Are contrast-enhanced and non-contrast MRI findings reflecting synovial inflammation in knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the correlation between knee synovitis assessed on contrast-enhanced (CE) and non-contrast enhanced (NCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with histology in patients with knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed, and related articles published through July 2018 were extracted. Spearman correlation coefficients of MRI-based scores with histology reports were pooled using random effects model. To evaluate presence of publication bias, Egger test was performed. RESULTS: Of 2377 identified records, eight studies consisting of 246 MRI exams were included. Two studies reported results of dynamic CE (DCE)-MRI examinations (81 knees) and two studies reported results of NCE-MRI. There were moderate positive correlations between CE-MRI scores and macroscopic (r = 0.53 (95% Confidence Interval (CI):0.37-0.66), P < 0.001) as well as microscopic (r = 0.56 (0.39-0.69), P < 0.001) histology. DCE-MRI were strongly correlated (r = 0.71 (0.58-0.80), P-value<0.001), with microscopic histology reports, while the correlation for NCE-MRI was low positive (r = 0.44 (0.20-0.63), P < 0.001). Meta-regression analysis showed that pooled correlation coefficients of DCE-MRI were significantly higher than CE-MRI (Slope = 0.29, SE = 0.13, P-value = 0.02). CE-MRI were also correlated with inflammatory infiltrate (r = 0.42), while the correlations for cell number of synovial lining (r = 0.27) and level of fibrosis (r = 0.29, P < 0.001) were very low. CONCLUSION: Static and dynamic CE-MRI evaluation of knee synovitis were positively correlated with macroscopic and microscopic features of synovial membrane inflammation. Among the features of synovial tissue inflammation, CE-MRI scores correlated best with the inflammatory infiltrates of synovial tissue. Paucity of current evidence warrants further studies to assess performance of NCE-MRI on determining knee synovitis.

Coupled Active Shape Models for Automated Segmentation and Landmark Localization in High-Resolution CT of the Foot and Ankle.

PURPOSE: We develop an Active Shape Model (ASM) framework for automated bone segmentation and anatomical landmark localization in weight-bearing Cone-Beam CT (CBCT). To achieve a robust shape model fit in narrow joint spaces of the foot (0.5 - 1 mm), a new approach for incorporating proximity constraints in ASM (coupled ASM, cASM) is proposed. METHODS: In cASM, shape models of multiple adjacent foot bones are jointly fit to the CBCT volume. This coupling enables checking for proximity between the evolving shapes to avoid situations where a conventional single-bone ASM might erroneously fit to articular surfaces of neighbouring bones. We used 21 extremity CBCT scans of the weight-bearing foot to compare segmentation and landmark localization accuracy of ASM and cASM in leave-one-out validation. Each scan was used as a test image once; shape models of calcaneus, talus, navicular, and cuboid were built from manual surface segmentations of the remaining 20 scans. The models were augmented with seven anatomical landmarks used for common measurements of foot alignment. The landmarks were identified in the original CBCT volumes and mapped onto mean bone shape surfaces. ASM and cASM were run for 100 iterations, and the number of principal shape components was increased every 10 iterations. Automated landmark localization was achieved by applying known point correspondences between landmark vertices on the mean shape and vertices of the final active shape segmentation of the test image. RESULTS: Root Mean Squared (RMS) error of bone surface segmentation improved from 3.6 mm with conventional ASM to 2.7 mm with cASM. Furthermore, cASM achieved convergence (no change in RMS error with iteration) after ~40 iterations of shape fitting, compared to ~60 iterations for ASM. Distance error in landmark localization was 25% to 55% lower (depending on the landmark) with cASM than with ASM. The importance of using a coupled model is underscored by the finding that cASM detected and corrected collisions between evolving shapes in 50% to 80% (depending on the bone) of shape model fits. CONCLUSION: The proposed cASM framework improves accuracy of shape model fits, especially in complexes of tightly interlocking, articulated joints. The approach enables automated anatomical analysis in volumetric imaging of the foot and ankle, where narrow joint spaces challenge conventional shape models.

Tibiofibular syndesmosis in asymptomatic ankles: initial kinematic analysis using four-dimensional CT.

AIM: To evaluate the reliability of ankle syndesmotic measurements and their changes during active motion using four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) examination in asymptomatic ankles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 4DCT was performed on both ankles of patients with signs and symptoms of unilateral ankle instability. Ankles from the asymptomatic side of 10 consecutive patients were included in this analysis. Five ankle syndesmotic measurements were adopted from the available literature and performed by two fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeons: (1) syndesmotic anterior distance (SAD); (2) syndesmotic posterior distance (SPD); (3) syndesmotic translation (ST); (4) syndesmotic tibiofibular angle (STFA); and (5) ankle tibiofibular angle (ATFA). A Monte Carlo simulation was also performed to obtain exact p-values with 99% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Excellent interobserver reliability was observed among the two readers for four out of five measurements (intra-class correlation coefficients [ICC]: 0.767-0.995, p<0.001-0.020). The ICC values for SAD were not statistically significant (ICC=0.548 and 0.569 for dorsi and plantarflexion respectively, p=0.1). Among the five measurements, only ST measurements had significant changes during active motion (median [interquartile range] for change: -0.70 mm [-1.6-0.10]; p=0.012). Of the above measurements, only the ST measurements demonstrated a negative linear association with the tibiocalcaneal angle during active motion (beta=-2.5, p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Reliable quantitative kinematic assessment of ankle syndesmosis can be performed using 4DCT examination. Syndesmotic measurements remain unchanged during ankle motion except for the syndesmotic translation, which tends to decrease during plantar flexion.