Primary cardiac sarcomas: Treatment strategies.

OBJECTIVE: Our multidisciplinary cardiac tumor team now has an experience of operating on 122 cases of primary cardiac sarcoma over a 23-year period. The purpose of this study is to present our short- and long-term outcomes for cardiac sarcoma. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected Institutional Review Board-approved cardiac tumor database for cardiac sarcoma. Patient characteristics, surgical factors, and patient outcomes were analyzed. Perioperative data were collected from direct patient communication and all available medical records. The primary end point was all-cause mortality at 1, 3, and 5 years from the time of our surgery and 1, 3, and 5 years from the initial diagnosis. The secondary end point was all-cause mortality between the first and second halves of the study. RESULTS: From October 1998 to April 2021, we operated on 122 patients with a primary cardiac sarcoma. The mean age was 45.3 years old, and 52.5% were male. Tumors were most frequently found in the left atrium (40.2%) and right atrium (32.0%). The most common type of tumor histologically was an angiosarcoma (38.5%), followed by high-grade sarcoma (14.8%). Survival from initial diagnosis at 1, 3, and 5 years was 88.4%, 43.15%, and 27.8%, respectively. Survival from surgery at our institution at 1 and 3 years was 57.1% and 24.5%, respectively. When comparing outcomes from different time periods, we found no significant difference in survival between the previous era (1998-2011) and the current era (2011-2021). CONCLUSIONS: Management of these complex patients can show reasonable outcomes in centers with a multidisciplinary cardiac tumor team. Mortality has not improved with time and is likely related to the systemic nature of this disease.

Resternotomy Coronary Artery Bypass 1999-2018: Insights From The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database.

BACKGROUND: We sought to quantify the risk trend of resternotomy coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) over the past 2 decades. METHODS: We compared the outcomes of 194 804 consecutive resternotomy CABG patients and 1 445 894 randomly selected first-time CABG patients (50% of total) reported to The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database between 1999 and 2018. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and overall morbidity. Using multiple logistic regression for each outcome for each year, we computed the annual trends of risk-adjusted odds ratios for the primary outcomes in the entire cohort and in 194 776 propensity-matched pairs. RESULTS: The annual resternotomy CABG case volume from participating centers declined by 68%, from a median of 25 (range, 14-44) to a median of 8 (range, 4-15). Compared with first-time CABG, resternotomy CABG patients were consistently older, with higher proportions of comorbidities. After propensity matching, primary outcomes of resternotomy and first-time CABG were similar (mortality: 3.5% vs 2.3%, standardized difference [SDiff], 7.5%; morbidity: 40.7% vs 40.3%, SDiff, 0.9%). Mortality of resternotomy CABG performed after prior CABG was higher than that after prior non-CABG (4.3% vs 2.4%; SDiff, 10.8). Morbidity was similar between these subgroups (41.0% vs 39.1%; SDiff, 2.9). The adjusted odds ratio for mortality after resternotomy CABG declined from 1.93 (95% CI, 1.73-2.16) to 1.22 (95% CI, 0.92-1.62), and that of morbidity declined from 1.13 (95% CI, 1.08-1.18) to 0.91 (95% CI, 0.87-0.95), P < .001 for both. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of resternotomy CABG has decreased substantially over time. Resternotomy CABG performed after a prior CABG is higher risk compared with that performed after a non-CABG operation.

Volume-Outcome Relationship of Resternotomy Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

BACKGROUND: We assessed volume-outcome relationships of resternotomy coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: We studied 1,362,218 first-time CABG and 93,985 resternotomy CABG patients reported to The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database between 2010 and 2019. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and mortality and morbidity (M&M) rates calculated per hospital and per surgeon. Outcomes were compared across 6 total cardiac surgery volume categories. Multivariable generalized linear mixed-effects models were used considering continuous case volume as the main exposure, adjusting for patient characteristics and within-surgeon and hospital variation. RESULTS: We observed a decline in resternotomy CABG unadjusted mortality and M&M from the lowest to the highest case-volume categories (hospital-level mortality, 3.9% ± 0.6% to 3.3% ± 0.1%; M&M, 18.5% ± 1.1% to 15.7% ± 0.4%, P < .001; surgeon-level mortality, 4.1% ± 0.3% to 4.1% ± 1.3%; M&M, 18.5% ± 0.6% to 14.5% ± 2.2%, P < .001). Looking at outcomes vs continuous volume showed that beyond a minimum annual volume (hospital 200-300 cases; surgeon 100-150 cases, approximately), mortality and M&M rates did not further improve. Using individual-level data and adjusting for patient characteristics and clustering within surgeon and hospital, we found higher procedural volume was associated with improved surgeon-level outcomes (mortality adjusted odds ratio, 0.39/100 procedures; 95% CI, 0.24-0.61; M&M adjusted odds ratio, 0.37/100 procedures; 95% CI, 0.28-0.48; P < .001 for both). Hospital-level adjusted volume-outcomes associations were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: We observed an inverse relationship between total cardiac case volume and resternotomy CABG outcomes at the surgeon level only, indicating that individual surgeon's experience, rather than institutional volume, is the key determinant.

2021 MiECTiS focused update on the 2016 position paper for the use of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation in cardiac surgery.

The landmark 2016 Minimal Invasive Extracorporeal Technologies International Society (MiECTiS) position paper promoted the creation of a common language between cardiac surgeons, anesthesiologists and perfusionists which led to the development of a stable framework that paved the way for the advancement of minimal invasive perfusion and related technologies. The current expert consensus document offers an update in areas for which new evidence has emerged. In the light of published literature, modular minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) has been established as a safe and effective perfusion technique that increases biocompatibility and ultimately ensures perfusion safety in all adult cardiac surgical procedures, including re-operations, aortic arch and emergency surgery. Moreover, it was recognized that incorporation of MiECC strategies advances minimal invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) by combining reduced surgical trauma with minimal physiologic derangements. Minimal Invasive Extracorporeal Technologies International Society considers MiECC as a physiologically-based multidisciplinary strategy for performing cardiac surgery that is associated with significant evidence-based clinical benefit that has accrued over the years. Widespread adoption of this technology is thus strongly advocated to obtain additional healthcare benefit while advancing patient care.

Validation of the society of thoracic surgeons predicted risk of mortality score for long-term survival after cardiac surgery in Israel.

BACKGROUND: Long-term survival is an important metric in assessing procedural value. We previously confirmed that the Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality score (PROM) accurately predicts 30-day mortality in Israeli patients. The present study investigated the ability of the PROM to reliably predict long-term survival. METHODS: Data on 1279 patients undergoing cardiac surgery were prospectively entered into our database and used to calculate PROM. Long-term mortality was obtained from the Israeli Social Security Database. Patients were stratified into five cohorts according to PROM (A: 0-0.99%, B: 1.0-1.99%, C: 2.0-2.99%, D: 3.0-4.99% and E: ≥ 5.0%). Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival were calculated for each cohort and compared by Wilcoxon signed-rank test. We used C-statistics to assess model discrimination. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of long-term survival. RESULTS: Follow-up was achieved for 1256 (98%) patients over a mean period of 62 ± 28 months (median 64, range 0-107). Mean survival of the entire cohort was 95 ± 1 (95% CI 93-96) months. Higher PROM was associated with reduced survival: A-104 ± 1 (103-105) months, B-96 ± 2 (93-99) months, C-93 ± 3 (88-98) months, D-89 ± 3 (84-94) months, E-74 ± 3 (68-80) months (p < 0.0001). The Area Under the Curve was 0.76 ± 0.02 indicating excellent model discrimination. Independent predictors of long-term mortality included advanced age, lower ejection fraction, reoperation, diabetes mellitus, dialysis and PROM. CONCLUSIONS: The PROM was a reliable predictor of long-term survival in Israeli patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The PROM might be a useful metric for assessing procedural value and surgical decision-making.

Outcomes of sublobar resection vs lobectomy for invasive clinical stage T1N0 non-small-cell lung cancer: A propensity-match analysis.

BACKGROUND: The role of sub lobar resection (SLR; either segmentectomy or wedge resection) vs lobectomy (LBCT) for invasive clinical stage T1N0 non-small-cell-lung-cancer (NSCLC) has not been fully established yet. AIM: We aimed to characterize the preoperative parameters leading to selecting SLR and compare the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of these two surgical approaches. METHODS: Clinical data on 162 patients (LBCT-107; SLR-55) were prospectively entered in our departmental database. Preoperative parameters associated with the performance of SLR were identified using univariate and multivariate cox regression analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compute OS and DFS. Comparison between LBCT and SLR groups and 32 propensity-matched groups was performed using Log-rank test. RESULTS: Median follow-up time for the LBCT and SLR groups was 4.76 (Inter-quartile range [IQR] 2.96 to 8.23) and 3.38 (IQR 2.9 to 6.19) years respectively. OS and DFS rates were similar between the two groups in the entire cohort (OS-LBCT vs SLR P = .853, DSF-LBCT vs SLR P = .653) and after propensity matching (OS-LBCT vs SLR P = .563 DSF-LBCT vs SLR P = .632). Specifically, Two- and five-year OS rates for LBCT and SLR were 90.6.% vs 92.7%, 71.8% vs 75.9% respectively. Independent predictors of selecting for SLR included older age (P < .001), reduced FEV1% (P = .026), smaller tumor size (P = .025), smaller invasive component (P = .021) and higher American Society of Anesthesiology scores (P = .014). CONCLUSIONS: In 162 consecutive and 32 matched cases, SLR and lobar resection had similar overall and disease-free survival rates. SLR may be considered as a reasonable oncological procedure in carefully selected T1N0 NSCLC patients that present with multiple comorbidities and relatively small tumors.

Right-Sided Cardiac Calcifying Fibrous Pseudotumor Manifesting With Embolic Stroke.

This report describes the case of a 43-year-old woman with a right-sided cardiac calcifying fibrous pseudotumor who presented with embolic stroke. This rare clinicopathologic entity should be included in the differential diagnosis of cardiac masses. Tissue diagnosis should be pursued. Management should be tailored to symptoms and feasibility of resection.

Global perspectives on cardiothoracic, cardiovascular, and cardiac surgical training.

OBJECTIVE: Various methods for cardiothoracic, cardiovascular, and cardiac surgical training exist across the globe, with the common goal of producing safe, independent surgeons. A comparative analysis of international training paradigms has not been undertaken, and our goal in doing so was to offer insights into how to best prepare future trainees and ensure the health of our specialty. METHODS: We performed a comparative analysis of available publications offering detailed descriptions of various cardiothoracic, cardiovascular, and cardiac surgical training paradigms. Corresponding authors from previous publications and other international collaborators were also reached directly for further data acquisition. RESULTS: We report various approaches to common challenges surrounding (1) selection of trainees and plans for the future surgical workforce; (2) trainee assessments and certification of competency before independent practice; and (3) challenges related to a changing practice landscape. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiothoracic surgery remains a dynamic and rewarding specialty. Current and future trainees face several challenges that transcend national borders. To foster collaboration and adoption of best practices, we highlight international strengths and weaknesses of various nations in terms of workforce selection, trainee operative experience and assessment, board certification, and preparation for future changes anticipated in cardiothoracic surgery.

11-year experience with Chest Wall resection and reconstruction for primary Chest Wall sarcomas.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Primary chest wall sarcomas are rare and therapeutically challenging tumors. Herein we report the outcomes of a surgery-based multimodality therapy for these pathologies over an 11-year period. In addition, we present a case that illustrates the surgical challenges that extensive chest wall resection may pose. METHODS: Using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons general thoracic surgery database, we have prospectively collected data in our institute on all patients undergoing chest wall resection and reconstruction for primary chest wall sarcomas between June 2008-October 2019. RESULTS: We performed 28 surgical procedures on 25 patients aged 5 to 91 years (median age 33). Eleven tumors were bone- and cartilage-derived and 14 tumors originated from soft tissue elements. Seven patients (7/25, 28%) received neo-adjuvant therapy and 14 patients (14/25, 56%) received adjuvant therapy. The median number of ribs that were resected was 2.5 (range 0 to 6). In 18/28 (64%) of surgeries, additional skeletal or visceral organs were removed, including: diaphragm [1], scapula [2], sternum [2], lung [2], vertebra [1], clavicle [1] and colon [1]. Chest wall reconstruction was deemed necessary in 16/28 (57%) of cases, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) Gore-Tex patches was used in 13/28 (46%) of cases and biological flaps where used in 4/28 (14%) of cases. R0, R1 and R2 resection margins were achieved in 19/28 (68%), 9/28 (32%) and 0/28 (0%) of cases, respectively. The median follow up time was 33 months (range 2 to 138). During the study period, disease recurred in 8/25 (32%) of patients. Of these, 3 were re-operated on and are free of disease. At date of last follow up, 5/25 (20%) of patients have died due to their disease and in contrast, 20/25 (80%) were alive with no evidence of disease. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery-based multimodality therapy is an effective treatment approach for primary chest wall sarcomas. Resection of additional skeletal or visceral organs and reconstruction with synthetic and/or biological flaps is often required in order to obtain R0 resection margins. Ultimately, long-term survival in this clinical scenario is an achievable goal.

The American Society of Thoracic Surgery Score versus EuroSCORE I and EuroSCORE II in Israeli Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Recently, Israel established the first national-level adult cardiac surgery database, which was linked to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). OBJECTIVES: To validate and compare the STS predicted risk of mortality (PROM) to logistic EuroSCORE I (LESI) and EuroSCORE II (ESII) in Israeli patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 1279 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac surgeries with a calculable PROM. Data were prospectively entered into our database and used to calculate PROM, LESI, and ESII. Scores were normalized and correlated using linear regression and Pearson's test. To examine model calibration, we plotted the total observed versus expected mortality for each score and across five risk-score subgroups. Model discrimination was assessed by measuring the area under the receiver operating curves. RESULTS: The observed 30-day operative mortality was 1.95%. The median (IQ1; IQ3) PROM, LESI, and the ESII scores were 1.45% (0.69; 3.22), 4.54% (2.28; 9.27), and 1.88% (1.18; 3.54), respectively, with observed over expected ratios of 0.63 (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.42-0.93), 0.59 (95%CI 0.40-0.87), and 0.24 (95%CI 0.17-0.36), respectively, (STS vs. ESII P = 0.36, STS vs. LESI P = 0.0001). There was good correlation among all scores. All models overestimated mortality. Model discrimination was high and similar for all three scores. Model calibration of the STS, PROM, and ESII were more accurate than the LESI, particularly in higher risk subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: All scores overestimated mortality. In Israeli patients, the STS, PROM, and ESII risk-scores were more reliable metrics than LESI, particularly in higher risk patients.