Feasibility and Acceptability of the Project Faith Influencing Transformation Intervention in Faith-Based Settings.

African Americans (AAs) are disproportionately burdened with diabetes and prediabetes. Predominately AA churches may be optimal settings for reaching AAs at greatest diabetes risk, along with related morbidities and mortalities. The current study used the RE-AIM framework to qualitatively examine the feasibility, acceptability, and satisfaction with the Project Faith Influencing Transformation (FIT) intervention, a diabetes risk reduction intervention in AA churches. Participants were (N = 21) church and community members who also participated in the larger Project FIT intervention and were primarily female, with an average age of 60 years (SD = 11.1). Participants completed a brief survey and focus group discussion. Participants discussed intervention effectiveness in changing health behaviors and outcomes, with high rates of adoption, acceptability, and satisfaction across churches that conducted the intervention. Participants also discussed outreach to members of the broader community, the role of the pastor, and challenges to intervention implementation and maintenance-tailored strategies to improve intervention effectiveness are discussed. Given the significant diabetes disparities that exist for AAs, it is imperative to continue to investigate best practices for reaching communities served by churches with sustainable, relevant health programming. This study has the potential to inform more effective, tailored diabetes prevention interventions for high-risk AAs in faith-based settings.

Stress Cardiomyopathy Induced by Refractory Hypoglycemia Due to Acute Sulfonylurea Intoxication.

Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TCM) is a reversible syndrome that resembles a myocardial infarction but without typical coronary stenosis and with an apical "ballooning" image present on an echocardiogram. Multiple triggers have been linked to TCM but rarely, acute severe hypoglycemia. This is a case of a 39-year-old woman who was brought to the emergency department after being found unresponsive at home. She was severely hypoglycemic with a glucose of 18 mg/dL and suspected to have sulfonylurea intoxication. The patient was intubated and transferred to our ICU from an outside facility for a higher level of care. The patient was noted to have an elevated troponin and the initial echocardiogram demonstrated TCM. The patient remained persistently hypoglycemic, despite continuous dextrose infusion and glucagon treatment. Stress dose steroids were added with the eventual resolution of hypoglycemia. A repeat echocardiogram demonstrated the resolution of TCM.

Perceptions of difference and disdain on the self-stigma of mental illness.

BACKGROUND: People with mental illness are viewed as different and disdained by the general population leading to public stigma. When public stigma becomes internalized, it results in self-stigma. Content-less measures of stigma have shown to benefit studying public stigma, but research on self-stigma is limited. AIMS: This study sought to validate the use of content-less measures (Difference and Disdain) to assess self-stigma of mental illness. METHODS: Participants with lived experience (N = 291) completed a survey including measures of Difference and Disdain for self-stigma and outcomes assessing depression, self-esteem, recovery and the "Why Try" effect. Factor structure of Difference and Disdain across stages of self-stigma and their effects on harmful outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Factor structure was not supported. Reliability analysis suggested a two-stage conceptualization of self-stigma for Difference and Disdain characterized by early (i.e. aware, agree) and late stages (i.e. apply, harm). Disdain was found to independently contribute to significant harmful outcomes, especially in the late stages. CONCLUSIONS: Disdain seems to be the driver of the egregious effects of self-stigma for people with mental illness. Anti-stigma efforts should focus on stereotypes of Disdain in the future.

Stigma and coping experiences in Latinx individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis.

AIM: The experiences of culturally diverse individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR) is not well studied. Exploratory research needs to examine whether differences exist between racial/ethnic groups within the CHR population. Understanding experiences of Latinx patients is of importance, as the Latinx population represents the most rapidly growing paediatric population in the United States and they face significant barriers to mental health treatment. Because Latinx persons experience high rates of mental illness-based stigma and discrimination in their communities, they may face additional stigma-based barriers to CHR treatment. METHOD: Twenty-six participants (15 Latinx, 11 non-Latinx white/NLW) who met CHR criteria based on the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes (SIPS) were interviewed regarding stigma associated with CHR identification and symptoms. Using a consensus-based open-coding thematic analysis approach, data were analysed for stigma, discrimination, and coping responses. RESULTS: Instances of internalization of stereotypes appeared to be more salient to NLW participants than Latinx participants, and Latinx participants reported seemingly more anticipated rejection from stereotypes than NLW participants. Experiences of discrimination also appeared to be more salient to Latinx participants than NLW participants. Moreover, Latinx participants reported evidently greater instances of discrimination across anticipated, individual, and structural discrimination. Finally, while covering strategies appeared to be more salient to NLW's, Latinx clients more often described using secrecy as well as a greater range of coping responses, including empowerment. CONCLUSION: While the experience of anticipated rejection appeared to be more salient to Latinx CHR participants and they seemingly report more secrecy than NLW, they also engaged in empowerment-related coping strategies. Future research should continue to explore the roles of cultural values in influencing coping strategies among CHR individuals.

Formal peer-support services that address priorities of people with psychiatric disabilities: A systematic review.

Formal peer-support services are provided by people with shared lived experience of serious mental illness and recovery to help others with psychiatric disabilities address their priorities in, among other things, transitioning from hospitals, dealing with physical health, and illness management/recovery. This article summarizes a systematic review of the impact of formal peer services on these priorities. We used PRISMA Guidelines to review the existing research literature from 1995 to 2020; the first wave of our review yielded 424 studies which were then reduced to 68 quantitative investigations included for coding and syntheses. A graph of the trajectory of published articles per 5-year period showed a steady increase up to 2015 when the frequency of studies then leveled out. Using randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as one index of design quality, we found more than two-thirds of studies included an RCT. We used inferential analyses based on primary impact as defined by hypotheses as outcome indicator. Four of 68 studies suggested iatrogenic effects of peer services related to hospitalization, physical quality of life, and employment. A frequency of significant positive benefits for outcome ranged from 46.2% to 100% of findings. Future research should seek to identify personal-level factors that indicate greater benefits for peer support; this provides direction for tailoring the intervention. Personal-level variables include the role of diversity and social disadvantage in the benefits of formal peer-support programs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

A Comparison of the Pulmonary Valve, Main Pulmonary Artery, and Branch Pulmonary Artery Measurements by Echocardiography and Computed Tomography Scan.

INTRODUCTION: Congenital heart diseases (CHD) are one of the most commonly occurring congenital anomalies. Echocardiography is usually the initial investigation for suspected CHD. However, it is operator-dependent and limited by available chest windows. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scan provides superior temporal and spatial resolution producing excellent cross-sectional anatomical images. MDCT is specifically helpful for pulmonary artery anomalies if not clearly visible on an echocardiogram. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: The study aims to compare measurements of branch pulmonary arteries, pulmonary valve, and main pulmonary artery obtained from trans-thoracic echocardiography measurements and MDCT. Forty-nine patients younger than 17 years of age underwent MDCT, and an echocardiogram was included in the study. The measurements of the pulmonary valve, main pulmonary artery, and branch pulmonary arteries were measured on MDCT and echocardiogram. RESULTS: Bland-Altman analysis revealed the mean difference (95% confidence limits) in measurements of diameter between echocardiogram and MDCT for the right pulmonary artery, left pulmonary artery, pulmonary valve, and main pulmonary artery, which were -0.5 (-3.1, 2.2) mm, -0.6 (-3.3, 2.1) mm, 0.7 (-2.5, 3.9) mm, and 1.2 (-6.9, 4.5) mm, respectively. CONCLUSION:  The analysis revealed acceptable agreement in measurements of the pulmonary valve, main pulmonary artery, and branch pulmonary arteries obtained from MDCT and echocardiogram. The difference was marginally more for the main pulmonary artery compared to the pulmonary valve and branch pulmonary arteries.

COVID-19 Pandemic: Knowledge and Perceptions of the Public and Healthcare Professionals.

Background and objective The recent pandemic due to the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has become a major concern for the people and governments across the world due to its impact on individuals as well as on public health. The infectiousness and the quick spread across the world make it an important event in everyone's life, often evoking fear. Our study aims at assessing the overall knowledge and perceptions, and identifying the trusted sources of information for both the general public and healthcare personnel. Materials and methods This is a questionnaire-based survey taken by a total of 1,246 respondents, out of which 744 belonged to the healthcare personnel and 502 were laypersons/general public. There were two different questionnaires for both groups. The questions were framed using information from the World Health Organization (WHO), UpToDate, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Center for Disease Control (CDC), National Institute of Health (NIH), and New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) website resources. The questions assessed awareness, attitude, and possible practices towards ensuring safety for themselves as well as breaking the chain of transmission. A convenient sampling method was used for data collection. Descriptive statistics [mean(SD), frequency(%)] were used to portray the characteristics of the participants as well as their awareness, sources of information, attitudes, and practices related to SARS-CoV-2. Results The majority (94.3%) of the respondents were Indians. About 80% of the healthcare professionals and 82% of the general public were worried about being infected. Various websites such as ICMR, WHO, CDC, etc., were a major source of information for the healthcare professional while the general public relied on television. Almost 98% of healthcare professionals and 97% of the general public, respectively, identified 'Difficulty in breathing" as the main symptom. More than 90% of the respondents in both groups knew and practiced different precautionary measures. A minority of the respondents (28.9% of healthcare professionals and 26.5% of the general public) knew that there was no known cure yet. Almost all respondents from both the groups agreed on seeking medical help if breathing difficulty is involved and self-quarantine if required. Conclusion Most healthcare professionals and the general public that we surveyed were well informed about SARS-CoV-2 and have been taking adequate measures in preventing the spread of the same. There is a high trust of the public in the government. There are common trusted sources of information and these need to be optimally utilized to spread accurate information.

HIV Risk and Sociodemographic Factors Associated with Physician-Advised HIV Testing: What Factors Are Overlooked in African American Populations?

HIV is diagnosed at eight times the rate in African Americans (AAs) compared to whites. One-third of AAs have never been tested for HIV. Studies indicate low rates of HIV testing in healthcare settings, so understanding missed opportunities for HIV testing can inform prevention efforts in these settings. Our study examined predictors of self-reported physician-advised HIV testing using baseline survey data (N = 1500) from Taking It to the Pews (TIPS), a church-basedHIV/STD testing and education intervention. One-third (33%) of participants reported that their physician ever suggested an HIV test. Results indicated that participants who identified as homosexual/bisexual, received Medicaid or were uninsured, and/or had previously diagnosed STDs were more likely to report physician-advised HIV testing. AA churches provide a unique opportunity to increase the reach of HIV testing and may be well-positioned to equip their church and community members with information on HIV risk and strategies to advocate for physician-advised routine HIV testing in medical settings.

Addressing the public health concerns of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder: Impact of stigma and health literacy.

BACKGROUND: Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD) are a group of developmental disabilities that may result from the mother's consumption of alcohol during pregnancy. The present study examined the effects of health literacy and stigma on the public health agenda for preventing FASD. METHODS: Three hundred and forty-one participants were sampled to ascertain levels of endorsement of the public health priorities of FASD, and FASD health literacy. Stigma towards women who consume alcohol during pregnancy, and towards biological mothers of children with FASD were operationalized using ratings of difference and disdain. RESULTS: Public stigma towards women who consume alcohol during pregnancy was greater than stigma towards biological mothers of children with FASD. Research participants with higher FASD literacy were more likely to endorse the prevention priorities of FASD, but also more likely to endorse greater stigma towards biological mothers of children with FASD. Interestingly, those who endorsed greater stigma supported the public health priorities of FASD more strongly. Female research participants more strongly supported the prevention priorities of FASD than male participants. Male participants were more likely to endorse stigma than female participants. CONCLUSIONS: Stigma experienced by biological mothers of children with FASD generalizes to women who consume alcohol while pregnant. Some results were contrary to expectations: stigma was positively associated with health literacy and endorsement of prevention priorities of FASD. Reasons for these findings are speculated and should be tested in future research.

The Public Stigma of Birth Mothers of Children with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders.

BACKGROUND: Stigma affects not only the person with a stigmatizing condition such as fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD), but also their family members. This study examined whether there are stigmatizing attitudes about biological mothers of children with FASD in a crowdsourced sample. METHODS: Three hundred and eighty-nine participants were asked to rate levels of difference, disdain, and responsibility on 4 conditions: serious mental illness (MI), substance use disorder (SUD), jail experience, and FASD. A budget allocation task was administered as a proxy of discrimination. Prior experience with each of the 4 conditions was noted to assess familiarity. RESULTS: Research participants viewed mothers of children with FASD as more different, disdained, and responsible than women with serious MI, SUD, and jail experience. Budget allocation toward FASD service programs was significantly lower than that toward all other human service programs. Familiarity with the 3 comparison conditions moderated most of the stigma ratings, but this effect was not seen in the FASD condition. CONCLUSIONS: Results supported the notion that mothers of children with FASD are highly stigmatized for their past behavior. The data also suggested that the public might discriminate against this population. Stigma reduction interventions should focus on contact-based strategies, rather than education-based strategies.

Educational intervention to improve intravenous cannulation skills in paediatric nurses using low-fidelity simulation: Indian experience.

INTRODUCTION: Inserting, monitoring and maintaining intravenous access are essential components of nursing. We evaluated simulation training on a manikin to improve cannulation skills. METHODS: Nursing staff managing paediatric patients were asked to cannulate NITA Newborn-1800 manikin before and after appropriate training. Skills were assessed by a single assessor using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) checklist. Four steps were identified as critical. A score of 8/10 (80%) was considered satisfactory. Knowledge was assessed by 10 questions. A training module consisting of theoretical aspects, PowerPoint presentations, videos and hands on training over a manikin was conducted. Post-training assessment was done 1 week later. RESULTS: Seventy-five (80.6%) nurses who completed preassessments and postassessments were assessed for paired comparisons of knowledge and skill. The majority of the nurses were females, had contractual appointment, were in their early career phase and from the paediatric wards. The mean (SD) post-training knowledge score was greater vis-a-vis pretraining score (7.52 (1.58) vs 5.32 (1.57), P<0.001). A similar result was observed for total OSCE scores (9.22 (0.66) vs 7.91 (1.11), P<0.001). Significantly higher proportion of participants exhibited intravenous cannulation satisfactorily after the training vis-a-vis pretraining assessment (69 (92%) vs 36 (48%), P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Training using manikin showed improvement in post-training score of intravenous cannulation skill of paediatric nurses; however, this finding needs further confirmation by a randomised control trial, as our study does not have a control group.