Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Int J Equity Health ; 20(1): 201, 2021 09 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34493294

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Parents in the Arab population of Israel are known to be "pro-vaccination" and vaccinate their children at higher rates than the Jewish population, specifically against human papilloma virus (HPV) and seasonal influenza. OBJECTIVES: This study seeks to identify and compare variables associated with mothers' uptake of two vaccinations, influenza and HPV, among different subgroups in Arab and Jewish society in Israel. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of the entire spectrum of the Israeli population was conducted using a stratified sample of Jewish mothers (n = 159) and Arab mothers (n = 534) from different subgroups: Muslim, Christian, Druse and Northern Bedouins. From March 30, 2019 through October 20, 2019, questionnaires were distributed manually to eighth grade pupils (13-14 years old) who had younger siblings in second (7-8 years old) or third (8-9 years old) grades. RESULTS: Arab mothers exhibited a higher rate of uptake for both vaccinations (p < .0001, HPV - 90%; influenza - 62%) than Jewish mothers (p = 0.0014, HPV - 46%; influenza - 34%). Furthermore, results showed that HPV vaccination uptake is significantly higher than seasonal influenza vaccination uptake in both populations. Examination of the different ethnic subgroups revealed differences in vaccination uptake. For both vaccinations, the Northern Bedouins exhibited the highest uptake rate of all the Arab subgroups (74%), followed by the Druse (74%) and Muslim groups (60%). The Christian Arab group exhibited the lowest uptake rate (46%). Moreover, the uptake rate among secular Jewish mothers was lower than in any of the Arab groups (38%), though higher than among religious/traditional Jewish mothers, who exhibited the lowest uptake rate (26%). A comparison of the variables associated with mothers' vaccination uptake revealed differences between the ethnic subgroups. Moreover, the findings of the multiple logistic regression revealed the following to be the most significant factors in Arab mothers' intake of both vaccinations: school-located vaccination and mothers' perceived risk and perceived trust in the system and in the family physician. These variables are manifested differently in the different ethnic groups. CONCLUSIONS: This research shows that all Arabs cannot be lumped together as one monolithic group in that they exhibit major differences according to religion, education and access to information. Ranking of variables associated with uptake of the two vaccines can provide decision-makers an empirical basis for tailoring appropriate and specific interventions to each subgroup to achieve the highest vaccine uptake rate possible. Media campaigns targeting the Arab population should be segmented to appeal to the various sub-groups according to their viewpoints, needs and health literacy.


Subject(s)
Arabs , Influenza Vaccines , Jews , Mothers , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Vaccination , Adolescent , Arabs/psychology , Arabs/statistics & numerical data , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice/ethnology , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/ethnology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Israel , Jews/psychology , Jews/statistics & numerical data , Male , Mothers/psychology , Mothers/statistics & numerical data , Papillomavirus Infections/ethnology , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Seasons , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data
2.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 9(1): 148, 2020 09 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32887658

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are on the front line of the COVID-19 outbreak, and their constant exposure to infected patients and contaminated surfaces puts them at risk of acquiring and transmitting the infection. Therefore, they must employ protective measures. In practice, HCWs in Israel were not fully prepared for this sudden COVID-19 outbreak. This research aimed to identify and compare: (1) Israeli HCWs' perceptions regarding the official COVID-19 guidelines' applicability and their protective value, and (2) HCWs executives' response to HWCs' concern regarding personal protective equipment (PPE) shortage. METHODS: A mixed-methods sequential explanatory design consists of: (1) An online survey of 242 HCWs about the application of the guidelines and PPE, and (2) Personal interviews of 15 HCWs executives regarding PPE shortage and the measures they are taking to address it. RESULTS: A significant difference between the perceived applicability and protective value was found for most of the guidelines. Some of the guidelines were perceived as more applicable than protective (hand hygiene, signage at entrance, alcohol rub sanitizers at entrance, and mask for contact with symptomatic patients). Other were perceived as less applicable than protective (prohibited gathering of over 10 people, maintaining a distance of 2 m', and remote services). CONCLUSIONS: HCWs need the support of the healthcare authorities not only to provide missing equipment, but also to communicate the risk to them. Conveying the information with full transparency, while addressing the uncertainty element and engaging the HCWs in evaluating the guidelines, are critical for establishing trust.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Health Personnel/psychology , Infection Control/methods , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Cross Infection/transmission , Cross Infection/virology , Female , Guideline Adherence/standards , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Israel/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Personal Protective Equipment , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Vaccine ; 38(1): 29-38, 2020 01 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31611101

ABSTRACT

The literature indicates that trust plays an important role in people's decision-making with respect to vaccinations. This research seeks to examine the impact of trust on the high response rate to vaccinations among the minority Arab population living in Israel. The research employs the qualitative phenomenological research method, using personal interviews to identify and analyze perceived trust among mothers of young children and teenagers (n = 70) and among nurses (n = 20) in the Arab population in the context of vaccinations and the high response rate to vaccinations among this population. The research findings point to differing levels of trust in the medical system. The participants placed the highest trust in the nurses working in the Tipat Halav Family Health Centers run by the Ministry of Health. These nurses are the main communicators of information about childhood vaccinations in Israel. Moreover, the interviewees saw vaccinations as an example of the state offering equal and optimal services to the Arab minority population. In addition, the interviewees consider the explanatory materials to be limited, superficial and not culturally appropriate. These positive attitudes toward vaccinations alongside reports that no importance is attributed to the explanatory materials due to their low quality may cause the population to accept vaccination recommendations as they are and to delegate responsibility and authority to the state.


Subject(s)
Arabs/psychology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Mothers/psychology , Nurses/psychology , Qualitative Research , Trust/psychology , Vaccination/psychology , Adult , Delivery of Health Care , Female , Humans , Israel/ethnology , Population Surveillance/methods , Young Adult
4.
Reprod Health ; 14(1): 49, 2017 Apr 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28376917

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study focused on decision-making on terminating pregnancy for Arab Muslim women in Israel who were pregnant with fetuses diagnosed with congenital anomalies. It examined the impact of the doctor-patient interaction on the women's decision, especially in light of social and religious pressures not to terminate under any circumstances. Our goal was to identify perceptions and attitudes of Muslim Arab women who choose to continue their pregnancy following the detection of congenital anomalies in prenatal tests. Specific objectives included (1) To examine the Muslim Arab women's perceptions on genetic testing, and ascertain the reasons for their decision to continue the pregnancy following the detection of a congenital anomaly in the fetus; and (2) To examine risk communication of gynecologists regarding genetic testing and abortions, and regarding the decision of continuing or terminating a pregnancy following detection of a congenital anomaly. METHODS: The research framework used the constructivist classical qualitative method to understand the experience of women at high risk for congenital anomalies and their experience of how doctors communicate the risk. RESULTS: It showed that the emotional element is no less dominant than religious and social elements. The findings emphasized the disparities between doctors and women regarding emotional involvement (non-directive counselling). The women interviewees (N = 24) felt that this expressed insensitivity. As far as we know, the emotional component has not been raised in previous studies of Muslim women at high risk for congenital defects in their fetus, and therefore comprises a significant contribution of the present study. CONCLUSIONS: To mitigate gaps, doctors should take affect into consideration in their communication with patients. It is important for doctors to understand the emotional element in risk communication, both in how they respect women's emotions and in creating an emotional interaction between themselves and the women.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced/psychology , Congenital Abnormalities/diagnosis , Decision Making , Fetal Diseases/diagnosis , Islam , Maternal Behavior/psychology , Physician-Patient Relations , Adult , Arabs , Communication , Congenital Abnormalities/diagnostic imaging , Congenital Abnormalities/psychology , Female , Fetal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Fetal Diseases/psychology , Humans , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Prenatal Diagnosis , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...