1.88, and p < 0.00001). Significant improvements in mean voiding volume (MVV) and decreasing nocturia were also observed. CONCLUSIONS: Nerve stimulations either PTNS or TTNS appear to be effective interventions in treating refractory idiopathic OAB in terms of daily voiding frequency, MVV, urgency episodes, and nighttime voiding frequency. However, our result did not show any improvement in terms of urinary incontinence, postvoid residual volume or urge incontinence, and maximum cystometric capacity which emphasized the efficacy of these modalities on dry-OAB rather than wet-OAB.