Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Turk Neurosurg ; 33(6): 967-975, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37885308

ABSTRACT

AIM: To analyze the clinical and angiographic outcomes of interventional embolization under transarterial balloon protection technique in patients with cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistulas. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a single-center cohort of 30 patients undergoing cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistulas embolization under balloon protection. We collected their clinical symptoms, complications, mid-term follow-up angiographic results, and long-term clinical outcomes for the baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Thirty patients with 31 lesions were included in this study. Immediate applications of angiographies after embolization indicated that complete obliteration occurred in 29 lesions (93.5% of 31 lesions). Two cases with permanent trigeminal nerve palsy were treated by arterial approach. Onyx dispersed into the internal carotid artery in one process, and salvage stent implantation was performed to prevent parent artery occlusion. CONCLUSION: Interventional embolization with intra-arterial balloon protection is effective and safe with rarely occurring complications.


Subject(s)
Cavernous Sinus , Central Nervous System Vascular Malformations , Embolization, Therapeutic , Humans , Cavernous Sinus/diagnostic imaging , Cavernous Sinus/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Polyvinyls/therapeutic use , Embolization, Therapeutic/methods , Central Nervous System Vascular Malformations/complications , Central Nervous System Vascular Malformations/diagnostic imaging , Central Nervous System Vascular Malformations/therapy , Retrospective Studies
2.
J Clin Neurosci ; 115: 29-32, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37467525

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Microcatheter shaping plays a vital role in coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms, while the complicated method and insufficient training opportunities make it difficult for junior neurovascular clinicians to master this technique. In this program, we constructed a novel training method and assessment system for microcatheter shaping in coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms with 3D technique, and evaluated its efficacy for microcatheter shaping training in junior neurovascular clinicians. METHODS: Patient-specific models for cerebral aneurysms in different locations and with different morphologies were selected by experienced senior neurovascular clinicians. The solid polylactic acid model and the soft hollow crystal silicone model of intracranial aneurysms were then made separately for shaping reference and assessment in the training course. Twelve residents without prior experience of microcatheter shaping and 25 neurovascular clinicians who have in vivo experience of microcatheter shaping on 3-5 occasions were selected for this training program and randomly divided into the traditional training group and the experimental training group. Four senior neurovascular clinicians assisted and guided the trainees in two groups and evaluated the time and accuracy of microcatheter shaping. RESULTS: Eighteen trainees were assigned to the traditional training group, among which 4 had prior experience in microcatheter shaping. The other 19 were assigned to the experimental training group, including 8 with prior experience. No statistical difference in the distribution of experienced students between the two groups was noted(P = 0.295). After the training session, the shaping time was found shorter in the experimental training group than that in the traditional training group (40.3.5 ± 16.2 s vs. 54.2 ± 16.4 s, P = 0.014), while the shaping score was found higher in the experimental training group than that in the traditional training group (4.4 ± 0.5 vs. 2.6 ± 1.2, P < 0.001). Specifically, for the trainees without prior experience, the experimental training group also showed less time consumption and higher score (Time: 52.7 ± 7.7 vs. 61.5 ± 9.5, P = 0.02; Score 4.1 ± 0.5 vs. 2.3 ± 1.1, P < 0.01). Meanwhile, for the trainees with prior experience, the advantage was noted in shaping score (4.7 ± 0.3 vs. 3.9 ± 0.6, P < 0.01) but not in time consumption (23.3 ± 4.4 vs. 28.5 ± 3.9, P = 0.07). CONCLUSION: This training program is quite effective at teaching junior neurovascular physicians the essential surgical abilities required for coiling cerebral aneurysms.


Subject(s)
Embolization, Therapeutic , Intracranial Aneurysm , Humans , Intracranial Aneurysm/therapy , Intracranial Aneurysm/surgery , Embolization, Therapeutic/methods , Cerebral Angiography/methods , Catheters , Printing, Three-Dimensional
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...