Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 20(10): 3286-93, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23846779

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) have established nomograms to predict sentinel node positivity. We propose the addition of two novel variables-distance of tumor from the nipple and from the skin-can improve their performance. METHODS: Ultrasounds of clinical T1/T2 tumors were reviewed. Distances of the tumor from the skin and from the nipple were measured. MSKCC and MDACC nomogram predictions and the AUC-ROC for each model were calculated. The added utility of the two variables was then examined using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 401 cancers studied, 79 (19.7 %) were node positive. The mean distance of tumors from the nipple in node-positive patients was 4.9 cm compared with 6.0 cm in node-negative patients (p = 0.0007). The mean distance of tumors from the skin was closer in node-positive cases (0.8 cm) versus node-negative cases (1.0 cm, p = 0.0007). The MSKCC and MDACC nomograms AUC-ROC values were 0.71 (95 % CI 0.64-0.77) and 0.74 (95 % CI 0.68-0.81). When adjusted for the MSKCC predicted probability, addition of both distance from nipple (p = 0.008) and distance from skin (p = 0.02) contributed significantly to prediction of nodal positivity and improved the AUC-ROC to 0.75 (95 % CI 0.70-0.81). Similarly, distance from nipple (p = 0.002), but not distance from skin (p = 0.09), added modestly to the MDACC nomogram performance (AUC 0.77; 95 % CI 0.71-0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Distance of tumor from the nipple and from the skin are important variables associated with nodal positivity. Adding these to established nomograms improves prediction of nodal positivity.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Nipples/pathology , Skin/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery , Carcinoma, Lobular/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Nipples/surgery , Nomograms , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , ROC Curve , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
2.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 19(10): 3131-8, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22847124

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lobular neoplasia (LN) includes atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) and lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). LN often is an incidental finding on breast core needle biopsy (CNBx) and management remains controversial. Our objective was to define the incidence of malignancy in women diagnosed with pure LN on CNBx, and identify a subset of patients that may be observed. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with LN on CNB between January 1993 and December 2010 were identified. Patients with an associated high-risk lesion or ipsilateral malignancy at time of diagnosis were excluded. All cases were reviewed by dedicated breast pathologists and breast imagers for pathologic classification and radiologic concordance, respectively. RESULTS: The study cohort was comprised of 184 (1.3 %) cases of pure LN (147 ALH, 37 LCIS) from 180 patients. Pathologic-radiologic concordance was achieved in 171 (93 %) cases. Excision was performed in 101 (55 %) cases and 83 (45 %) were observed. Mean follow-up was 50.3 (range, 6-212) months. Of cases excised, 1 of 81 (1.2 %) ALH and 1 of 20 (5 %) LCIS cases were upstaged to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), respectively. Only 1 of 101 (1 %) concordant lesions was upstaged on excision. Of the cases observed, 4 of 65 (6.2 %) developed ipsilateral cancer during follow-up: 1 of 51 (2 %) case of ALH and 3 of 14 (21.4 %) cases with LCIS (2 ILC, 2 DCIS). During follow-up, 2.9 % (4/138) patients with excised or observed LN developed a contralateral cancer. CONCLUSIONS: These data support that not all patients with LN diagnosed on CNB require surgical excision. Patients with pure ALH, demonstrating radiologic-pathologic concordance, may be safely observed.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Carcinoma in Situ/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Lobular/diagnosis , Hyperplasia/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinoma in Situ/surgery , Carcinoma, Lobular/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Hyperplasia/surgery , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Prognosis , Time Factors
3.
Am J Surg ; 204(5): 798-9, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22575397

ABSTRACT

Methylene blue dye has an important role in lymphatic mapping for sentinel lymph node surgery. A recent safety announcement from the US Food and Drug Administration warned physicians about possible serious central nervous system reactions in patients on serotonergic medications who received intravenous methylene blue for the identification of parathyroid glands. This report summarizes evidence from the Food and Drug Administration's announcement and methylene blue pharmacokinetics. The authors conclude that the use of methylene blue dye at low doses for lymphatic mapping likely carries very little risk for serotonin neurotoxicity, although breast surgeons should be aware of this potential complication in the event of mental status or neuromuscular changes in patients after lymphatic mapping.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Central Nervous System/drug effects , Coloring Agents/adverse effects , Methylene Blue/adverse effects , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/adverse effects , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy/methods , Coloring Agents/pharmacokinetics , Drug Interactions , Female , Humans , Methylene Blue/pharmacokinetics , Practice Guidelines as Topic , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...