Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 25(7): 105024, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38763164

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Rich social capital is regarded as an individual's social asset, which may contribute to the maintenance of functional ability, even in a state of frailty. This study examined the moderating role of individual social capital in the association between physical frailty and functional ability among older adults. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: In total, 522 community-dwelling older adults aged ≥60 years were recruited from among visitors to public facilities, including community cultural centers and gymnasiums in Aichi, Japan. METHODS: Functional ability was assessed using the 5-item subscale of the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology Index of Competence that assesses instrumental self-maintenance, including transportation, finance management, and shopping. Physical frailty was defined by the Fried Frailty Phenotype Questionnaire, including 5 items of fatigue, resistance, ambulation, inactivity, and weight loss, and the participants were classified into 3 groups: non-frailty, pre-frailty, and frailty. Individual social capital was assessed for 2 dimensions: the cognitive dimension (perceptions of community social cohesion) and the structural dimension (informal socializing and social participation). RESULTS: The participants' mean age (SD) was 74.1 (6.5) years and 78.0% were women. Among the participants, non-frailty was 46.6%, pre-frailty was 47.0%, and frailty was 6.5%. Multivariable linear regression analysis revealed that physical frailty was associated with lower levels of functional ability compared with non-frailty [pre-frailty: ß (95% CI) = -0.07 (-0.22 to 0.08), P = .374; frailty: ß = -0.67 (-0.99 to -0.35), P < .001]. However, individual structural social capital showed a negative interaction with physical frailty against low functional ability, indicating a moderating association (P = .027). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: High levels of individual structural social capital mitigated the adverse association between physical frailty and functional ability. Fostering rich social capital may preserve the functional ability of frail older adults, helping their independent lives in the community.


Subject(s)
Frail Elderly , Frailty , Social Capital , Humans , Female , Aged , Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , Japan , Frail Elderly/psychology , Geriatric Assessment , Aged, 80 and over , Independent Living , Activities of Daily Living , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Dementia (London) ; 22(8): 1886-1899, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37857447

ABSTRACT

Background: Overcoming dementia stigma is a global challenge. Contact and education on dementia may be promising approaches for reducing public stigma; however, the current evidence is insufficient. This study examined the moderating factors associated with the public stigma against dementia, focusing on experiences of interacting with and learning about people with dementia. Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited 710 adults aged 20-69 years who were not involved in any medical or care work. Participants were recruited via a web-based questionnaire survey for a large internet survey agency's panel in Japan. In terms of the public stigma about dementia, four domains were assessed using a multidimensional assessment scale: personal avoidance, fear of labelling, person-centredness, and fear of discrimination. We compared the stigma scores according to the participants' experiences of interacting with people with dementia ('none', 'talking or activities together', or 'living together') and learning about dementia ('yes' or 'no'), adjusted for demographic and socioeconomic factors.Results: Compared with those without interaction experiences, those with experiences of talking or activities with people with dementia had lower personal avoidance (p = .001), fear of labelling (p = .026), and fear of discrimination (p = .031); those with experiences of living together with people with dementia had lower personal avoidance (p = .014) and fear of discrimination (p = .031). Compared with those without learning experiences related to dementia, those with such experiences had lower personal avoidance (p < .001) and higher person-centredness (p = .048).Conclusions: The findings suggest that the promotion of interaction with and learning about people with dementia may be important for addressing the public stigma.


Subject(s)
Dementia , Adult , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Social Stigma , Fear , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Geriatr Gerontol Int ; 22(9): 790-796, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36058625

ABSTRACT

AIM: Reducing stigma against dementia is a global challenge, but the assessment scale is not well established. We examined the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the assessment scale of public stigma against dementia. METHODS: This study recruited 819 adults aged 20-69 years (mean age = 45.9 years; 52.0% females) through an internet survey, and 34 community-dwelling adults aged 20-78 years (mean age = 45.8 years; 55.9% females). Participants completed the Japanese version of the assessment scale of dementia stigma developed by Phillipson et al., with forward and back translations. In the internet survey sample, exploratory factor analysis was performed to verify factorial validity, and correlations with ageism and dementia attitudes were examined to test the concurrent validity. In the community sample, test-retest reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between two responses with a two-week interval. RESULTS: Factor analysis revealed a four-factor structure: "personal avoidance," "fear of labeling," "person centeredness," and "fear of discrimination" (Cronbach's α = 0.892, 0.840, 0.879, 0.829, respectively). Personal avoidance, fear of labeling, and fear of discrimination were positively correlated with ageism (r = 0.598, 0.214, 0.369) and negatively correlated with dementia attitudes (r = -0.745, -0.453, -0.475); person centeredness was inversely correlated with ageism (r = -0.322), but positively correlated with dementia attitudes (r = 0.537), showing good concurrent validity. The scale showed acceptable test-retest reliability (ICCs = 0.67-0.80). CONCLUSIONS: The Japanese version of the assessment scale of public stigma against dementia was established with good concurrent validity and adequate reliability. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2022; 22: 790-796.


Subject(s)
Dementia , Social Stigma , Dementia/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Japan , Male , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...