Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 99(3): 714-722, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34101336

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Measurement of post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) fractional flow reserve (FFR) demonstrates residual ischemia in a large percentage of cases deemed angiographically successful which, in turn, has been associated with worse long-term outcomes. It has recently been shown that a resting pressure index, Pd/Pa, has prognostic value post stenting, however, its diagnostic value relative to FFR post-PCI has not been evaluated. METHODS: The diagnostic accuracy of Pd/Pa in identifying ischemia (FFR≤0.80) pre- and post-PCI was evaluated. Three patient subsets were analyzed. A reference pre-PCI cohort of 1,255 patients (1,560 vessels) was used to measure the accuracy of pre-PCI Pd/Pa vs. FFR. A derivation post-PCI group of 574 patient (664 vessels) was then used to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of post-PCI Pd/Pa vs. FFR. A final prospective validation cohort of 230 patients (255 vessels) was used to test and validate the diagnostic performance of post-PCI Pd/Pa. RESULTS: Median Pd/Pa and FFR were 0.90 (IQR 0.90-0.98) and 0.80 (IQR 0.71-0.88) in the reference pre-PCI model, 0.96 (IQR 0.93-1.00) and 0.87 (IQR 0.77-0.90) in the post-PCI derivation model, and 0.94 (IQR 0.89-0.97) and 0.84 (IQR 0.77-0.90) in the post-PCI validation model respectively. There was a strong linear correlation between Pd/Pa and FFR in all three models (p < 0.0001). Using ROC analysis, the optimal Pd/Pa cutoff value to predict a FFR ≤ 0.80 was ≤0.92 (AUC 0.87) in the pre-PCI model, ≤0.93 (AUC 0.85) in the post-PCI derivation model, and ≤ 0.90 (AUC 0.91) in the post-PCI validation model. Using a hybrid strategy of post-PCI Pd/Pa and post-PCI FFR when necessary (25% patients), overall diagnostic accuracy was improved to 95%. CONCLUSIONS: Pd/Pa has excellent diagnostic accuracy for identifying ischemia post-intervention. Using a hybrid strategy of post-PCI Pd/Pa first, and FFR afterwards, if required, adenosine administration can be avoided in over 75% of physiologic assessments post intervention.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Coronary Stenosis , Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Coronary Vessels , Humans , Ischemia , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Predictive Value of Tests , Registries , Treatment Outcome
2.
JACC Case Rep ; 2(10): 1642-1647, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32839760

ABSTRACT

This case series summarizes our experience of delayed acute myocardial infarction presentations during the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic predominantly driven by patient fear of contracting the virus in the hospital. Many presented with complications rarely seen in the primary percutaneous coronary intervention era including ventricular septal rupture, left ventricular pseudoaneurysm, and right ventricular infarction. (Level of Difficulty: Beginner.).

3.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 12(20): 2002-2014, 2019 10 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31648762

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the prognostic value of post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) distal coronary pressure to aortic pressure ratio (Pd/Pa) in predicting long-term clinical outcomes and to determine whether Pd/Pa combined with fractional flow reserve (FFR) post-intervention provides additional prognostic information superior to either marker alone. BACKGROUND: Post-PCI FFR has been shown to be a predictor of long-term outcomes in numerous studies. The role of post-PCI resting Pd/Pa has not been previously studied in this setting. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing PCI who had pre- and post-PCI Pd/Pa and FFR were followed for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. RESULTS: A total of 574 patients were followed for 30 months (25th to 75th percentile 18 to 46 months). Using receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis post-stenting FFR cutoff of ≤0.86 had the best predictive accuracy of MACE (17% vs. 23%; log-rank p = 0.02), whereas post-stenting Pd/Pa ≤0.96 was the best predictor of MACE (15% vs. 24%; log rank p = 0.0006). There was a significant interaction between post-PCI Pd/Pa and FFR on MACE risk such that patients with Pd/Pa ≤0.96 and FFR ≤0.86 had the highest event rate (25%), whereas those with Pd/Pa >0.96 and FFR >0.86 had the lowest event rate (15%), which was not different from patients with Pd/Pa >0.96 and FFR ≤0.86 (17%). In a fully adjusted Cox regression analysis, Pd/Pa was an independent predictor of MACE (hazard ratio: 2.07; 95% confidence interval: 1.3 to 3.3; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Post-PCI resting Pd/Pa is a powerful prognostic tool for MACE prediction. It adds complementary and incremental risk stratification over established factors including post-PCI FFR.


Subject(s)
Aorta/physiopathology , Arterial Pressure , Cardiac Catheterization , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Coronary Vessels/physiopathology , Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Aged , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis , Coronary Artery Disease/mortality , Coronary Artery Disease/physiopathology , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/mortality , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...