Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Combination Therapy of Dapagliflozin and Linagliptin Over Dapagliflozin and Vildagliptin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled With Metformin.

Background Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients commonly undergo metformin monotherapy. This study aims to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of combination therapy of dapagliflozin plus linagliptin versus dapagliflozin plus vildagliptin as add-on therapy in T2DM patients inadequately controlled on metformin. Methodology This was an 18-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, phase III clinical study. About 236 participants were randomly assigned to receive either a fixed-dose combination of dapagliflozin 10 mg plus linagliptin 5 mg tablets or a fixed-dose combination of dapagliflozin 10 mg plus vildagliptin SR 100 mg tablets added to metformin monotherapy. The primary outcome was the mean change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline to the end of week 16. The key secondary endpoints were mean change in postprandial blood glucose (PPBG), fasting blood glucose (FBG), body weight, and the proportion of participants achieving HbA1c less than 7.0%. Results The dapagliflozin/linagliptin combination therapy showed a more significant change in HbA1c from baseline to the end of 16 weeks (mean reduction: -1.59% vs. -1.25%) compared to dapagliflozin/vildagliptin (p < 0.0001). Additionally, compared to the dapagliflozin/vildagliptin group, the dapagliflozin/linagliptin group demonstrated a significant reduction in both PPBG (mean reduction: -59.99 mg/dL vs. -55.34 mg/dL) and FPG (mean reduction: -32.91 mg/dL vs. -26.78 mg/dL). A total of 18 adverse events were reported in 17 (7.20%) participants, all of which were mild and resolved completely. There were no serious adverse events. Conclusions Compared to dapagliflozin and vildagliptin combination therapy, dapagliflozin and linagliptin fixed-dose combination provided clinically significant improvements in glycemic control. Because of its effectiveness, safety, and tolerability, the fixed-dose combination of dapagliflozin and linagliptin was a better option for treating T2DM patients who had previously only received metformin monotherapy.

Personalized multimodal management for severe obstructive sleep apnea in a patient intolerant of positive airway pressure with hypoglossal nerve stimulator and mandibular advancement device.

Treatment of moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea poses clinical challenges in persons with intolerance or inadequate response to traditional treatment modalities, including positive airway pressure and mandibular advancement devices. Hypoglossal nerve stimulation is a new treatment option, but few management guidelines exist when it is intolerable or ineffective. Combining several treatment modalities has been an effective strategy for improving symptoms, tolerance, and efficacy. We describe a patient intolerant to positive airway pressure therapy who had continued sleepiness, morning headaches, and snoring with a mandibular advancement device. He underwent hypoglossal nerve stimulation implantation but was intolerant of the voltages required to adequately control his obstructive sleep apnea. Multimodal management with hypoglossal nerve stimulation, mandibular advancement device, and positional therapy was successfully implemented to improve sleepiness, nocturnal symptoms, and the apnea-hypopnea index. This case highlights the personalization and adaptability of combination therapy to suit patient needs while effectively controlling obstructive sleep apnea. CITATION: Lowery MM, Rundo JV, Walia HK, Shah V. Personalized multimodal management for severe obstructive sleep apnea in a patient intolerant of positive airway pressure with hypoglossal nerve stimulator and mandibular advancement device. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(2):403-408.

Association of Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation With Improvements in Long-term, Patient-Reported Outcomes and Comparison With Positive Airway Pressure for Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Importance: Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) and positive airway pressure (PAP) have been shown to improve patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, to our knowledge, there are no data that compare change in PROs between HNS and PAP or that indicate whether HNS improves comorbid insomnia or depression in the long term. Objectives: To determine whether HNS is associated with improvements in patient-reported sleepiness, insomnia, and depression in the long term and to compare the respective associations of HNS and PAP with improved PROs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from patients treated at the Cleveland Clinic for OSA. Participants received either HNS (referred sample) from November 1, 2015, to September 31, 2018, or PAP (previous cohort) from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2014, for OSA. Patients were matched 3:1 for PAP:HNS based on age, body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), sex, and apnea hypopnea index (AHI). Data were collected at baseline and at prespecified follow-up points. Data were analyzed from March 26, 2020, to September 9, 2021. Exposures: Treatment with HNS vs PAP. Main Outcomes and Measures: Data collected included AHI and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; depression) scores. Results: Among 85 patients receiving HNS (mean [SD] age, 62.8 [9.5] years; 59 men [69.4%]; 77 White patients [90.6%]; mean [SD] BMI, 28.8 [3.1]), compared with 217 matched patients receiving PAP (mean [SD] age, 62.1 [9.9] years; 157 men [72.4%]; 173 White patients [81.2%]; mean [SD] BMI, 29.5 [3.1]) included in the analysis, significant improvements were seen in PHQ-9 scores for HNS vs PAP (least square means, -4.06 [95% CI, -5.34 to -2.79] vs -2.58 [95% CI, -3.35 to -1.82]; mean difference, -1.48 [95% CI, -2.78 to -0.19]) with comparable improvements in ESS, FOSQ, and ISI scores. Clinically meaningful differences were observed in 42 of 65 HNS group patients (64.6%) vs 118 PAP group patients (54.5%) for ESS scores, 29 of 49 HNS group patients (59.2%) vs 67 of 217 PAP group patients (30.9%) for FOSQ scores, 14 of 48 HNS group patients (29.2%) vs 53 of 217 PAP group patients (24.4%) for PHQ-9 scores, and 23 of 49 HNS group patients (46.9%) vs 79 of 217 PAP group patients (36.4%) for ISI scores. At the 1-year post-HNS assessment, meaningful improvements were seen in 17 of 28 patients (60.7%) for ESS scores, 11 of 20 patients (55.0%) for FOSQ scores, 7 of 23 patients (30.4%) for PHQ-9 scores, and 11 of 25 patients (44.0%) for ISI scores. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with OSA, sustained improvements in PROs were observed 1 year after HNS and were comparable to those for PAP at 3 months. These findings suggest that HNS is a viable treatment for improving insomnia and depression in patients with OSA.

Association of Sleep-Related Hypoxia With Risk of COVID-19 Hospitalizations and Mortality in a Large Integrated Health System.

Importance: The influence of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and sleep-related hypoxemia in SARS-CoV-2 viral infection and COVID-19 outcomes remains unknown. Controversy exists regarding whether to continue treatment for SDB with positive airway pressure given concern for aerosolization with limited data to inform professional society recommendations. Objective: To investigate the association of SDB (identified via polysomnogram) and sleep-related hypoxia with (1) SARS-CoV-2 positivity and (2) World Health Organization (WHO)-designated COVID-19 clinical outcomes while accounting for confounding including obesity, underlying cardiopulmonary disease, cancer, and smoking history. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case-control study was conducted within the Cleveland Clinic Health System (Ohio and Florida) and included all patients who were tested for COVID-19 between March 8 and November 30, 2020, and who had an available sleep study record. Sleep indices and SARS-CoV-2 positivity were assessed with overlap propensity score weighting, and COVID-19 clinical outcomes were assessed using the institutional registry. Exposures: Sleep study-identified SDB (defined by frequency of apneas and hypopneas using the Apnea-Hypopnea Index [AHI]) and sleep-related hypoxemia (percentage of total sleep time at <90% oxygen saturation [TST <90]). Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes were SARS-CoV-2 infection and WHO-designated COVID-19 clinical outcomes (hospitalization, use of supplemental oxygen, noninvasive ventilation, mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and death). Results: Of 350 710 individuals tested for SARS-CoV-2, 5402 (mean [SD] age, 56.4 [14.5] years; 3005 women [55.6%]) had a prior sleep study, of whom 1935 (35.8%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Of the 5402 participants, 1696 were Black (31.4%), 3259 were White (60.3%), and 822 were of other race or ethnicity (15.2%). Patients who were positive vs negative for SARS-CoV-2 had a higher AHI score (median, 16.2 events/h [IQR, 6.1-39.5 events/h] vs 13.6 events/h [IQR, 5.5-33.6 events/h]; P < .001) and increased TST <90 (median, 1.8% sleep time [IQR, 0.10%-12.8% sleep time] vs 1.4% sleep time [IQR, 0.10%-10.8% sleep time]; P = .02). After overlap propensity score-weighted logistic regression, no SDB measures were associated with SARS-CoV-2 positivity. Median TST <90 was associated with the WHO-designated COVID-19 ordinal clinical outcome scale (adjusted odds ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.10-1.74; P = .005). Time-to-event analyses showed sleep-related hypoxia associated with a 31% higher rate of hospitalization and mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.08-1.57; P = .005). Conclusions and Relevance: In this case-control study, SDB and sleep-related hypoxia were not associated with increased SARS-CoV-2 positivity; however, once patients were infected with SARS-CoV-2, sleep-related hypoxia was an associated risk factor for detrimental COVID-19 outcomes.

Acute lacunar infarct in an obese adolescent with obstructive sleep apnea.

Obstructive sleep apnea is associated with an increased risk of acute ischemic cerebrovascular accidents in adults. However, this association has not been well established in the pediatric population. We report a case of acute right internal capsule lacunar infarct manifesting as left-sided hemiplegia in an adolescent with severe obesity. Severe untreated obstructive sleep apnea was identified during the hospital stay. Positive airway pressure therapy, weight loss, and tonsillectomy eventually normalized sleep-disordered breathing. The patient recovered completely without any residual neurological deficits with multidisciplinary care. Lacunar infarcts due to hypertension-related cerebral vasculopathy are a well-known cause of stroke in adults. Untreated obstructive sleep apnea may cause hypertension and potentially predispose even the pediatric population to develop lacunar infarcts. Polysomnography needs to be considered as a part of the diagnostic algorithm in pediatric patients with stroke. CITATION: Chen B, Gorantla S, Shah V. Acute lacunar infarct in an obese adolescent with obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2021;17(8):1743-1747.

Obstructive sleep apnea and insulin resistance in children with obesity.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Because existing data investigating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and insulin resistance (IR) are inconsistent, we examine OSA and IR in a pediatric obesity clinic. METHODS: Children (2-18 years) in the obesity clinic (2013-2017) undergoing polysomnography (PSG), anthropometric measurements, and fasting laboratory tests were included. Linear regression assessed OSA defined by the obstructive apnea-hypopnea index (oAHI) with the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Secondary aims assessed oxygen desaturation index (ODI) and age interactions with HOMA-IR. Logistic regression models and receiver operating characteristic analysis were performed to investigate optimal oAHI and ODI cutoffs relative to HOMA-IR ≥ 3. RESULTS: Eighty children were included (mean age, 11.4 ± 4.0 years; 56% female; 46% Caucasian; median body mass index [BMI], 34.6 kg/m² [interquartile ratio, 29.9-40.1], median BMI z-score, 2.5 [interquartile ratio, 2.3-2.8); 46% with oAHI ≥ 5 events/h. HOMA-IR was higher in the OSA group (oAHI ≥ 5 events/h): 5 vs 3.8 (P = .034). After adjustment for sex, race, and BMI z-score, oAHI ≥ 5 events/h retained significance with HOMA-IR (P = .041). HOMA-IR increased in older children (age ≥ 12 years) when adjusting for waist circumference z-score and waist-height ratio (statistical interaction, P = .020 and .034, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic showed optimal cut points of oAHI and ODI for predicting significant IR 4.9 (area under the curve, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.83; sensitivity, 0.76; specificity, 0.66) and 4.6 (area under the curve, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.80; sensitivity, 0.70; specificity, 0.67), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In a clinic-based pediatric cohort with obesity, OSA is associated with increased IR even after adjusting for confounders including obesity defined by the BMI z-score. Age ≥ 12 years was associated with AHI relative to IR after adjustment for waist circumference z-score and waist-height ratio. Significant IR could be discriminated by oAHI ≥ 4.9 with moderate sensitivity/specificity. Future studies are needed to verify these findings.

The Protein-Sparing Modified Fast Diet: An Effective and Safe Approach to Induce Rapid Weight Loss in Severely Obese Adolescents.

OBJECTIVES: The protein-sparing modified fast (PSMF) is a rigorous way of rapidly losing a large amount of weight. Although adult studies have shown the PSMF to be effective, data in adolescents are lacking. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of the PSMF in severely obese adolescents. METHODS: 12 subjects who were evaluated in the Obesity Management Program at the Cleveland Clinic from 2011 to 2014 were included. The subjects were initiated on the PSMF after failing other conventional methods of weight loss. Once the goal weight was achieved, subjects were transitioned to the refeeding phase for weight maintenance. RESULTS: Follow-up was scheduled at 3-month (11 patients) and 6-month (6 patients) intervals. At the 6-month follow-up visit, the average weight loss was 11.19 kg (95% confidence interval = -5.4, -27.8, P = .028), with average of 9.8% from baseline. Fifty percent of subjects had >5% weight loss and 20% had >10% weight loss. Four patients were lost to the follow-up (40%). An improvement was noted in total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein. Due to a small sample size these results were not statistically significant. Side effects reported by subjects were mild dehydration due to nausea (2 patients), decreased energy (1 patient), and transient labile mood (1 patient). No life-threatening side effects were reported. CONCLUSION: Our results show that the PSMF diet can be used as an effective and safe method in the outpatient setting for rapid weight loss in adolescents with severe obesity.

Characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients without cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has increased significantly in United States over the last few decades in parallel with the epidemic of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Limited data suggests that HCC could arise in steatotic liver without the presence of cirrhosis. The present study was conducted to characterize patients with NAFLD presenting with HCC in non-cirrhotic liver (NCL) compared to the NAFLD- HCC patients in association with cirrhotic liver (CL). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients diagnosed with HCC and NAFLD diagnosis seen at our institution between 2003 and 2012 was done. The patients were characterized based on demographic and clinical variables as well as histological and tumor features. Comparisons between the NCL and CL groups were done using analysis of variance (ANOVA) or the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis tests and Pearson's chi-square tests or Fisher's Exact tests as appropriate. P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients with NAFLD and HCC in NCL (HCC-NCL group) were identified and compared to 47 patients with NAFLD-HCC and Liver Cirrhosis (HCC-LC group). Liver fibrosis was not present in 55.9 % of patients in the HCC-NCL group (F0), stage 1 was present in 17.6 %, stage 2 in 8.8 % and stage 3 in 17.6 %. Lobular inflammation was present in 63.6 % of non-cirrhotic patients. Patients in the HCC-NCL were older (67.5 ± 12.3 vs. 62.7 ± 8.1 years), and less likely to be obese (52 % vs. 83 %) or have type 2 diabetes (38 % vs. 83 %), with p value <0.05 for all. More importantly, compared with the HCC-CL group, those in the HCC-NCL group were more likely to present with a single nodule (80.6 % vs. 52.2 %), larger nodule size (>5 cm) (77.8 % vs. 10.6 %), and receive hepatic resection as the modality of HCC treatment (66.7 % vs. 17 %); and were less likely to receive loco-regional therapy (22.3 % vs. 61.7 %) or orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) (0 % vs. 72.3 %), with p value <0.001 for all. Furthermore, 86 % of patients without cirrhosis had HCC recurrence compared to only 14 % in patients with cirrhosis (p < 0.001). Unadjusted analysis indicates that non-cirrhotics had worse survival with mortality rate of 47 % vs. 28 % in CL group (p = 0.03); however this difference in survival between two groups was not significant after adjusting for age or OLT (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with HCC in the absence of liver cirrhosis are more likely to present at an older age with larger tumor and have higher rates of tumor recurrence. Studies to assess the cost-effectiveness of HCC surveillance in this group should be conducted.