ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Considering the escalating incidence of strabismus and its consequential jeopardy to binocular vision, there is an imperative demand for expeditious and precise screening methods. This study was to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) platform in the form of an applet that facilitates the screening and management of strabismus on any mobile device. METHODS: The Visual Transformer (VIT_16_224) was developed using primary gaze photos from two datasets covering different ages. The AI model was evaluated by 5-fold cross-validation set and tested on an independent test set. The diagnostic performance of the AI model was assessed by calculating the Accuracy, Precision, Specificity, Sensitivity, F1-Score and Area Under the Curve (AUC). RESULTS: A total of 6194 photos with corneal light-reflection (with 2938 Exotropia, 1415 Esotropia, 739 Vertical Deviation and 1562 Orthotropy) were included. In the internal validation set, the AI model achieved an Accuracy of 0.980, Precision of 0.941, Specificity of 0.979, Sensitivity of 0.958, F1-Score of 0.951 and AUC of 0.994. In the independent test set, the AI model achieved an Accuracy of 0.967, Precision of 0.980, Specificity of 0.970, Sensitivity of 0.960, F1-Score of 0.975 and AUC of 0.993. CONCLUSIONS: Our study presents an advanced AI model for strabismus screening which integrates electronic archives for comprehensive patient histories. Additionally, it includes a patient-physician interaction module for streamlined communication. This innovative platform offers a complete solution for strabismus care, from screening to long-term follow-up, advancing ophthalmology through AI technology for improved patient outcomes and eye care quality.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The use of machine learning(ML) methods would improve the diagnosis of small airway dysfunction(SAD) in subjects with chronic respiratory symptoms and preserved pulmonary function(PPF). This paper evaluated the performance of several ML algorithms associated with the impulse oscillometry(IOS) analysis to aid in the diagnostic of respiratory changes in SAD. We also find out the best configuration for this task. METHODS: IOS and spirometry were measured in 280 subjects, including a healthy control group (n = 78), a group with normal spirometry (n = 158) and a group with abnormal spirometry (n = 44). Various supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms and feature selection strategies were examined, such as Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forests (RF), Adaptive Boosting (ADABOOST), Navie Bayesian (BAYES), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN). RESULTS: The first experiment of this study demonstrated that the best oscillometric parameter (BOP) was R5, with an AUC value of 0.642, when comparing a healthy control group(CG) with patients in the group without lung volume-defined SAD(PPFN). The AUC value of BOP in the control group was 0.769 compared with patients with spirometry defined SAD(PPFA) in the PPF population. In the second experiment, the ML technique was used. In CGvsPPFN, RF and ADABOOST had the best diagnostic results (AUC = 0.914, 0.915), with significantly higher accuracy compared to BOP (p < 0.01). In CGvsPPFA, RF and ADABOOST had the best diagnostic results (AUC = 0.951, 0.971) and significantly higher diagnostic accuracy (p < 0.01). In the third, fourth and fifth experiments, different feature selection techniques allowed us to find the best IOS parameters (R5, (R5-R20)/R5 and Fres). The results demonstrate that the performance of ADABOOST remained essentially unaltered following the application of the feature selector, whereas the diagnostic accuracy of the remaining four classifiers (RF, SVM, BAYES, and KNN) is marginally enhanced. CONCLUSIONS: IOS combined with ML algorithms provide a new method for diagnosing SAD in subjects with chronic respiratory symptoms and PPF. The present study's findings provide evidence that this combination may help in the early diagnosis of respiratory changes in these patients.
