Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 14(6): e0218412, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31220119

ABSTRACT

The Consortium for Mouse Cell Line Authentication was formed to validate Short Tandem Repeat (STR) markers for intraspecies identification of mouse cell lines. The STR profiling method is a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay comprised of primers targeting 19 mouse STR markers and two human STR markers (for interspecies contamination screening). The goals of the Consortium were to perform an interlaboratory study to-(1) validate the mouse STR markers to uniquely identify mouse cell lines (intraspecies identification), (2) to provide a public database of mouse cell lines with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)-validated mouse STR profiles, and (3) to publish the results of the interlaboratory study. The interlaboratory study was an international effort that consisted of 12 participating laboratories representing institutions from academia, industry, biological resource centers, and government. The study was based on 50 of the most commonly used mouse cell lines obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). Of the 50 mouse cell lines, 18 had unique STR profiles that were 100% concordant (match) among all Consortium laboratory members, and the remaining 32 cell lines had discordance that was resolved readily and led to improvement of the assay. The discordance was due to low signal and interpretation issues involving artifacts and genotyping errors. Although the total number of discordant STR profiles was relatively high in this study, the percent of labs agreeing on allele calls among the discordant samples was above 92%. The STR profiles, including electropherogram images, for NIST-validated mouse cell lines will be published on the NCBI BioSample Database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/biosample/). Overall, the interlaboratory study showed that the multiplex PCR method using 18 of the 19 mouse STR markers is capable of discriminating at the intraspecies level between mouse cell lines. Further studies are ongoing to refine the assay including (1) development of an allelic ladder for improving the accuracy of allele calling and (2) integration of stutter filters to identify true stutter.


Subject(s)
Genotype , Genotyping Techniques/methods , Microsatellite Repeats/genetics , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Alleles , Animals , Cell Line , Humans , Mice
2.
Forensic Sci Int ; 283: 41-46, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29248811

ABSTRACT

For forensic biological sample collections, the specimen donor is linked solidly to his or her specimen through a chain of custody (CoC) sometimes referenced as a chain of evidence. Rarely, a donor may deny that a urine or oral fluid (OF) specimen is his or her specimen even with a patent CoC. The goal of this pilot study was to determine the potential effects of short-term storage on the quality and quantity of DNA in both types of specimen under conditions that may be encountered with employment-related drug testing specimens. Fresh urine and freshly collected oral fluid all produced complete STR profiles. For the "pad" type OF collectors, acceptable DNA was extractable both from the buffer/preservative and the pad. Although fresh urine and OF produced complete STR profiles, partial profiles were obtained after storage for most samples. An exception was the DNA in the Quantisal OF collector, from which a complete profile was obtained for both freshly collected OF and stored OF.


Subject(s)
DNA Fingerprinting , DNA/analysis , Specimen Handling , Substance Abuse Detection , Employment , Humans , Microsatellite Repeats , Pilot Projects , Salvia/chemistry , Specimen Handling/instrumentation , Time Factors
3.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ; 43(12): 3712-6, 2002 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12454041

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the effects of immunization against lysostaphin on the bactericidal action of lysostaphin in ocular tissue and the possible induction of allergic reactions. METHODS: Rabbits were immunized against lysostaphin by subcutaneous, intranasal, or topical routes. Anti-lysostaphin antibody titers were determined by ELISA and by neutralization of lysostaphin. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was intrastromally or intravitreously injected into rabbit eyes. Eyes were treated either topically with drops of lysostaphin (0.3%) or with a single intravitreous injection (0.1 mL) of lysostaphin (0.1%). At the time of death, corneas or vitreous humors were cultured to determine the number of colony forming units (CFU). RESULTS: Rabbits in keratitis experiments that were immunized subcutaneously, intranasally, or topically had serum antibody titers of 10,240, 187, and 1,867, respectively, and neutralization titers of 8 or less. In both normal and immunized rabbits with keratitis, lysostaphin significantly reduced the log CFU to less than 1 log, whereas the untreated eyes contained more than 10(6) CFU/cornea (P < or = 0.0001). Rabbits that were subcutaneously or topically immunized for endophthalmitis experiments had serum antibody titers of 1636 or 137, respectively, and neutralization titers of 2 or less. A single intravitreous injection of lysostaphin (0.1%) sterilized all eyes of immunized and nonimmune rabbits with endophthalmitis. No adverse effects were observed with the administration of lysostaphin to either normal or immunized rabbit eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Lysostaphin treatment of immunized rabbits was effective in treating S. aureus-infected eyes, despite the presence of anti-lysostaphin antibody. No adverse reactions were produced by administration of lysostaphin to immunized rabbits.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Eye Infections, Bacterial/therapy , Immunotherapy , Lysostaphin/therapeutic use , Methicillin Resistance , Staphylococcal Infections/therapy , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Animals , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/immunology , Antibody Formation/immunology , Colony Count, Microbial , Corneal Stroma/microbiology , Endophthalmitis/immunology , Endophthalmitis/microbiology , Endophthalmitis/therapy , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Eye Infections, Bacterial/immunology , Eye Infections, Bacterial/microbiology , Immunity , Immunization , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Keratitis/immunology , Keratitis/microbiology , Keratitis/therapy , Lysostaphin/immunology , Methicillin/pharmacology , Rabbits , Staphylococcal Infections/immunology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Vitreous Body/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...