Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 144
Filter
1.
J Trauma ; 51(6): 1031-6, 2001 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11740246
2.
J Trauma ; 50(5): 843-7, 2001 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11371839

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The radiographic diagnosis of blunt traumatic aortic laceration (BTAL) remains problematic. We reviewed our experience with chest radiographic signs of BTAL at a single trauma center. METHODS: The chest radiographs of 188 consecutive blunt trauma patients with suspected BTAL who underwent portable chest radiography and aortography were retrospectively reviewed by a thoracic radiologist. The presence or absence of 15 radiographic findings were recorded, and the sensitivity and specificity of individual radiographic signs and combinations of signs were determined. RESULTS: There were 10 patients with BTAL. Although three signs showed greater than 90% sensitivity for BTAL, these signs showed low specificity, and no significant improvement in overall accuracy was achieved by combining radiographic findings. CONCLUSION: The experience at our institution suggests that chest radiographs have limited utility in the accurate diagnosis of blunt traumatic aortic laceration. Cross-sectional imaging techniques will likely become the preferred imaging procedures for evaluating patients with suspected BTAL.


Subject(s)
Aorta/injuries , Lacerations/diagnostic imaging , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , Radiography , Retrospective Studies
3.
J Trauma ; 50(4): 604-9; discussion 609-11, 2001 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11303153

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Urban geriatric trauma patients are known to die more often than their younger counterparts. Little is known of the fate of geriatric trauma patients in a rural environment where delays to definitive treatment are frequent. We hypothesized that rural trauma patients would do worse than their urban counterparts because of prolonged delays to definitive care. METHODS: Five-year retrospective analysis of all trauma deaths occurring within a rural state and retrospective outcome analysis of trauma patients admitted to a tertiary care facility who were less than 55 years old (defined as young) and 55 or more years old (defined as old). Outcome analysis was performed comparing old and young rural hospitalized patients to the Major Trauma Outcome Study data set collected in major urban trauma centers. RESULTS: Of the total trauma deaths in the state, 32.5% were old. Old patients were less likely to die at the scene of the injury than were their younger counterparts (R2 = 0.84, p < 0.001). Hospitalized old patients had a significantly higher mean Revised Trauma Score and a significantly lower Injury Severity Score, a higher complication rate, and a higher mortality rate than did hospitalized young patients. The young group had a significantly better survival (W = 0.59, Z = -3.49, p = 0.0001) than the MTOS data set, but the old group had a significantly worse survival (W = -1.8, Z = -3.49, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In a rural environment, old trauma patients die more commonly in the hospital than their younger counterparts, who die more commonly at the scene. Old trauma patients who die in the hospital were less severely injured than their younger counterparts who died in the hospital. Old patients admitted to this rural trauma center have a significantly worse survival than their urban counterparts despite the fact that young rural trauma patients do significantly better than their urban counterparts. Understanding the demographics of rural geriatric trauma may be useful in allocating resources in rural trauma system design. It must be understood that despite relatively low injury severity and physiologic stability, there is a significant potential for rural geriatric trauma patients to do poorly.


Subject(s)
Aged/statistics & numerical data , Multiple Trauma/mortality , Rural Health/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged, 80 and over , Cause of Death , Child , Child, Preschool , Euthanasia, Passive/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Rationing , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Infant , Middle Aged , Multiple Trauma/classification , Multiple Trauma/etiology , Needs Assessment , Population Surveillance , Registries , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Time Factors , Trauma Severity Indices , Treatment Outcome , Vermont/epidemiology
4.
J Trauma ; 50(3): 409-13; discussion 414, 2001 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11265019

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Formalized systems of trauma care are believed to improve outcomes in an urban setting, but little is known of the applicability in a rural setting. METHODS: We conducted a population-based analysis of hospital survival after trauma comparing an American College of Surgeons-verified Level I trauma center (TC) with the pooled results of 13 small community hospitals (CH) in a rural state with no formal trauma system. All patients admitted to any hospital within the state of Vermont over a 5-year period (1995-1999) with a trauma discharge diagnosis were included. Elderly patients with isolated femur fractures were excluded from the database. International Classification of Diseases Injury Severity Scores (ICISSs) were calculated for each patient and used to control for injury severity in an omnibus logistic regression model that included age, ICISS, and hospital type (TC vs. CH) as predictors of survival. Patients who died were characterized on the basis of ICISS into "expected" (ICISS < 0.25), "indeterminate" (ICISS = 0.26-0.50), and "unexpected" (ICISS > 0.5). RESULTS: In 16,354 trauma admissions over the 5-year period in the rural state of Vermont, 370 (2.2%) died. There were 5,964 (36%) admitted to TC. Patients admitted to TC were more injured (ICISS 0.94 vs. 0.96) and had a higher mortality (3.1% vs. 1.8). Overall, care at the CH provided an improved survival (odds ratio = 1.75, 95% confidence internal = 1.31-2.18, p = 0.000). However, in the more severely injured cohort of trauma patients (expected and indeterminate; n = 133), overall survival was higher in the TC (16% CH vs. 38% TC, p = 0.02, chi2). Because the TC was known to provide care equivalent to Major Trauma Outcome Study norms during this time period (Z = -0.03, M = 0.894), we believe this study confirms that trauma care throughout the state is in accordance with national norms. CONCLUSION: In a rural state, without a statewide formal trauma system, survival after trauma is no worse at CH than TC when corrected for injury severity and age. Future expenditures of resources might better be concentrated in other areas such as discovery or prehospital care to further improve outcomes.


Subject(s)
Community Health Planning/organization & administration , Hospitals, Community/organization & administration , Hospitals, Rural/organization & administration , Multiple Trauma/mortality , Multiple Trauma/therapy , Rural Health Services/organization & administration , Traumatology/organization & administration , Adult , Aged , Health Care Rationing/organization & administration , Health Services Research , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Multiple Trauma/classification , Multiple Trauma/complications , Needs Assessment/organization & administration , Odds Ratio , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Survival Analysis , Vermont/epidemiology
5.
J Trauma ; 50(1): 96-101, 2001 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11231677

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pediatric trauma centers (PTCs) were developed to improve the survival of injured children, but it is currently unknown if children admitted to PTCs are more likely to survive than those admitted to adult trauma centers (ATCs). METHODS: Fifty-three thousand one hundred thirteen pediatric trauma cases from 22 PTCs and 31 ATCs included in the National Pediatric Trauma Registry were reviewed to evaluate survival rates at PTCs and ATCs. RESULTS: Overall, 1,259 children died. The raw mortality rate was lower at PTCs (1.81% of 32,554 children) than at ATCs (3.88% of 18,368 children). However, patients admitted to ATCs were more severely injured. When Injury Severity Score, Pediatric Trauma Score, mechanism (blunt or penetrating), gender, age, clustering, and American College of Surgeons (ACS) verification status were controlled for using a single logistic regression model, there was no statistically significant difference in survival between PTCs and ATCs (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.26; p = 0.587). A similar comparison of the 12 ACS-verified trauma centers with the 41 nonverified centers showed verification to be associated with improved survival (odds ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.97; p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Although PTCs have higher overall survival rates than ATCs, this difference disappears when the analysis controls for Injury Severity Score, Pediatric Trauma Score, age, mechanism, and ACS verification status. ACS-verified centers have significantly higher survival rates than do unverified centers.


Subject(s)
Registries , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries/mortality , Adult , Child , Female , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Logistic Models , Male , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Survival Rate , United States/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/therapy
6.
J Trauma ; 48(5): 851-63; discussion 863-4, 2000 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10823528

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hypotension doubles the adverse outcome of severe brain injury (BI). This finding is thought to be due to secondary ischemia caused by cerebral hypoperfusion. Aggressive prehospital fluid resuscitation in BI is advocated to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP). Increasing MAP by prehospital fluid resuscitation before control of hemorrhage is thought to increase blood loss and reduce survival. We hypothesized that vasoconstrictor treatment of uncontrolled hemorrhage would increase MAP, reduce hemorrhage volume, and decrease the extent of BI compared with delayed fluid resuscitation (DR) or resuscitation with Ringer's lactate (RL). METHODS: Swine were randomly assigned to a control group or an experimental group: splenic laceration (uncontrolled hemorrhage) and cryogenic BI. The experimental group received one of three prehospital resuscitation regimens: DR, RL, or phenylephrine (Phen) to maintain baseline MAP. Variables were measured at baseline and at 20, 50, and 120 minutes during the simulated "prehospital and early hospital" phases and at 2 and 8 hours after surgical control of the uncontrolled hemorrhage. After killing, biopsies of the brain, liver, kidney, and gut were evaluated for histologic evidence of ischemia and compared between groups. RESULTS: Hemorrhage volume was similar in the experimental groups. Mortality was lowest in the Phen group (11%) compared with DR (40%) and RL (33%) groups. Phen increased MAP and cerebral perfusion pressure. RL infusion increased cerebral blood flow and resulted in less secondary injury than either Phen or DR. CONCLUSION: Phen improves MAP and systemic and cerebral perfusion pressure in the prehospital phase but does not reduce secondary neuronal ischemia. RL restores cerebral blood flow earlier and is associated with less secondary ischemia than either Phen or DR in this model. These data suggest that prehospital infusion of RL in patients with BI and shock is warranted and decreases secondary ischemia.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic alpha-Agonists/therapeutic use , Brain Injuries/drug therapy , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Phenylephrine/therapeutic use , Resuscitation/methods , Shock, Hemorrhagic/drug therapy , Vasoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic use , Adrenergic alpha-Agonists/pharmacology , Animals , Biopsy , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Brain Injuries/mortality , Brain Injuries/pathology , Brain Injuries/physiopathology , Cerebrovascular Circulation/drug effects , Disease Models, Animal , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Female , Fluid Therapy/methods , Isotonic Solutions/therapeutic use , Male , Phenylephrine/pharmacology , Random Allocation , Ringer's Lactate , Shock, Hemorrhagic/mortality , Shock, Hemorrhagic/pathology , Shock, Hemorrhagic/physiopathology , Swine , Time Factors , Vasoconstrictor Agents/pharmacology
8.
Arch Surg ; 134(11): 1274-7, 1999 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10555646

ABSTRACT

HYPOTHESIS: Factors associated with fetal death in injured pregnant patients are related to increasing injury severity and abnormal maternal physiologic profile. DESIGN: A multi-institutional retrospective study of 13 level I and level II trauma centers from 1992 to 1996. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Fetal survival. RESULTS: Of 27,715 female admissions, there were 372 injured pregnant patients (1.3%); 84% had blunt injuries and 16% had penetrating injuries. There were 14 maternal deaths (3.8%) and 35 fetal deaths (9.4%). The population suffering fetal death had higher injury severity scores (P<.001), lower Glascow Coma Scale scores (P<.001), and lower admitting maternal pH (P = .002). Most women who lost their fetus arrived in shock (P = .005) or had a fetal heart rate of less than 110 beats/min at some time during their hospitalization (P<.001). An Injury Severity Score greater than 25 was associated with a 50% incidence of fetal death. Placental abruption was the most frequent complication, occurring in 3.5% of patients and associated with 54% mortality. Cardiotrophic monitoring to detect potentially threatening fetal heart rates was performed on only 61% of pregnant women in their third trimester. Of these patients, 7 had abnormalities on cardiotrophic monitoring and underwent successful cesarean delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Fetal death was more likely with greater severity of injury. Cardiotrophic monitoring is underused in injured pregnant patients in their third trimester even after admission to major trauma centers. Increased use of cardiotrophic monitoring may decrease the mortality caused by placental abruption.


Subject(s)
Fetal Death/epidemiology , Fetal Death/etiology , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies
9.
J Trauma ; 47(5): 834-44, 1999 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10568709

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recently acquired data suggest that prehospital fluid resuscitation may worsen outcome of patients with penetrating torso trauma. In patients with head injury, delayed resuscitation (DR) could lead to secondary cerebral ischemia. We hypothesized that standard prehospital resuscitation (SPR) with lactated Ringer's solution or diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin would reduce secondary cerebral ischemia compared with DR. METHODS: Anesthetized swine were randomized to receive SPR, diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin, or DR after cryogenic brain injury and uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock and studied for 70 minutes after the combined insults. RESULTS: Hemorrhage volume was lowest in the DR group (p<0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups in systemic or cerebral oxygen delivery. Intracranial pressure was lower and cerebral perfusion pressure higher in the diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin group compared with SPR (p<0.05). Lesion size was greatest in the SPR group, but the difference was not significant. CONCLUSION: In this model, SPR leads to secondary cerebral ischemia. DR is no worse and may be superior to conventional prehospital resuscitation with lactated Ringer's solution.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries/therapy , Emergency Medical Services , Resuscitation/methods , Animals , Aspirin/administration & dosage , Aspirin/analogs & derivatives , Blood Substitutes/administration & dosage , Brain Injuries/physiopathology , Brain Ischemia/physiopathology , Brain Ischemia/prevention & control , Cerebrovascular Circulation/drug effects , Cerebrovascular Circulation/physiology , Female , Fluid Therapy , Hemodynamics/drug effects , Hemodynamics/physiology , Hemoglobins/administration & dosage , Intracranial Pressure/drug effects , Intracranial Pressure/physiology , Isotonic Solutions/administration & dosage , Male , Oxygen/blood , Ringer's Lactate , Shock, Hemorrhagic/physiopathology , Shock, Hemorrhagic/therapy , Swine , Time Factors
10.
J Trauma ; 47(4): 802-21, 1999 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10528626

ABSTRACT

Improving the care of trauma patients in a rural environment requires that several important issues be addressed. First, a universal definition of what constitutes "rural" must be established. We propose that a combined effort of the Federal Government and the Committee on Trauma of the American College of Surgeons develop this definition. Second, data on rural trauma demographics and outcome must be collected in a national database. We propose that this database be incorporated in the "TRACS" database of the Committee on Trauma of the American College of Surgeons. Such a database will allow a "needs assessment analysis of existing care in rural environments and facilitate planning and implementation of efficient systems of care. Funding for the rural database should come from the federal government. Finally, increased public awareness of problems unique to rural trauma care is necessary. The rural trauma subcommittee of the ACSCOT should go from an ad hoc committee to a standing committee with the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. We propose a national conference on rural trauma care hosted by the federal government for the purpose of addressing these issues and simultaneously increasing public awareness.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration , Multiple Trauma/therapy , Rural Health Services/organization & administration , Traumatology/organization & administration , Forecasting , Health Priorities , Humans , Multiple Trauma/epidemiology , Needs Assessment/organization & administration , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/organization & administration , Patient Transfer/organization & administration , Reimbursement Mechanisms/organization & administration , Telemedicine/organization & administration , Transportation of Patients/organization & administration , United States/epidemiology
11.
J Trauma ; 46(4): 553-62; discussion 562-4, 1999 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10217217

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The focused abdominal sonogram for trauma (FAST) has been used by surgeons and emergency physicians (CLIN) to screen reliably for hemoperitoneum after trauma. Despite recommendations for "appropriate training," ranging from 50 to 400 proctored examinations, there are no supporting data. METHODS: We prospectively examined the initial FAST experience of CLIN in detecting hemoperitoneum by using diagnostic peritoneal lavage, computed tomography, and clinical findings as the diagnostic "gold standard." RESULTS: 241 patients had FAST performed by 12 CLIN (average, 20/CLIN; range, 2-43); 51 patients (21.2%) had hemoperitoneum and 17 patients (7.1%) required laparotomy. Initial experience with FAST by CLIN produced 35 true positives, 180 true negatives, 16 false negatives, and 3 false positives; sensitivity, 68%; specificity, 98%. Initial error rate was 17%, which fell to 5% after 10 examinations (chi2; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Previous recommendations for the number of proctored examinations for individual nonradiologist clinician sonographers to develop competence are excessive.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Hemoperitoneum/diagnostic imaging , Radiology/education , Ultrasonography/standards , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnostic imaging , Abdominal Injuries/diagnosis , Adult , Diagnostic Errors/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Medicine/education , Female , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Learning , Male , Peritoneal Lavage , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Vermont , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/classification
12.
J Trauma ; 46(3): 380-5, 1999 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10088837

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of blunt cervical arterial injury (CAI) is made difficult by its infrequent occurrence and delayed presentation. Beginning in January of 1995, we used computed tomographic angiography (CTA) of the neck to screen for CAI. We hypothesized that CTA could be incorporated into the workup of patients sustaining blunt neck injury as a screening modality for CAI and that CTA would increase the early detection of CAI. METHODS: Retrospective review of all CAI for the years January of 1988 to June of 1997 at a Level I trauma center. CAI diagnosed before introduction of CTA (pre-CTA; January of 1988 to December of 1994) were compared with those after (post-CTA; January of 1995 to June of 1997). RESULTS: The overall incidence of CAI for the entire time period was 0.11%. Motor vehicle crash (53%) was the most common mechanism, with focal neurologic deficit (23%) or seizures (17.6%) the most common presenting clinical symptoms. CTA added only a few additional minutes to the time required for the workup of patients sustaining blunt neck injury in whom CAI was suspected. The incidence of CAI increased from 0.06% pre-CTA to 0.19% post-CTA (p = 0.02; Fisher exact test). CTA was associated with a decrease in mean time to make the diagnosis of CAI (156 hours pre-CTA vs. 5.9 hours post-CTA). In addition, CTA was associated with a decrease in the incidence of permanent neurologic sequelae from CAI (50% pre-CTA vs. 0% post-CTA; p = 0.07; Fisher exact test). CONCLUSION: We conclude that CTA does not significantly increase the time of the diagnostic workup of the patient with injuries caused by blunt trauma. The introduction of CTA at our institution was associated with an increase in the detection rate of CAI. Earlier detection of CAI may allow for more timely therapeutic intervention and potentially prevent permanent neurologic sequelae.


Subject(s)
Angiography , Carotid Artery Injuries , Mass Screening/methods , Neck/blood supply , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Vertebral Artery/injuries , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnostic imaging , Accidents, Traffic , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Algorithms , Angiography/methods , Decision Trees , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity , Time Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
13.
J Trauma ; 46(3): 483-7, 1999 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10088856

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Children and the elderly are more likely to be underinsured compared with the general population of trauma patients. We performed financial analysis on all trauma patients admitted during an 18-month period to a Level I adult and pediatric trauma center to evaluate the financial impact of providing trauma care for children and the elderly. METHODS: Patients were categorized by age: PEDI<17 years, GERI>64 years and MID = 17 to 64 years. Reimbursement ratio (RR = reimbursement/cost; RR>1 = profit, RR<1 = loss), length of stay (LOS), and Injury Severity Score (ISS) were calculated for each age group. RESULTS: RR for GERI (RR = 0.99) was significantly lower than for PEDI (RR = 1.15) and MID (RR = 1.16). There was no difference in ISS, but the LOS of GERI was greater than that of PEDI and MID (p<0.05). Cost per patient and LOS were less in PEDI versus MID and GERI (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Trauma care reimbursement for the elderly is inadequate, whereas pediatric trauma care costs less to deliver and is profitable to the trauma center.


Subject(s)
Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Trauma Centers/economics , Wounds and Injuries/economics , Accounting/methods , Adolescent , Age Factors , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Diagnosis-Related Groups/economics , Health Services Research , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Injury Severity Score , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Reimbursement Mechanisms/economics , Retrospective Studies , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Vermont , Wounds and Injuries/therapy
14.
J Trauma ; 46(2): 328-33, 1999 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10029042

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the characteristics and outcome of transferred trauma patients in a rural setting. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study of all trauma admissions to a rural Level I trauma center to examine a 3.5-year (1993-1996) comparison of trauma patients admitted directly with those transferred (RTTP) after being initially stabilized at an outlying hospital. We used prehospital times, Injury Severity Score (ISS), LD50ISS (the ISS at which 50% of patients died), Revised Trauma Score, probability of survival, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, and observed survival as main outcome measures. RESULTS: RTTPs (39.4%) spent an average of 182+/-139 minutes at the outlying hospital and 72+/-42 minutes in transport to the trauma center. Proportionately more head/neck and patients with multiple injuries composed the RTTP group. The RTTP were more severely injured (ISS 11.1+/-8.5; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II 16.2+/-5.8; Revised Trauma Score 7.44+/-1.1) than the trauma patients admitted directly (ISS 7.9+/-5.3; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II 13.1+/-6.3; Revised Trauma Score 7.8+/-0.4; p < 0.05). However, both groups had the same LD50ISS (ISS = 35). When logistic regression was applied with death as the dependent variable, both ISS and age contributed significantly (p = 0.0001) but transfer status did not (p = 0.473). CONCLUSION: Rural trauma centers admit a high percentage of RTTP. These RTTP have a higher injury severity and acuity than their trauma patients admitted directly counterparts. Trauma care in rural areas that involves initial stabilization at outlying hospitals does not adversely affect mortality.


Subject(s)
Hospitals, Rural , Multiple Trauma/therapy , Patient Transfer/standards , Trauma Centers , APACHE , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Female , Hospitals, Community , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Trauma/classification , Multiple Trauma/mortality , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Survival Analysis , Trauma Severity Indices , Triage/standards , Vermont/epidemiology
15.
J Trauma ; 45(2): 234-7; discussion 237-8, 1998 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9715178

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Risk stratification of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is an important tool because it permits comparison of patient populations for research and quality control. Unfortunately, currently available scoring systems were developed primarily in medical ICUs and have only mediocre performance in surgical ICUs. Moreover, they are very expensive to purchase and use. We conceived a simple risk-stratification tool for the surgical ICU that uses readily available International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes to predict outcome. Called ICISS (International Classification of Disease Illness Severity Score), our score is the product of the survival risk ratios (obtained from an independent data set) for all International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, diagnosis codes. METHODS: A total of 5,322 noncardiac patients admitted to a surgical ICU during an 8-year period had their Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores compared with their ICISS as predictors of outcome (survival/nonsurvival, length of stay, and charges). RESULTS: ICISS proved to be a much better predictor of survival than APACHE (receiver operating characteristic (ROC) APACHE = 0.806; Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) APACHE = 22.56; ROC ICISS = 0.892; HL ICISS = 12.06) or the APACHE survival probability (ROC = 0.836; HL = 34.47). These differences were highly statistically significant (p < 0.001). ICISS was also better correlated with ICU length of stay (APACHE R2 = 0.06; ICISS R2 = 0.32) and ICU charges (APACHE R2 = 0.07; ICISS R2 = 0.39). When combined in a logistic model with ICISS, APACHE II added slightly to the predictive power of ICISS alone (combined ROC = 0.903) but degraded the calibration of the model (combined HL = 16.29; p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: Because ICISS is both more accurate and much less expensive to calculate than APACHE II score, ICISS should replace APACHE II score as the standard risk stratification tool in surgical ICUs.


Subject(s)
APACHE , Hospital Charges/statistics & numerical data , Intensive Care Units/economics , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/economics , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Severity of Illness Index , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Calibration , Child , Child, Preschool , Diagnosis-Related Groups/classification , Diagnosis-Related Groups/economics , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , North Carolina , Predictive Value of Tests , ROC Curve , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis
16.
Arch Surg ; 133(4): 390-8, 1998 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9565119

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of delayed vs early fluid resuscitation on cerebral hemodynamics after severe head injury and uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled experimental trial. SETTING: Surgical research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Immature swine (N=16) weighing 40 to 50 kg. INTERVENTIONS: Twelve swine were subjected to cryogenic brain lesion and hemorrhage to maintain a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 50 mm Hg. Animals were randomized to receive 1 L of Ringer lactate solution in 20 minutes, starting 20 minutes after injury and hemorrhage, followed by 1 L of Ringer lactate solution in 30 minutes (ER group) (n=6), or no fluid resuscitation (DR group) (n=6). The 4 control animals underwent instrumentation only. The study ended 70 minutes after head injury and hemorrhage. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Measurements of MAP, bilateral regional cerebral blood flow, serum hemoglobin level, systemic and regional cerebral oxygen delivery, and intracranial pressure performed at baseline and 20 (phase 1), 50 (phase 2), and 70 minutes (phase 3) after head injury and hemorrhage. Lesion size (percentage of ipsilateral cortex) was measured post mortem. RESULTS: All animals survived the experimental period. Systemic cerebral oxygen delivery in the DR group was significantly lower at phase 3 compared with that of the ER group (31.5% vs 53.1% at baseline) (P=.03). However, bilateral regional cerebral oxygen delivery was significantly greater in the DR group at phase 3 compared with that of the ER group (71.5% vs 47.0% at baseline in the injured side; 72.9% vs 48.4% at baseline in the noninjured side) (P=.02). Bilateral cerebral blood flow was similar in all groups at all times. The ER group showed a trend toward a greater intracranial pressure elevation (6.8 vs -0.25) (P=.07) and lesion size (37.0% vs 28.6%) (P=.07). Hemoglobin level became significantly lower in the ER group at phase 2 (7.0 vs 10.7) (P=.03) and remained lower at phase 3 (6.9 vs 11.7) (P=.01). CONCLUSIONS: Early fluid resuscitation with Ringer lactate solution following head injury and uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock worsens cerebral hemodynamics. Cerebral pressure autoregulation is sufficiently intact following head injury to maintain regional cerebral oxygen delivery without asanguineous fluid resuscitation.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries/therapy , Cerebrovascular Circulation/physiology , Fluid Therapy , Isotonic Solutions/therapeutic use , Resuscitation/methods , Shock, Hemorrhagic/therapy , Animals , Brain/metabolism , Brain Injuries/complications , Brain Injuries/physiopathology , Fluid Therapy/adverse effects , Intracranial Pressure/physiology , Isotonic Solutions/adverse effects , Oxygen Consumption/physiology , Random Allocation , Ringer's Lactate , Shock, Hemorrhagic/complications , Shock, Hemorrhagic/physiopathology , Swine , Time Factors
17.
Arch Surg ; 133(4): 406-11; discussion 412, 1998 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9565121

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the short- and long-term outcomes of vena cava filter (VCF) placement for prophylaxis against pulmonary embolism in patients at high risk due to trauma. DESIGN AND SETTING: Case series at a level I trauma center. PATIENTS: Patients were considered for prophylactic VCF placement if they met 1 of the injury criteria--spinal cord injuries with neurologic deficit, severe fractures of the pelvis or long bone (or both), and severe head injury--and had a contraindication to anticoagulation. INTERVENTION: Vena cava filters were placed percutaneously by the interventional radiologists when the acute trauma condition was stabilized following admission. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Filter tilt of 14 degrees or more, strut malposition, insertion-related deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or inferior vena cava patency. RESULTS: There were 132 prophylactic VCFs placed. A 3.1% rate of insertion-related deep vein thrombosis occurred, all of which were asymptomatic. Filter tilt occurred in 5.5% of patients and strut malposition in 38%. Three cases of pulmonary embolism (1 fatal) occurred in a prophylactic VCF, and all patients had either filter tilt or strut malposition. The risk of pulmonary embolism developing was higher in those patients with filter tilt or strut malposition than in those who did not have these complications (6.3% vs 0%; P=.05; Fisher exact test). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year inferior vena cava patency rates (+/-SD) were 97%+/-3%. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic VCF can be placed safely with an acceptable rate of insertion-related deep vein thrombosis and long-term inferior vena cava patency. Patients with prophylactic VCF remain at risk for pulmonary embolism if the filter is tilted 14 degrees or more or has strut malposition. In such patients, consideration should be given to placing a second filter.


Subject(s)
Pulmonary Embolism/prevention & control , Vena Cava Filters , Wounds and Injuries/complications , Adult , Anticoagulants , Contraindications , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pulmonary Embolism/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Thrombophlebitis/epidemiology , Thrombophlebitis/etiology , Time Factors , Vena Cava Filters/adverse effects
18.
J Trauma ; 44(1): 50-8, 1998 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9464749

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Experimental and clinical work has suggested that hypertonic saline (HTS) would be better than lactated Ringer's solution (LRS) for the resuscitation of patients with head injuries. No clinical study has examined the effect of HTS infusion on intracranial pressure (ICP) and outcome in patients with head injuries. We hypothesized that HTS infusion would result in a lower ICP and fewer medical interventions to lower ICP compared with LRS. METHODS/DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical trial at two teaching hospitals. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled and were similar in age and Injury Severity Score. HTS patients had a lower admission Glasgow Coma Scale score (HTS: 4.7+/-0.7; LRS: 6.7+/-0.7; p = 0.057), a higher initial ICP (HTS: 16+/-2; LRS: 11+/-2; p = 0.06), and a higher initial mean maximum ICP (HTS: 31+/-3; LRS: 18+/-2; p < 0.01). Treatment effectively lowered ICP in both groups, and there was no significant difference between the groups in ICP at any time after entry. HTS patients required significantly more interventions (HTS: 31+/-4; LRS: 11+/-3; p < 0.01). During the study, the change in maximum ICP was positive in the LRS group but negative in the HTS group (LRS: +2+/-3; HTS: -9+/-4; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: As a group, HTS patients had more severe head injuries. HTS and LRS used with other therapies effectively controlled the ICP. The widely held conviction that sodium administration will lead to a sustained increase in ICP is not supported by this work.


Subject(s)
Craniocerebral Trauma/therapy , Fluid Therapy/methods , Resuscitation/methods , Saline Solution, Hypertonic/therapeutic use , Adult , Female , Glasgow Coma Scale , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Intracranial Pressure/drug effects , Isotonic Solutions/chemistry , Isotonic Solutions/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Prospective Studies , Ringer's Lactate , Saline Solution, Hypertonic/chemistry
19.
J Trauma ; 43(3): 413-22, 1997 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9314301

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Specific cohorts of patients with blunt traumatic thoracic aortic laceration (BTTAL) might benefit from conservative or delayed management. We hypothesized that age and comorbidities would predict outcome. METHODS: BTTAL data from 14 trauma centers over 11 years. Hospital and autopsy records of confirmed BTTAL were retrospectively reviewed. Regression analysis evaluated outcome by trauma indices, age, premorbidities, interventions, adjuvant therapy, and delay of repair. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-five cases of BTTAL were identified, 233 who were stable. Stable cohort survival was 71.9%. No trauma indices predicted outcome. Comorbidities, especially coronary artery disease (CAD), were associated with mortality. The use of beta-blocking agents and maintenance of normal blood pressure were associated with survival. Delay of >4 hours to operative repair was not associated with increased mortality. Increasing age was associated with higher mortality. Multivariate regression found CAD and AGE predictive of mortality (log odds formula: exp [-2.0858 + 0.0253(AGE) + 2.0428(CAD)]). CONCLUSIONS: AGE and CAD are associated with worse outcome in stable BTTAL patients undergoing operative repair. Treating comorbidities and managing associated injuries should be undertaken in stable BTTAL patients. Physiologic stability should be established before repair of BTTAL.


Subject(s)
Thoracic Arteries/injuries , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/surgery , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Prognosis , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Thoracic Arteries/surgery , Trauma Centers , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/classification , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/mortality
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...