Unusual presentation of Sjogren's syndrome.

Sjogren's syndrome is a known cause of renal tubular acidosis (RTA). However, osteomalacia associated with Sjogren's syndrome is rare and seldom reported in literature. We report a case of pseudofractures of both femora due to osteomalacia as a result of RTA secondary to Sjogren's syndrome, which was initially misdiagnosed as a stress fracture. A man in his 30s presented with hip pain and was initially misdiagnosed to have stress fractures because of the 'through and through' extension of the 'fracture' lines at the neck of both femora. The patient had a normal serum biochemistry profile except for elevated alkaline phosphatase levels. On further evaluation, he was found to have distal RTA secondary to Sjogren's syndrome. The patient responded to sodium bicarbonate therapy with clinical, biochemical and radiological improvement. A high index of suspicion for RTA should be kept in a patient with osteomalacia with a normal calcium profile and vitamin D level.

Comparative Evaluation of Linscope and King Vision Video Laryngoscopes in Tracheal Intubation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Introduction Indirect laryngoscopy has become a widely accepted method for learning the techniques of airway management. The incorporation of small, less expensive, and yet more reliable video cameras in laryngoscopes has given the process of laryngoscopy and intubation a big leap. The King Vision video laryngoscope (Medline Industries, USA) has demonstrated promise in several settings while the Linscope video laryngoscope (Centrum, Turkey) is a newly launched device and no literature is available to the best of our knowledge. Therefore, we aimed to compare the performance of the Linscope video laryngoscope (VL) and King Vision video laryngoscope. Method This is a randomized controlled trial study. Seventy patients, after approval from the institute's ethical clearance, were divided into two groups. In Group A, patients were intubated with Linscope VL and in Group B patients were intubated with King Vision VL as per the protocol. The primary outcome measure was the duration of tracheal intubation. Secondary outcomes were measured by the number of attempts, ease of intubation, and glottic view. Results Both Linscope VL and King Vision VL groups were comparable in terms of mean intubation time (20.34 s vs. 19.45 s). The endotracheal intubation with both devices was 100% successful at the first attempt. Both the devices provided a percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score of > 70% and a clear vision of the glottis. The POGO score obtained with King Vision VL was 83.57 ± 11.41% and with Linscope VL was 87.85 ± 10.31%. POGO score was greater with Linscope VL compared to King Vision VL, but the difference was not statistically significant (p-value>0.05). Conclusion King Vision demonstrated shorter intubation time and fewer optimization maneuvers. Both devices achieved a 100% success rate on the first attempt. While both devices are viable first-line options, King Vision's well-established efficacy in the literature suggests its preference over Linscope till extensive evidence is available in the future.