Homemade Fenestrated Stent-Grafts for Complete Endovascular Repair of Aortic Arch Dissections.

Purpose: To evaluate outcomes of homemade fenestrated stent-grafts for complete endovascular aortic repair of aortic arch dissections. Materials and Methods: From July 2014 through September 2018, 35 patients (mean age 66±11 years; 25 men) underwent homemade fenestrated stent-graft repair of acute (n=16) or chronic (n=10) complicated type B aortic dissections (n=16) and dissecting aortic arch aneurysms subsequent to surgical treatment of acute type A dissections (n=9). Nineteen (54%) procedures were emergent. Results: Zone 2 single-fenestrated stent-grafts were used in 25 cases; the remaining 10 were double-fenestrated stent-grafts deployed in zone 0. Median time for stent-graft modification was 18 minutes (range 16-20). Technical success was achieved in all cases. An immediate distal type I endoleak was treated intraoperatively. Among the double-fenestrated stent-graft cases, the left subclavian artery fenestration could not be cannulated in 2 patients and revascularization was required. Partial coverage of the left common carotid artery necessitated placement of a covered stent in 3 cases. One (3%) patient had a stroke without permanent sequelae. Two type II endoleaks required additional covered stent placement at 5 and 7 days postoperatively, respectively. The 30-day mortality was 6% (2 patients with ruptured aortic arch aneurysm). During a mean follow-up of 17.6±13 months, there was no aortic rupture or retrograde dissection. One late type I endoleak was treated with additional proximal fenestrated stent-graft placement. One type II endoleak is currently under observation. One additional patient died (unrelated to the aorta); overall mortality was 9%. All supra-aortic trunks were patent. Conclusion: The use of homemade fenestrated stent-grafts for endovascular repair of aortic arch dissections is feasible and effective for total endovascular aortic arch repair. Durability concerns will need to be assessed in additional studies with long-term follow-up.

Double homemade fenestrated stent graft for total endovascular aortic arch repair.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the outcomes of physician-modified double fenestrated stent grafts for total endovascular aortic arch repair: one proximal large fenestration for the brachiocephalic trunk and the left common carotid artery and one distal fenestration for the left subclavian artery (LSA). METHODS: From January 2017 through February 2018, 17 patients (88.2% elective) underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with double homemade fenestrated stent graft for total endovascular aortic arch repair to maintain supra-aortic trunk patency. Indications were degenerative aortic arch aneurysm (n = 7), dissecting aortic arch aneurysms subsequent to surgical treatment of acute type A dissections (n = 6), chronic complicated type B aortic dissection (n = 3), and acute complicated type B aortic dissection (n = 1). Routine postoperative follow-up imaging with computed tomography angiography was performed to assess TEVAR and supra-aortic trunks patency and endoleak. RESULTS: The median time for stent graft modification was 19 minutes (range, 16-20 minutes). Endovascular exclusion of the aortic arch was achieved in all the cases. One LSA catheterization failed and LSA revascularization was performed by carotid axillary bypass and coverage of the LSA fenestration by additional stent graft placement. Additional planned endovascular procedures were required in three patients: closure of supra-aortic trunks re-entry tears in two cases of dissecting aortic arch aneurysms and one transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe native aortic valve regurgitation. One stroke, with no long-term deficit, was observed. No patients died. All left supra-aortic trunks are patent. No type I endoleak was observed. We only observed one patient with a type II endoleak. During a mean follow up of 7 ± 2 months, there were no conversions to open surgical repair, aortic rupture, paraplegia, or retrograde dissection. CONCLUSIONS: Double homemade fenestrated TEVAR is both feasible and effective for maintaining the patency of the supra-aortic trunks and allows total endovascular aortic arch repair. Durability concerns will need to be assessed in additional studies with long-term follow-up.

Risk factors for distal stent graft-induced new entry tear after endovascular repair of thoracic aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: A review of the literature was conducted for incidence, outcomes, and risk factors for distal stent graft-induced new entry (SINE) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of aortic dissection. METHODS: The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS: Seven articles reporting on 1415 patients with thoracic aortic dissection undergoing TEVAR without supplemental distal bare stenting were included. In this cohort, 86 patients were treated for a residual type A aortic dissection and 1329 for a complicated type B aortic dissection. Distal SINE occurred in 112 patients (7.9%). The mean time to identification of distal SINE was 19 ± 7 months. The incidence of distal SINE after TEVAR for type B aortic dissection differed on the basis of whether it was a chronic or acute dissection repair and was, respectively, 12.9% (43/331) and 4.3% (12/273). Successful secondary interventions were performed in 54% of the patients. All the studies analyzing the relationship between distal stent graft oversizing and incidence of distal SINE reported a significantly higher rate of SINE with oversizing. CONCLUSIONS: The successful management of complicated descending thoracic aortic dissections by TEVAR is well established. Whereas distal SINE is relatively frequent, if it does occur, the complication can generally be treated with additional TEVAR without a poor outcome. The main determinant of SINE seems to be excessive distal oversizing.

Systematic review of native and graft-related aortic infection outcome managed with orthotopic xenopericardial grafts.

OBJECTIVE: Limited data are available on the use of xenopericardium in the treatment of native and graft-related aortic infections. The aim of this review was to assess outcomes of neoaortic reconstruction using xenopericardium in this challenging group of patients. METHODS: Studies involving xenopericardial graft reconstruction to treat native and aortic graft infections were systematically searched and reviewed (Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases) for the period of January 2007 to December 2017. RESULTS: A total of 4 studies describing 71 patients treated for aortic graft (n = 54) and native aortic (n = 17) infections were included; 25 patients (35%) were operated on in an acute setting. The technical success rate was 100%. The mean 30-day mortality was 25% (range, 7.7%-31%). Only one death (1.4%) was linked to the operator-made pericardial tube graft (acute postoperative bleeding from proximal anastomosis). Septic multiorgan failure was the most common cause of perioperative death (72% [13/18]). Among the 53 patients who survived, only 3 presented with recurrent infection (5.7%), so 70.4% of patients were alive after intervention without evidence of infection (50/71). During follow-up, 2 false aneurysms (3.7% [2/53]), 1 early rupture (1.4% [1/71]), and 2 cases (3.7% [2/53]) of late rupture were reported. Other causes of late deaths unrelated to the aortic xenopericardial repair were not reported in the different series. The early reintervention rate was 1.4% (1/71), treated by open repair for rupture. The late reintervention rate was 7.5% (4/53) with thoracic endovascular aortic repair in three patients (one false aneurysm and two ruptures) and open repair in one patient (one false aneurysm). There were no cases of early or late graft thrombosis. One-year mortality rate was 38% but only 4.2% were related to the aortic repair using orthotopic xenopericardium (one early and two late ruptures). CONCLUSIONS: These data confirm the high morbidity of native and graft-related aortic infections and provide insight into the results of orthotopic xenografts as a treatment alternative. Larger series and longer follow-up will be required to compare the role of operator-made pericardial tube graft with other treatment options in infected fields.

Homemade fenestrated stent-graft for thoracic endovascular aortic repair of zone 2 aortic lesions.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the outcomes of homemade fenestrated stent-grafts for thoracic endovascular aortic repair of zone 2 aortic lesions. METHODS: From November 2013 to January 2017, 24 patients underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair with left subclavian artery revascularization using a homemade fenestrated stent-graft to preserve the patency of the left subclavian artery. Elective cases accounted for 54% (n = 13) of the sample. Indications included acute complicated type B aortic dissection (n = 9), degenerative aneurysm (n = 9), penetrating aortic ulcer (n = 5), and intramural hematoma (n = 1). Routine postoperative follow-up imaging with computed tomography angiography was performed to assess thoracic endovascular aortic repair and left subclavian artery fenestration patency and endoleak. RESULTS: Median duration for stent-graft modification was 16 minutes (range, 14-17 minutes). The technical success rate was 100%. One patient had a distal type I endoleak requiring additional stent-graft placement. One patient had partial coverage of the left common carotid artery requiring left common carotid artery stenting. One patient had a stroke without permanent sequelae (4.1%). Overall mortality was 0%. All left subclavian arteries were patent. Two type III endoleaks required additional left subclavian artery covered stent placement. One type II endoleak is currently observed. During a mean follow-up of 13.2 ± 2 months, there were no conversions to open surgical repair, aortic rupture, paraplegia, or retrograde dissection. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a homemade fenestrated stent-graft for thoracic endovascular aortic repair of zone 2 aortic lesions is both feasible and effective for left subclavian artery revascularization during thoracic endovascular aortic repair involving a spectrum of thoracic aortic pathology. Durability concerns will need to be assessed in additional studies with long-term follow-up.

Discontinuation of preoperative clopidogrel is unnecessary in peripheral arterial surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal management of preoperative clopidogrel remains controversial, as vascular surgeons are increasingly encountering patients treated with clopidogrel as part of dual antiplatelet therapy. Current practice differs considerably, from cessation of the medication at least 5 days before surgery to proceeding with surgery without delay. The purpose of this prospective, nonrandomized, comparative study was to determine the effect of preoperative exposure to clopidogrel and aspirin on perioperative bleeding complications in patients undergoing open arterial surgery. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on 647 consecutive major arterial procedures from 2005 through mid-2012. Patients were classified into two groups: the clopidogrel group consisted of 305 procedures performed in 269 patients who were maintained, after obtaining informed consent, on dual clopidogrel and aspirin up to the time of surgery and the no-clopidogrel group consisted of 342 procedures completed in 298 patients who were taking neither medication together or were taking aspirin alone. The primary composite end point was reoperation for bleeding and bleeding-related death. Secondary end points included blood transfusion requirements, hematoma formation, the procedure duration, as well as hospital and intensive care unit length of stay. RESULTS: The patients taking clopidogrel had a higher cardiovascular risk profile and a higher prevalence of prior peripheral and coronary stents (P < .0001). Clopidogrel use was common across all operation categories: 59% of carotid endarterectomy patients (104 of 177), 43% of lower extremity bypass patients (147 of 344), and 43% of abdominal aortic bypass patients (54 of 126). The difference in the primary end point between the clopidogrel and no-clopidogrel groups was not statistically significant (0.65% and 0.3%, respectively; P =.55). No bleeding-related deaths were observed. Further analysis revealed a similar incidence of stable hematomas. Blood transfusions were mainly required by patients undergoing aortic surgery, at similar rates and volumes in the clopidogrel and no-clopidogrel groups: abdominal aortic bypass cohort (a mean of 1.6 units packed red blood cells needed in 72% vs a mean of 1.6 units in 69%, respectively; P =.76); lower extremity bypass cohort (a mean of 1.5 units needed in 15% vs 1.3 units needed in 11%; P < .004). The mean operative time and intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay were not longer in clopidogrel recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Combined therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin up to the day of surgery is not associated with increased bleeding complications or transfusion requirements. Data from this study do not validate the perceived higher risk of perioperative bleeding in clopidogrel patients and do support the strategy of continued clopidogrel use in patients undergoing peripheral arterial surgery.

In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Essential Oils against Streptococcus pyogenes.

Streptococcus pyogenes plays an important role in the pathogenesis of tonsillitis. The present study was conducted to evaluate the in vitro antibacterial activities of 18 essential oils chemotypes from aromatic medicinal plants against S. pyogenes. Antibacterial activity of essential oils was investigated using disc diffusion method. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of essential oils showing an important antibacterial activity was measured using broth dilution method. Out of 18 essential oils tested, 14 showed antibacterial activity against S. pyogenes. Among them Cinnamomum verum, Cymbopogon citratus, Thymus vulgaris CT thymol, Origanum compactum, and Satureja montana essential oils exhibited significant antibacterial activity. The in vitro results reported here suggest that, for patients suffering from bacterial throat infections, if aromatherapy is used, these essential oils, considered as potential antimicrobial agents, should be preferred.