The Fab-8 boundary defines the distal limit of the bithorax complex iab-7 domain and insulates iab-7 from initiation elements and a PRE in the adjacent iab-8 domain.

The Drosophila bithorax complex Abdominal-B (Abd-B) gene specifies parasegmental identity at the posterior end of the fly. The specific pattern of Abd-B expression in each parasegment (PS) determines its identity and, in PS10-13, Abd-B expression is controlled by four parasegment-specific cis-regulatory domains, iab-5 to iab-8, respectively. In order to properly determine parasegmental identity, these four cis-regulatory domains must function autonomously during both the initiation and maintenance phases of BX-C regulation. The studies reported here demonstrate that the (centromere) distal end of iab-7 domain is delimited by the Fab-8 boundary. Initiators that specify PS12 identity are located on the proximal iab-7 side of Fab-8, while initiators that specify PS13 identity are located on the distal side of Fab-8, in iab-8. We use transgene assays to demonstrate that Fab-8 has enhancer blocking activity and that it can insulate reporter constructs from the regulatory action of the iab-7 and iab-8 initiators. We also show that the Fab-8 boundary defines the realm of action of a nearby iab-8 Polycomb Response Element, preventing this element from ectopically silencing the adjacent domain. Finally, we demonstrate that the insulating activity of the Fab-8 boundary in BX-C is absolutely essential for the proper specification of parasegmental identity by the iab-7 and iab-8 cis-regulatory domains. Fab-8 together with the previously identified Fab-7 boundary delimit the first genetically defined higher order domain in a multicellular eukaryote.

A difference in the pattern of repair in a large genomic region in UV-irradiated normal human and Cockayne syndrome cells.

Xeroderma pigmentosum group C cells repair DNA damaged by ultraviolet radiation in an unusual pattern throughout the genome. They remove cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers only from the DNA of transcriptionally active chromatin regions and only from the strand that contains the transcribed strand. The repair proceeds in a manner that creates damage-free islands which are in some cases much larger than the active gene associated with them. For example, the small transcriptionally active beta-actin gene (3.5 kb) is repaired as part of a 50 kb single-stranded region. The repair responsible for creating these islands requires active transcription, suggesting that the two activities are coupled. A preferential repair pathway in normal human cells promotes repair of actively transcribed DNA strands and is coupled to transcription. It is not known if similar large islands, referred to as repair domains, are preferentially created as a result of the coupling. Data are presented showing that in normal cells, preferential repair in the beta-actin region is associated with the creation of a large, completely repaired region in the partially repaired genome. Repair at other genomic locations which contain inactive genes (insulin, 754) does not create similar large regions as quickly. In contrast, repair in Cockayne syndrome cells, which are defective in the preferential repair pathway but not in genome-overall repair, proceeds in the beta-actin region by a mechanism which does not create preferentially a large repaired region. Thus a correlation between the activity required to preferentially repair active genes and that required to create repaired domains is detected. We propose an involvement of the transcription-repair coupling factor in a coordinated repair pathway for removing DNA damage from entire transcription units.

A re-examination of the intragenome distribution of repaired sites in proliferating xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C fibroblasts.

We find that rapidly proliferating fibroblasts from xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C (XP-C) patients, cells that have a small residual DNA excision repair capacity, repair DNA in localized regions of the genome in a clustered pattern rather than at single sites in dispersed locations. This finding is similar to that observed earlier for nondividing cells but is in contrast to published results that indicate that the residual repair in proliferating XP-C cells is dispersed throughout the genome in a non-clustered pattern. While we detect the same amount of repair in both proliferating and nondividing cells, we also observe no shift from the clustered pattern of repair to a more dispersive pattern when nondividing cells are stimulated to proliferate by fresh serum addition. We have no obvious explanation for these discrepancies with the published results. We have noted previously that proliferating XP-C cells are very UV sensitive relative to normal cells while nondividing cells that exhibit the same amount of repair activity are relatively UV resistant. There is no satisfactory explanation for this change in relative response to the lethal effects of UV, a change not observed for cell strains from other XP complementation groups. However, we argue that clustered repair in specific genomic regions promotes survival in nondividing XP-C cells but does not promote survival in proliferating cells.