Hump-nosed pit viper (Hypnale hypnale) envenoming causes mild coagulopathy with incomplete clotting factor consumption.

CONTEXT: Limited information exists on the coagulopathy caused by hump-nosed pit viper (Hypnale hypnale) envenoming. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to characterise the coagulopathy in hump-nosed pit viper bites by measuring laboratory clotting times and factor studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cases of hump-nosed pit viper envenoming were included from a prospective cohort study of Sri Lankan snake-bite patients. Patient age, sex, snake identification, time of bite and clinical effects were recorded. Patients did not receive anti-venom because no specific anti-venom to hump-nosed vipers exists. All patients received supportive care and serial 20-min whole blood clotting tests (WBCT20). The prothrombin time (PT), international normalised ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), coagulation factors I, II, V, VII, VIII, IX and X, von Willebrand factor (vWF) antigen and D-Dimer concentrations were measured. The median of highest or lowest test result for each patient was reported with interquartile range (IQR). Results. There were 80 hump-nosed pit viper bites, median age was 37 years (IQR: 26-51 years) and 48 were male. The WBCT20 was positive in one patient. The median highest INR was 1.9 (1.5-2.2; Range: 1.3 to > 12) and median highest aPTT was 54 s (46-72 s; Range: 35-170 s). There was low fibrinogen [median: 1.3 g/L;1, -1.8 g/L; Range: < 0.2-2.9], low factor VIII levels [median: 23%; 16-37%] and low factor V levels [median: 43%; 23-74%]. D-Dimer concentrations [median: 3.4 mg/L; 2-7.4 mg/L] were slightly elevated. Factors II, VII and X and vWF antigen concentrations were normal. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Hump-nosed pit viper bites result in a mild coagulopathy which is usually not detected by a WBCT20. It is characterised by mild elevation of INR, low fibrinogen and Factors V and VIII which may be consistent with the venom containing a thrombin-like enzyme.

Diagnostic 20-min whole blood clotting test in Russell's viper envenoming delays antivenom administration.

BACKGROUND: The 20-min whole blood clotting test (WBCT20) is widely used for the identification of coagulopathy in snake envenoming, but its performance in practice has not been evaluated. AIM: We aimed to investigate the diagnostic utility of the WBCT20 for coagulopathy in Russell's viper envenoming. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. METHODS: Adult patients with snake envenoming were recruited. Age, sex, bite information, clinical effects, serial WBCT20 and antivenom treatment were recorded. Definite Russell's viper envenoming was confirmed with venom specific enzyme immunoassay. We assessed sensitivity of admission WBCT20 to coagulopathy (international normalized ratio, INR > 1.5) in Russell's viper envenoming, the specificity of negative WBCT20 in non-envenomed patients and directly compared paired WBCT20 and INR. RESULTS: Admission WBCT20 was done in 140 Russell's viper bites with coagulopathy and was positive in 56/140 [sensitivity 40% (95% confidence interval (CI): 32-49%)]. A negative WBCT20 led to delayed antivenom administration [WBCT20-ve tests: median delay, 1.78 h (interquartile range (IQR): 0.83-3.7 h) vs. WBCT20 + ve tests: median delay, 0.82 h (IQR: 0.58-1.48 h); P = 0.0007]. Delays to antivenom were largely a consequence of further WBCT20 being performed and more common if the first test was negative (41/84 vs. 12/56). Initial WBCT20 was negative in 9 non-envenomed patients and 48 non-venomous snakebites [specificity: 100% (95% CI: 94-100%)]. In 221 paired tests with INR > 1.5, the WBCT20 was positive in 91(41%). The proportion of positive WBCT20 only increased slightly with higher INR. CONCLUSION: In clinical practice, the WBCT20 has low sensitivity for detecting coagulopathy in snake envenoming and should not over-ride clinical assessment-based decisions about antivenom administration. There is an urgent need to develop a simple bedside test for coagulopathy in snake envenoming.

Comparison of two commonly practiced atropinization regimens in acute organophosphorus and carbamate poisoning, doubling doses vs. ad hoc: a prospective observational study.

There is a wide variation and lack of evidence in current recommendations for atropine dosing schedules leading to subsequent variation in clinical practice. Therefore, we sought to examine the safety and effectiveness of a titrated vs. ad hoc atropine treatment regimen in a cohort of patients with acute cholinesterase inhibitor pesticide poisoning. A prospective cohort study was conducted in three district secondary referral hospitals in Sri Lanka using a structured data collection form that collected details of clinical symptoms and outcomes of cholinesterase inhibitor pesticide poisoning, atropine doses, and signs of atropinization. We compared two hospitals that used a titrated dosing protocol based on a structured monitoring sheet for atropine infusion with another hospital using an ad hoc regime. During the study, 272 symptomatic patients with anticholinesterase poisoning requiring atropine were admitted to the three hospitals. Outcomes of death and ventilation were analyzed for all patients, 226 patients were prospectively assessed for atropine toxicity. At baseline, patients in the titrated dose cohort had clinical signs consistent with greater toxicity. This in part may be due to ingestion of more toxic organophosphates. They received less pralidoxime and atropine, and were less likely to develop features of atropine toxicity, such as delirium (1% vs. 17%), hallucinations (1% vs. 35%), or either (1% vs. 35%) and need for patient restraint (3% vs. 48%) compared with the ad hoc dose regime. After adjusting for the pesticides ingested, there was no difference in mortality and ventilatory rates between protocols. Ad hoc high dose atropine regimens are associated with more frequent atropine toxicity without any obvious improvement in patient outcome compared with doses titrated to clinical effect. Atropine doses should be titrated against response and toxicity. Further education and the use of a structured monitoring sheet may assist in more appropriate atropine use in anticholinesterase pesticide poisoning.