A Phase 1 First-in-Human Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of JNJ-64264681, a Covalent Inhibitor of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase.

JNJ-64264681 is an irreversible covalent inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase. This phase 1, first-in-human, 2-part (single-ascending dose [SAD]; multiple-ascending dose [MAD]) study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD; Bruton's tyrosine kinase occupancy [BTKO]) of JNJ-64264681 oral solution in healthy participants. For SAD (N = 78), 6 increasing doses of JNJ-64264681 (4-400 mg) or placebo were evaluated in fasted males. The effects of sex, food, and a capsule formulation were evaluated in separate cohorts. For MAD (N = 27), sequential cohorts of male and female participants received 36/100/200 mg JNJ-64264681 once daily for 10 days. JNJ-64264681 exposure (peak concentration; area under the concentration-time curve) was less than dose proportional from 4 mg to 36 mg. Dose-normalized area under the concentration-time curves following the 36 mg and 100 mg doses were generally similar. The mean terminal half-life was 1.6-13.2 hours. With multiple doses, steady state was achieved by day 2. A semimechanistic PK/PD model was developed using the first 5 SAD cohorts' data to predict %BTKO in MAD cohorts. PK/PD model guided dose-escalation, and all participants in the 200/400 mg single-dose cohorts achieved ≥90% BTKO at 4 hours after dosing (peak) with prolonged occupancy. As BTKO data became available from MAD cohorts, it was found that observed BTKO data were consistent with model predictions. JNJ-64264681 showed no safety signals of concern. Overall, safety, tolerability, PK, BTKO, and PK/PD modeling guided the rationale for dose selection for the subsequent first-in-patient lymphoma studies.

A multiple-dose double-blind randomized study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and analgesic efficacy of the TRPV1 antagonist JNJ-39439335 (mavatrep).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This double-blind (DB), randomized, placebo-controlled, sequential-group, multiple-ascending dose, phase 1 study evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of JNJ-39439335 in healthy men (part 1), and in participants with knee osteoarthritis (part 2). METHODS: Both parts 1 and 2 consisted of screening (upto 21 days), 21-day DB treatment phase [eight participants/group: JNJ-39439335 (part 1: 2-50 mg; part 2: 10-50 mg): n=6; placebo: n=2] and follow-up (total study duration ~10 weeks). RESULTS: Plasma concentrations and systemic exposure of JNJ-39439335 increased in slightly higher than dose-proportional fashion (steady-state reached by day 14). Renal excretion of JNJ-39439335 was negligible. Marked dose-related increases in pharmacodynamic heat pain assessments were observed in JNJ-39439335-treated participants, which persisted throughout the treatment with no signs of tolerance with repeated dosing. No effect on pharmacodynamic cold pain or mechanical pain assessments were seen. Effects on pharmacodynamic capsaicin-induced flare assessments in JNJ-39439335-treated participants versus placebo were consistent with effects observed with single-dose, and did not demonstrate tolerance with multiple dosing. In participants with knee osteoarthritis, significant improvements versus placebo were observed in a stair-climbing-induced pain model. All JNJ-39439335-treated participants reported ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE); most common (≥50% incidence) TEAEs in part 1 were feeling hot (79%), thermohypoesthesia (71%), paresthesia (58%) and feeling cold (50%), and in part 2, were minor thermal burns (50%). CONCLUSIONS: JNJ-39439335 (doses 2-50 mg) was well-tolerated, and associated with acceptable multiple-dose pharmacokinetic profile. JNJ-39439335 demonstrated sustained pharmacodynamic effects (heat pain perception, heat pain latency, capsaicin-induced flare), and an efficacy signal in participants with osteoarthritis pain. IMPLICATIONS: Given the efficacy signal observed and the unique safety profile, larger phase 2 studies are needed to better understand the potential of JNJ-39439335 in the treatment of chronic pain. Analgesic efficacy of lower doses administered over a longer period of time and improved patient counseling techniques to reduce the minor thermal burns can be explored to minimize the adverse events.

Bioavailability and Pharmacokinetics of TRPV1 Antagonist Mavatrep (JNJ-39439335) Tablet and Capsule Formulations in Healthy Men: Two Open-Label, Crossover, Single-Dose Phase 1 Studies.

To improve room temperature stability and oral bioavailability of mavatrep (JNJ-39439335, a transient receptor potential vanilloid subtype-1 antagonist), various formulations were initially developed and evaluated in 2 phase 1 open-label, randomized, 3-way crossover studies in healthy participants. Study 1 evaluated 2 new overencapsulated tablet formulations (formulations B and C) relative to an overencapsulated early tablet formulation (formulation A), using mavatrep HCl salt form. Because these tablets were still not room-temperature stable, in study 2: two free-base solid dispersion amorphous formulations (formulations D and E) were evaluated relative to the best encapsulated formulation from study 1 (formulation C) and also food effect. Both studies had screening (∼4 weeks), treatment (study 1: n = 18, 6-sequenced; formulations B and C [2 × 25 mg] versus A [2 × 25 mg]; study 2, part 1: n = 24, formulations D and E [2 × 12.5 mg] versus C [1 × 25 mg]; study 2, part 2: n = 16, best formulation from part 1 fed versus fasted, 2 × 12.5 mg) with a 21-day washout period and a follow-up. Mavatrep exhibited consistent pharmacokinetics across formulations. Following rapid absorption (median tmax , 1.5-6.5 hours), plasma concentrations declined multiexponentially (mean t1/2 , 67-104 hours). The new encapsulated tablet formulation (formulation C, capsule filler: poloxamer 407) was the best formulation (Cmax and AUC values 2-3-fold > than the other 2) from study 1. Using this as a reference in study 2, part 1, only small (<20%) differences in mean Cmax and AUC were observed between the 3 formulations (C, D, and E). Formulation E (gelatin capsule with amorphous solid dispersion [12.5 mg free base], hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, vitamin E polyethylene glycol succinate, silicified microcrystalline cellulose, magnesium stearate, colloidal silicon dioxide) showed improved room-temperature stability and provided the best overall bioavailability with small variability. Small effects of a high-fat meal on oral bioavailability were observed for formulation E, but were not clinically meaningful. Mavatrep safety profiles were similar across formulations and under fasted and fed conditions. No new safety concerns were reported.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Mavatrep (JNJ-39439335), a TRPV1 Antagonist in Healthy Japanese and Caucasian Men: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Sequential-Group Phase 1 Study.

This single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential-group phase 1 study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of mavatrep (JNJ-39439335), a transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 antagonist, in healthy Japanese and caucasian subjects. In part 1, a single-ascending-dose study, 50 subjects (25 each healthy Japanese and caucasians) were enrolled and received a single oral dose of 10, 25, or 50 mg mavatrep. Caucasian subjects were matched to Japanese subjects with respect to age (±5 years) and body mass index (±5 kg/m2 ). In part 2, a multiple-ascending-dose study, 36 Japanese subjects were enrolled and received once-daily oral doses of 10, 25, or 50 mg of mavatrep for 21 days. The single-dose PK of mavatrep and its metabolites was similar in the Japanese and caucasian subjects after adjustment of body weight. Following multiple dosing in Japanese subjects, a steady-state condition was reached in approximately 14 days. M2 and M3 are major circulating metabolites with mean exposure > 10% of mavatrep. Nonrenal clearance was the major route of elimination for mavatrep, M2, and M3. Mavatrep exhibited a long half-life, ranging from 68 to 101 and 82-130 hours for Japanese and caucasian subjects, respectively. After single and multiple dosing, mavatrep was well tolerated. The most common adverse events observed were thermohypoesthesia, feeling cold, chills, and feeling hot. Mavatrep and its metabolites exhibited similar PK profiles after single ascending doses in healthy Japanese and caucasian men.

A randomized study to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of a single dose of the TRPV1 antagonist mavatrep in patients with osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1) receptor antagonists have been evaluated in clinical studies for their analgesic effects. Mavatrep, a potent, selective, competitive TRPV1 receptor antagonist has demonstrated pharmacodynamic effects consistent with target engagement at the TRPV1 receptor in a previous single-dose clinical study. The current study was conducted to evaluate the analgesic effects of a single dose of mavatrep. METHODS: In this randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, 3-way crossover, phase 1b study, patients with painful knee osteoarthritis were treated with a single-dose of 50mg mavatrep, 500mg naproxen twice-daily, and placebo. Patients were randomized to 1 of 6 treatment sequences. Each treatment sequence included three treatment periods of 7 days duration with a 7 day washout between each treatment period. The primary efficacy evaluation was pain reduction measured by the 4-h postdose sum of pain intensity difference (SPID) based on the 11-point (0-10) Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain after stair-climbing (PASC). The secondary efficacy evaluations included 11-point (0-10) NRS pain scores entered into the Actiwatch between clinic visits, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index subscales (WOMAC) questionnaire, and use of rescue medication. Safety and tolerability of single oral dose mavatrep were also assessed. RESULTS: Of 33 patients randomized, 32 completed the study. A statistically significantly (p<0.1) greater reduction in PASC was observed for mavatrep versus placebo (4-h SPID least square mean [LSM] [SE] difference: 1.5 [0.53]; p=0.005 and 2-h LSM [SE] difference of PID: 0.7 [0.30]; p=0.029). The mean average daily current pain NRS scores were lower in the mavatrep and naproxen treatment arm than in the placebo arm (mavatrep: 7 day mean [SD], 3.72 [1.851]; naproxen: 7 day mean [SD], 3.49 [1.544]; placebo: 7 day mean [SD], 4.9 [1.413]). Mavatrep showed statistically significant improvements as compared with placebo on the WOMAC subscales (pain on days 2 [p=0.049] and 7 [p=0.041], stiffness on day 7 [p=0.075]), and function on day 7 [p=0.077]). The same pattern of improvement was evident for naproxen versus placebo. The mean (SD) number of rescue medication tablets taken during the 7-day treatment period was 4.2 (6.49) for mavatrep treatment, 2.8 (5.42) for naproxen, and 6.3 (8.25) for placebo treatment. All patients that received mavatrep reported at least 1 treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE). Feeling cold (79%), thermohypoesthesia (61%), dysgeusia (58%), paraesthesia (36%), and feeling hot (15%) were the most common TEAEs in the mavatrep group. Total 9% patients receiving mavatrep experienced minor thermal burns. No deaths or serious AEs or discontinuations due to AEs occurred. CONCLUSION: Overall, mavatrep was associated with a significant reduction in pain, stiffness, and physical function when compared with placebo in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Mavatrep's safety profile was consistent with its mechanism of action as a TRPV1 antagonist. IMPLICATIONS: Further studies are required to evaluate whether lower multiple doses of mavatrep can produce analgesic efficacy while minimizing adverse events, as well as the potential for improved patient counselling techniques to reduce the minor thermal burns related to decreased heat perception. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 2009-010961-21 (EudraCT Number).

TRPV1 antagonist JNJ-39439335 (mavatrep) demonstrates proof of pharmacology in healthy men: a first-in-human, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, sequential group study.

This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, sequential group, phase 1 study was designed to assess in healthy men, the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and translational pharmacodynamics of JNJ-39439335 (mavatrep), a transient receptor potential vanilloid subtype 1 antagonist; it was preceded by a translational preclinical study which assessed the ability of JNJ-39439335 to block capsaicin-induced flare in rats, providing predictive pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data that informed the subsequent phase 1 clinical study. The clinical study consisted of 2 parts: part 1 assessed pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, including heat pain detection threshold and heat pain tolerance, of JNJ-39439335, and part 2 assessed pharmacodynamic effect of JNJ-39439335 on capsaicin-induced flare and sensory testing on naïve and UVB-sensitized skin in humans. Plasma concentrations of JNJ-39439335 peaked at approximately 2 to 4 hours postdose, then declined multiexponentially, with a prolonged terminal phase (half-life: 30-86 hours). Renal clearance of JNJ-39439335 was negligible. JNJ-39439335 treatment resulted in clear, consistent dose-related increases in heat pain detection threshold, heat pain tolerance, and heat pain latency. JNJ-39439335 reduced the capsaicin-induced flare area and flare intensity, with complete blocking observed in the 50-mg dose group at 144 hours postdose. This was consistent with the capsaicin flare results observed with JNJ-39439335 in rats. The most common adverse events observed in the clinical study were related to increases in body temperature after JNJ-39439335 treatment; these were predominately mild to moderate in severity with no evidence of exposure dependence up to 225 mg. JNJ-39439335 was well tolerated at single doses up to 225 mg, recommending its suitability for further clinical development.

Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Learnings from a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Sequential Group First-in-Human Study of the TRPV1 Antagonist, JNJ-38893777, in Healthy Men.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Nociceptive and neuropathic pain, one of common reasons of disability and loss of quality life, are often undertreated due to safety concerns with current therapies. This study assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of JNJ-38893777, a potent and selective transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) channel antagonist in healthy men. METHODS: In a single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential group, single-ascending-dose phase 1 study, 80 healthy men (18-45 years old; body mass index 18.5 to <30 kg/m(2)), randomized to two groups, received either JNJ-38893777 (n = 6) or placebo (n = 2) in a dose-escalation manner. The study was designed in two parts: Part 1, an early tablet formulation was administered under fasting conditions at 5, 15, 45, 125, 250, or 500 mg; Part 2, a new tablet formulation was administered in a fasting state (250 mg) and a high-fat fed state (250 mg, 375 mg, or 500 mg). Serial plasma and urine samples (collected over 120 h post-dose) were analyzed using LC-MS/MS for pharmacokinetic evaluations. RESULTS: JNJ-38893777 concentrations peaked from 3.0 to 5.5 h (median) post-administration, and then declined multi-exponentially with a prolonged terminal phase. Renal clearance was negligible. Maximum concentration (C max) and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC∞) of the early formulation increased with increasing doses but less than dose-proportionally over 5-500 mg (fasted) doses. The new tablet formulation showed no improvements in the fasting state but showed an 11- to 22-fold increase in JNJ-38893777 exposure; interindividual variability reduced from 73-85% to 23-24%, and a significant increase (P < 0.05) in heat pain detection threshold (~3 °C) was observed in the fed state. Mild to moderate adverse events were observed, with no evidence of exposure dependence up to 500 mg (fed). Concentration-related increases in body temperature or changes in Fridericia-corrected QT interval (QTcF) were not observed. CONCLUSION: JNJ-38893777 was tolerated at single doses up to 500 mg (fed) and is suitable for further clinical development.

Pharmacokinetic interactions between topiramate and pioglitazone and metformin.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate potential drug-drug interactions between topiramate and metformin and pioglitazone at steady state. METHODS: Two open-label studies were performed in healthy adult men and women. In Study 1, eligible participants were given metformin alone for 3 days (500 mg twice daily [BID]) followed by concomitant metformin and topiramate (titrated to 100mg BID) from days 4 to 10. In Study 2, eligible participants were randomly assigned to treatment with pioglitazone 30 mg once daily (QD) alone for 8 days followed by concomitant pioglitazone and topiramate (titrated to 96 mg BID) from days 9 to 22 (Group 1) or to topiramate (titrated to 96 mg BID) alone for 11 days followed by concomitant pioglitazone 30 mg QD and topiramate 96 mg BID from days 12 to 22 (Group 2). An analysis of variance was used to evaluate differences in pharmacokinetics with and without concomitant treatment; 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the ratio of the geometric least squares mean (LSM) estimates for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under concentration-time curve for dosing interval (AUC12 or AUC24), and oral clearance (CL/F) with and without concomitant treatment were used to assess a drug interaction. RESULTS: A comparison to historical data suggested a modest increase in topiramate oral clearance when given concomitantly with metformin. Coadministration with topiramate reduced metformin oral clearance at steady state, resulting in a modest increase in systemic metformin exposure. Geometric LSM ratios and 90% CI for metformin CL/F and AUC12 were 80% (75%, 85%) and 125% (117%, 134%), respectively. Pioglitazone had no effect on topiramate pharmacokinetics at steady state. Concomitant topiramate resulted in decreased systemic exposure to pioglitazone and its active metabolites, with geometric LSM ratios and 90% CI for AUC24 of 85.0% (75.7%, 95.6%) for pioglitazone, 40.5% (36.8%, 44.6%) for M-III, and 83.8% (76.1%, 91.2%) for M-IV, respectively. This effect appeared more pronounced in women than in men. Coadministration of topiramate with metformin or pioglitazone was generally well tolerated by healthy participants in these studies. CONCLUSIONS: A modest increase in metformin exposure and decrease in topiramate exposure was observed at steady state following coadministration of metformin 500 mg BID and topiramate 100mg BID. The clinical significance of the observed interaction is unclear but is not likely to require a dose adjustment of either agent. Pioglitazone 30 mg QD did not affect the pharmacokinetics of topiramate at steady state, while coadministration of topiramate 96 mg BID with pioglitazone decreased steady-state systemic exposure to pioglitazone, M-III, and M-IV. While the clinical consequence of this interaction is unknown, careful attention should be given to the routine monitoring for adequate glycemic control of patients receiving this concomitant therapy. Concomitant administration of topiramate with metformin or pioglitazone was generally well tolerated and no new safety concerns were observed.

Pharmacokinetics of topiramate in patients with renal impairment, end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis, or hepatic impairment.

PURPOSE: Topiramate is primarily renally excreted. Chronic renal and hepatic impairment can affect the clearance of topiramate. Therefore, the objective was to establish dosage guidelines for topiramate in chronic renal impairment, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing hemodialysis, or chronic hepatic impairment patients. METHODS: In 3 separate open-label, parallel group studies (n=5-7/group), in patients with mild-moderate and severe renal impairment (based on creatinine clearance), ESRD requiring hemodialysis, or moderate-severe hepatic impairment (based on Child-Pugh classification) and matching healthy participants, pharmacokinetics of a single oral 100mg topiramate was determined. RESULTS: Compared with healthy controls, overall exposure (AUC0-∞) for topiramate was higher in mild-moderate (85%) and severe renal impairment (117%), consistent with significantly (p<0.05) lower apparent total body clearance (CL/F) and renal clearance (CLR), leading to longer elimination half-life. Both CLR and CL/F of topiramate correlated well with renal function. CL/F was comparable in ESRD and severe renal impairment. Half of usual starting and maintenance dose is recommended in moderate-severe renal impairment patients, and those with ESRD. Hemodialysis effectively removed plasma topiramate with mean dialysis clearance approximately 12-fold greater than CL/F (123.5 mL/min versus 10.8 mL/min). Compared with healthy matched, patients with moderate-severe hepatic impairment exhibited small increase (29%) in topiramate peak plasma concentrations and AUC0-∞ values, consistent with lower CL/F (26%). Topiramate was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Half of usual dose is recommended for moderate-severe renal impairment and ESRD. Supplemental dose may be required during hemodialysis. Dose adjustments might not be required in moderate-severe hepatic impairments; however, the small sample size limits generalization.

Pharmacokinetic interactions between topiramate and diltiazem, hydrochlorothiazide, or propranolol.

Drug-drug interactions between topiramate and diltiazem, hydrochlorothiazide, or propranolol were evaluated along with safety/tolerability in three open-label studies. Healthy participants (aged 18-45 years) received topiramate 75 mg every 12 hours (q12h) and diltiazem 240 mg/day (study 1); topiramate 96 mg q12h and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg/day (study 2); topiramate 100 mg q12h and propranolol 40-80 mg q12h (study 3). The pharmacokinetic parameters for topiramate, diltiazem (and active metabolites, desacetyldiltiazem [DEA], N-demethyl diltiazem [DEM]), hydrochlorothiazide, and propranolol (and its active metabolite) were assessed at steady state. Results showed no effect of diltiazem on topiramate pharmacokinetics. However, a modest reduction in systemic exposures of diltiazem and DEA (10-27%) occurred during coadministration with topiramate. Systemic exposure of DEM was unaffected. Furthermore, oral and renal clearance of topiramate decreased (22-30%) significantly (P < 0.05) during coadministration with hydrochlorothiazide, while systemic exposure increased by 27-29%. Topiramate had no effect on hydrochlorothiazide pharmacokinetics. The results demonstrated lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between topiramate and propranolol. Overall, no new safety concerns emerged when topiramate was coadministered with diltiazem, hydrochlorothiazide, or propranolol.

An open-label drug-drug interaction study of the steady-state pharmacokinetics of topiramate and glyburide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Topiramate is approved for epilepsy and migraine headache management and has potential antidiabetic activity. Because topiramate and antidiabetic drugs may be co-administered, the potential drug-drug interactions between topiramate and glyburide (glibenclamide), a commonly used sulfonylurea antidiabetic agent, was evaluated at steady state in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: This was a single-center, open-label, phase I, drug interaction study of topiramate (150 mg/day) and glyburide (5 mg/day alone and concomitantly) in patients with T2DM. The study consisted of 14-day screening, 48-day open-label treatment, and a 7-day follow-up phase. Serial blood and urine were obtained and analyzed by liquid chromatography coupled mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry for topiramate, glyburide, and its active metabolites M1 (4-trans-hydroxy-glyburide) and M2 (3-cis-hydroxy-glyburide) concentrations. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by model-independent methods. Changes in fasting plasma glucose from baseline and safety parameters were monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: Of 28 enrolled patients, 24 completed the study. Co-administration of topiramate resulted in a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in the glyburide area under the concentration-time curve (25 %) and maximum plasma concentration (22 %), and reduction in systemic exposure of M1 (13 %) and M2 (15 %). Renal clearance of M1 (13 %) and M2 (12 %) increased during treatment with topiramate. Steady-state pharmacokinetics of topiramate were unaffected by co-administration of glyburide. Co-administration of topiramate and glyburide was generally tolerable in patients with T2DM. CONCLUSION: Glyburide did not affect the pharmacokinetics of topiramate. Co-administration of topiramate decreased systemic exposure of glyburide and its active metabolites; combined treatment may require dosing adjustments of glyburide as per clinical judgment and glycemic control.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of adjunctive topiramate in infants (1-24 months) with refractory partial-onset seizures: a randomized, multicenter, open-label phase 1 study.

PURPOSE: To characterize the pharmacokinetics of adjunctive topiramate in infants (1-24 months) with refractory partial-onset seizures (POS); also to evaluate safety and tolerability of topiramate in the dose range of 3-25 mg/kg/day. METHODS: In this open-label phase 1 study, infants (N = 55) with refractory POS receiving at least one concurrent antiepileptic drug (AED) were enrolled. Infants were stratified by age and randomly assigned to one of four topiramate target dose groups (3-, 5-, 15-, or 25 mg/kg/day). Treatment was initiated at 3 mg/kg/day with titration to the target dose by weekly dose escalation. Topiramate was administered daily in two divided doses as oral liquid (5 mg/ml for infants <9 kg or those who could not tolerate solid foods) or sprinkle capsule (25 mg) formulations. Following seven consecutive days of topiramate administration at the target dose, four blood samples were collected from each infant for pharmacokinetic assessments (predose, 1-3, 4-6, and 8-10 h postdose). KEY FINDINGS: Fifty-five infants (mean [SD] age in months: 11.4 [5.79]) with POS were enrolled, of whom 33% had seizures with or without secondary generalization. Complete pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained in 35 infants in whom mean plasma topiramate concentration-time profiles demonstrated linear pharmacokinetics (predose topiramate concentrations [C(trough) ] and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 through 12 h [AUC(12 h)]) of topiramate over the dose range studied). Apparent steady state oral clearance (CL(ss) /F) remained similar across all topiramate target dose groups and was independent of creatinine clearance, age, and weight. Mean values for CL(ss) /F were approximately twofold greater in infants receiving concomitant enzyme-inducing AEDs versus enzyme-inhibiting AEDs. Topiramate was well tolerated and safety findings were consistent with previous reports in children and adults. Most common treatment emergent adverse events (≥10%) were upper respiratory tract infection, fever, vomiting, somnolence, and anorexia. SIGNIFICANCE: In infants (1-24 months), topiramate exhibited linear steady state pharmacokinetics over the dose range 3-25 mg/kg/day, and CL(ss) /F of topiramate was independent of dose. Moreover, the concomitant enzyme-inducing AEDs doubled the clearance of topiramate. Topiramate was generally well tolerated as adjunctive therapy at doses up to 25 mg/kg/day.

Long-term open-label study of adjunctive topiramate in infants with refractory partial-onset seizures.

Data from 2 studies (phase 1 and phase 3) in infants <2 years old (N = 284; mean [SD] age, 12[6.3] months) with refractory partial-onset seizures were pooled to assess the long-term safety up to 1 year (primary objective) and tolerability of adjunctive topiramate treatment (mean treatment duration = 282 days). Monthly seizure rate summaries were also assessed. During the open-label extensions of these studies, study medication was first titrated to a dose of 25 mg/kg/d with subsequent uptitration to the maximum dosage tolerated, or seizure freedom, or a maximum of 60 mg/kg/d, whichever occurred first. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (≥30%) were fever (52%), respiratory tract infections (51%), anorexia (35%), and acidosis (31%). Mean (SD) changes from pretreatment baseline to endpoint in Z scores for growth parameters were as follows: -0.82 (1.19) (body weight), -0.45 (1.60) (body length), and -0.36 (1.02) (head circumference).Tolerability in infants was consistent with previous studies.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics of intravenous itraconazole and hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin in infants, children, and adolescents.

This investigation was designed to evaluate the single-dose pharmacokinetics of itraconazole, hydroxyitraconazole, and hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin (HP-beta-CD) after intravenous administration to children at risk for fungal infection. Thirty-three children aged 7 months to 17 years received a single dose of itraconazole (2.5 mg/kg in 0.1-g/kg HP-beta-CD) administered over 1 h by intravenous infusion. Plasma samples for the determination of the analytes of interest were drawn over 120 h and analyzed by high-pressure liquid chromatography, and the pharmacokinetics were determined by traditional noncompartmental analysis. Consistent with the role of CYP3A4 in the biotransformation of itraconazole, a substantial degree of variability was observed in the pharmacokinetics of this drug after IV administration. The maximum plasma concentrations (C(max)) for itraconazole, hydroxyitraconazole, and HP-beta-CD averaged 1,015 +/- 692 ng/ml, 293 +/- 133 ng/ml, and 329 +/- 200 mug/ml, respectively. The total body exposures (area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h) for itraconazole, hydroxyitraconazole, and HP-beta-CD averaged 4,922 +/- 6,784 ng.h/ml, 3,811 +/- 2,794 ng.h/ml, and 641.5 +/- 265.0 mug.h/ml, respectively, with no significant age dependence observed among the children evaluated. Similarly, there was no relationship between age and total body clearance (702.8 +/- 499.4 ml/h/kg); however, weak associations between age and the itraconazole distribution volume (r(2) = 0.18, P = 0.02), C(max) (r(2) = 0.14, P = 0.045), and terminal elimination rate (r(2) = 0.26, P < 0.01) were noted. Itraconazole infusion appeared to be well tolerated in this population with a single adverse event (stinging at the site of infusion) deemed to be related to study drug administration. Based on the findings of this investigation, it appears that intravenous itraconazole can be administered to infants beyond 6 months, children, and adolescents using a weight-normalized approach to dosing.