Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cureus ; 15(1): e33399, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36751211

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The objective is to assess and compare whether AdvanSync gives better skeletal, dental, and soft tissue outcomes than Forsus fixed functional appliance in post-pubertal skeletal Class II malocclusion patients. METHODOLOGY: A prospective study was conducted using 3D-CBCT of patients taken before and after fixed functional appliance therapy. The sample consisted of 16 patients divided into two groups: Group 1 was treated with Forsus and group 2 with AdvanSync appliance. All subjects were in their post-pubertal growth phase. Treatment changes were evaluated between the study groups using 12 angular and 14 linear parameters. The data were subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: Statistically significant changes in SNB (P:0.04) and ANB (P:0.01) in Forsus appliance and AdvanSync (SNB, P:008), (ANB, P: <0.001) were found between the pre and post-fixed functional appliance protocol. The effective mandibular length increased in both groups Forsus(P-value: 0.01) and AdvanSync (P-value: 0.01). Group 1 resulted in lower incisor proclination and intrusion, a reduction in an overbite, whereas group 2 resulted in lower incisor proclination, upper incisor extrusion, and retroclination. Both groups showed significant improvement in the molar relation and overjet. An increase in the total facial convexity was shown in group 1; group 2 showed an increase in the facial convexity and total facial convexity. There was no statistically significant difference between the effects of the Forsus and Advansync appliance groups in the post-fixed functional period. Both groups presented similar results. CONCLUSION: Forsus and Advansync appliances are effective with similar results in normalizing skeletal Class II malocclusion in post-pubertal patients. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups using Forsus or AdvanSync. The changes were minimal - mandibular skeletal effects, majorly dentoalveolar effects, and mild soft tissue effects.

2.
Cureus ; 14(11): e31921, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36579292

ABSTRACT

Everyone aspires to have a youthful appearance, complete with a beaming grin. By treating skeletal and dental malocclusions that interfere with facial aesthetics, orthodontics helps patients attain a beautiful face and a smile they will be proud of. The diagnosis of the underlying illness or condition serves as the basis for all medical, dental, and surgical operations. Dental professionals all across the world have reaped the benefits of a major scientific advance in recent years. Many measurements may now be seen and quantified more easily using computer-assisted cephalometry. The accuracy and high quality of all dental materials have been enhanced thanks to computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacture. There have been several developments in the realm of orthodontics. The growing use of technology in recent years has transformed every sector, including medicine and dentistry. From Angle's time to today's nanorobotic age, orthodontic ideas, biomaterials, and technology have evolved greatly. It has been extensively utilized for diagnosis, treatment planning, three-dimensional printing, appliance systems, digital storage, integration, and data retrieval. The technology used in orthodontics is always getting better, and this article aims to give an overview of the most recent changes.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...