A qualitative study of physician perspectives of cost-related communication and patients' financial burden with managing chronic disease.

BACKGROUND: Patient financial burden with chronic disease poses significant health risks, yet it remains outside the scope of clinical visits. Little is known about how physicians perceive their patients' health-related financial burden in the context of primary care. The purpose of this study was to describe physician experiences with patients' financial burden while managing chronic disease and the communication of these issues. METHODS: In November 2013, four focus groups were conducted in an academic medical center. A convenience sample of 29 internal and family medicine resident physicians was used in this study. A semi-structured interview protocol was employed by trained facilitators. Coded transcripts were analyzed for themes regarding physicians' experiences with identifying, managing, and communicating financial burden with their patients in the context of primary care. RESULTS: Major themes identified were 1) patient financial burden with chronic care is visible to physicians, 2) patient's financial burden with chronic care and discussing these issues is important to physicians, 3) ability to identify patients who perceive financial burden is imperfect, 4) communication of financial burden with patients is complex and difficult to navigate, 5) strategies utilized to address concerns are not always generalizable, and 6) physicians have ideas for widespread change to make these conversations easier for them. CONCLUSION: Awareness of physician perspectives in identifying and addressing their patients' disease-related financial burden may better equip researchers and medical educators to develop interventions that aid care teams in better understanding these patient concerns to promote compliance with treatment recommendations.

Clinicopathologic features of primary Merkel cell carcinoma: a detailed descriptive analysis of a large contemporary cohort.

BACKGROUND: Little uniformity exists in the clinical and histologic variables reported with primary Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). OBJECTIVE: To provide a rigorous descriptive analysis of a contemporary cohort and promote the prospective collection of detailed data on MCC for future outcome studies. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A detailed descriptive analysis was performed for clinical and histologic features of 147 patients with 150 primary MCC tumors in a prospectively collected database from 2006 to 2010. RESULTS: The majority (73.5%) of patients were at American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical stage I or II at presentation, 20.4% at stage III, and 6.1% at stage IV. Detailed descriptive clinical and histologic findings are presented. CONCLUSION: Clinical and histologic profiling of primary MCC in the literature is variable and limited. Systematic prospective collection of MCC data is needed for future outcome studies and the ability to compare and share data from multiple sources for this relatively rare tumor.