Does prior transurethral resection of prostate have a negative impact on the outcome of holmium laser enucleation of prostate? Results from a prospective comparative study.

Objectives: To prospectively evaluate safety and efficacy of holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP) for surgical treatment of recurrent symptoms due to prostatomegaly after prior transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). Materials and Methods: We prospectively evaluated 43 patients with a history of TURP who underwent HoLEP (study group). Patients in chronological order who underwent HoLEP without prior TURP were included in the control group. We hypothesized that prior TURP would increase technical difficulties, thereby leading to a reduction in procedure efficiency by 25%. Patients' demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data were compared, and statistical analysis was performed. Results: Demographic data in both groups were comparable. The average interval between past TURP and HoLEP was 4.22 years. There was no difficulty in identifying the dissection plane in the study group and the difference in the procedure efficiency between the study and the control groups were statistically insignificant (0.75 ± 0.31 g/min-study group vs. 0.69 ± 0.36 g/min-control group; P = 0.665). The intraoperative parameters and postoperative outcomes were comparable in both groups. Conclusions: Prior TURP does not negatively impact the outcome of HoLEP in treating symptomatic recurrence for enlarged prostate after initial TURP.

Bilateral same session flexible ureterorenoscopy for endoscopic management of bilateral renal calculi is noninferior to unilateral flexible ureterorenoscopy for management of multiple unilateral renal calculi: outcomes of a prospective comparative study.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to prospectively evaluate safety and efficacy of bilateral same session ureterorenoscopy (BSS-FURS) for management of bilateral renal calculi. METHODS: A prospective comparative study was designed to compare the results of BSS-FURS with unilateral flexible ureterorenoscopy (U-FURS) for management of renal calculi between June 2003 and May 2016. A sample size of 55 patients in each arm was calculated considering a 20% increase in the incidence of complications with BSS-FURS over 15% complication rate in U-FURS (alpha = 0.05; Beta = 0.90). Patient demographics, stone burden, total operative time, postoperative creatinine level, duration of hospital stay, perioperative complications and stone free rate (SFR) were compared in both the groups. The literature pertaining to BSS-FURS was reviewed. RESULTS: Although the study group patients had higher overall stone burden (18.60 ± 7.70 mm vs. 13.32 ± 6.43 mm) and significantly longer operative time (48.30 ± 16.71 min vs. 32.95 ± 13.05 min; p < 0.05) as compared to the control group, the length of hospital stay, SFR (67.85% vs. 78.5%; p = 0.436) and perioperative complications were comparable in both the groups. Most patients who developed postoperative fever from both groups had struvite stones. CONCLUSION: BSS-FURS is a safe and efficient procedure for the management of bilateral renal calculi in the hands of an experienced endourologist. It has comparable SFR and morbidity compared to U-FURS. Caution should be exercised in patients with struvite stones, as they are more likely to develop postoperative fever.

A prospective evaluation of high- and low-power holmium laser settings for transurethral lithotripsy in the management of adults with large bladder calculi.

PURPOSE: To prospectively investigate the efficacy and safety of high-power (100 W) vs low-power (20 W) laser settings for transurethral laser lithotripsy in the management large vesical calculi (> 4 cm). METHODS: All patients with vesical calculi > 4 cm in the maximum dimension and scheduled for transurethral holmium laser lithotripsy were invited to participate in the study. Every alternate patient was treated with either the low- or high-power laser settings. We used a continuous irrigation resectoscope with laser bridge or a laser working element (Karl Storz) for laser lithotripsy of bladder stones. We compared the operative time, intra-operative/post-operative complications (up to 1 year), and stone-free rates between the treatment groups using IBM SPSS Statistics 24 software. Comparisons between treatment groups for continuous variables were assessed using the Welch test, while categorical variables were compared with either the Chi-square or Fisher's exact test. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Twenty patients with ten in each cohort were recruited. Preoperative data and mean bladder stone size were comparable in both groups. The duration of surgery was significantly reduced from 70.80 ± 25.28 min in low-power cohort to 40.90 ± 15.01 min in the high-power group (p = 0.005). There were no significant intra-operative complications in either group. All patients were stone-free following the procedure. CONCLUSION: High-power laser setting of up to 100 W results in a significant reduction in duration of surgery without any increase in the complication rate for treatment of large bladder stones.

A randomized controlled trial comparing high and medium power settings for holmium laser enucleation of prostate.

PURPOSE: To report the results of a randomized controlled trial comparing outcomes between medium power (MP) and high power (HP) laser settings for HoLEPs. METHODS: The primary objective was to compare the enucleation efficiency (EE) of HP- HoLEP (80-100 W) with MP-HoLEP (50 - 60 W). The secondary objectives were to compare treatment efficacy and safety between both groups. To show a 25% difference in EE, a sample size of 45 individuals per treatment arm was required (alpha = 0.05; Beta = 0.80). Patients demographic and perioperative factors were analyzed, including EE, hemoglobin drop, duration of catheterization, and length of hospital stay. The surgical outcome was evaluated with AUA symptom score, maximum flow rate, postvoid residual urine, and complications to assess differences between MP and HP HoLEP at baseline, 3 months, 1, and 5 years. Quantitative outcomes were compared with independent sample t tests (2-tailed) and qualitative outcomes were compared with chi-square tests. RESULTS: Preoperative data with the exception of indication for surgery were comparable in both treatment arms. There was no statistically significant difference in enucleation efficiency between the HP-HoLEP and MP-HoLEP laser setting (0.97 ± 0.47 vs. 0.85 ± 0.47 gm/min, p = 0.209). MP laser settings did not increase perioperative or postoperative complications and resulted in durable outcome comparable with HP laser settings at 5-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: MP-HoLEP is safe and efficient and does not compromise the outcome for HoLEPs when compared with HP-HoLEP.

Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate Within 6 Weeks of Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy is Safe and Effective.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of performing Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for the treatment of bladder outlet obstruction secondary to an enlarged prostate within 6-weeks of a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent a HoLEP at our institution, excluding any patients with a confounding urologic history and compared patients who underwent a TRUS-guided 6- or 12-core prostate biopsy, and then underwent a HoLEP within 6 weeks (study group) with all other patients (control group). Our primary outcomes were enucleation efficiency (EE) and perioperative complication rate. Our secondary outcomes included postoperative drop in hemoglobin, duration of catheterization, length of hospital stay, voiding metrics at 1 and 6 months and rate of incidental prostate cancer diagnosed on histopathological examination of prostate specimens after HoLEP. To test for differences between the study and control groups, we performed independent sample t-test (2-tailed) and chi-square tests for quantitative and qualitative variables, respectively. P values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: 552 patients met inclusion criteria and 84 patients underwent prostate biopsy within a period of 45 days prior to HoLEP. Enucleation efficiency was higher in the study group (P = 0.00). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding perioperative complications, postoperative voiding outcomes, or rate of incidental prostate cancer detection. CONCLUSIONS: TRUS prostate biopsy performed within 6 weeks of HoLEP does not negatively impact operative difficulty or treatment outcome.

A randomized control trial evaluating efficacy of nephrostomy tract infiltration with bupivacaine after tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

PURPOSE: We conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of nephrostomy tract infiltration with bupivacaine in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All adult patients undergoing unilateral tubeless PCNL from July 1, 2007 to October 31, 2007 were included in the study. Patients were randomized to receive infiltration of bupivacaine in the nephrostomy tract at the end of the procedure or not to receive bupivacaine. To show a 10% difference in postoperative pain, a sample size of 30 persons per group would be needed. Postoperatively, the pain score were obtained at 4 and 24 hours by a nurse who was blinded to the protocol. The perioperative outcome of these patients (study group) was compared with those undergoing tubeless PCNL without nephrostomy tract infiltration of bupivacaine (control group). RESULTS: Patient demographics and intraoperative parameters in both groups were comparable. Supracostal access was needed in 65.7% and 72.7% patients in the study and control group, respectively. The nephrostomy tract were infiltrated with bupivacaine in 31 patients. The visual analogue pain score at 4 hours and 24 hours for the study group was 2.66 ± 1.07 & 2.23 ± 0.50 respectively, while in control group was 5.15 ± 1.52 and 3.22 ± 1.11, respectively (P=0.000). There was a trend toward lesser analgesia requirement in the study group (94.8 vs 124.2 mg of diclofenac sodium). There was no difference in the duration of postoperative catheterization, hospital stay, stone-free rates, and complication between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Nephrostomy tract infiltration of bupivacaine in tubeless PCNL is associated with less postoperative pain and analgesia requirement.

Sequential holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and laparoscopic extraperitoneal bladder diverticulectomy: initial experience and review of literature.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Urologic applications of laparoscopy and the holmium laser have increased exponentially in the past few years. We present our experience with sequential holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and extraperitoneal laparoscopic diverticulectomy for a large symptomatic bladder diverticulum and associated bladder outlet obstruction. PATIENTS AND METHOD: From June 2004 to June 2005, three patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and a large secondary bladder diverticulum were offered sequential HoLEP and laparoscopic extraperitoneal bladder diverticulectomy. Demographic data and perioperative outcomes were recorded. A review of the literature was performed to determine the present role of laparoscopic diverticulectomy. RESULTS: All patients underwent the planned procedure successfully. The mean operating time was 63.33 minutes for HoLEP and 246.6 minutes for diverticulectomy. Oral intake was resumed after a mean of 8.6 hours. The mean postoperative analgesia required was 146 mg of parecoxib sodium, and the mean drop in hemoglobin was 1.13 g/dL. Patients were discharged after an average of 66.6 hours. At 1-month follow-up, the average American Urological Association Score had improved from 13 to 6, the post-void [corrected] residual urine volume had decreased from 997 mL to 164 mL, and the peak uroflow rate had improved from 4.9 mL/sec to 10.4 mL/sec. These measures showed further improvement on later follow-up. A total of 30 cases of laparoscopic diverticulectomy have been reported in literature [corrected] of which only two were done extraperitoneally. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous HoLEP and laparoscopic extraperitoneal diverticulectomy is an effective strategy for the treatment of BPH with associated large bladder diverticulum.