Implications of power imbalance in antenatal care seeking among pregnant adolescents in rural Tanzania: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Adolescent girls (10-19 years) are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality from pregnancy and childbirth complications, compared with older mothers. Low and middle-income countries, including Tanzania, bear the largest proportion of adolescent perinatal deaths. Few adolescent girls in Tanzania access antenatal care at health facilities, the reasons for which are poorly understood. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative thematic analysis study of the experiences of pregnant adolescents with accessing antenatal care in Misungwi district, Tanzania. We recruited 22 pregnant or parenting adolescent girls using purposive sampling, and conducted in-depth interviews (IDIs) about antenatal care experiences. IDI data were triangulated with data from eight focus group discussions (FGDs) involving young fathers and elder men/women, and nine key informant interviews (KIIs) conducted with local health care providers. FGDs, KIIs and IDIs were transcribed verbatim in Swahili. Transcripts were then translated to English and analysed using emergent thematic analysis. RESULTS: Four main themes emerged: 1) Lack of maternal personal autonomy, 2) Stigma and judgment, 3) Vulnerability to violence and abuse, and 4) Knowledge about antenatal care, and highlighted the complex power imbalance that underlies barriers and facilitators to care access at the individual, family/interpersonal, community, and health-systems levels, faced by pregnant adolescents in rural Tanzania. CONCLUSION: Adolescent antenatal care-seeking is compromised by a complex power imbalance that involves financial dependence, lack of choice, lack of personal autonomy in decision making, experiences of social stigma, judgement, violence and abuse. Multi-level interventions are needed to empower adolescent girls, and to address policies and social constructs that may act as barriers, thereby, potentially reducing maternal morbidity and mortality in Tanzania.

Rater training for standardised assessment of Objective Structured Clinical Examinations in rural Tanzania.

OBJECTIVES: To describe a simulation-based rater training curriculum for Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) for clinician-based training for frontline staff caring for mothers and babies in rural Tanzania. BACKGROUND: Rater training for OSCE evaluation is widely embraced in high-income countries but not well described in low-income and middle-income countries. Helping Babies Breathe, Essential Care for Every Baby and Bleeding after Birth are standardised training programmes that encourage OSCE evaluations. Studies examining the reliability of assessments are rare. METHODS: Training of raters occurred over 3 days. Raters scored selected OSCEs role-played using standardised learners and low-fidelity mannikins, assigning proficiency levels a priori. Researchers used Zabar's criteria to critique rater agreement and mitigate measurement error during score review. Descriptive statistics, Fleiss' kappa and field notes were used to describe results. RESULTS: Six healthcare providers scored 42 training scenarios. There was moderate rater agreement across all OSCEs (κ=0.508). Kappa values increased with Helping Babies Breathe (κ=0.28-0.48) and Essential Care for Every Baby (κ=0.42-0.77) by day 3 of training, but not with Bleeding after Birth (κ=0.58-0.33). Raters identified average proficiency 50% of the time. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that the in-country raters in this study had a hard time identifying average performance despite moderate rater agreement. Rater training is critical to ensure that the potential of training programmes translates to improved outcomes for mothers and babies; more research into the concepts and training for discernment of competence in this setting is necessary.