The effect of virtual reality on pain and anxiety management during outpatient hysteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) intervention for pain and anxiety relief during outpatient hysteroscopy. METHODS: Various databases were searched for available clinical trials from inception until June 2023. We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared virtual reality intervention versus standard care among women undergoing outpatient hysteroscopy. We used Revman software to perform our meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the pain score during the procedure. The secondary outcomes were anxiety during the procedure and pain post-procedure. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to assess pain and anxiety. RESULTS: Six RCTs were retrieved, involving a total of 457 patients. Virtual reality was associated with a significant reduction in pain score during the procedure in comparison with the control group (MD = - 1.43, 95% CI [- 1.69, - 1.16], p < 0.001). In addition, there was a significant decrease in anxiety during the procedure among the virtual reality group compared to the control group (p = 0.01). The pain score post-procedure significantly decreased within the virtual reality group (MD = - 1.52, 95% CI [- 1.78, - 1.26], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Virtual reality technology is a simple, feasible, and effective intervention for reducing pain and anxiety during outpatient hysteroscopy. More trials are required to confirm our findings.

Effect of Dexmedetomidine, Dexamethasone, and Ondansetron on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Children Undergoing Dental Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common unpleasant adverse effects after surgery. The incidence of PONV in pediatric patients is often twice as high as in adults. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of dexmedetomidine, dexamethasone, and ondansetron for preventing PONV in children undergoing dental rehabilitation surgery. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Sharurah Armed Forces Hospital, Ministry of Defense Medical Services, Saudi Arabia. METHODS: One hundred patients (6-12 years old) scheduled for dental rehabilitation were included. Patients were randomly allocated into 4 groups (25 each) to receive either 0.15 mg/kg dexamethasone (DEX), 0.05 mg/kg ondansetron (OND), 0.3 microgram/kg dexmedetomidine (DEXMED), or normal saline (control[CONT]) in DEX, OND, DEXMED or CONT groups, respectively, via infusion after induction of anesthesia. The primary outcome was a PONV incident in the first 24 hours. Secondary outcomes were: granisetron doses during 24 hours postoperative, Paediatric Anaesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale, Pediatric Objective Pain Scale (POPS) for 4 hours postoperatively, and complications in the first 24 hours. RESULTS: The reduction of PONV and the overall number of patients who developed PONV was statistically significant in the DEXMED group compared to the CONT group (P = 0.041). However, the DEXMED group was higher compared to the DEX and OND groups but not statistically significant. Granisetron requirements and doses were statistically significantly lower in the DEXMED group than in the CONT group. PAED and POPS scores were much better in the DEXMED group than in the other groups with a statistically significant difference in most of the time measurements. LIMITATION: Optimal dexmedetomidine dose for better effect on PONV without affecting hemodynamic stability requires more studies. CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine is effective in reducing PONV in children undergoing dental rehabilitation with better sedative and analgesic scores as compared to the control group.

Pediatric Postoperative Pain Control With Quadratus Lumborum Block and Dexamethasone in Two Routes With Bupivacaine: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided Quadratus Lumborum block (QLB) is a regional analgesia approach that has been reported to provide effective post-operative pain relief for both abdominal and retroperitoneal surgery. Bupivacaine is the most often used and well documented local anesthetic medication in children. Dexamethasone is a systemic glucocorticoid that is often used to minimize postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain to improve recovery quality after surgery. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate postoperative analgesia of QLB in pediatric patients undergoing renal surgeries by the addition of dexamethasone to bupivacaine compared to intravenous administration. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Pediatric surgery unit in a university hospital. METHODS: One hundred and five patients (6-12 years old) scheduled for renal surgeries were randomly allocated into 3 groups, with 35 patients in each group. Randomization was based on computer-generated codes. The groups were DEX1 (QLB with IV dexamethasone group), DEX2 (QLB dexamethasone group), and QLB CONTROL (QLB alone). The 1st time for rescue analgesia request, total morphine consumption, Pediatric Objective Pain Scale (POPS), and parents' satisfaction score were measured in 24 hours follow-up to evaluate postoperative pain control. RESULTS: The time to 1st rescue analgesics request (hours), total morphine consumption (mg), and the parents' satisfaction scores were much better in groups DEX1 and DEX2 as compared to group CONTROL with statistical significance. However, group DEX2 was better than DEX1 in the previous outcomes but without statistical significance. In respect, the pediatric objective pain scale was much lower with a significant difference in groups DEX1and DEX2 in comparison with group CONTROL up to 18 hours postoperatively. LIMITATIONS: Difficult to assess the block as all children were sedated, plus this was a unilateral surgical procedure with limited surgical incision, so the effect of QLB needed to be studied when there is a bilateral surgical procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Dexamethasone may be more effective when added to bupivacaine than when given systemically in analgesic effects without any impact on the other secondary pain-related outcomes. Dexamethasone as an adjuvant to bupivacaine has a marked hand on prolongation of the postoperative duration of analgesia, less request for rescue analgesia, and fewer side effects as compared to bupivacaine if used as a sole agent in QLB.

Superior Hypogastric Plexus Block for Pain Management Post-Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of superior hypogastric plexus (SHP) block in pain relief among women undergoing hysterectomy. Cochrane Library, PubMed, ISI web of science, and Scopus were searched from inception to May 2021 for the available randomized clinical trials (RCTs). We included RCTs that compared SHP block (intervention group) to saline (control group) in hysterectomy. Our primary outcomes were pain scores at different time intervals using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Our secondary outcomes were postoperative opioid consumption within 24 hours and postoperative nausea and vomiting incidence. We extracted the available data from included studies and pooled them in a meta-analysis model using RevMan software. Four RCTs with a total number of 289 patients met our inclusion criteria. The VAS pain scores were significantly declined at post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), 2, 6, and 12 hours postoperatively among SHP block group (p < 0.05). However, no significant difference was reported in VAS pain score 1 day postoperatively between intervention and control groups. Moreover, SHP block significantly reduced the postoperative opioid consumption and incidence of nausea and vomiting (p = 0.03 & p = 0.003). In conclusion, superior hypogastric plexus block effectively reduces postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and incidence of nausea and vomiting post-hysterectomy.

The impact of virtual reality on pain management during normal labor: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of virtual reality on pain management during normal labor. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in September 2021 through PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and ISI web of science. We selected randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared virtual reality in the intervention group versus placebo or no intervention in the control group among laboring women during their normal delivery. Revman software was used for performing our meta-analysis. Our primary outcome was the pain score evaluated during the labor process by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Our secondary outcomes were anxiety and satisfaction scores during childbirth in addition to the duration of the first and second stages of labor. RESULTS: Eight RCTs met our inclusion criteria with a total number of 466 patients. We found virtual reality was linked to a significant reduction in the VAS pain score during labor compared to the control group (MD = -1.40, 95% CI [-1.83, -0.96], p < 0.001). The anxiety score during labor was significantly reduced among the virtual reality group (SMD = -1.15, 95% CI [-2.18, -0.12], p = 0.03). Moreover, virtual reality significantly improved the satisfaction score during labor (MD = 15.58, 95% CI [4.93, 26.22], p = 0.004). However, there were no significant differences between virtual reality and control groups regarding the duration of the first and second stages of labor. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual reality is an effective technique for reducing anxiety, increasing satisfaction, and improving pain management during normal labor.