ABSTRACT
Background: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) are two new treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Previous studies had reported that TACE combined with HAIC conferred better survival benefit than TACE alone. The study was to evaluate the availability and safety of TACE combined with HAIC for the treatment of large HCC. Methods: Patients with unresectable large HCC who underwent TACE combined with HAIC (TACE-HAIC group) and HAIC alone (HAIC group) at the Department of Interventional Radiology between August 2018 and September 2022 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, and adverse events (AEs) were used to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the two groups by using log-rank test. The independent factors of OS of large HCC patients were investigated by Cox regression model. Results: A total of 73 patients (mean age, 59.8±8.8; 60 men) with unresectable large HCC were finally screened in the current study, including 32 who received TACE combined with HAIC and 41 who received HAIC alone. Compared with patients in HAIC group, TACE-HAIC group had higher median OS (37.1 vs. 14.9 months, P=0.0014). Similarly, PFS in the TACE-HAIC group was longer than that in the HAIC group (16.5 vs. 6.9 months, P=0.0037). The objective response rate (ORR) was 65.6% vs. 53.7% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 90.6% vs. 78.0% in the two groups, neither was statistically significant (P=0.345 and 0.208, respectively). All AEs related to therapy were manageable, and there were no significant differences in the incidence of any grade and grade 3/4 AEs between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions: TACE combined with HAIC yielded a promising prognosis in treating patients with large HCC compared with HAIC alone, with tolerable toxicity.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC) treated by percutaneous transhepatic biliary stenting (PTBS) combined with 125I seed intracavitary irradiation and further develop a predictive model related to SII. Methods: A total of 145 patients with EHCC who received PTBS combined with 125I seed implantation were retrospectively analyzed. The optimal cut-off value of SII was identified by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression were applied to estimate the prognostic value of SII and identify other significant factors of overall survival (OS). Additionally, a novel nomogram was constructed. The concordance index (C-index), calibration plots and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate the performance of the nomogram model. Results: The optimal cut-off value for preoperative SII of 890.2 stratified the patients into High-SII (H-SII) and Low-SII (L-SII) groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that SII was an independent factor for OS. We also found that better therapeutic effect could be obtained with combined postoperative chemotherapy (P < 0.001). Moreover, we revealed that elevated preoperative CA19-9 (P = 0.038) and TBIL level (P = 0.024) were reason for poor prognosis of EHCC. A well-discriminated and calibrated nomogram was developed to predict the 1-year and 2-year OS of EHCC (C-index: 0.709). Conclusion: The SII may be a feasible and convenient prognosis predictor for EHCC. The comprehensive nomogram based on SII presented in this study is a promising model for predicting OS in EHCC patients after PTBS combined with 125I seed intracavitary irradiation.
