Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sci Rep ; 7: 46612, 2017 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28569261

ABSTRACT

Stroke induces network-wide changes in the brain, affecting the excitability in both nearby and remotely connected regions. Brain stimulation is a promising neurorestorative technique that has been shown to improve stroke recovery by altering neuronal activity of the target area. However, it is unclear whether the beneficial effect of stimulation is a result of neuronal or non-neuronal activation, as existing stimulation techniques nonspecifically activate/inhibit all cell types (neurons, glia, endothelial cells, oligodendrocytes) in the stimulated area. Furthermore, which brain circuit is efficacious for brain stimulation is unknown. Here we use the optogenetics approach to selectively stimulate neurons in the lateral cerebellar nucleus (LCN), a deep cerebellar nucleus that sends major excitatory output to multiple motor and sensory areas in the forebrain. Repeated LCN stimulations resulted in a robust and persistent recovery on the rotating beam test, even after cessation of stimulations for 2 weeks. Furthermore, western blot analysis demonstrated that LCN stimulations significantly increased the axonal growth protein GAP43 in the ipsilesional somatosensory cortex. Our results demonstrate that pan-neuronal stimulations of the LCN is sufficient to promote robust and persistent recovery after stroke, and thus is a promising target for brain stimulation.


Subject(s)
Cerebellar Cortex/physiopathology , Cerebellar Nuclei/physiopathology , Deep Brain Stimulation , Optogenetics , Recovery of Function , Stroke , Animals , Cerebellar Cortex/physiology , Cerebellar Nuclei/pathology , Mice , Mice, Transgenic , Stroke/pathology , Stroke/physiopathology , Stroke/therapy
2.
Neurosurg Focus ; 36(4): E19, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24684331

ABSTRACT

Cranioplasty, one of the oldest surgical procedures used to repair cranial defects, has undergone many revolutions over time to find the ideal material to improve patient prognosis. Cranioplasty offers cosmetic and protective benefits for patients with cranial defects. The first primitive cranioplasty procedures date back to 7000 bc and used metal and gourds to repair cranial defects. Cranioplasty was first documented by Fallopius who described repair using gold plates; the first bone graft was documented by van Meekeren. The first significant improvement for this procedure began with experimentation involving bone grafts in the late 19th century as a more natural approach for repairing cranial defects. The next impetus for advancement came because of wartime injuries incurred during World Wars I and II and involved experimentation with synthetic materials to counter the common complications associated with bone grafts. Methyl methacrylate, hydroxyapatite, ceramics, and polyetheretherketone implants among other materials have since been researched and used. Research now has shifted toward molecular biology to improve the ability of the patient to regenerate bone using bone growth factors. This paper reviews the evolution of materials used over time in addition to the various advantages and pitfalls associated with each change. It is important for neurosurgeons to be mindful of how these techniques have evolved in order to gain a better understanding of this procedure and how it has been adapted.


Subject(s)
Bone Transplantation , Craniotomy , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Skull/surgery , Bone Substitutes/history , Bone Transplantation/history , Bone Transplantation/instrumentation , Bone Transplantation/methods , Craniotomy/history , Craniotomy/instrumentation , Craniotomy/methods , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , History, Ancient , History, Medieval , Humans , Prostheses and Implants
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...