Comparison of Outcomes of Drug-Coated Balloons versus Plain Balloons in Secondary Interventions on Percutaneous Arteriovenous Fistulae.

PURPOSE: To compare patency and reintervention outcomes after either plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) or drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCBA) for venous stenoses after percutaneous arteriovenous fistula (pAVF) creation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-hundred ninety-five pAVFs were successfully created during the study period, 141 using Ellipsys and 54 using Wavelinq. After pAVF creation, 95 patients (48.7%) required secondary percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with either POBA (n = 55, 58%) or DCBA (n = 40, 42.1%). The most common site for PTA was the juxta-anastomotic segment (75.5%; 74/98). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to compare target lesion primary patency, access circuit primary patency, secondary patency, and reintervention rates in the POBA and DCBA cohorts. RESULTS: Thirty-four of 55 (62%) patients in the POBA cohort and 14 of 40 (35%) patients in the DCBA cohort required reinterventions for pAVF restenosis. Mean number of follow-up days among patients treated with POBA was 1,030.4 (SD ± 342.9) and among those treated with DCBA was 744.4 (SD ± 403.5). The use of POBA compared with DCBA was not associated with target lesion and access circuit primary patency loss in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.81; 95% CI, 0.93-3.51; P = .080; and HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 0.73-4.28; P = .210, respectively). However, time from fistula creation to the first PTA (days) was statistically significantly associated with both outcomes (HR, 0.997; 95% CI, 0.994-0.999; P = .009; and HR, 0.997; 95% CI, 0.992-0.999; P = .021, respectively). There were no major adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective single-center analysis of pAVFs, considerably more patients who underwent PTA with POBA after pAVF creation required reinterventions compared with PTA using DCBA, although the follow-up time of POBA was longer. In multivariate analysis, no differences were noted in the hazard of patency loss between POBA and DCBA.

Proximalization of arteriovenous inflow as native loop utilizing the upper arm basilic and forearm cephalic veins for the treatment of hemodialysis access induced hand ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Up to 10% of hemodialysis patients with an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) suffer hemodialysis access induced distal ischemia (HAIDI). We report a treatment option of HAIDI by proximalization of arterial inflow (PAI) to the axillary artery as native upper arm loop and salvaging the matured forearm cephalic vein after previous creation of a radio-cephalic AVF (RCAVF). METHODS: A 79-years-old multimorbid male patient with end-stage kidney disease presented with an elsewhere placed left-sided RCAVF. With the start of cannulations, the patient suffered severe HAIDI. Due to the low/normal AVF-flow of 550 ml/min, a PAI procedure using the matured forearm cephalic and upper arm basilic veins in a form of native upper arm loop was performed. RESULTS: Patient's symptoms resolved postoperatively with successful cannulations and tunneled dialysis catheter removal after 5 weeks. During a follow-up period of 64 months, several interventions were performed to maintain the patency, yet the AVF remained patent for >5 years. CONCLUSIONS: This modified PAI technique using native vessels in form of upper arm loop graft is a feasible and durable option to maintain long-term cumulative patency and should be considered as a valid native treatment option for HAIDI.

Achieving high maturation and cannulation rates of radial-cephalic arteriovenous fistulas with VasQ™ device.

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis is the predominant treatment modality for chronic kidney disease, with arteriovenous fistula (AVF) being considered to be the preferred type of long-term vascular access. Implantation of the external anastomotic VasQ™ support device during AVF creation has been suggested to improve the functional outcomes of AVFs. In the current study, we report the clinical outcomes when using the device with radial-cephalic AVF (RCAVF) creation in a large cohort over 3 years. METHODS: One hundred fifty RCAVFs were created between June 2018 and August 2021 with implantation of VasQ™. Time to maturation, cannulation characteristics, and assisted (AP) and secondary patency (SP) rates were analyzed. RESULTS: In this predominantly male (68%), median 64 years old cohort, 150 VasQ™ devices were implanted. Physiological maturation was achieved in 142/150 (95%) and was unassisted in 133/150 (89%). Of those, 129 matured within 1 month and four additional AVFs within 165 days. Eight AVFs achieved maturation following percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, and one required surgical patch angioplasty. The median time from creation to first successful cannulation in dialysis patients was 41 days. AP at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months was 89%, 81%, 78%, 73%, and 73%, and SP was 94%, 87%, 86%, 84%, and 84%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent use of the VasQ™ device in RCAVF creation demonstrates excellent AVF maturation and patency rates with very low frequency of assisted maturation and interventions for maintenance. The VasQ™ device appears a suitable aid in increasing the creation of functional RCAVFs.

Gracz fistula is a feasible option after two failed percutaneous arteriovenous fistulae.

Two devices for the creation of an endovascular percutaneous (pAVF) endovascular (endoAVF) arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) are available: the Ellipsys and the WavelinQ-4F systems. The main difference is the location of the anastomosis, making it feasible to use both pAVFs and surgical Gracz-type AVF in an algorithm sequence. A 66-year-old male patient with end-stage kidney disease and HIV was referred for a creation of a dialysis access after failed peritoneal dialysis. A radial-radial WavelinQ-pAVF with simultaneous coil embolization of a brachial vein was created but failed within 4 weeks. Therefore, an Ellipsys-pAVF was successfully created between the proximal radial artery and perforating vein on the same arm. After 2 days, however, the Ellipsys-pAVF anastomosis occluded. The ipsilateral Gracz-AVF was created, anastomosing perforating vein with the antecubital brachial artery. Cannulations were started 28 days later. During the follow up of 807 days, the AVF remained patent with last known volume flow of 1500 ml/min and no need for secondary interventions. We report a successful creation of a Gracz-AVF after primary failed pAVFs created with both pAVF-systems in a single patient and in the same arm. Thus, based on that case we recommend creation of pAVF prior to Gracz-AVF as integral part of Vascular Access creation algorithm, based on each patient's life plan.

Novel classification of proximal forearm perforator vein in the planning and creation of percutaneous and surgical Gracz-type arteriovenous fistulae.

BACKGROUND: The perforator vein determines whether it is feasible to create a percutaneous (pAVF) or surgical "Gracz-type" arteriovenous fistula (sAVF). Creating a standard anatomic classification of the antecubital region is beneficial to both the selection of the appropriate device and/or procedure and technical outcomes. Accordingly, an analysis of a large cohort of patients undergoing pAVF/sAVF was performed, focusing on perforator vein anatomical suitability, and a novel anatomical classification of the antecubital region was developed and proposed. METHODS: Between August 2018 and July 2022, chronic or end-stage kidney disease patients as well as patients anticipated an initiation of apheresis, who were referred for vascular access planning, underwent a standardized evaluation of upper extremities. A vessel mapping summary detailing the vasculature and the access creation plan was completed, indicating the anatomical suitability for sAVF and pAVF (Ellipsys and WavelinQ) techniques. RESULTS: Of 524 patients, 36.5% were female (average age 65 years). 53.2% were on dialysis, 41.6% had diabetes, and 13.2% had a previously failed permanent dialysis access. The anatomy for successful pAVF creation was judged to be suitable in 54% of patients for an Ellipsys-pAVF, and 29.8% for WavelinQ-pAVF. Of the WavelinQ group, 54.4% had suitable anatomy for ulnar, 26.9% for radial, and 18.6% for both ulnar/radial anastomoses. Additionally, 60.7% had suitable anatomy for pAVF creation with at least one of the systems, while 22.5% were suited for both types of pAVF-systems. 80.3% were candidates for creation of a Gracz-AVF. CONCLUSION: Overall, we found that about 60% of patients are likely candidates for a pAVF, with 80% being candidates for creation of a Gracz-AVF. Male patients have significantly higher suitability for most types of AVF creation, and younger patients are more suitable for Ellipsys-pAVF and RCAVFs. Most importantly, a universal classification of perforator vein was developed, which is indispensable in modern vascular access planning.

Percutaneous Arteriovenous Fistula Creation with Intended Brachial Vein Outflow and Secondary Brachial Vein Transposition Using the WavelinQ EndoAVF System.

PURPOSE: To assess percutaneous arteriovenous fistula (pAVF) creation with subsequent brachial vein transposition (BVT) using the WavelinQ endoAVF system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pre-existing database was retrospectively reviewed. Nine patients underwent attempted pAVF-BVT creation between December 2017 and November 2021. Study outcomes included technical success, time to maturation, patency rates, adverse events, and secondary interventions. Maturation was defined as a pAVF flow of ≥500 mL/min, outflow vein diameter ≥5 mm, and successful 2-needle cannulations in patients on active hemodialysis (HD). RESULTS: pAVF-BVT creation was technically successful in 8 of 9 patients (89%). Six of 8 created pAVFs remained patent and matured at 4 weeks, subsequently undergoing secondary BVT. Primary patency rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were 37.5%, 12.5%, and 12.5%, respectively. Secondary patency rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were 75%, 37.5%, and 37.5%, respectively. One patient had postprocedural access site bleeding, and 4 required secondary interventions to maintain patency. Two patients with failed pAVFs with BVT were successfully converted to surgical AVFs, probably facilitated by sufficient enlargement of superficial veins following pAVF creation. CONCLUSIONS: Off-label use of the WavelinQ system to create brachial vein outflow pAVF with BVT may be an alternative procedure for HD access creation in select patients with exhausted superficial veins.

Novel external stenting for reconstruction of high flow arteriovenous fistula.

BACKGROUND: High-flow arteriovenous fistulae (HF-AVF) may lead to adverse cardiac remodeling in hemodialysis patients. We have investigated whether a novel external stent is safe and effective in reducing and stabilizing flow rates during a 1-year follow-up after HF-AVF reconstruction. METHODS: All patients with HF-AVF (access flow rate ⩾ 1500 ml/min), who underwent HF-AVF reconstruction with external stenting in two centers between June 2018 and May 2020, were included in this retrospective analysis. During HF-AVF reconstruction, the dilated vein segment was resected, underwent volume reduction, and was externally stabilized using a braided cobalt-chromium external stent. AVF flow rates were assessed preoperatively, intraoperatively, and at follow up visits using duplex ultrasound. RESULTS: Forty-three HF-AVFs in 42 patients were reconstructed and supported with an external stent (mean age 49 years, range 20-86 years; 74% men). Fifty-one percent were forearm AVFs, 49% were upper arm. The mean preoperative flow rate was 2622 ± 893 ml/min (range: 1500-6000 ml/min) and was decreased to 710 ± 221 ml/min (range: 300-1300 ml/min) intra-operatively after HF-AVF reconstruction. At 6 and 12-months follow-up, the mean flow rates were 1132 ± 320 ml/min (range: 470-1700 ml/min) and 1453 ± 888 ml/min (range: 300-3800 ml/min), respectively. Recurrence of high flow (>1500 ml/min) occurred in 16% and 25% of the patients at 6 and 12 months and primary patency rates were 86% and 70%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This early experience with novel external stenting for HF-AVF reconstruction demonstrates that it is a safe and effective method for reducing and stabilizing flow rates up to 1-year post procedure. Additional studies are required to evaluate the durability of this procedure over the longer term and assess its effect on cardiac remodeling.

Multicenter European real-world utilization of VasQ anastomotic external support device for arteriovenous fistulae.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of arteriovenous fistulae (AVF), created with VasQ external support device under standard clinical practice across three vascular access clinics. METHODS: This multinational, retrospective study evaluated prospectively collected clinical outcomes of both forearm and upper arm brachiocephalic AVF (BCAVF) created using the VasQ device. Fifty-one AVF patients were pooled from three different vascular access centers in Germany, Italy, and Spain. Postprocedure outcomes were assessed by flow measurement with ultrasound examination in all centers. Primary failure, usability, patency, and intervention rates during the study period were evaluated. RESULTS: Fifty-one VasQ devices were implanted during 37 forearm (36 radiocephalic and 1 ulnar-basilic AVF) and 14 BCAVF procedures. The study population comprised mostly males (73%) and Caucasians (82%), with a mean age of 62.5 years (range, 38-84 years) and mean body mass index of 29.2. One patient died owing to access-unrelated reasons, and one patient was lost to follow-up without AVF assessment after its creation. From the remaining 49, 3 patients had a follow-up of less than 4 weeks and were excluded from maturation, primary failure, and dialysis initiation analysis (because those factors could not be evaluated yet), leaving 46 patients in this evaluation. Maturation was achieved in 91% of patients. The primary failure rate was 9%. A primary patency rate of 77% was observed at 6, 12, and 18 months. The secondary patency rate was 91% at 6 months, and 85% at 12 months and 18 months. Both primary patency and secondary patency did not differ statistically when comparing forearm AVF with BCAVF (P > .25). Successful cannulation was achieved in 86% of patients (32/37) requiring dialysis with a median time from creation to cannulation of 46 days. Of those patients, the functional patency rate was 94%. Five patients underwent seven interventions to maintain or restore patency or functionality, with an overall rate of 0.248 interventions per patient-year. CONCLUSIONS: AVFs created with VasQ external support device demonstrated promising patency and functionality outcomes in multicentric real-world setting across the two most commonly used anatomic locations.

The role of Doppler ultrasonography in vascular access surveillance-controversies continue.

Chronic hemodialysis therapy required regular entry into the patient's blood stream with adequate flow. The use of arteriovenous fistulas and grafts is linked with lower morbidity and mortality than the use of catheters. However, these types of accesses are frequently affected by stenoses, which decrease the flow and lead to both inadequate dialysis and access thrombosis. The idea of duplex Doppler ultrasound surveillance is based on the presumption that in-time diagnosis of an asymptomatic significant stenosis and its treatment prolongs access patency. Details of performed trials are conflicting, and current guidelines do not support ultrasound surveillance. This review article summarizes the trials performed and focuses on the reasons of conflicting results. We stress the need of precise standardized criteria of significant access stenosis and the weakness of the metaanalyses performed.

Comparison of Ellipsys Percutaneous and Proximal Forearm Gracz-Type Surgical Arteriovenous Fistulas.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) are created by establishing a proximal forearm anastomosis and offer a safe and reliable vascular access. This study compares the Ellipsys percutaneous AVF with a proximal forearm Gracz-type surgical AVF, chosen for comparison as it is constructed at the same anatomical site. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of prospectively collected clinical data. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: All vascular access procedures conducted during a 34-month period were reviewed. The study groups comprised 89 percutaneous AVFs and 69 surgical AVFs. EXPOSURE: Percutaneous or surgical AVF placement. OUTCOME: AVF patency, function, and complications. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Patency rates for each AVF group were evaluated by competing risk survival analysis using a cumulative incidence function. Association of primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency with the AVF groups was examined by Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Technical success was 100% for both groups. Average procedure times were 14 minutes for percutaneous AVFs and 74 minutes for surgical AVFs (P < 0.001). Proximal radial artery (PRA) was used in all percutaneous AVF cases. Inflow for surgical AVFs included radial (30%), ulnar (12%), and brachial (58%) arteries. Outflow veins for both groups were the cephalic and/or basilic veins. Access flow volumes, times to maturation, and overall numbers of interventions per patient-year were not significantly different. Cumulative incidence of primary patency failure at 12 months was lower for surgical AVF (47% vs 64%, P = 0.1), but secondary patency failure was not different between groups (20% vs 12%, P = 0.3). PRA surgical AVFs had similar primary patency (65% vs 64%, P = 0.8) but higher secondary patency failure rates than percutaneous AVFs at 12 months (34% vs 12%, P = 0.04). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study with a relatively short follow-up period, and not all patients required hemodialysis at the end of study. CONCLUSIONS: Both percutaneous and surgical AVFs demonstrated high rates of technical success and secondary patency. Percutaneous AVFs required shorter procedure times. The rate of intervention was similar. When a distal radial artery AVF is not feasible, percutaneous AVF might offer an appropriate procedure for creating a safe and functional access, maintaining further proximal forearm surgical AVF creation options.

Patency and functionality of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas with an external support device (VasQ™): Real-world single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: The VasQTM device was designed to improve the outcome of arteriovenous fistulae by optimizing the hemodynamics of the flow in the juxta-anastomotic region of the arteriovenous fistulae through tailored external support. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of the VasQ on outcome of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulae in a real-world setting. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective analysis of patients with either fistula creation before or after dialysis initiation with implantation of the VasQ device during creation of end-to-side radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulae between June 2018 and May 2019. The flow rate and vein diameter were evaluated intraoperatively, at discharge within 48 h postprocedure and at a follow-up of 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. RESULTS: Thirty-three VasQ devices were implanted during 33 radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula procedures. The study population comprised mostly of men, with an average age of 66 years. Mean intraoperative flow was 428 mL/min (range: 130-945). All patients were discharged with patent arteriovenous fistulae and mean fistula flow of 740 mL/min (range: 230-1300 mL/min). The primary patency was 100% and 79% at 3 and 6 months, respectively. Cumulative/secondary patency was 100% and 90% at 3 and 6 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Data presented here suggest that the VasQ device has the potential to provide benefit to the functionality of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulae.

Use of the Surfacer® Inside-Out® Catheter Access System to Obtain Central Venous Access in Dialysis Patients With Thoracic Venous Obstructions: Single-Center Series.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic central venous obstruction (TCVO) is a common condition which can impact the ability to achieve central venous access (CVA) in patients on hemodialysis. The Surfacer® Inside-Out® Catheter Access System is designed to enable repeated right-side central venous access in patients with TCVO. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed medical records of 10 dialysis patients who presented with TCVO and underwent the Inside-Out procedure with the Surfacer System to obtain CVA between 2017 and 2020. Patient demographics, hemodialysis vascular access history, and procedural data were identified and analyzed. The mean patient age was 62.4 ± 19.6 years (25.9-89.1 years) with 7 of the 10 patients being male. Eight patients (80.0%) were diagnosed with chronic kidney disease with time on hemodialysis ranging from 3 to 13 years. The remaining 2 required CVA to treat acute-on-chronic kidney injury due to septic shock. Patients in our series had a mean of 2.8 ± 1.6 previous catheters placed prior to the Surfacer procedure. RESULTS: CVA was achieved in all 10 patients with 1 patient requiring a second attempt to achieve access due to the inability to initially traverse the iliac vein with the device, possibly due to a history of kidney transplantation. One multimorbid patient died shortly after the successful procedure, possibly due to cardiac decompensation. Mean total procedure time for the 7 patients having only dialysis catheter placement using the Surfacer device was 67.2 ± 19.1 minutes (49-103 minutes). The remaining 3 patients received a Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow (HeRO) graft in conjunction with the Inside-Out procedure. All vascular accesses functioned properly during the immediate time period following placement. No adverse events associated with the use of Surfacer device were encountered. CONCLUSIONS: Data presented from our patient series confirms the effectiveness of the Surfacer System to safely achieve CVA in dialysis patients with TCVOs with a history of multiple catheter placements.

The past and the future of vascular access surgery: Creation of percutaneous arteriovenous fistula using Ellipsys vascular access system in a patient with previous ipsilateral Scribner-shunt.

BACKGROUND: Sixty years after the first description of Scribner-shunt, and 54 years after publication of the first radio-cephalic arterio-venous fistula (AVF), endovascular percutaneous AVF (pAVF) was introduced. We report a successful case of Ellipsys-pAVF creation and use for hemodialysis in a patient with a previous ipsilateral Scribner-shunt. CASE: A 72-year old female patient with chronic kidney disease (CKD), previous right-sided Scribner-shunt and kidney transplant, underwent a successful creation of right-sided Ellipsys-pAVF. The procedure time was 12 min with intraoperative brachial artery volume flow of 720 ml/min. At 39 days, an ultrasound-guided balloon-angioplasty of the outflow cephalic vein stenosis was performed. Cannulations were started 41 days after the creation of pAVF. No additional interventions were required during the follow-up of 258 days with last follow-up volume flow of 1400 ml/min. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of the creation of pAVF in a patient with previous "traumatic" ipsilateral placement of a Scribner-shunt. It allows the creation of a small anastomosis in very short time, which can be successfully used for hemodialysis treatment on the same day, if necessary, and reduces the expected risk of high-flow AVF with associated peripheral steal and cardiac outcomes (especially in a patient with cardiomyopathy such this one).

Comparison of Outcomes of Percutaneous Arteriovenous Fistulae Creation by Ellipsys and WavelinQ Devices.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of Ellipsys with those of WavelinQ-4F percutaneous arteriovenous fistulae (pAVF) devices in a single center by a single operator. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted in 100 patients who underwent pAVFs procedures (65 Ellipsys and 35 WavelinQ patients) and created between December 2017 and December 2019. A total of 69% were male and 37% were diabetic. Median age was 64.1 years (range: 28-86), and median body mass index was 27.2 (range: 15-45.1) kg/m2. A procedure sequence algorithm was followed for selecting all vascular accesses created. RESULTS: Ellipsys outcomes were compared to WavelinQ outcomes. Technical success was 100% versus 97%, respectively, and median procedure times were 14 versus 63 minutes, respectively (P < .001), with 183 (1-487) versus 185 (0-760) days follow-up, respectively. Maturation at 4 weeks was 68.3% versus 54.3%, respectively, and median times to cannulation were 60 (1-164) versus 90 (1-180) days, respectively. Successful pAVF dialysis was established in 31 of 39 patients (79.5%) versus 14 of 24 patients (58%), respectively (P = .071), dialysis patients with access-related adverse events observed in 4 individuals (1 Ellipsys versus 3 WavelinQ). Six patients (5 versus 1) with matured outflow from previous AVFs underwent first-day cannulations. Interventions were performed in 27.7% (33 Ellipsys) and 26.5% (15 WavelinQ) patients, and the number of interventions per patient-years was 0.96 versus 0.46, respectively. pAVF failure was seen in 15.4% versus 37.1% patients, respectively (P = .0137). Secondary patency at 12 months was significantly higher among patients who had an Ellipsys procedure (82%) than among those who underwent the WavelinQ procedure (60%). CONCLUSIONS: pAVFs were created with high technical success and low complications with both devices. Ellipsys pAVFs demonstrated significantly shorter procedure times without a need for radiation exposure and with superior secondary patency.

Single-center mid-term experience with chimney-graft technique for the preservation of flow to the supra-aortic branches.

Objectives To investigate the feasibility and the mid-term outcomes of the chimney-graft technique for the revascularization of supra-aortic branches in patients with thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch. Methods A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database between January 2010 and July 2016 was performed. Primary endpoints were 30-day and overall mortality. Secondary endpoints were technical success, target vessel patency, stroke/transitory ischemic attack and type I/III endoleak rate. Results A total of 30 patients (80% male, median age 70.0 years) were treated using the chimney-graft technique for the supra-aortic branches. The indication was a degenerative aneurysm in nine patients (32%) and a type B Stanford aortic dissection and a penetrating aortic ulcer in the descending aorta in seven patients (23%), respectively. In six patients (20.0%), the indication was an type Ia endoleak after previous endovascular thoracic repair, whereas a pseudoaneurysm after previous open repair of the descending aorta was the indication in one patient (3%). Twenty-three patients (77%) were treated electively, five (17%) emergently and two (7%) urgently because of free rupture. Technical success was achieved in 90% of patients. The 30-day/in-hospital mortality was 17% (5/30). A retrograde dissection was presented in five patients. Four patients experienced a cerebrovascular event. Eight patients had type Ia endoleak and 10 had type II. During the median follow-up of 16 months (range: 0-56), four further patients died: one in respiratory insufficiency, one due to a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, one in meningitis and the last one for unknown reason. The chimney-graft patency was 100%. According to the Kaplan-Meier curve, the estimated survival at one year was 66 ± 9%. Conclusions The chimney-graft technique, despite a technically demanding strategy, is a useful tool as bailout procedure in our armamentarium for high-risk patients, unsuitable for open or hybrid repair.

Endovascular Aortoiliac Aneurysm Repair with Fenestrated Stent Graft and Iliac Side Branch Using Image Fusion without Iodinated Contrast Medium.

BACKGROUND: The endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is becoming the preferred method to treat an aortic aneurysm with its better short-term postoperative mortality and morbidity rates in comparison with the open repair. A main drawback of this method is the need to use a nephrotoxic iodinated contrast medium to visualize the aorta and its side branches. CASE REPORT: An 83-year-old man with an asymptomatic infrarenal aortic aneurysm of a 51-mm diameter accompanied by a 42-mm aneurysm of the left common iliac artery was treated with combined fenestrated EVAR (FEVAR) and iliac side branch stent graft (ISBG) under guidance of image fusion (IF) without the intraoperative use of iodinated contrast agent. CONCLUSIONS: Complex EVAR (FEVAR and ISBG) using computed tomography angiography IF is feasible and together with the use of CO2 angiography may help to abstain from need to nephrotoxic contrast medium.

Technical feasibility of endovascular aortoiliac aneurysm repair combining Anaconda fenestrated and Zenith iliac side-branched stent grafts.

We demonstrate for the first time the technical feasibility of total endovascular aneurysm repair for juxtarenal and pararenal aortoiliac aneurysms by combining the Vascutek Anaconda custom-made fenestrated stent graft with the Cook Zenith iliac side-branched stent graft. Three patients (two male and one female) presented with asymptomatic pararenal aortoiliac aneurysm in the first case and juxtarenal aorto-left iliac aneurysms in the second and third cases. We successfully deployed the Anaconda fenestrated and the iliac side-branched stent graft combined with Atrium Advanta V12 stent grafts for renal, superior mesenteric, and hypogastric arteries. Postoperative computed tomography demonstrated excluded aneurysms with patent renovisceral and hypogastric arteries and no signs of endoleak.

Transforming growth factor ß1 oppositely regulates the hypertrophic and contractile response to ß-adrenergic stimulation in the heart.

BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine activation and local mediators such as transforming growth factor-ß1 (TGF-ß1) contribute to the pathobiology of cardiac hypertrophy and failure, but the underlying mechanisms are incompletely understood. We aimed to characterize the functional network involving TGF-ß1, the renin-angiotensin system, and the ß-adrenergic system in the heart. METHODS: Transgenic mice overexpressing TGF-ß1 (TGF-ß1-Tg) were treated with a ß-blocker, an AT1-receptor antagonist, or a TGF-ß-antagonist (sTGFßR-Fc), were morphologically characterized. Contractile function was assessed by dobutamine stress echocardiography in vivo and isolated myocytes in vitro. Functional alterations were related to regulators of cardiac energy metabolism. RESULTS: Compared to wild-type controls, TGF-ß1-Tg mice displayed an increased heart-to-body-weight ratio involving both fibrosis and myocyte hypertrophy. TGF-ß1 overexpression increased the hypertrophic responsiveness to ß-adrenergic stimulation. In contrast, the inotropic response to ß-adrenergic stimulation was diminished in TGF-ß1-Tg mice, albeit unchanged basal contractility. Treatment with sTGF-ßR-Fc completely prevented the cardiac phenotype in transgenic mice. Chronic ß-blocker treatment also prevented hypertrophy and ANF induction by isoprenaline, and restored the inotropic response to ß-adrenergic stimulation without affecting TGF-ß1 levels, whereas AT1-receptor blockade had no effect. The impaired contractile reserve in TGF-ß1-Tg mice was accompanied by an upregulation of mitochondrial uncoupling proteins (UCPs) which was reversed by ß-adrenoceptor blockade. UCP-inhibition restored the contractile response to ß-adrenoceptor stimulation in vitro and in vivo. Finally, cardiac TGF-ß1 and UCP expression were elevated in heart failure in humans, and UCP--but not TGF-ß1--was downregulated by ß-blocker treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the concept that TGF-ß1 acts downstream of angiotensin II in cardiomyocytes, and furthermore, highlight the critical role of the ß-adrenergic system in TGF-ß1-induced cardiac phenotype. Our data indicate for the first time, that TGF-ß1 directly influences mitochondrial energy metabolism by regulating UCP3 expression. ß-blockers may act beneficially by normalizing regulatory mechanisms of cellular hypertrophy and energy metabolism.