ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: S1 alar iliac (S1AI) trajectory has gained popularity as a salvage technique for revision surgeries and failed constructs in the lumbopelvic region. This study aims to investigate the morphometry of this new trajectory based on 3D models. The possible role of gender, ethnicity and view angle (surgeon's vs. radiologist's) was investigated. METHODS: Computed tomography-driven virtual 3D models of spinopelvic region were created applying Materialize MIMICS software, and assessed for coronal and sagittal radiographic versus surgeon's view angles, and morphometry of the screw trajectory. Independent-samples t test was used to analyze the results. P value was set at < = 0.05. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Software (SPSS version 24.0) was used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 164 3D models were simulated with a total 328 screws inserted satisfactorily within the S1AI trajectory. S1AI instrumentation was feasible in 96.48%. The mean radiological coronal angle was 50.619' ± 8.590' and the mean coronal angle for surgeons' perspective was 10.263' ± 5.860'. The mean radiological and surgeon's perspective sagittal angles were found to be 44.532' ± 6.424' and 31.164' ± 5.455', respectively. A statistically significant difference was found between anatomical and surgeon's perspective trajectories. Neither the pelvic laterality nor the gender influence the screw angles, length and diameter in radiological versus surgeon's view angles. CONCLUSION: Preoperative 3D modeling would be an invaluable adjunct to increase the accuracy of S1AI screw placement. Surgeon's perspective of the trajectory differs from standard CT sections and should be considered in preoperative planning.