Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Med Chem ; 47(5): 1242-50, 2004 Feb 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14971904

ABSTRACT

We present an extension and confirmation of our previously published method (J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2867-2876) for the prediction of volume of distribution (VD) in humans for neutral and basic compounds. It is based on two experimentally determined physicochemical parameters, ElogD(7.4) and f(i(7.4)), the latter being the fraction of compound ionized at pH 7.4, and on the fraction of free drug in plasma (fu). By regressing the fraction unbound in tissues, fut, vs the above parameters, we demonstrate the ruggedness of the method in predicting VD through the Oie-Tozer equation, via the use of several testing approaches. A comparison is also presented between several methods based on animal pharmacokinetic data, using the same set of proprietary compounds, and it lends further support for the use of this method, as opposed to methods that require the gathering of pharmacokinetic data in laboratory animals. The reduction in the use of animals and the overall faster and cheaper accessibility of the parameters used make this method highly attractive for prospectively predicting the VD of new chemical entities in humans.


Subject(s)
Pharmaceutical Preparations/metabolism , Pharmacokinetics , Algorithms , Blood Proteins/metabolism , Half-Life , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Models, Biological , Pharmaceutical Preparations/blood , Protein Binding , Statistics as Topic , Tissue Distribution
2.
Mini Rev Med Chem ; 3(8): 861-75, 2003 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14529504

ABSTRACT

A critical review of a very recent work in the field of in silico ADME prediction is presented with emphasis on the work published during the period 2000-2002, and several other review articles are mentioned in order to offer a broader view of the field. We find that not much progress has been made in developing robust and predictive models, and that the lack of accurate data, together with the use of questionable modeling end-points, has greatly hindered the real progress in defining generally applicable models. Due to the largely empirical nature of QSAR/QSPR approaches, general and truly predictive models for complex phenomena, such as absorption and clearance, may still be chimeric. The development of local models for use within focused chemical series may be the most appropriate way of utilizing in silico ADME predictions, once experience and data have been gained on a given project and/or structural class.


Subject(s)
Computational Biology/methods , Pharmaceutical Preparations/metabolism , Pharmacokinetics , Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship , Animals , Biological Availability , Blood Proteins/metabolism , Blood-Brain Barrier/metabolism , Humans , Intestinal Absorption , Protein Binding , Solubility
3.
J Med Chem ; 45(13): 2867-76, 2002 Jun 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12061889

ABSTRACT

We present a method for the prediction of volume of distribution in humans, for neutral and basic compounds. It is based on two experimentally determined physicochemical parameters, ElogD(7.4) and f(i(7.4)), the latter being the fraction of compound ionized at pH 7.4 and on the fraction of free drug in plasma (f(u)). The fraction unbound in tissues (f(ut)), determined via a regression analysis from 64 compounds using the parameters described, is then used to predict VD(ss) via the Oie-Tozer equation. Accuracy of this method was determined using a test set of 14 compounds, and it was demonstrated that human VD(ss) values could be predicted, on average, within or very close to 2-fold of the actual value. The present method is as accurate as reported methods based on animal pharmacokinetic data, using a similar set of compounds, and ranges between 1.62 and 2.20 as mean-fold error. This method has the advantage of being amenable to automation, and therefore fast throughput, it is compound and resources sparing, and it offers a rationale for the reduction of the use of animals in pharmacokinetic studies. A discussion of the potential errors that may be encountered, including errors in the determination of f(u), is offered, and the caveats about the use of computed vs experimentally determined logD and pK(a) values are addressed.


Subject(s)
Blood Proteins/metabolism , Pharmaceutical Preparations/metabolism , Pharmacokinetics , Chemical Phenomena , Chemistry, Physical , Half-Life , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Models, Biological , Pharmaceutical Preparations/chemistry , Protein Binding
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...