ABSTRACT
Visions for the future are a normal developmental process for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with and without cancer, and these visions often include expectations of sexual and romantic relationships. AYA cancer survivors indicate reproductive health is an issue of great importance and more attention is needed in the health care setting throughout the cancer experience, beginning at diagnosis. Various practice guidelines are predominately focused on fertility; are intended to influence survivorship care plans; and do not encompass the broad scope of reproductive health that includes romantic partnering, friendships, body image, sexuality, sexual identity, fertility, contraception, and more. Although interventions to reduce reproductive health-related sequelae from treatment are best approached as an evolving process, practitioners are not certain of the priorities of these various reproductive health content areas. Strategies incongruent with the reproductive health priorities of AYAs will likely thwart adequate follow-up care and foster feelings of isolation from the treatment team. Research is needed to identify these priorities and ensure discussions of diverse content areas. This review explored various domains of reproductive health and emphasized how understanding the priorities of the AYA cancer cohort will guide future models of care.
Subject(s)
Health Priorities , Neoplasms/therapy , Reproductive Health , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Body Image/psychology , Female , Fertility Preservation/methods , Fertility Preservation/standards , Humans , Marriage/psychology , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/psychology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pregnancy , Psychosexual Development , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Adolescent survivors of childhood cancer engage in risky behaviors. OBJECTIVE: This study tested a decision aid for cancer-surviving adolescents aimed at difficult decisions related to engaging in substance use behaviors. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial recruited 243 teen survivors at 3 cancer centers. The cognitive-behavioral skills program focused on decision making and substance use within the context of past treatment. Effects at 6 and 12 months were examined for decision making, risk motivation, and substance use behaviors using linear regression models. RESULTS: The majority of the teen cancer survivors (90%) rated the program as positive. There was an intermediate effect at 6 months for change in risk motivation for low riskers, but this effect was not sustained at 12 months. For quality decision making, there was no significant effect between treatment groups for either time point. CONCLUSIONS: The overall program effects were modest. Once teen survivors are in the program and learn what quality decision making is, their written reports indicated adjustment in their perception of their decision-making ability; thus, a more diagnostic baseline decision-making measure and a more intensive intervention are needed in the last 6 months. With 2 of 3 teen participants dealing with cognitive difficulties, the data suggest that this type of intervention will continue to be challenging, especially when 90% of their household members and 56% of their close friends model substance use. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This effectiveness trial using late-effects clinics provides recommendations for further program development for medically at-risk adolescents, particularly ones with cognitive difficulties.
