Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Exp Hepatol ; 14(4): 101373, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38495461

ABSTRACT

Background & aims: Frailty in patients with cirrhosis is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence of frailty and its impact on mortality and hospitalization in patients with cirrhosis. Methods: An elaborate search was undertaken in the databases "PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane, and preprint servers", and an assessment of all published articles till 17 February 2023 was done. Studies that provided data on prevalence, mortality and hospitalization among frail patients with cirrhosis were included. The study characteristics and data on the prevalence, mortality, and hospitalization were extracted from included studies. The primary outcome was to estimate the pooled prevalence of frailty and determine its impact on mortality and hospitalization in patients with cirrhosis. Results: Overall, 12 studies were included. Data on prevalence of frailty and mortality were available in 11 studies, while seven studies reported data on hospitalization. The analysis conducted among 6126 patients with cirrhosis revealed pooled prevalence of frailty to be 32% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24-41). A total of 540 events of death revealed a pooled mortality rate of 29% (95% CI, 19-41). Six-month and twelve-month pooled estimates of mortality were found to be 24% (95% CI, 17-33) and 33% (95% CI, 23-45), respectively. The pooled hospitalization rate among the seven studies was 43% (95% CI, 21-68). Conclusion: The prevalence of frailty in patients with cirrhosis is high, leading to poor outcomes. Frailty assessment should become an integral part of cirrhosis evaluation. Registry and registration number of study: PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022377507.

2.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord ; 112: 105451, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37236044

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a major cause of disability. We aimed to assess the benefit of ultrasonography of the vagus nerve (VN) to compare between PD and healthy controls as well as to deliver reference values of nerve cross sectional area (CSA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic search on Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science, up till July 25, 2022. After article selection and screening, we performed a quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Furthermore, a statistical analysis and subgroup analysis was performed. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included with a total of 809 participants (409 PD patients and 400 controls). A statistically significant difference in the CSA of the right and left VN between PD patients and healthy controls was observed, indicating the atrophy of VN in PD patients (p < 0.00001). The subgroup meta-analysis for average measurements of VN CSA showed insignificant heterogeneity for age (I2 = 48.67%, p = 0.058), level of measurements (I2 = 57.91%, p = 0.05), and disease duration (I2 = 27.1%, p = 0.241). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis showed a sonographically detectable degree of neuronal damage in PD, which correlates with VN atrophy with high confidence. Therefore, we believe this is a potential marker for vagus neuronal lesions. Future studies are required to assess the potential clinical correlation.


Subject(s)
Parkinson Disease , Humans , Parkinson Disease/complications , Parkinson Disease/diagnostic imaging , Parkinson Disease/pathology , Vagus Nerve/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography , Reference Values
3.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(12)2022 Dec 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36560493

ABSTRACT

Background: Monkeypox is a global public health concern, given the recent outbreaks in non-endemic countries where little scientific evidence exists on the disease. Specifically, there is a lack of data on asymptomatic monkeypox virus infection. This study aims to evaluate the overall prevalence of asymptomatic monkeypox virus infection. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we performed an extensive literature search in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, EMBASE, EBSCOHost, Cochrane, and preprint servers (medRxiv, arXiv, bioRxiv, BioRN, ChiRxiv, ChiRN, and SSRN) and assessed all published articles till September 2022. Primary studies reporting monkeypox infections among asymptomatic participants were included after quality assessment. The characteristics of the study and information on the number of cases and symptomatic status were extracted from the included studies. The heterogeneity between studies was assessed using the I2 statistic. Publication bias was analyzed using funnel plots and Egger regression tests. The primary outcome was the pooled prevalence of asymptomatic infections within the examined population. Results: A total of 16 studies were included for qualitative synthesis, while five studies, including 645 individuals, were included for quantitative synthesis. There was substantial heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 94.86%; p < 0.01), with a pooled percentage of asymptomatic infections in the studied population of 10.2% (95%CI, 2.5−17.9%). Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that many people infected with the monkeypox virus are asymptomatic and difficult to detect. Therefore, prompt detection of these cases of monkeypox virus and appropriate subsequent management is of utmost importance to global public health.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...