Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients Treated With Antiretroviral Therapy Only Versus Chemotherapy and Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV-Associated Kaposi Sarcoma: A Randomized Control Trial.

PURPOSE: In sub-Saharan Africa, Kaposi sarcoma (KS) is the most common HIV-associated cancer. KS causes substantial morbidity, and treatment goals should emphasize quality of life (QOL). Antiretroviral therapy (ART) is indicated, and early chemotherapy significantly improves tumor regression. The effect of ART alone or with chemotherapy on QOL in treatment-naïve South Africans with HIV-associated KS was assessed. METHODS: KAART (Kaposi Sarcoma AIDS Anti-Retroviral Therapy) is a randomized, controlled, open-label trial of ART versus ART plus chemotherapy. Crossover between arms was allowed for patients with progressive disease. Eighty-nine percent of patients had advanced tumor burden. Within KAART, QOL measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-QLQ-C30 questionnaire evaluated functional and symptom domains and global QOL. Intragroup changes between baseline and month 12 (Wilcoxon rank sign test), changes between the arms (Mann-Whitney test), and the relationship between responses, determined by AIDS Clinical Trial Group criteria and QOL measures (Kruskal-Wallis test), were evaluated. P values < .01 were considered significant. RESULTS: QOL information was available for 111 of 112 patients. Significant improvements over 12 months were seen in global health status and functional scales (emotional, cognitive, and social scales; not physical and role function). Most symptom scales (fatigue, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite, diarrhea, and constipation) also showed significant improvement. There were no statistically significant changes between arms in intention-to-treat analysis. Patients showing a response to the tumor (complete or partial) reported significantly increased global QOL ( P < .001), pain relief, and improved role functioning. Adherence, adverse events, HIV viral load, and CD4 count did not correlate with global QOL. CONCLUSION: African patients with HIV-associated KS derive a significant benefit in QOL from ART and tumor regression.

Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome associated with Kaposi sarcoma: higher incidence and mortality in Africa than in the UK.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of Kaposi sarcoma-associated paradoxical immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (KS-IRIS) in antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive HIV-infected patients with Kaposi sarcoma initiating ART in both well resourced and limited-resourced settings. DESIGN: Pooled analysis of three prospective cohorts of ART-naive HIV-infected patients with Kaposi sarcoma from sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and one from the UK. METHODS: KS-IRIS case definition was standardized across sites. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used to identify the incidence and predictors of KS-IRIS and Kaposi sarcoma-associated mortality. RESULTS: Fifty-eight of 417 (13.9%) eligible individuals experienced KS-IRIS with an incidence 2.5 times higher in the African vs. European cohorts (P=0.001). ART alone as initial Kaposi sarcoma treatment (hazard ratio 2.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-8.69); T1 Kaposi sarcoma stage (hazard ratio 2.96, 95% CI 1.26-6.94); and plasma HIV-1 RNA more than 5 log10 copies/ml (hazard ratio 2.14, 95% CI 1.25-3.67) independently predicted KS-IRIS at baseline. Detectable plasma Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpes virus (KSHV) DNA additionally predicted KS-IRIS among the 259 patients with KSHV DNA assessed (hazard ratio 2.98, 95% CI 1.23-7.19). Nineteen KS-IRIS patients died, all in SSA. Kaposi sarcoma mortality was 3.3-fold higher in Africa, and was predicted by KS-IRIS (hazard ratio 19.24, CI 7.62-48.58), lack of chemotherapy (hazard ratio 2.35, 95% CI 1.09-5.05), pre-ART CD4 cell count less than 200 cells/µl (hazard ratio 2.04, 95% CI 0.99-4.2), and detectable baseline KSHV DNA (hazard ratio 2.12, 95% CI 0.94-4.77). CONCLUSION: KS-IRIS incidence and mortality are higher in SSA than in the UK. This is largely explained by the more advanced Kaposi sarcoma disease and lower chemotherapy availability. KS-IRIS is a major contributor to Kaposi sarcoma-associated mortality in Africa. Our results support the need to increase awareness on KS-IRIS, encourage earlier presentation, referral and diagnosis of Kaposi sarcoma, and advocate on access to systemic chemotherapy in Africa.

A randomized controlled trial of highly active antiretroviral therapy versus highly active antiretroviral therapy and chemotherapy in therapy-naive patients with HIV-associated Kaposi sarcoma in South Africa.

BACKGROUND: The optimal approach to HIV-associated Kaposi sarcoma (HIV-KS) in sub-Saharan Africa is unknown. With large-scale rollout of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in South Africa, we hypothesized that survival in HIV-KS would improve and administration of chemotherapy in addition to HAART would be feasible and improve KS-specific outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, controlled, open-label trial with intention-to-treat analysis. Treatment-naive patients from King Edward VIII Hospital, Durban, South Africa, a public-sector tertiary referral center, with HIV-KS, but no symptomatic visceral disease or fungating lesions requiring urgent chemotherapy, were randomized to HAART alone or HAART and chemotherapy (CXT). HAART arm received stavudine, lamivudine, and nevirapine (Triomune; CXT arm received Triomune plus bleomycin, doxorubicin, and vincristine every 3 weeks. When bleomycin, doxorubicin, and vincristine were not available, oral etoposide (50-100 mg for 1-21 days of a 28-day cycle) was substituted. Primary outcome was overall KS response using AIDS Clinical Trial Group criteria 12 months after HAART initiation. Secondary comparisons included time to response, progression-free survival, overall survival, adverse events, HIV control, CD4 reconstitution, adherence, and quality of life. RESULTS: Fifty-nine subjects were randomized to HAART and 53 to CXT; 12-month overall KS response was 39% in the HAART arm and 66% in the CXT arm (difference, 27%; 95% confidence interval, 9%-43%; P = 0.005). At 12 months, 77% were alive (no survival difference between arms; P = 0.49), 82% had HIV viral load <50 copies per milliliter without difference between the arms (P = 0.47); CD4 counts and quality-of-life measures improved in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: HAART with chemotherapy produced higher overall KS response over 12 months, whereas HAART alone provided similar improvement in survival and select measures of morbidity. In Africa, with high prevalence of HIV and human herpes virus-8 and limited resources, HAART alone provides important benefit in patients with HIV-KS.