[Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of the drug Sinupret in preoperative preparation and the postoperative period of observation (treatment) during planned rhino-surgical interventions]. / Sravnitel'naya otsenka effektivnosti preparata «Sinupret¼ v predoperatsionnoi podgotovke i posleoperatsionnom periode nablyudeniya (lecheniya) pri planovykh rinokhirurgicheskikh vmeshatel'stvakh.

INTRODUCTION: Pathology of the nose and paranasal sinuses currently occupy one of the leading places in the general structure of diseases of the ENT organs. The proportion of patients in this group who are treated in highly specialized departments of the hospital and who undergo surgical interventions in the nasal cavity is more than 65%. OBJECTIVE: To equalize the efficacy and safetyof the preparation Sinupret in combination with standard therapy in patients in the preoperative and postoperative periods with planned surgical interventions in violation of the architectonics of the nasal cavity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: On the clinical basis of the Department of Otorhinolaryngology of the Ural State Medical University of Yekaterinburg, the comparative efficacy and safety of the use of Sinupret in planned surgical interventions in the nasal cavity in patients in preoperative preparation and postoperative management were evaluated. RESULTS: After performing planned surgical interventions in the nasal cavity (septoplasty and submucosal vasotomy with partial resection of the posterior extremities of the lower nasal turbinates), in the observed who in combination with standard conservative therapy received a plant-based remedy, the average score of the total amount of the SNOT-22 test was 20.4, and in patients who, after a similar operation, received only standard conservative treatment, the average score of the total test amount was 20.4, and in patients who after a similar operation received only standard conservative treatment, the average score of the total test amount of the test SNOT-22 corresponded to 28.1, given that the average score of the total amount of the SNOT-22 test before these interventions and the course of therapy was 56.8. The recovery period of nasal breathing was also shortened and the clinical picture improved in patients receiving complex treatment. CONCLUSION: The use of herbal remedies in combination with standard therapy can reduce the time spent in the hospital after planned surgical interventions in the nasal cavity, accelerate the healing and restoration of the nasal mucosa after surgery, and also qualitatively facilitate postoperative care.