Executive Functioning of Older Adults Correlates with Performance of Touchscreen App-Based Puzzles.

BACKGROUND: The use of touchscreen tablets has become common in healthcare. This technology has the potential to be used as a motivational tool for cognitive training. Age-related decline in executive functioning (EF) and dexterity may lead to poor performance using tablet applications (apps), but the impact on performance of app-based puzzles has not been studied. OBJECTIVES: (1) To characterize and compare the experience performance of playing tablet apps of older and younger adults, (2) To determine if EF and dexterity contribute to performance of app-based puzzles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of community-dwelling healthy older (n = 35) and younger adults (n = 34). EF was measured by the Trail Making Test (part B) (TMT-B) and the Weekly Calendar Planning Activity. Dexterity was assessed using the Nine-Hole Peg Test. Participants played three unfamiliar app-based puzzles requiring EF and filled out the short feedback questionnaire. RESULTS: All participants succeeded in playing the apps and reported enjoyment, however, older adults perceived less success and control. Significant differences in EF, dexterity, and performance were found between groups. EF of older adults (TMT-B) accounted for 17.7%-36.8% (P < 0.05) of the total variance of performance. CONCLUSION: These findings have implications for the use of tablet apps for older adults. Longer instruction and training periods may be required for training EF among older adults.

Nonfunctional Redundant Acts Characterize OCD, Even in OCD-Unrelated Tasks: A Demonstration in Questionnaire Completion.

BACKGROUND: Ethological methods used to analyze human obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) rituals demonstrated excess of unnecessary repetitions as well as irrelevant, idiosyncratic acts (additions) compared to normal activity. A question that still remains is whether these well-known repetitions and additions are manifested in behaviors unrelated to the OCD rituals. Our objectives were to: (1) assess whether OCD-related repetitions and additions as found in previous studies also affect the patients' activity of filling out questionnaires and (2) evaluate the specificity of these behaviors to OCD as opposed to other anxiety disorders and healthy controls. SAMPLING AND METHODS: Several standardized disorder-specific self-report questionnaires were used in order to assess the patient's psychopathologies. The style of filling-out these questionnaires by OCD and non-OCD anxiety outpatients and normal controls was analyzed. Four categories were used: omissions, repetitions, corrections, and additions. RESULTS: The OCD group scored significantly higher on the number of additions as compared with both the anxiety group and the nonclinical group, and significantly higher on the number of corrections and repetitions as compared with the nonclinical group. CONCLUSIONS: The hallmarks of OCD, repetitions and additions, are manifested not only in the patient's rituals and thoughts, but in apparently "neutral" tasks that do not a priori involve the intrusive thoughts, urges, and images typical of obsessive-compulsive behavior. Additions seem to be more specific to OCD than repetitions. These two executive faults impede routine functionality of OCD patients in tasks related and unrelated to their rituals. Our study delineates simple, observable behavioral characteristics that distinguish between OCD and non-OCD anxiety patients as well as healthy individuals. These symptomatic behaviors may offer a clue to personality traits or deficits in executive functions that possibly play a part in the pathophysiology of OCD. Our results are an additional indication that nonfunctionality in obsessive-compulsive behavior deserves full attention for a better understanding of the psychopathological mechanisms of OCD.

Response inhibition in a subclinical obsessive-compulsive sample.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Inconsistent findings across studies challenge the viability of response inhibition (RI) as an endophenotype of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Contemporary conceptualization of endophenotypes in psychiatric disorders suggests that these markers vary continuously in the general population, highlighting the importance of analogue sample research. Although neuropsychological functions have been studied in subclinical obsessive-compulsive (OC) samples, no study to date had examined RI in the context of the go/no-go paradigm. METHODS: A subclinical OC sample (HOC; n = 27) and a low OC symptoms control sample (LOC; n = 25), as determined by the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised, completed a go/no-go task and clinical questionnaires. RESULTS: The groups did not differ on age, gender, or state anxiety. Controlling for depressive severity, the HOC group made significantly more commission errors and exhibited larger response time variability on the go/no-go task. However, standardized scores produced using population norms revealed that the HOC group performed within normative range. LIMITATIONS: This study used a non-clinical sample and no structured clinical screening was performed. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to LOC participants, a psychometrically-defined subclinical OC sample exhibited deficient RI and sustained attention. However, when raw scores were converted to age and education adjusted standardized scores according to the test's population norms, the HOC group task performance was in the normative range. These results, are in line with findings in OCD samples, suggesting that moderate degree of RI deficiencies is associated with the presence of OC symptomatology regardless of clinical status. However, the conceptualization of RI underperformance as an OCD disorder-specific impairment, remains controversial.