ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gastroenterology fellowships need to ensure that trainees achieve competence in upper endoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy. Because the impact of structured feedback remains unknown in endoscopy training, this study compared the effect of structured feedback with standard feedback on trainee learning curves for EGD and colonoscopy. METHODS: In this multicenter, cluster, randomized controlled trial, trainees received either individualized quarterly learning curves or feedback standard to their fellowship. Assessment was performed in all trainees using the Assessment of Competency in Endoscopy tool on 5 consecutive procedures after every 25 EGDs and colonoscopies. Individual learning curves were created using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. The primary outcome was the mean CUSUM score in overall technical and overall cognitive skills. RESULTS: In all, 13 programs including 132 trainees participated. The intervention arm (6 programs, 51 trainees) contributed 558 EGD and 600 colonoscopy assessments. The control arm (7 programs, 81 trainees) provided 305 EGD and 468 colonoscopy assessments. For EGD, the intervention arm (-.7 [standard deviation {SD}, 1.3]) had a superior mean CUSUM score in overall cognitive skills compared with the control arm (1.6 [SD, .8], P = .03) but not in overall technical skills (intervention, -.26 [SD, 1.4]; control, 1.76 [SD, .7]; P = .06). For colonoscopy, no differences were found between the 2 arms in overall cognitive skills (intervention, -.7 [SD, 1.3]; control, .7 [SD, 1.3]; P = .95) or overall technical skills (intervention, .1 [SD, 1.5]; control, -.1 [SD, 1.5]; P = .77). CONCLUSIONS: Quarterly feedback in the form of individualized learning curves did not affect learning curves for EGD and colonoscopy in a clinically meaningful manner. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02891304.).
Subject(s)
Learning Curve , Clinical Competence , Colonoscopy , Feedback , Gastroenterology/education , HumansABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) affects up to 25% of the western population, and the annual expenditure for managing GERD is estimated to be more than $14 billion. Most GERD patients do not consult a specialist, but rather rely on their primary care physician for symptom management. Research has shown that many patients--regardless of diagnosis--do not fully understand what their doctors tell them and remain uncertain as to what they are supposed to do to take care of themselves. To determine if patients are adequately educated in the management of GERD, we conducted a survey. METHOD: We administered a survey to patients with GERD in an outpatient setting and explored their knowledge of such management practices as modification of behavior and diet and use of medication. RESULTS: Of 333 patients enrolled, 66% reported having an in-depth discussion with their primary care physician. Among patients taking a proton pump inhibitor, 85% of those who'd had an in-depth discussion were aware of the best time to take their medication, compared with only 18% of those who did not have an in-depth discussion. In addition, patients who'd had in-depth conversations were significantly more likely than those who didn't to know some of the behavior modification measures that might improve their symptoms. CONCLUSION: Our study underscores the need for primary care providers to fully discuss GERD with their patients to improve overall management of the disease.
Subject(s)
Gastroesophageal Reflux/therapy , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Patient Compliance , Patient Education as Topic , Physician-Patient Relations , Primary Health Care , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/psychology , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Risk Reduction Behavior , Self CareABSTRACT
Blood spurting or oozing from a varix confirms the diagnosis of variceal hemorrhage. In most cases of variceal hemorrhage, however, the bleeding has ceased by the time endoscopy is performed. Endoscopists rely on identification of stigmata of recent hemorrhage to determine whether varices are the cause of bleeding and to predict the likelihood of rebleeding. Most of the attention has focused on red color signs, such as red wale markings, described by Beppu et al. [Gastrointest Endosc 1981;27:213-218] and well known to endoscopists. Here we describe our experience with a less recognized stigma of variceal hemorrhage known as the 'white nipple sign', which resulted in active hemorrhage when manipulated.
