Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 168(1): 59-64, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35380876

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the financial trends in Medicare reimbursement rates for the most billed procedures at a single institution from 2000 to 2020 within pediatric otolaryngology. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis. SETTING: United States. METHODS: The most billed surgical and in-office procedures in pediatric otolaryngology at our institution were identified in the Physician Fee Schedule Look-up Tool from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to extract reimbursement data for each CPT code (Current Procedural Terminology). Monetary data were adjusted for inflation to 2020 US dollars per the changes to the consumer price index. Mean annual and total percentage changes in reimbursement were calculated by the adjusted values for all included procedures (N = 25). RESULTS: From 2000 to 2020, without adjusting for inflation, reimbursement for the most billed procedures increased by 10.9%, while the allocated relative value unit per procedure increased by 15.4%. However, when adjusted for inflation, reimbursement for these procedures decreased by 27.5% over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings identify a downward trend in reimbursement for the most billed procedures in pediatric otolaryngology at our institution. Given the low predominance of pediatric otolaryngology codes within Medicare reimbursement, these codes are rarely reviewed for accurate revaluation. It is imperative that our professional society remain active and engaged within this process to ensure quality delivery of care to our patients.


Subject(s)
Insurance, Health, Reimbursement , Physicians , Aged , Child , United States , Humans , Medicare , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Retrospective Studies , Fee Schedules
2.
Sleep ; 45(5)2022 05 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35554583

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Obstructive sleep apnea is associated with neurobehavioral dysfunction, but the relationship between disease severity as measured by the apnea-hypopnea index and neurobehavioral morbidity is unclear. The objective of our study is to compare the neurobehavioral morbidity of mild sleep-disordered breathing versus obstructive sleep apnea. METHODS: Children 3-12 years old recruited for mild sleep-disordered breathing (snoring with obstructive apnea-hypopnea index < 3) into the Pediatric Adenotonsillectomy Trial for Snoring were compared to children 5-9 years old recruited for obstructive sleep apnea (obstructive apnea-hypopnea 2-30) into the Childhood Adenotonsillectomy Trial. Baseline demographic, polysomnographic, and neurobehavioral outcomes were compared using univariable and multivariable analysis. RESULTS: The sample included 453 participants with obstructive sleep apnea (median obstructive apnea-hypopnea index 5.7) and 459 participants with mild sleep-disordered breathing (median obstructive apnea-hypopnea index 0.5). By polysomnography, participants with obstructive sleep apnea had poorer sleep efficiency and more arousals. Children with mild sleep-disordered breathing had more abnormal executive function scores (adjusted odds ratio 1.96, 95% CI 1.30-2.94) compared to children with obstructive sleep apnea. There were also elevated Conners scores for inattention (adjusted odds ratio 3.16, CI 1.98-5.02) and hyperactivity (adjusted odds ratio 2.82, CI 1.83-4.34) in children recruited for mild sleep-disordered breathing. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal executive function, inattention, and hyperactivity were more common in symptomatic children recruited into a trial for mild sleep-disordered breathing compared to children recruited into a trial for obstructive sleep apnea. Young, snoring children with only minimally elevated apnea-hypopnea levels may still be at risk for deficits in executive function and attention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Pediatric Adenotonsillectomy for Snoring (PATS), NCT02562040; Childhood Adenotonsillectomy Trial (CHAT), NCT00560859.


Subject(s)
Sleep Apnea Syndromes , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive , Tonsillectomy , Adenoidectomy , Child , Child, Preschool , Clinical Trials as Topic , Humans , Morbidity , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/complications , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/surgery , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/complications , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/surgery , Snoring/complications , Snoring/surgery
3.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 157: 111115, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35500331

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute otitis media (AOM), or ear infection, is the most common reason for pediatric medical visits in the United States [1]. Additionally, transportation barriers are a significant driver of missed and delayed care across medical specialties [2,3]. Yet, the role of transportation barriers in impeding access for children with frequent ear infections (FEI) has not been investigated. Assessing the prevalence of transportation barriers across sociodemographic groups may help clinicians improve outcomes for children with FEI. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the U.S. National Health Interview Survey was completed to examine associations between sociodemographic characteristics among children with FEI and transportations barriers to seeking care between 2011 and 2018. RESULTS: Multivariable logistic regression found that income level, insurance status, and health status were linked to disparities in transportation barriers among children with FEI. Those in the middle (aOR 3.00, 95% CI 1.77-5.08, p < 0.001) and lowest income brackets (aOR 6.33, 95% CI 3.80, p < 0.001), who were publicly insured (aOR 3.24, 95% CI 2.00-5.23, p < 0.001) or uninsured (aOR 3.46, 95% CI 1.84-6.51, p < 0.001), and with Poor to Fair health status were more likely to face transportation delays than patients who were in the highest income bracket, privately insured, or had Good to Excellent health status. CONCLUSION: Children with FEI from families that were lower-income, less insured, and less healthy faced more transportation barriers when accessing care than their counterparts. Future interventions to improve health-related transportation should be targeted toward these patient subgroups to reduce gaps in outcomes.


Subject(s)
Insurance, Health , Medically Uninsured , Child , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Insurance Coverage , Poverty , Retrospective Studies , United States
4.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 34(5): 382-7, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23415572

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Establish the time to safely and efficiently perform cochlear implantation (CI) in a university-based academic center. STUDY DESIGN: Case series with chart review. SETTING: Academic neurotologic referral center. PATIENTS: 424 patients who underwent CI surgery between 2002 and 2010. INTERVENTION: Unilateral, bilateral or revision CI using commercially available devices approved for use in the United States. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: mean surgical duration (SD) and mean total operative room time (TORT). RESULTS: Overall mean SD for all 424 patients was 83 ± 30 min (min) whereas the mean TORT was 135 ± 56 min. The mean SD for unilateral CI was 84 ± 18 min for the first implant and 82 ± 22 min for the second implant (p=0.55). The SD for primary and revision CI was 83 ± 18 min and 85 ± 36 min, respectively (p=0.51). The mean SD for pediatric and adult CI was 83 ± 21 min and 83 ± 18 min, respectively (p=0.92). The mean SD without resident assistance was 74 ± 14 min whereas with the assistance of a resident the mean SD was 84 ± 20 min (p=0.02). When ossification was encountered the mean SD was 90 ± 32 min compared to 82 ± 19 min when absent (p<0.001). An association was found between TORT or SD, and the year of surgery, presence of ossification and the involvement of an assistant. CONCLUSION: In a university-based academic center, CI surgery can be safely and efficiently performed, supporting future cost-effectiveness analysis of its current practice.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers , Cochlear Implantation , Deafness/surgery , Hospitals, University , Operating Rooms , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...