Profiles and persistence of initial antiretroviral therapy among HIV infected patients in taiwan: A nationwide population-based cross-sectional study from 2011 to 2017.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Antiretroviral therapy (ART) has been applied for treating patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) for decades. Our study explored initial ART use patterns and ART persistence in patients who begin HIV treatment in Taiwan. METHODS: The National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan was used in our study. The study cohort included patients who are incident ART users from 2011 to 2017. The patterns of ART-based regimens initiated were documented, mainly including non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based, protease inhibitor (PI)-based and integrase inhibitor (INI)-based regimens. Time from HIV diagnosis to ART initiation, ART persistence, and ART treatment patterns were documented. RESULTS: There were 19,726 incident ART users. While NNRTI-based regimen was the first choice of initial ART from 2011 to 2017, INI-based regimen accounted for 52.9% of total ART initiation and was the most commonly prescribed regimen in 2017. PI-based regimen decreased from 17.0% to 0.7% during the study period. We found that changes of initial ART between 2011 and 2017 were common, consist with the changes of National Imbursement Guideline for HIV therapy in Taiwan. CONCLUSIONS: We found a trend of rapidly increasing INI-based regimen and decreasing PI-based regimen during the study period. Shorten time window for initiating ART was found according to reimbursement regulation of STR as the first-line therapy and government policy of same-day HIV testing and treatment initiation. The persistence of ART was influenced by treatment guideline during the study period.

Potential or contraindicated drug-drug interactions with antiretroviral therapy in real-world settings in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Given the complex metabolic pathway of antiretroviral therapy (ART), polypharmacy may increase the risk of drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Therefore, we investigated the frequency of DDIs during ART exposure to improve medical care for patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). METHODS: This was a nationwide cross-sectional study using claims data from the National Health Insurance in Taiwan in 2016. Potential or contraindicated DDIs with recommended first-line ART (1L-ART) or protease inhibitors (PIs) were identified from the University of Liverpool drug interaction database. Fisher's exact or chi-square test was used to determine the significance of categorical variables. RESULTS: A total of 25,863 HIV-infected individuals were identified. Regarding 1L-ART users, patients with contraindicated DDIs accounted for 1-4%, whereas those with potential DDIs accounted for 15-50%. The most frequently coprescribed medications related to potential DDIs were diclofenac and polyvalent cation-containing antacids. Among PI users, 8-10% of them had contraindicated DDIs while 44-50% of them had potential DDIs. The medications related to potential DDIs with PIs were zolpidem, betamethasone, polyvalent cation-containing antacids, and loperamide. CONCLUSION: Our study showed a low prevalence of contraindicated DDIs in the HIV population; however, more attention should be paid to a high proportion of potential DDIs. Strategies to avoid these DDIs should be implemented if possible. Further research that focuses on the long-term clinical impact of potential DDIs is warranted.

Comparison of risk of acute kidney injury between patients receiving the combination of teicoplanin and piperacillin/tazobactam versus vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: To compare the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) among patients receiving teicoplanin (TA) plus piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) versus vancomycin (VAN) plus TZP. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records. Patients were included if a combination of glycopeptide and TZP or other selected ß-lactams were used during hospitalization. In the main analysis, two study groups were identified: TA + TZP and VAN + TZP. We used 1:1 propensity score matching to control for potential confounders, and hazard ratio (HR) of AKI between study groups was calculated. We further compared the risk of AKI between patients receiving VAN + TZP and VAN + ß-lactams as an auxiliary analysis to verify the validity of the study design. RESULTS: The final sample contained 211 pairs of patients receiving either TA + TZP or VAN + TZP. The median dosage of TA and VAN were 10.3 and 26.7 mg/kg/day, respectively. The median trough level of VAN was 12.3 mg/L. The AKI risk in the TA + TZP group was similar to that in the VAN + TZP group (12.3% vs. 11.4%; HR = 1.25 [0.72-2.18], p = 0.44). The auxiliary analysis showed a higher risk of AKI in the VAN + TZP group than in the VAN + ß-lactam group (13.2% vs. 9.6%; HR = 1.63 [1.04-2.55], p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Our study results showed that the risk of AKI were similar for patients receiving TA + TZP and VAN + TZP. However, low VAN and high TA dose may play a role in this finding. Further investigation on the association between AKI and TA + TZP is required.

Nephrotoxicity of teicoplanin-based combination therapy: focus on piperacillin/tazobactam and other anti-pseudomonal ß-lactams.

BACKGROUND: The concurrent use of vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam increases the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) compared with vancomycin use with other anti-pseudomonal ß-lactams (OAPBs). Teicoplanin is a glycopeptide antibiotic with lower nephrotoxicity than that of vancomycin. Whether the concomitant use of teicoplanin and piperacillin/tazobactam also increases the risk of AKI remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the AKI risk between teicoplanin-piperacillin/tazobactam and teicoplanin-OAPBs. METHODS: This was a retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study. Adult patients receiving teicoplanin-based combination therapy were included. OAPBs included cefepime, cefoperazone/sulbactam, ceftazidime, doripenem, imipenem/cilastatin and meropenem. Propensity score matching was performed to balance demographic and confounding factors. The primary endpoint was AKI during combination therapy. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 954 patients (teicoplanin-piperacillin/tazobactam: teicoplanin-OAPBs, 1:3 matched, 243 pairs in total) were included for analysis. The mean age was 66.3 years in the matched cohort and 17.1% of patients had shock. Use of nephrotoxic medications (45.7% versus 48.7%) and baseline renal function (78.88 ± 31.26 versus 81.05 ± 31.53 mL/min/1.73 m2) were similar in the two groups. The median teicoplanin dose was 10.7 mg/kg in both groups. The groups did not differ significantly in terms of AKI risk (14.8% versus 14.2%, P = 0.815). However, the time to AKI appeared shorter in the teicoplanin-piperacillin/tazobactam group (4.64 ± 2.33 versus 6.29 ± 4.72 days, P = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of teicoplanin and piperacillin/tazobactam was not associated with an increased risk of AKI compared with teicoplanin and OAPBs.

Safety of high-dose daptomycin in patients with severe renal impairment.

BACKGROUND: Treatment options are limited for infections due to multidrug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens. Daptomycin is a lipopeptide antibiotic with concentration-dependent killing characteristic and dose-dependent post-antibiotic effect. To achieve optimized pharma-codynamic effect, some experts advocated using a high dose of daptomycin (≥9 mg/kg) for severe infections. However, the safety of high-dose therapy in patients with renal impairment remains unknown. This study was aimed to evaluate the safety of daptomycin in patients with severe renal impairment. METHODS: This was a retrospective study performed by reviewing electronic medical records. Patients with severe renal impairment who were treated with daptomycin in a tertiary teaching hospital between January 1, 2013, and June 30, 2016, were included for evaluation. The incidence rates of creatine kinase (CK) elevation between high-dose (≥9 mg/kg) and standard-dose (<9 mg/kg) groups were compared. RESULTS: Overall, 164 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 114 (69.5%) of them were on renal replacement therapy. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci were the most common pathogens (61.3%) of the patients with documented pathogens. The treatment success rate was 51.6% in the 91 patients with bacteremia. The average dose of daptomycin was 8.0±2.3 mg/kg, and 37 (22.6%) patients received ≥9 mg/kg. CK levels were followed in 108 (65.9%) patients. Significantly higher incidence of CK elevation was found in the high-dose group compared with that in the standard-dose group (10.8% vs 1.6%, P<0.05). Moreover, patients with elevated CK received a higher dose of daptomycin than those without (9.3±1.2 vs 7.9±2.3 mg/kg, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the rate of CK elevation between patients treated with different dosing frequency or with the concurrent use of statins, fibrate, or colchicine. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe renal impairment, high-dose (≥9 mg/kg) daptomycin therapy may result in a significantly higher incidence of CK elevation. More frequent CK monitoring is warranted to avoid potential harm in this population.