Cross-Seal IDE Trial: Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of the Cross-Seal Suture-Mediated Vascular Closure Device System.

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of interventional procedures require large-sheath technology (>12F) with a favorable outcome with endovascular rather than open surgical access. However, vascular complications are a limitation for the management of these patients. This trial aimed to determine the effectiveness and safety of the Cross-Seal suture-mediated vascular closure device in obtaining hemostasis at the target limb access site following interventional procedures using 8F to 18F procedural sheaths. METHODS: The Cross-Seal IDE trial (Investigational Device Exemption) was a prospective, single-arm, multicenter study in subjects undergoing percutaneous endovascular procedures utilizing 8F to 18F ID procedural sheaths. The primary efficacy end point was time to hemostasis at the target limb access site. The primary safety end point was freedom from major complications of the target limb access site within 30 days post procedure. RESULTS: A total of 147 subjects were enrolled between August 9, 2019, and March 12, 2020. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement was performed in 53.7% (79/147) and percutaneous endovascular abdominal/thoracic aortic aneurysm repair in 46.3% (68/147) of subjects. The mean sheath ID was 15.5±1.8 mm. The primary effectiveness end point of time to hemostasis was 0.4±1.4 minutes. An adjunctive intervention was required in 9.2% (13/142) of subjects, of which 2.1% (3/142) were surgical and 5.6% (8/142) endovascular. Technical success was achieved in 92.3% (131/142) of subjects. Freedom from major complications of the target limb access site was 94.3% (83/88). CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients undergoing percutaneous endovascular procedures utilizing 8F to 18F ID procedural sheath, Cross-Seal suture-mediated vascular closure device achieved favorable effectiveness and safety in the closure of the large-bore arteriotomy. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03756558.

Definition and Perception of Autonomy in Vascular Surgery Training.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of data evaluating operative autonomy within vascular surgery. This study aims to determine where discrepancies exist in the definition of autonomy between trainees and attending faculty. METHODS: An Institutional Review Board-approved, anonymous survey was e-mailed to vascular trainees and attending faculty at all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-approved vascular surgery training programs in the United States. Data were compared using chi-square statistical analysis. RESULTS: One-hundred forty-nine responses from vascular surgery trainees (n = 89) and faculty (n = 60) were obtained. The most highly ranked preoperative skill by trainees was Case Planning, at all post-graduate year-levels. Although a majority of trainees believe this skill is expected of them, only 36.1% of attendings responded that they expect all trainee levels to perform this task. Draping/positioning was ranked as the second most important intraoperative task for all post-graduate year-levels by attendings; however, only 32.8% of attendings expect trainees to perform this. Exposure of Critical Structures was ranked as the most important intraoperative task by both trainees and attendings at the Chief and Fellow level. However, responses by both trainees and attendings showed that this is expected <70% of the time. When asked about double-scrubbing independently of other tasks, most trainees assessed double-scrubbing as inherently important to autonomy at all levels of training and within all regions. Only 44.3% of attendings responded that they expect all trainees to double-scrub. Additionally, most trainees in all regions responded that they spend <25% of cases double-scrubbed. CONCLUSIONS: These responses show a discrepancy between the skills that both trainees and attendings deem important to autonomy versus what is being expected of trainees in reality.

A dedicated risk prediction model of 1-year mortality following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair involving the renal-mesenteric arteries.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment goals of prophylactic endovascular aortic repair of complex aneurysms involving the renal-mesenteric arteries (complex endovascular aortic repair [cEVAR]) include achieving both technical success and long-term survival benefit. Mortality within the first year after cEVAR likely indicates treatment failure owing to associated costs and procedural complexity. Notably, no validated clinical decision aid tools exist that reliably predict mortality after cEVAR. The purpose of this study was to derive and validate a preoperative prediction model of 1-year mortality after elective cEVAR. METHODS: All elective cEVARs including fenestrated, branched, and/or chimney procedures for aortic disease extent confined proximally to Ishimaru landing zones 6 to 9 in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative were identified (January 2012 to August 2023). Patients (n = 4053) were randomly divided into training (n = 3039) and validation (n = 1014) datasets. A logistic regression model for 1-year mortality was created and internally validated by bootstrapping the AUC and calibration intercept and slope, and by using the model to predict 1-year mortality in the validation dataset. Independent predictors were assigned an integer score, based on model beta-coefficients, to generate a simplified scoring system to categorize patient risk. RESULTS: The overall crude 1-year mortality rate after elective cEVAR was 11.3% (n = 456/4053). Independent preoperative predictors of 1-year mortality included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic renal insufficiency (creatinine >1.8 mg/dL or dialysis dependence), hemoglobin <12 g/dL, decreasing body mass index, congestive heart failure, increasing age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class ≥IV, current tobacco use, history of peripheral vascular intervention, and increasing extent of aortic disease. The 1-year mortality rate varied from 4% among the 23% of patients classified as low risk to 23% for the 24% classified as high risk. Performance of the model in validation was comparable with performance in the training data. The internally validated scoring system classified patients roughly into quartiles of risk (low, low/medium, medium/high and high), with 52% of patients categorized as medium/high to high risk, which had corresponding 1-year mortality rates of 11% and 23%, respectively. Aneurysm diameter was below Society for Vascular Surgery recommended treatment thresholds (<5.0 cm in females, <5.5 cm in males) in 17% of patients (n = 679/3961), 41% of whom were categorized as medium/high or high risk. This subgroup had significantly increased in-hospital complication rates (18% vs 12%; P = .02) and 1-year mortality (13% vs 5%; P < .0001) compared with patients in the low- or low/medium-risk groups with guideline-compliant aneurysm diameters (≥5.0 cm in females, ≥5.5 cm in males). CONCLUSIONS: This validated preoperative prediction model for 1-year mortality after cEVAR incorporates physiological, functional, and anatomical variables. This novel and simplified scoring system can effectively discriminate mortality risk and, when applied prospectively, may facilitate improved preoperative decision-making, complex aneurysm care delivery, and resource allocation.

The USMLE® STEP 1 Pass or Fail Era of the Vascular Surgery Residency Application Process: Implications for Structural Bias and Recommendations.

United States Medical Licensing Examination® (USMLE®) STEP 1 score reporting has been changed to a binary pass/fail format since January 26, 2022. The motives behind this change were (1) the questionable validity of using USMLE STEP 1 as a screening tool during the candidate selection process and (2) the negative impact of using standardized examination scores as an initial gatekeeping threshold for the underrepresented in medicine (URiM) candidates applying to graduate medical education programs, given their generally lower mean standardized exams scores compared to non-URiM students. The USMLE administrators justified this change as a tactic to enhance the overall educational experience for all students and to increase the representation of URiM groups. Moreover, they advised the program directors (PDs) to give more attention to other important qualities and components such as the applicant's personality traits, leadership roles and other extracurricular accomplishments, as part of a holistic evaluation strategy. At this early stage, it is unclear how this change will impact Vascular Surgery Integrated residency (VSIR) programs. Several questions are outstanding, most importantly, how VSIR PDs will evaluate applicants absent the variable which heretofore was the primary screening tool. Our previously published survey showed that VSIR PDs will move their attention to other measures such as USMLE STEP 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) and letters of recommendation during the VSIR selection process. Furthermore, more emphasis on subjective measures such as the applicant's medical school rank and extracurricular student activities is expected. Given the expected higher weight of USMLE STEP 2CK in the selection process than ever, many anticipate that medical students will dedicate more of their limited time to its preparation at the expense of both clinical and nonclinical activities. Potentially leaving less time to explore specialty pathways and to determine whether Vascular Surgeons  is the appropriate career for them. The critical juncture in the VSIR candidate evaluation paradigm presents an opportunity to thoughtfully transform the process via current (Standardized Letter of Recommendation, USMLE STEP 2CK, and clinical research) and future (Emotional Intelligence, Structure Interview and Personality Assessment) measures which constitute a framework to follow in the USMLE STEP 1 pass/fail era.

StemRad MD, An Exoskeleton-Based Radiation Protection System, Reduces Ergonomic Posture Risk Based on a Prospective Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: Poor ergonomic posture during interventional procedures might lead to increased physical discomfort and work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Adjunctive equipment such as lead aprons (LAs) has been shown to increase ergonomic posture risk (EPR). The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of StemRad MD (StemRad Ltd., Tel Aviv, Israel), a weightless exoskeleton-based radiation protective ensemble, in reducing EPR on the operator using wearable inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors. METHODS: A prospective, observational study was conducted at an academic hospital. Inertial measurement unit sensors were affixed to the upper back of 9 interventionalists to assess ergonomic risk posture during endovascular procedures while wearing a traditional LA or the StemRad MD radiation protection system. Total fluoroscopy time, procedure type, and ergonomic risk postures were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-one cases were performed with StemRad MD and 30 with LAs. Mean procedure time for the StemRad MD procedures was 48.4±23.3 minutes (range: 24-106 min), and for LA procedures, it was 34.66±25.83 minutes (range: 6-100 min) (p=.060). The operators assumed low-risk ergonomic positions in 96.1% of StemRad MD cases and in 62.9% of LA cases (p=.001), and high-risk ergonomic positions in 0% and 6.2%, respectively (p=.80). Mean EPR score for StemRad MD was 1.16, and for the LA, it was 1.49 (p=.001). CONCLUSIONS: StemRad MD significantly reduces the EPR to the torso compared with a LA-based radiation protection system. CLINICAL IMPACT: Poor ergonomic posture during interventional procedures might leas to work-related musculoskeletal disorders for healthcare workers. StemRad MD, a weightless, exoskeleton-based radiation protection system was shown to significantly reduce ergonomic posture risk to the torso compared to conventional lead aprons. This might lead to reduced physical discomfort for procedure-based specialists.

Vascular surgery integrated resident selection criteria in the pass or fail era.

OBJECTIVES: Vascular surgery integrated residency (VSIR) programs are highly competitive; however, criteria for resident selection remain opaque and non-standardized. The already unclear selection criteria will be further impacted by the impending transition of the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 from numeric scores to a binary pass/fail outcome. The purpose of this study was to investigate the historical and anticipated selection criteria of VSIR applicants. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, nationwide, 59-item survey that was sent to all VSIR program directors (PDs). Data was analyzed using the Fisher exact test if categorical and the Mann-Whitney U test and the Kruskal-Wallis test if ordinal. RESULTS: Forty of 69 PDs (58%) responded to the survey. University-based programs constituted 85% of responders. Most VSIR PDs (65%) reported reviewing between 101 to 150 applications for 1 to 2 positions annually. Forty-two percent of the responding PDs reported sole responsibility for inviting applicants to interview, whereas 50% had a team of faculty responsible for reviewing applications. On a five-point Likert scale, letters of recommendation (LOR) from vascular surgeons or colleagues (a person the PD knows) were the most important objective criteria. Work within a team structure was rated highest among subjective criteria. The majority of respondents (72%) currently use the Step 1 score as a primary method to screen applicants. Regional differences in use of Step 1 score as a primary screening method were: Midwest (100%), Northeast (76%), South (43%), and West (40%) (P = .01). PDs responded that that they will use USMLE Step 2 score (42%) and LOR (10%) to replace USMLE Step 1 score. The current top ranked selection criteria are letters from a vascular surgeon, USMLE Step 1 score and overall LOR. The proposed top ranked selection criteria after transition of USMLE Step 1 to pass/fail include LOR overall followed by Step 2 score. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate the selection criteria used by PDs for VSIR. The landscape of VSIR selection criteria is shifting and increasing transparency is essential to applicants' understanding of the selection process. The transition of USMLE Step 1 to a pass/fail report will shift the attention to Step 2 scores and elevate the importance of other relatively more subjective criteria. Defining VSIR program selection criteria is an important first step toward establishing holistic review processes that are transparent and equitable.

Vascular trainee perceptions of diversity, equity, and inclusion within United States vascular surgery training programs.

OBJECTIVES: Vascular surgery training programs face multiple pressures, including attracting and retaining trainees. Current knowledge of trainees' views with respect to diversity and equity in vascular training programs is limited. We sought to understand United States vascular surgery trainees' perceptions and expectations regarding diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). METHODS: The Association of Program Directors in Vascular Surgery designed and administered the Annual Training Survey to specifically address DEI and administered it to all trainees (Integrated Residents/Fellows; n = 637) at 122 institutions in August 2020. RESULTS: Of the 637 vascular trainees, 227 (35%) responded. The respondents included 115 male and 62 female trainees, with 50 not disclosing or not answering the question. The majority of respondents (96.9%) believed their programs incorporated a diverse background of trainees. Of the trainees, 89.8% felt that the faculty were similarly comprised of a diverse background. The majority of respondents (63.6%) felt that their training program was both more diverse and focused on inclusion compared with other training programs at their institution. However, 20% of respondents had experienced discrimination. Seventy-three percent (n = 143) of trainees felt empowered to disagree or engage in a discussion should they observe a faculty member make a disparaging remark about a patient's background/race/gender, although 27% (n = 35) trainees expressed fear of retaliation as a reason to not engage. Trainees view their program director (82.6%), faculty mentor (60.9%), and Graduate Medical Education office (52.7%) as potential resources for support. Overall, 83.7% (n = 160) of trainees believe that their program has been open to discussion of race relations within the medical community. CONCLUSIONS: Trainees are committed to multifaceted diversity and inclusion. The perception of trainees regarding DEI issues within vascular surgery training programs appears to be positive; however, trainees did describe discrimination and gender biases in their institutions. This data has the potential to improve institutional education of faculty and trainees about the multidimensional levels of diversity and increased awareness and incorporation of this philosophy can assist in the recruitment of diverse vascular surgeons.

Incidence of Acute and Chronic Renal Failure Following Branched Endovascular Repair of Complex Aortic Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence of acute kidney injury and chronic renal impairment following branched endovascular aneurysm repair (BEVAR) of complex thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) using the Medtronic Valiant Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm stent graft system (MVM), the physician-modified Visceral Manifold, and Unitary Manifold stent graft systems. The objective was to report the acute and chronic renal function changes in patients following complex TAAA aneurysm repair. METHODS: This is an analysis of 139 patients undergoing branched endovascular repair for complex TAAAs between 2012 and 2020. Patient renal function was evaluated using serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate at baseline, 48 hr, discharge, 1 month, 6 months, and annually to 2 years. Patients on dialysis prior to the procedure were excluded from data analysis. RESULTS: A total of 139 patients (mean age 71.13; 64.7% male) treated for TAAA with BEVAR met inclusion criteria and were evaluated. A total of 530 visceral vessels were stented. A majority of patients (n = 131, 94.2%) underwent a single procedure while 8 required staged procedures. Thirty-day, 1-year and 2-year all-cause mortality rates were 5.8%, 25.2%, and 32.4%, respectively. Primary and secondary patency rates at a median follow-up of 26.9 months (95% CI; 21.1 - 32.7) were 96.2% and 97.5% for all vessels and 95.4% and 96.9% for renal arteries, respectively. Postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) was identified in 22 (15.8%) patients. At discharge, 16 patients (11.6%) had an increase in CKD stage with 3 requiring permanent dialysis. Five additional patients required permanent dialysis over the 2-year follow-up period for a total of 8 (5.8%). Increasing age (HR = 1.0327, P= 0.0477), hemoglobin < 7 prior to procedure (HR = 2.4812, P= 0.0093), increasing maximum aortic diameter (HR = 1.0189, P= 0.0084), presence of AKI (HR = 2.0757, P= 0.0182), and increase in CKD stage (HR = 1.3520, P= 0.002) at discharge were significantly associated with decreased patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative AKI and a chronic decline in renal function continue to be problematic in endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms. This study found that BEVAR using the manifold configuration resulted in immediate and mid-term renal function that is comparable to similar analyses of branched and/or fenestrated grafts.

A modern appraisal of current vascular surgery education.

OBJECTIVE: Although general program requirements and curriculum content outlines are provided by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Association for Program Directors in Vascular Surgery, and Vascular Surgery Board of the American Board of Surgery, there is no single format for delivery of this content. The delivery of these defined educational components is, thus, likely to differ from site to site. The curriculum committee of the Association of Program Directors in Vascular Surgery was tasked with formalizing the content of the Vascular Surgery Surgical Council on Resident Education curriculum modules, and, therefore, we sought to appraise the current status of vascular educational programs in U.S. training programs before its implementation. METHODS: Program directors (PDs) of 112 U.S. vascular surgery residency and fellowship training programs were contacted via email and asked to participate in an anonymous electronic survey. This survey evaluated the educational components of individual programs, including vascular specific conferences, use of other training modalities, and determination of who was involved in the creation of these programs. RESULTS: Of the 112 PDs offered the survey, 80 (71%) responded. Most (42 of 80; 53%) have both an integrated vascular residency and a fellowship with the remaining being solely fellowship (31 of 80; 39%) or integrated residencies (7 of 80; 9%). The majority (79 of 81; 98%) of programs hold at least one vascular conference per week, with 75% (60 of 81) holding more than one each week. The total time spent in conference averaged 2.6 hours/wk, and the most common educational components of the weekly conferences were review of upcoming (48 of 79, 61%) or recently completed surgical cases (30 of 79; 38%), lectures on vascular disease processes (40 of 79; 51%), and review of book chapters from vascular surgery textbooks (27 of 78; 35%). PDs are responsible for creating the schedule at 50% (39 of 78) of the programs with most remaining programs relying on trainees (18 of 78; 23%) and assistant PDs (17 of 78; 22%). Vascular trainees present the majority of material at most programs' conferences (64 of 77; 83%). The majority of PDs feel that trainees should independently study 4 hours or more per week (51 of 79; 65%), but only 25% (20 of 79) believe that trainees actually spend this amount of time studying (P = .0001). Only 13 of 80 (16%) programs currently use a preformatted standardized vascular curriculum, but 64 of 80 (80%) believe that there is a need for the creation of this product and 72 of 80 (90%) would most likely use it. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant variation in vascular surgery educational programs with considerable dependence on trainees to create the curriculum. The majority of PDs in vascular surgery support the creation of a standardized vascular curriculum and would use it if made.

Outcomes of autogenous fistulas and prosthetic grafts for hemodialysis access in diabetic and nondiabetic patients.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the effect of diabetes on outcomes of autogenous fistulas and prosthetic grafts for hemodialysis access in a large population-based cohort of patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all patients who initiated hemodialysis in the United States Renal Database System (2007-2014). The χ2 test, Student t-test, Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test, and multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses were employed to evaluate maturation, interventions, patency, infection, and mortality. RESULTS: The study of 381,622 patients comprised 303,307 (79.5%) autogenous fistulas and 78,315 (20.5%) prosthetic grafts placed in 231,134 (60.6%) diabetic patients and 150,488 (39.4%) nondiabetic patients. There was decrease in maturation for diabetics compared to nondiabetics who received autogenous fistulas (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.88; P < .001) and prosthetic grafts (aHR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83-0.93; P < .001). Comparing diabetics vs nondiabetics, primary patency at 5 years was 19.4% vs 23.5% (P < .001) for autogenous fistulas and 9.1% vs 11.2% (P < .001) for prosthetic grafts. Primary assisted patency at 5 years was 35.2% vs 38.7% (P < .001) for autogenous fistulas and 17.2% vs 19.2% (P = .015) for prosthetic grafts. Secondary patency at 5 years was 44.8% vs 48.6% (P < .001) for autogenous fistulas and 34.1% vs 36.8% (P = .002) for prosthetic grafts. There was 5% decrease in primary patency (aHR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.94-0.96; P < .001) for diabetics compared to nondiabetics who received autogenous fistulas. There was no difference in primary assisted and secondary patency for autogenous fistulas as well as primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency for prosthetic grafts in comparing diabetic to nondiabetic patients. There was also no significant difference in severe prosthetic graft infection between the groups (aHR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.92-1.08; P = .90). There was a 19% increase in patient mortality for diabetic relative to nondiabetic autogenous fistula recipients (aHR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.17-1.20; P < .001) and 12% increase for prosthetic graft recipients (aHR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.10-1.15; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based cohort of hemodialysis patients, diabetes mellitus was associated with a decrease in patient survival, access maturation, and primary fistula patency. In contrast, there was no association between diabetes and prosthetic graft patency and severe prosthetic graft infection warranting excision.

Hemodynamic events during carotid stenting are associated with significant periprocedural stroke and adverse events.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the impact of carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS)-related changes in blood pressure, heart rate, and preprocedural medications on periprocedural stroke in contemporary, real-world practice. This study evaluates the risk attributable to the CAS-related hemodynamic events and the impact preprocedural medications have on mitigating this risk in a large, population-based cohort. METHODS: We studied all patients in the Vascular Quality Initiative who underwent CAS between January 2006 and December 2016. Kaplan-Meier, multivariable logistic, and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the impact of periprocedural hypertension, hypotension, bradycardia, and medication use on immediate periprocedural stroke (IPPS), 30-day, and 1-year stroke. RESULTS: Of the 13,698 CAS procedures studied, 1239 (9.1%), 1824 (13.3%), and 1333 (9.7%) patients experienced periprocedural hypertension, hypotension, and bradycardia, respectively. IPPS was 3.2% vs 2.1% vs 0.65% (P < .001), comparing patients with periprocedural hypertension vs hypotension vs normotension and 1.4 vs 1.0% (P = .19) for bradycardic vs nonbradycardic patients. Periprocedural hypertension was associated with a four-fold increase in IPPS (adjusted odd ratio [aOR], 3.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.63-5.99; P < .001). periprocedural hypotension and bradycardia were associated with 5.5-fold (aOR, 5.56; 95% CI, 3.24-9.52; P < .001) and 2.3-fold (aOR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.26-4.25; P = .007) increases in IPPS among patients with carotid symptoms. There was 76% decrease in IPPS for patients who did not experience a periprocedural hemodynamic event (aOR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.16-0.35; P < .001). Unlike preprocedural beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, prophylactic antibradyarrhythmic agents conferred a 58% reduction in IPPS among patients with carotid symptoms (aOR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.78; P = .006). The periprocedural hemodynamic events were also associated with 7.7-fold increase in myocardial infarction (aOR, 7.70; 95% CI, 4.77-12.45; P < .001), a 2.2-fold increase in 30-day mortality (aOR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.61-3.12; P < .001), and a 16% increase in length of stay (aOR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.04-2.28; P = .042). The occurrence of these hemodynamic events is higher in patients with prior cardiac disease and the difference in periprocedural outcomes extended to 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Periprocedural hemodynamic events are associated with an increase in periprocedural stroke, myocardial infarction, death, and length of stay. Periprocedural hypertension in all patients; hypotension and bradycardia in patients with symptomatic carotid disease are associated with significant increase in IPPS. Prophylactic antibradyarrhythmic agents are associated with decrease in bradycardia and IPPS. These results heighten the need to anticipate and promptly address these CAS-related hemodynamic events, especially in susceptible patients.

Renal Artery Coverage During Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

INTRODUCTION: Coverage of one or both renal arteries may be required to facilitate endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients who are not candidates for open surgery in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs). We sought to understand the consequences of renal coverage during these emergent procedures. METHODS: Using the VQI data set from 2013 to 2018, we selected patients who had undergone EVAR for rAAA. Patients were distinguished by whether they had none, unilateral, or bilateral renal artery coverage. Patients were excluded if they were previously on dialysis or had an intervention to preserve renal perfusion. Primary endpoints included inhospital mortality, composite permanent dialysis/30-day death, and 1-year survival. RESULTS: Overall, there were 2,278 patients presenting with ruptured aneurysms. Most patients had no renal artery coverage (n = 2,230; 98%), followed by single renal artery coverage (n = 30; 1.2%), and finally bilateral renal artery coverage (n = 18, 0.8%). On multivariate regression, bilateral renal coverage was associated with increased odds of inhospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 5.7, ±4; P = 0.030), permanent dialysis/30-day death (OR = 9.5, ±7; P = 0.016), and permanent dialysis (OR = 47.5, ±47; P < 0.001). Two patients with bilateral renal coverage did not suffer permanent dialysis/death. Single renal artery coverage significantly increased the odds of permanent dialysis/30-day death (OR = 2.8, ±1.6; P = 0.044) driven mainly by its effect on the outcome of permanent dialysis (OR = 12.3, ±6; P < 0.001). Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier one-year survival estimates were significantly lower with bilateral renal coverage (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.4, P = 0.0002). Bilateral coverage remained a significant predictor on adjusted analysis (HR = 3.5, P = 0.002); however, single renal coverage did not significantly affect survival in unadjusted or adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral renal coverage in rAAA significantly increases inhospital mortality and lowers long-term survival. While single renal artery coverage increases the risk of permanent dialysis/30-day death driven mainly by its effect on permanent dialysis, it does not significantly affect inhospital mortality or one-year survival and may be a viable option for select patients with rAAAs.

Defining a Leader-Characteristics That Distinguish a Chair of Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Chair of the Department of Surgery, sometimes known as the Chief, holds a title that has significant historical connotations. Our goal was to assess a group of objectively measurable characteristics that unify these individuals as a group. METHODS: Utilizing publicly available data for all US teaching hospitals, demographic information was accumulated for the named chiefs/chairs of surgery. Information collected included location of their program, their medical/surgical training history, their surgical specialty, previous chair/chief titles held, and academic productivity. RESULTS: Of the 259 programs listed, data were available on 244 individuals who were trained in 19 different specialties. The top three specialties of these practitioners are General Surgery (40, 16.3%), Surgical Oncology (38, 15.5%), and Vascular Surgery (33, 13.5%). There were only 14 female chairs (5.7%) and only one chair with a doctor of osteopathic medicine degree. The majority (62.3%) had been a previous chief of a surgical subdivision with only 26% having been a previous chair/chief of the surgical department. The average chair had 72 peer-reviewed manuscripts with 28 published book chapters. Chair's at academic institutions with university affiliation had a significantly higher number of peer-reviewed manuscripts (P < 0.0001) as well as were more likely to be trained at academic institutions (P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: There are no set characteristics that define the Chair of a Department of Surgery. By understanding a group of baseline characteristics that unify these surgical leaders, young faculty and trainees with leadership aspirations may begin to understand what is necessary to fill these roles in the future.

Educational resources for vascular laboratory education in vascular surgery residencies and fellowships: Survey of Vascular Surgery Program Directors.

OBJECTIVE: The Registered Physician in Vascular Interpretation (RPVI) credential is a prerequisite for certification by the Vascular Surgery Board of the American Board of Surgery. Of concern, as more current trainees and recent program graduates take the Physician Vascular Interpretation (PVI) examination, vascular surgery trainee pass rates have decreased. Residents and fellows have a lower PVI examination pass rates than practicing vascular surgeons. The purpose of this study was to assess current vascular laboratory (VL) training for vascular surgery residents and fellows and to identify gaps that residency and fellowship programs might address. METHODS: Program directors (PDs) of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited vascular surgery programs (107 fellowships, 53 integrated residency programs) were surveyed using a web-based tool. Responses were submitted anonymously. Data collected included information about the program, the PD, accreditation status of the VL, and the curriculum used to meet the PVI prerequisites. Concurrent data (June 2017) on the credentials of all PDs were obtained from the Alliance for Physician Certification and Advancement (APCA). RESULTS: Sixty-one of 117 PDs participated in the survey (52% response rate). Of these, 44 individuals (72% of responders) reported they held the RPVI and/or Registered Vascular Technologist credential. Records from APCA indicated that 51 of 117 PDs of accredited vascular surgery residencies and fellowships (44%) had an RPVI/Registered Vascular Technologist credential. Ninety-four percent reported that their VL was accredited. Practical VL experience for trainees was reported to be 20 hours or less by 62% of respondents. The use of a structured curriculum for practical experience was reported by only 15 programs. Programs with fellowships established for more than 10 years were more likely to have a structured program for didactic instruction (P = .03). Only 23 programs reported a dedicated VL rotation. Didactic instruction provided was 20 hours or less for 75% of the cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of a standardized VL curriculum, there is variation in the VL instruction provided to trainees. Fellowship programs with longer histories have more structured instruction, but time allocated to VL education is substantially less than the 30 hours of didactic and 40 hours of practical experience recommended by the APCA. Programs and learners may benefit from the development of VL training guidelines and curriculum resources.