Midterm Outcomes of Multimodal Approach to Treating Severe Scoliosis in Patients With Osteogenesis Imperfecta.

INTRODUCTION: The surgical management of severe scoliosis in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is challenging because of curve rigidity, small stature, and inherent bone fragility. This study evaluated the midterm outcomes of our multimodal approach to address these issues, integrating perioperative bisphosphonate therapy, preoperative/intraoperative traction, various osteotomies, segmental pedicle screw instrumentation with cement augmentation, and bone morphogenetic protein-2 application. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review of 30 patients (average age 14.1 ± 2.2 years; 18 were female) diagnosed with OI and scoliosis was conducted. These patients underwent posterior spinal fusion between 2008 and 2020 and completed a minimum follow-up of 2 years. We measured radiographic parameters at each visit and reviewed the incidence of complications. A mixed-effects model was used to evaluate changes in radiographic parameters from preoperative measurements to the first and latest follow-ups. RESULTS: The patient cohort consisted of 2 individuals with type I OI, 20 with type III, 6 with type IV, and 2 with other types (types V and VIII). Surgical intervention led to a notable improvement in the major curve magnitude from 76° to 36°, with no notable correction loss. In addition, the minor curve, apical vertical translation, lowest instrumented vertebra tilt, and pelvic obliquity were also improved. In the sagittal plane, thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis remained unchanged while thoracolumbar kyphosis markedly improved. Two patients experienced proximal junctional kyphosis with screw pullout, one of whom required revision surgery. One patient developed a superficial infection that was successfully treated with oral antibiotics. No instances of neurologic deficits or cement extravasation were observed. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of our multimodal approach to treating scoliosis in patients with OI, achieving a 53% major curve correction with minimal complications over 2-year follow-up. These findings provide notable insights into managing scoliosis in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV (case series).

Anterior vertebral body tethering shows clinically comparable shoulder balance outcomes to posterior spinal fusion.

PURPOSE: Posterior spinal fusion (PSF) is the current gold standard in surgical treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a fusionless alternative. Shoulder balance is an important metric for outcomes and patient satisfaction. Here we compare shoulder balance outcomes between PSF and VBT. METHODS: In this retrospective review, the pre-operative and post-operative absolute radiographic shoulder height (|RSH|) of 45 PSF patients were compared to 46 VBT patients. Mean values were compared and then collapsed into discrete groups (|RSH| GROUP) and compared. Patients were propensity score matched. Regression models based on pretest-posttest designs were used to compare procedure type on post-operative outcomes. RESULTS: Pre-operatively there were no differences in |RSH| between PSF and VBT, however, at latest post-operative follow-up PSF maintained a larger |RSH| imbalance compared to VBT (0.91 cm vs 0.63 cm, p = 0.021). In an ANCOVA regression, PSF was associated with a larger |RSH| imbalance compared to VBT, F(1, 88) = 5.76, p = 0.019. An ordinal logistic regression found that the odds ratio of being in a worse |RSH| GROUP for PSF vs VBT is 2.788 (95% CI = 1.099 to 7.075), a statistically significant effect χ2(1) = 4.658, p = 0.031. Results were similar in subgroup analyses of Lenke 1 and Lenke 2 patients, though to less statistical significance. CONCLUSION: While PSF was found to be associated with worse |RSH| outcomes, the actual numbers (2-3 mm) are unlikely to be clinically meaningful. Thus, in this analysis, VBT can be said to show comparable shoulder balance outcomes to PSF.

Differences in spine growth potential for Sanders maturation stages 7A and 7B have implications for treatment of idiopathic scoliosis.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to clarify the differences in spine and total body height growth and curve progression between Sanders maturation stage (SMS) 7A and 7B in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). METHODS: This retrospective case-control study involving patients with AIS at SMS 7 evaluated the differential gains in the spine (T1-S1) and total body height and curve progression between SMS 7A and 7B. A validated formula was used to calculate the corrected height, accounting for height loss due to scoliosis. A multivariable non-linear and logistic regression model was applied to assess the distinct growth and curve progression patterns between the SMS 7 subtypes, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 231 AIS patients (83% girls, mean age 13.9 ± 1.2 years) were included, with follow-up averaging 3.0 years. Patients at SMS 7A exhibited larger gains in spine height (9.9 mm vs. 6.3 mm) and total body height (19.8 mm vs. 13.4 mm) compared with SMS 7B. These findings remained consistent even after adjustments for curve magnitude. Non-linear regression models showed continued spine and total body height increases plateauing after 2 years, significantly greater in SMS 7A. More SMS 7A patients had curve progression over 10°, with an adjusted odds ratio of 3.31. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that patients staged SMS 7A exhibited more spine and total body growth and a greater incidence of substantial curve progression than those at 7B. These findings imply that delaying brace discontinuation until reaching 7B could be beneficial, particularly for those with larger curves. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III (Case-control study).

Incidence of Tether Breakage in Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic anterior vertebral body tethering (TAVBT) is an emerging treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Tether breakage is a known complication of TAVBT with incompletely known incidence. We aim to define the incidence of tether breakage in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who undergo TAVBT. The incidence of tether breakage in TAVBT is hypothesized to be high and increase with time postoperatively. METHODS: All patients with right-sided, thoracic curves who underwent TAVBT with at least 2 and up to 3 years of radiographic follow-up were included. Tether breakage between 2 vertebrae was defined a priori as any increase in adjacent screw angle >5 degrees from the minimum over the follow-up period. The presence and timing of tether breakage were noted for each patient. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to calculate expected tether breakage up to 36 months. χ 2 analysis was performed to examine the relationship between tether breakage and reoperations. Independent t test was used to compare the average final Cobb angle between cohorts. RESULTS: In total, 208 patients from 10 centers were included in our review. Radiographically identified tether breakage occurred in 75 patients (36%). The initial break occurred at or beyond 24 months in 66 patients (88%). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis estimated the cumulative rate of expected tether breakage to be 19% at 24 months, increasing to 50% at 36 months. Twenty-one patients (28%) with a radiographically identified tether breakage went on to require reoperation, with 9 patients (12%) requiring conversion to posterior spinal fusion. Patients with a radiographically identified tether breakage went on to require conversion to posterior spinal fusion more often than those patients without identified tether breakage (12% vs. 2%; P =0.004). The average major coronal curve angle at final follow-up was significantly larger for patients with radiographically identified tether breakage than for those without tether breakage (31 deg±12 deg vs. 26 deg±12 deg; P =0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of tether breakage in TAVBT is high, and it is expected to occur in 50% of patients by 36 months postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering: A Review of the Available Evidence.

Idiopathic scoliosis is a complex three-dimensional deformity of the spine with anterior overgrowth (hypokyphosis), coronal curvature, and axial rotation. Scoliosis treatment in the skeletally immature spine is therapeutically challenging because of growth and was commonly limited to observation, bracing treatment, or fusion. Fusion accomplishes powerful deformity correction at the expense of future growth and mobility of the involved segments, increasing the risk of adjacent segment degeneration and intervertebral disk disease later in life. Anterior vertebral body tethering is a motion-preserving technique that exploits the Hueter-Volkmann principle by applying compression at the anterior and convex aspects of the curve to stimulate differential vertebral growth for gradual deformity reduction without fusion. The appropriate timing, curve magnitude, tensioning, growth prediction, indications, and limitations of tethering are being refined as this technique becomes more prevalent. Early outcome studies show that growth modulation with vertebral body tethering is safe, can achieve good results, and preserve motion in select patients.

Predictors of Rod Length Gain and Sagittal Alignment Change After Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod Lengthening.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: There are preoperative characteristics that predict rod lengthening of magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR). The lengthening of MCGR will lead to increased kyphosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The amount of length gained by MCGR is variable, and predictors are lacking. Similarly, sagittal plane changes over the MCGR lengthening period have not been investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with MCGR and a minimum 2-year follow-up were identified and those with previous spine surgery were excluded. Preimplantation, postimplantation, and last follow-up postlengthening radiographs were examined. Multiple linear regression analyses were used for rod length gain predictors. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients with early-onset scoliosis met inclusion criteria: nine idiopathic, five congenital, 14 neuromuscular, 20 syndromic, and eight skeletal dysplasia patients. No difference was seen between subtypes of early-onset scoliosis for rod length gain ( P =0.62). Shorter preoperative T1-T12 height and higher curve correction rate after implantation were significant predictors for rod length gain ( P <0.001). Preoperative major curve magnitude and kyphosis were not significant predictors. Flattening of the spine around the actuator and compensative increase in T1-T5 kyphosis were seen secondarily after MCGR implantation. Maximum sagittal kyphosis, T1-T5 kyphosis, and T5-T12 kyphosis did not change during lengthening. Lumbar lordosis significantly decreased postimplantation (first erect) but then increased during lengthening. Pelvic incidence and sacral slope both increased during lengthening, but this may be age related. CONCLUSION: Patients who gained the most rod length with MCGR were those with an initially shorter T1-T12 height and better initial curve correction at implantation, likely representing that implants work best in small patients with flexible curves. Diagnosis, preoperative curve magnitude, and thoracic kyphosis were not related to rod length gain. Thoracic kyphosis did not deteriorate over the lengthening phase. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective cohort study.

Intraoperative neuromonitoring predicts postoperative deficits in severe pediatric spinal deformity patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate intraoperative monitoring (IOM) alerts and neurologic deficits during severe pediatric spinal deformity surgery. METHODS: Patients with a minimum Cobb angle of 100° in any plane or a scheduled vertebral column resection (VCR) with minimum 2-year follow-up were prospectively evaluated (n = 243). Preoperative, immediate postoperative, and 2-year postoperative neurologic status were reported. Radiographic data included preoperative and 2-year postoperative coronal and sagittal Cobb angles and deformity angular ratios (DAR). IOM alert type and triggering event were recorded. SRS-22r scores were collected preoperatively and 2-years postoperatively. RESULTS: IOM alerts occurred in 37% of procedures with three-column osteotomy (n = 36) and correction maneuver (n = 32) as most common triggering events. Patients with IOM alerts had greater maximum kyphosis (101.4° vs. 87.5°) and sagittal DAR (16.8 vs. 12.7) (p < 0.01). Multivariate regression demonstrated that sagittal DAR independently predicted IOM alerts (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.08) with moderate sensitivity (60.2%) and specificity (64.8%) using a threshold value of 14.3 (p < 0.01). IOM alerts occurred more frequently in procedures with new postoperative neurologic deficits (17/24), and alerts with both SSEP and TCeMEP signals were associated with new postoperative deficits (p < 0.01). Most patients with new deficits experienced resolution at 2 years (16/20) and had equivalent postoperative SRS-22r scores. However, patients with persistent deficits had worse SRS-22r total score (3.8 vs. 4.2), self-image subscore (3.5 vs. 4.1), and function subscore (3.8 vs. 4.3) (p ≤ 0.04). CONCLUSION: Multimodal IOM alerts are associated with sagittal kyphosis, and predict postoperative neurologic deficits. Most patients with new deficits experience resolution of their symptoms and have equivalent 2-year outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

The Role of Liposomal Bupivacaine in Multimodal Pain Management Following Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Faster and Farther With Less Opioids.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective controlled cohort. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of intraoperative liposomal bupivacaine (LB) infiltration on postsurgical pain management in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients by analyzing postoperative opioid consumption, ambulation, and length of stay (LOS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Optimal postoperative pain control for AIS patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) is challenging. Multimodal pain management protocols provide adequate analgesia while decreasing opioid consumption. LB was recently approved for pediatric patients; however, use in AIS patients is understudied. METHODS: 119 consecutive patients with AIS who underwent PSF were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients who received LB as erector spinae block in addition to the standard postoperative pain management protocol (Group A), and patients who received only the standard postoperative pain protocol (Group B). Oral morphine equivalents, intravenous opioid and valium consumption, pain scores (VAS), nausea/vomiting, ambulation distance and LOS were assessed. RESULTS: Group A experienced significantly lower total opioid consumption compared to Group B (44.5 mg vs. 70.2 mg). Morphine use was lower in Group A on postoperative day (POD) 0, and oxycodone use was lower in Group A on PODs 1 and 2. There was a higher proportion of patients who used only oral opioids in Group A (81% vs. 41%). Of patients requiring any intravenous opioids, 79% did not receive LB. A significantly higher proportion of LB patients were discharged on POD 2 (55% vs. 27%); therefore, LOS was shorter for Group A. Group A ambulated further postoperatively. There were no differences in pain scores, valium requirements or nausea/vomiting. CONCLUSIONS: LB was associated with decreased total opioid use, shorter LOS, and improved ambulation in AIS patients undergoing PSF. Including LB in multimodal pain management protocols proved effective in reducing opioid use while increasing mobilization in the immediate postoperative period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Fifteen Years of Spinal Fusion Outcomes in Children With Cerebral Palsy: Are We Getting Better?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter study. OBJECTIVE: We reviewed 15-year trends in operative factors, radiographic and quality of life outcomes, and complication rates in children with cerebral palsy (CP)-related scoliosis who underwent spinal fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Over the past two decades, significant efforts have been made to decrease complications and improve outcomes of this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a multicenter registry of pediatric CP patients who underwent spinal fusion from 2008 to 2020. We evaluated baseline and operative, hospitalization, and complication data as well as radiographic and quality of life outcomes at a minimum 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: Mean estimated blood loss and transfusion volume declined from 2.7±2.0 L in 2008 to 0.71±0.34 L in 2020 and 1.0±0.5 L in 2008 to 0.5±0.2 L in 2020, respectively, with a concomitant increase in antifibrinolytic use from 58% to 97% (all, P <0.01). Unit rod and pelvic fusion use declined from 33% in 2008 to 0% in 2020 and 96% in 2008 to 79% in 2020, respectively (both, P <0.05). Mean postoperative intubation time declined from 2.5±2.6 to 0.42±0.63 days ( P< 0.01). No changes were observed in preoperative and postoperative coronal angle and pelvic obliquity, operative time, frequency of anterior/anterior-posterior approach, and durations of hospital and intensive care unit stays. Improvements in the Caregiver Priorities and Child Health Index of Life with Disabilities postoperatively did not change significantly over the study period. Complication rates, including reoperation, superficial and deep surgical site infection, and gastrointestinal and medical complications remained stable over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Over the past 15 years of CP scoliosis surgery, surgical blood loss, transfusion volumes, duration of postoperative intubation, and pelvic fusion rates have decreased. However, the degree of radiographic correction, the rates of surgical and medical complications (including infection), and health-related quality of life measures have broadly remained constant.

The Effect of Implant Density on Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Fusion: Results of the Minimize Implants Maximize Outcomes Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) can be treated with instrumented fusion, but the number of anchors needed for optimal correction is controversial. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized study that included patients undergoing spinal fusion for single thoracic curves between 45° and 65°, the most common form of operatively treated AIS. Of the 211 patients randomized, 108 were assigned to a high-density screw pattern and 103, to a low-density screw pattern. Surgeons were instructed to use ≥1.8 implants per spinal level fused for patients in the high-implant-density group or ≤1.4 implants per spinal level fused for patients in the low-implant-density group. The primary outcome measure was the percent correction of the coronal curve at the 2-year follow-up. The power analysis for this trial required 174 patients to show equivalence, defined as a 95% confidence interval (CI) within a ±10% correction margin with a probability of 90%. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean percent correction of the coronal curve was equivalent between the high-density and low-density groups at the 2-year follow-up (67.6% versus 65.7%; difference, -1.9% [95% CI: -6.1%, 2.2%]). In the per-protocol cohorts, the mean percent correction of the coronal curve was also equivalent between the 2 groups at the 2-year follow-up (65.0% versus 66.1%; difference, 1.1% [95% CI: -3.0%, 5.2%]). A total of 6 patients in the low-density group and 5 patients in the high-density group required reoperation (p = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of spinal fusion for primary thoracic AIS curves between 45° and 65°, the percent coronal curve correction obtained with use of a low-implant-density construct and that obtained with use of a high-implant-density construct were equivalent. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Socioeconomic, Racial, and Insurance Disparities in Clinical Outcomes After Surgery Among Patients With Idiopathic Scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic status (SES), race, and insurance type correlate with initial curve severity for patients with idiopathic scoliosis, but less is known regarding how these variables impact surgical outcomes. The objectives of this study were to determine the influence of SES, race, and insurance on preoperative appointment attendance, likelihood of obtaining a preoperative second opinion, brace prescription, missed 6 or 12-month postsurgical appointments, incidence of emergency department visits 0 to 90 days after surgery, and major complications within a year of surgery. METHODS: A review of 421 patients diagnosed with idiopathic scoliosis who underwent surgery at a single high-volume pediatric spinal deformity institution between May 2015 and October 2021 was conducted. Area Deprivation Index, a quantitative measure of SES, was collected. Scores were stratified by quartile; higher scores indicated a lower SES. χ 2 tests for correlation were performed to determine whether clinical outcomes were dependent upon Area Deprivation Index, race, or insurance type; P ≤0.05 was significant. RESULTS: The sample was 313 Caucasian (74%), 69 (16%) black, and 39 (9.3%) other patients. More patients had private versus public insurance (80% vs 20%) and were of higher SES. The likelihood of missing preoperative appointments was higher for black patients ( P = 0.037). Those with lower SES missed more postoperative appointments and received less bracing and second opinions ( P = 0.038, P = 0.017, P = 0.008, respectively). Being black and publicly insured correlated with fewer brace prescriptions ( P < 0.001, P = 0.050) and decreased rates of obtaining second opinions ( P = 0.004,  P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with idiopathic scoliosis surgery who were Caucasian, privately insured, and of higher SES were more likely to seek preoperative second opinions, be prescribed a brace, and attend postoperative appointments. Recognition of the inherent health care disparities prevalent within each pediatric spine surgery referral region is imperative to better inform local and national institutional level programs to educate and assist patients and families most at risk for disparate access to scoliosis care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III; retrospective case-control study.

Do Pedicle Screws That Terminate in the Costovertebral Joint Compromise Proximal Anchor Fixation in a Dual Growing Rod Construct?

INTRODUCTION: Growing rods (GRs) are used to treat early-onset scoliosis (EOS) recalcitrant to bracing and casting. Proximal anchor pullout, a known complication of GR constructs, can result in spinal cord injury if pedicle screw anchors are placed with a lateral-to-medial trajectory. To mitigate this risk, a more straightforward and potentially safer trajectory may result in screws that terminate within the costovertebral joint (CVJ). We asked, how often does CVJ placement occur and does this technique increase the rate of failure in GR constructs? METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 35 patients with EOS treated with dual GR with >2-year follow-up excluding patients with skeletal dysplasia or history of previous posterior instrumentation. Patient demographics, radiographic parameters, and implant constructs were assessed. RESULTS: Of patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 18/35 (51%) were females with an average age of 7.96 (range: 4.0 to 15.2) years at surgery with a follow-up of 3.7 (range: 2.0 to 7.7) years. Five (14%) patients had idiopathic EOS, 5 (14%) had congenital EOS, 12 (34%) had neuromuscular EOS, 10 (29%) had syndromic scoliosis, and 3 (9%) had another etiology for EOS. Among 195 proximal pedicle screws placed, 19 (10%) terminated within the CVJ, and 13 patients (37%) had at least 1 CVJ screw. Two patients (6%) experienced unilateral proximal pullout. In both patients, the anchors on the affected side included 1 of 2 screws within the CVJ. Both patients had constructs that included 2 screws on the side that pulled out and 3 screws on the side that did not. None of the remaining 17 CVJ screws led to implant failure. CONCLUSION: Pedicle screw placement within the CVJ is common and does not appear to significantly contribute to proximal screw pullout; however, it may contribute to unilateral implant failure in constructs employing only 2 proximal screws, where 1 of those 2 screws terminates within the CVJ. Construct modifications should be considered in this scenario. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

BrAIST-Calc: Prediction of Individualized Benefit From Bracing for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter study data were used for model derivation and externally validated using retrospective cohort data. OBJECTIVE: Derive and validate a prognostic model of benefit from bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Trial (BrAIST) demonstrated the superiority of bracing over observation to prevent curve progression to the surgical threshold; 42% of untreated subjects had a good outcome, and 28% progressed to the surgical threshold despite bracing, likely due to poor adherence. To avoid over-treatment and to promote patient goal setting and adherence, bracing decisions (who and how much) should be based on physician and patient discussions informed by individual-level data from high-quality predictive models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Logistic regression was used to predict curve progression to <45° at skeletal maturity (good prognosis) in 269 BrAIST subjects who were observed or braced. Predictors included age, sex, body mass index, Risser stage, Cobb angle, curve pattern, and treatment characteristics (hours of brace wear and in-brace correction). Internal and external validity were evaluated using jackknifed samples of the BrAIST data set and an independent cohort (n=299) through estimates of discrimination and calibration. RESULTS: The final model included age, sex, body mass index, Risser stage, Cobb angle, and hours of brace wear per day. The model demonstrated strong discrimination ( c -statistics 0.83-0.87) and calibration in all data sets. Classifying patients as low risk (high probability of a good prognosis) at the probability cut point of 70% resulted in a specificity of 92% and a positive predictive value of 89%. CONCLUSION: This externally validated model can be used by clinicians and families to make informed, individualized decisions about when and how much to brace to avoid progression to surgery. If widely adopted, this model could decrease overbracing of AIS, improve adherence, and, most importantly, decrease the likelihood of spinal fusion in this population.

Baclofen pumps do not increase risk of complications following spinal fusion.

PURPOSE: To assess the complication risks associated with intrathecal baclofen (ITB) pumps in cerebral palsy (CP) patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) and to determine if timing of pump implantation before or during PSF impacts the risk of complications. METHODS: A prospectively collected multicenter database was retrospectively reviewed to identify CP patients undergoing PSF from 2008 to 2023. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: those with an ITB pump (ITB cohort) and those without (non-ITB cohort). The ITB cohort was further categorized by placement of the pump prior to or during PSF. Cohorts were then compared in terms of postoperative complications, perioperative complications, and need for revision surgery. RESULTS: Four hundred six patients (ITB n = 79 [53 prior to, 26 during PSF], non-ITB n = 326) were included in this analysis. At an average follow-up of 4.0 years (range 2-10 years), there were no significant differences between the ITB and non-ITB cohorts in the rate of perioperative complications (5.0% vs 6.5%, p = 0.80), revision surgeries (2.5% vs 4.6%, p = 0.54), or any complication type, regardless of whether pumps were placed prior to or during PSF, aside from longer surgical times in the latter group. CONCLUSION: Complication rates are similar for ITBs placed prior to and during PSF. Patients with spastic CP may safely be treated with ITB pumps without increased risks of complication or further reoperation/revision following PSF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Non-Fusion Versus Fusion Surgery in Pediatric Idiopathic Scoliosis: What Trade-Offs in Outcomes Are Acceptable for the Patient and Family?

BACKGROUND: Vertebral body tethering and other non-fusion techniques for the treatment of pediatric idiopathic scoliosis are increasing in popularity. There is limited physician consensus on this topic as the result of a paucity of published data regarding which patients most benefit from non-fusion strategies. Thus, much of the decision-making is left to patients and parents, who must select a treatment based on their goals and values and the information available from health-care providers, the internet, and social media. We sought to understand patient and family preferences regarding the attributes of fusion versus non-fusion surgery that drive these choices. METHODS: Patients and families were recruited from 7 pediatric spine centers and were asked to complete a survey-based choice experiment that had been jointly developed with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to evaluate patient preferences. Choices between experimentally designed alternatives were analyzed to estimate the relative importance of outcomes and requirements associated with the choice options (attributes). The attributes included appearance, confidence in the planned correction, spinal motion, device failure, reoperation, and recovery period. The inclusion criteria were (1) an age of 10 to 21 years and (2) a diagnosis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in patients who were considering, or who had already undergone, treatment with fusion or non-fusion surgery. Preference weights were estimated from the expected changes in choice given changes in the attributes. RESULTS: A total of 344 respondents (124 patients, 92 parents, and 128 parent/patient dyads) completed the survey. One hundred and seventy-three patients were enrolled prior to surgery, and 171 were enrolled after surgery. Appearance and motion were found to be the most important drivers of choice. For the entire cohort, fusion was preferred over non-fusion. For patients who were considering surgery, the most important attributes were preservation of spinal motion and appearance. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and families seeking treatment for idiopathic scoliosis value appearance and preservation of spinal motion and, to a lesser extent, reoperation rates when considering fusion versus non-fusion surgery.

Influences of Increasing Pedicle Screw Diameter on Widening Vertebral Pedicle Size during Surgery in Spinal Deformities in Children and Adolescents without Higher Risk of Pedicle and Vertebral Breaches.

BACKGROUND: A very common technique for treating spinal deformities in children and adolescents is the use of segmental screws. In order to obtain proper stability and the best possible correction, the screws must first be precisely inserted. Additional factors influencing the quality and success of the operation are the size and quality of the bone, the skills of the surgeon, and biomechanical factors, i.e., the width and length of the screws used during surgery. Our study was focused on evaluating the effect of increasing the diameter of the instrumented pedicles by pedicle screws and assessing the safety of expanding these pedicles with screws of various sizes in children with spinal deformities during the growth period, using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and postoperative computed tomography (CT) to assess and compare preoperative size measurements from MRI to postoperative CT measurements. METHODS: We obtained data for evaluation from the available medical records and treatment histories of patients aged 2 to 18 who underwent surgical treatment of spinal deformities in the years 2016-2023. In 230 patients (28 male and 202 female), 7954 vertebral bodies were scanned by preoperative MRI, and 5080 pedicle screws were inserted during surgery, which were then assessed by postoperative CT scan. For the most accurate assessment, patients were classified into three age groups: 2-5 years (Group 1), 6-10 years (Group 2), and 11-18 years (Group 3). In addition, we studied implant subgroups: vertebral bodies with inserted pedicles of screw sizes 5.0 mm and 5.5 mm (Group S), and pedicles of screw sizes 6.0 mm, 6.5 mm, and 7.0 mm (Group L). RESULTS: The morphology of pedicles (Lenke classification) analyzed before surgery using MRI was 55.2% type A, 33.8% type B, 4.7% type C, and 6.3% type D. The postoperative lateral and medial breaches were noted, and these did not cause any complications requiring revision surgery. The mean pedicle diameter before surgery for T1-L5 vertebral pedicles was between 3.79 (1.44) mm and 5.68 (1.64) mm. The mean expanding diameter of pedicles after surgery for T1-L5 vertebral pedicles ranged from 1.90 (0.39) mm to 2.92 (0.28) mm, which corresponds to the extension of the pedicle diameter in the mean range of 47% (4.1)-71% (3.0). We noted that the mean vertebral pedicle expansion was 49% in Group 1, 52% in Group 2, and 62% in Group 3 (N.S.), and the mean expansion for 7.0 mm screw pedicles was 78%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that there is a wide range of expansion of the vertebral pedicle during screw insertion (up to 78%) with a low risk of lateral or medial breaches and without an increased risk of complications. The larger the diameter of the screw inserted into the pedicle, the more the pedicle expands. Pedicle measurements by preoperative MRI may be helpful for sufficient reliability in preoperative planning.

Transcranial electric motor evoked potential monitoring during scoliosis surgery in children with cerebral palsy and active seizure disorder: is it feasible and safe?

PURPOSE: Use of spinal cord monitoring in children with cerebral palsy (CP) and neuromuscular scoliosis is challenging. The previous reports suggest low success rates in the setting of CP, and it is unclear if transcranial electric motor evoked potentials (TcMEP) monitoring is contraindicated in patients with an active seizure disorder. The purpose of this study was to determine (1) are patients with CP able to be appropriately monitored with TcMEP? and (2) does TcMEP cause an increase in seizure activity? METHODS: This was an institutional review board-approved retrospective cohort study observing 304 patients from 2011 to 2020. Inclusion criteria included all patients with CP undergoing posterior spinal fusion during this time. Intraoperative data were examined for the ability to obtain monitoring and any intraoperative events. Patients were followed for 3 months postoperatively to determine any increase in seizure activity that could have been attributed to the TcMEP monitoring. RESULTS: Of the 304 patients who were observed, 21% (20.8%) were unable to be monitored due to lacking baseline signals from the extremities. Seventy-seven percent (77.5%) were successfully monitored with TcMEP. For these patients, no increased seizure activity was documented either intra- or postoperatively. CONCLUSION: A high percentage of children (77.5%) with CP were able to be successfully monitored with TcMEP during posterior spinal fusion. Furthermore, the concerns about increased seizure activity after TcMEP were not supported by the data from this cohort. Technical details of successful neuromonitoring in these patients are important and included increased stimulation voltage requirements and latency times. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III retrospective comparative study.

The Sanders Classification and Obesity: Do Obese Kids With AIS Present With More Advanced Skeletal Maturity?

INTRODUCTION: Obese and overweight (OOW) patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) have been shown to initially present with a more advanced Risser score compared to normal weight (NW) patients. The Sanders Maturity Scale (SMS) is now more commonly used by surgeons to assist with treatment decisions because it more reliably predicts skeletal maturity. However, the relationship between SMS and obesity has not been described. We hypothesize that in patients with AIS, OOW patients will have a higher SMS score on initial presentation when compared to NW patients. METHODS: Billing data from 2 different institutions were used to identify patients with AIS presenting to a pediatric orthopaedic spine surgeon for an initial visit between July 2012 and March 2020. We excluded those without height/weight data, spine radiographs, or left-hand radiographs for measuring SMS stage. Body mass index-for-age percentiles were calculated and used to group patients into NW (<85th percentile) or OOW (85th percentile and above) per Centers for Disease Control guidelines. After collecting preliminary data, a power analysis was performed using average SMS scores between NW and OOW patients with an alpha of 0.5, determining a needed sample size of approximately 300 male and 300 female subjects. RESULTS: Five hundred ninety patients (296 female, 294 male) were identified. The SMS stage at presentation was significantly greater in OOW compared to NW patients for both females (5.9±1.8 vs. 5.2±1.7; P =0.003) and males (4.9±1.9 vs. 4.1±1.8; P =0.002). The major curve magnitude for OOW females was significantly different from NW females (36±16 degrees vs. 30±16 degrees; P =0.004). The major curve magnitude was not different for OOW and NW males ( P =0.3). CONCLUSION: At initial presentation, OOW patients present at a greater skeletal maturity as measured by the SMS compared with NW patients. OOW female patients present with a greater major curve magnitudes than NW female patients. These results highlight negative implications of the pediatric obesity epidemic as it relates to the AIS population. These findings can be used to counsel families and provide anticipatory guidance for the AIS treatment plan. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-cross-sectional study.

Subclassification of Sanders Maturation Stage 3 Demonstrates Differences in Spine and Total Height Velocity Between 3A and 3B in Patients with Idiopathic Scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: A single-center retrospective case-control study. OBJECTIVE: To compare the spine and total height velocity between Sanders maturation stage (SMS) 3A and 3B. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Identifying SMS 3 is critical for treating growing children because it represents the early phase of rapid adolescent growth. However, there is limited literature available that clearly describes the growth differences between 3A and 3B. METHODS: The current study included consecutive patients with idiopathic scoliosis staged SMS 3 from January 2012 to December 2021. T1-S1 spine height, total body height, and curve magnitude were measured at the initial and follow-up visits. In addition to the spine and total height velocity calculated per month, corrected height velocity was estimated for curve magnitude using a validated formula. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare SMS 3A and 3B outcomes, followed by a multiple linear regression model to evaluate the association of the SMS subclassifications to growth velocity adjusted for confounding factors. RESULTS: A total of 204 patients (66% girls, mean age: 12.3±1.3 y) met the inclusion criteria. Patients staged SMS 3A had higher spine height velocity (mm/month) in both girls (2.3 vs. 1.5, P<0.001) and boys (2.6 vs. 1.7, P<0.001), as well as total height velocity (mm/month; (5.8 vs. 4.3, P<0.001 for girls; 6.6 vs. 4.5, P<0.001 for boys). Corrected velocity showed similar results with greater spine and total height velocity in SMS 3A. Multivariate analysis indicated a significant association of the SMS subclassification to the spine and total height velocity. The scoliosis curve progression was comparable between SMS 3A and 3B. CONCLUSION: SMS 3A and 3B had differential growth velocity in the spine and total body height. These results advocated the significance of SMS 3 subclassification for managing scoliosis treatment, including observation, bracing, and surgical interventions with fusion and growth modulation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III (Case-control study).

Is spinal height gain associated with rod orientation and the use of cross-links in magnetically controlled growing rods in early-onset scoliosis?

Optimal orientation for magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) is unclear. The objective of this study was to investigate associations of rod orientation with implant-related complications (IRCs) and spinal height gains. Using an international early-onset scoliosis (EOS) database, we retrospectively reviewed 57 patients treated with dual MCGRs from May 2013 to July 2015 with minimum 2-year follow-up. Outcomes of interest were IRCs and left/right rod length gains and thoracic (T1-T12) and spinal (T1-S1) heights. We compared patients with two rods lengthened in the cephalad ( standard; n  = 18) versus opposite ( offset; n  = 39) directions. Groups did not differ in age, sex, BMI, duration of follow-up, EOS cause, ambulatory status, primary curve magnitude, baseline thoracic height, or number of distractions/year. We compared patients whose constructs used ≥1 cross-link (CL group; n  = 22) versus no CLs (NCL group; n  = 35), analyzing thoracic height gains per distraction ( α  = 0.05). Offset and standard groups did not differ in left or right rod length gains overall or per year or in thoracic or spinal height gain. Per distraction, the CL and NCL groups did not differ significantly in left or right rod length or thoracic or spinal height gain. Complications did not differ significantly between rod orientation groups or between CL groups. MCGR orientation and presence of cross-links were not associated with differences in rod length gain, thoracic height, spinal height, or IRCs at 2-year follow-up. Surgeons should feel comfortable using either MCGR orientation. Level of evidence: 3, retrospective.