Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
Fam Med ; 55(1): 12-19, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36656882

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to establish the psychometric properties and diagnostic accuracy of the Teen Hurt-Insult-Threaten-Scream-Sex (TeenHITSS), a 5-item measure used to screen adolescents for family violence in clinical settings. METHODS: Study participants included 251 adolescent participants (n=197 not at-risk subsample; n=56 at-risk subsample), recruited from ambulatory care clinics, a medical center at-risk referral clinic, and area shelters. Participants completed a cross-sectional survey, including the TeenHITSS and Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scales (CTSPC) questionnaires. We calculated internal reliability, validity, and sensitivity and specificity for the full sample and both subsamples for each screening instrument. RESULTS: Concurrent validity between the TeenHITSS and CTSPC was strong (r=.71, P<.000). We determined an optimal cutpoint based on sensitivity and specificity for correctly identifying abuse victims as a score of one or greater on the TeenHITSS. The TeenHITSS also proved slightly superior to the CTSPC in differentiating between victims and nonvictims of adolescent abuse (AUC=.79 vs .73, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The TeenHITSS screening tool performed as well as the CTSPC in correctly classifying at-risk and not-at-risk teenagers and offers much greater utility to providers by supplying an actionable cut score. The findings of this study suggest that TeenHITSS is a valid and reliable tool to screen for physical and sexual abuse in children ages 13 years and older in clinical settings and can help health care providers detect adolescent abuse and initiate intervention and prevention of future abuse.


Subject(s)
Child Abuse , Humans , Adolescent , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Child Abuse/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Psychometrics
2.
Acad Med ; 96(10): 1441-1448, 2021 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34074899

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Faculty promotion is important for retention and has implications for diversity. This study provides an update on recent trends in faculty promotion in U.S. medical schools. METHOD: Using data from the Association of American Medical Colleges Faculty Roster, the authors examined trends in faculty promotion over 10 years. Promotion status for full-time assistant and full-time associate professors who started between 2000 and 2009 inclusive was followed from January 1, 2010 to January 1, 2019. The authors used bivariate analyses to assess associations and promotion rates by sex, race/ethnicity, department, tenure status, and degree type. RESULTS: The promotion rate for assistant professors was 44.3% (2,330/5,263) in basic science departments, 37.1% (17,232/46,473) in clinical science departments, and 33.6% (131/390) in other departments. Among clinical departments, family medicine had the lowest rate of promoting assistant professors (24.4%; 484/1,982) and otolaryngology the highest rate (51.2%; 282/551). Faculty members who were male (38.9%; 11,687/30,017), White (40.0%; 12,635/31,596), tenured (58.7%; 98/167) or tenure-eligible (55.6%; 6,653/11,976), and holding MDs/PhDs (48.7%; 1,968/4,038) had higher promotion rates than, respectively, faculty who were female (36.3%; 7,975/21,998), minorities underrepresented in medicine (URM; 31.0%; 1,716/5,539), nontenured (32.5%; 12,174/37,433), and holding other/unknown degrees (20.6%; 195/948; all P < .001). These differences were less pronounced among associate professors; however, URM and nontenured faculty continued to have lower promotion rates compared with White, Asian, or tenured faculty at the associate professor level. CONCLUSIONS: Promotion rates varied not only by faculty rank but also by faculty sex, race/ethnicity, department, tenure status, and degree type. The differences were more pronounced for assistant professors than associate professors. URM faculty members, particularly assistant professors, were promoted at lower rates than their White and Asian peers. More research to understand the drivers of disparities in faculty promotion seems warranted.


Subject(s)
Cultural Diversity , Faculty, Medical/trends , Personnel Selection , Schools, Medical/trends , Faculty, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Income , Male , Minority Groups , Personnel Turnover , Race Factors , Schools, Medical/organization & administration , Schools, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Sex Factors , United States
3.
Am Fam Physician ; 102(8): 487-492, 2020 10 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33064426

ABSTRACT

Groin hernias are caused by a defect of the abdominal wall in the groin area and comprise inguinal and femoral hernias. Inguinal hernias are more common in men. Although groin hernias are easily diagnosed on physical examination in men, ultrasonography is often needed in women. Ultrasonography is also helpful when a recurrent hernia, surgical complication after repair, or other cause of groin pain (e.g., groin mass, hydrocele) is suspected. Magnetic resonance imaging has higher sensitivity and specificity than ultrasonography and is useful for diagnosing occult hernias if clinical suspicion is high despite negative ultrasound findings. Herniography, which involves injecting contrast media into the hernial sac, may be used in selected patients. Becoming familiar with the common types of surgical interventions can help family physicians facilitate postoperative care and assess for complications, including recurrence. Laparoscopic repair is associated with shorter recovery time, earlier resumption of activities of daily living, less pain, and lower recurrence rates than open repair. Watchful waiting is a reasonable and safe option in men with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias. Watchful waiting is not recommended in patients with symptomatic hernias or in nonpregnant women.


Subject(s)
Hernia, Inguinal/diagnosis , Hernia, Inguinal/therapy , Herniorrhaphy , Watchful Waiting , Hernia, Inguinal/physiopathology , Humans , Laparoscopy , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Physical Examination , Sex Factors , Ultrasonography
4.
Acad Med ; 95(2): 241-247, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31348063

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Tenure status has important implications for medical school faculty recruitment and retention and may affect educational quality, academic freedom, and collegiality. However, tenure trends in academic family medicine are unknown. This study aimed to describe trends in tenure status of family medicine faculty overall and by gender and status of minorities underrepresented in medicine (URM) in Liaison Committee on Medical Education-accredited medical schools. METHOD: Association of American Medical Colleges Faculty Roster data were used to describe trends in tenure status of full-time family medicine faculty, 1977 to 2017. Bivariate and trend analyses were conducted to assess associations and describe patterns between tenure status and gender, race, and ethnicity. Interdepartmental variations in tenure trends over the years were also examined. RESULTS: Among family medicine faculty, the proportions of faculty tenured or on a tenure track dropped more than threefold from 1977 (46.6%; n = 507/1,089) to 2017 (12.7%; n = 729/5,752). Lower proportions of women and URM faculty were tenured or on a tenure track than male and non-URM faculty, respectively. But the gaps among them were converging. Compared with other clinical departments, family medicine had the highest proportion of faculty (74.6%; n = 4,291/5,752) not on a tenure track in 2017. CONCLUSIONS: Proportion of tenure positions significantly decreased among family medicine faculty in U.S. medical schools. While gaps between male and female faculty and among certain racial/ethnic groups remained for family medicine tenure status, they have decreased over time, mainly because of a substantial increase in nontenured positions.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers/organization & administration , Faculty, Medical/trends , Family Practice/education , Career Mobility , Female , Humans , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
5.
Fam Med ; 50(10): 763-769, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30428105

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Though child abuse is prevalent and detrimental, health care providers fail to screen for abuse at sufficient rates to detect or preempt events. Current child abuse screening tools lack brevity and usefulness in clinical settings. To validate the Pediatric Hurt-Insult-Threaten-Scream-Sex (PedHITSS) screening tool, a 5-item questionnaire designed to detect and prompt provider investigation into child abuse in clinical settings, the PedHITSS was compared to the Conflict Tactics Scale: Parent-Child Version (CTSPC) screening measure. METHODS: Participants included 422 pediatric patients (n=242 nonabused; n=180 abused subsample) recruited from an ambulatory care setting, a medical center at-risk referral clinic, or homeless shelter clinic. Parents were asked to complete a cross-sectional survey, including PedHITSS and CTSPC questionnaires. Concurrent validity of PedHITSS was tested with 242 participants identified as nonabused. Construct validity was assessed with 180 participants previously identified as victims of child abuse. RESULTS: Concurrent validity between the CTSPC and PedHITSS was strong, rs=.70 (P<.01). Sensitivity and specificity for correctly identifying abuse victims (≤12 years) was optimal at a cutpoint of one or greater. There was no significant difference in sensitivity and specificity of HITSS and CTSPC in correctly identifying victims of child abuse. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that PedHITSS performs as well as CTSPC in identifying and differentiating victims and nonvictims of child abuse. PedHITSS allows health care providers to confidently screen and report suspected cases of child abuse and serves as a mechanism to confirm abuse status through validated means.


Subject(s)
Child Abuse/diagnosis , Mass Screening/methods , Adult , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Awareness , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Family Practice , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires , Texas
7.
Fam Med ; 46(3): 180-5, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24652635

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Researchers in intimate partner violence (IPV) screening have developed a short written tool called HITS. The acronym corresponds to questions that elicit information about how often a woman's male partner physically Hurts, Insults, Threatens harm, and Screams at her. The purpose of this study was to develop a verbal form of the HITS and to compare it to the published written version. METHODS: A secondary analysis of data from prior HITS research was conducted. From this, the screening questions were modified for oral presentation so that patients could respond with a yes or no answer. To test the comparability of the two screening formats, 103 adult female patients completed both forms of the HITS during routine office visits. Phase one of this study used Optimal Data Analysis (ODA) on 210 cases from prior HITS research to create a cut score that differentiates clinic patients from self-identified victims of abuse. From this, written HITS questions were modified for verbal administration. Phase two of this study used t test, ANOVA, and classification of two screening formats to compare the written and verbal HITS administered to 103 adult female family medicine patients. RESULTS: Responses to both types of screening were related. The mean score on the written HITS was statistically higher for respondents who reported "yes" to a Verbal HITS question. This was consistent across all four questions. Also, the mean written HITS score increased linearly as a function of the number of yes answers on the Verbal HITS. The screening classification (positive, negative) from both forms of the HITS was the same for 83% of the respondents. CONCLUSIONS: The verbal and written HITS comprise two ways that clinicians can screen for domestic violence.


Subject(s)
Family Practice/methods , Mass Screening/methods , Spouse Abuse/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Chicago , Female , Humans , Mass Screening/instrumentation , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Young Adult
8.
J Community Health ; 35(4): 392-7, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20373137

ABSTRACT

We examined awareness of osteoporosis prevention among peri- and post-menopausal South Asian women attending two community centers in the Dallas/Fort-Worth Metroplex. We conducted a quasi-experimental study (final N = 61) assessing knowledge about osteoporosis among South Asian women (>or=40 years). The mean age was 52.3 years (SD = 8.72). Over 50% were college educated and 64% had no health insurance. We administered a baseline knowledge test, followed by a health education intervention and, 2 weeks later, by a post-test. Participants received one point for each correct answer and scores were added (

Subject(s)
Asian/education , Health Education/methods , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Osteoporosis/prevention & control , Adult , Asian/statistics & numerical data , Community Health Centers , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Program Evaluation , Risk Factors , Texas
10.
Am Fam Physician ; 77(12): 1697-702, 2008 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18619079

ABSTRACT

Gastrointestinal complications of diabetes include gastroparesis, intestinal enteropathy (which can cause diarrhea, constipation, and fecal incontinence), and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Patients with gastroparesis may present with early satiety, nausea, vomiting, bloating, postprandial fullness, or upper abdominal pain. The diagnosis of diabetic gastroparesis is made when other causes are excluded and postprandial gastric stasis is confirmed by gastric emptying scintigraphy. Whenever possible, patients should discontinue medications that exacerbate gastric dysmotility; control blood glucose levels; increase the liquid content of their diet; eat smaller meals more often; discontinue the use of tobacco products; and reduce the intake of insoluble dietary fiber, foods high in fat, and alcohol. Prokinetic agents (e.g., metoclopramide, erythromycin) may be helpful in controlling symptoms of gastroparesis. Treatment of diabetes-related constipation and diarrhea is aimed at supportive measures and symptom control. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is common in persons who are obese and who have diabetes. In persons with diabetes who have elevated hepatic transaminase levels, it is important to search for other causes of liver disease, including hepatitis and hemochromatosis. Gradual weight loss, control of blood glucose levels, and use of medications (e.g., pioglitazone, metformin) may normalize hepatic transaminase levels, but the clinical benefit of aggressively treating nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is unknown. Controlling blood glucose levels is important for managing most gastrointestinal complications.


Subject(s)
Antiemetics/therapeutic use , Diabetes Complications/physiopathology , Fatty Liver/etiology , Gastric Emptying , Gastroparesis , Metoclopramide/therapeutic use , Algorithms , Diabetes Complications/classification , Fatty Liver/physiopathology , Gastric Emptying/drug effects , Gastric Emptying/physiology , Gastroparesis/classification , Gastroparesis/etiology , Gastroparesis/physiopathology , Humans
11.
Am Fam Physician ; 74(12): 2046-54, 2006 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17186710

ABSTRACT

Parkinson's disease is a common neurodegenerative disorder that can cause significant disability and decreased quality of life. The cardinal physical signs of the disease are distal resting tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia, and asymmetric onset. Levodopa is the primary treatment for Parkinson's disease; however, its long-term use is limited by motor complications and drug-induced dyskinesia. Dopamine agonists are options for initial treatment and have been shown to delay the onset of motor complications. However, dopamine agonists are inferior to levodopa in controlling motor symptoms. After levodopa-related motor complications develop in advanced Parkinson's disease, it is beneficial to initiate adjuvant therapy with dopamine agonists, catechol O-methyltransferase inhibitors, or monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors. Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus has been shown to ameliorate symptoms in patients with advanced disease. Depression, dementia, and psychosis are common psychiatric problems associated with Parkinson's disease. Psychosis is usually drug induced and can be managed initially by reducing antiparkinsonian medications. The judicious use of psychoactive agents may be necessary. Consultation with a subspecialist is often required.


Subject(s)
Parkinson Disease/diagnosis , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Algorithms , Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Catechol O-Methyltransferase Inhibitors , Diagnosis, Differential , Dopamine Agonists/therapeutic use , Humans , Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Neuroprotective Agents/therapeutic use , Parkinson Disease/complications
13.
Fam Med ; 37(3): 193-8, 2005 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15739135

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To date, screening tools for domestic violence have been validated only for use with female patients. A four-item HITS (Hurt-Insult-Threaten-Scream) screening tool is one of those instruments. The purpose of the current research was to validate the HITS screening tool in a population of male patients. METHODS: In Phase I of the study, 78 non-victim male subjects from an ambulatory clinic, a Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) clinic, or emergency room completed the HITS and the Conflict Tactics Scale to establish the concurrent validity of the HITS. In Phase II, Optimal Data Analysis (ODA) was used to establish the construct validity of the HITS by identifying the score that reliably differentiated Phase I non-victims from 17 self-identified male victims of domestic violence. RESULTS: Concurrent validity of the HITS was good. ODA found that the score of 11 on the HITS differentiated between non-victims and victims. Sensitivity and specificity were 88% and 97%, respectively. Predictive values were 97% for non-victims and 88% for victims. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 34.41 and 0.12, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: HITS differentiated between male victimized respondents from non-victims in clinical settings.


Subject(s)
Mass Screening , Spouse Abuse/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...