Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TEXCAPS): additional perspectives on tolerability of long-term treatment with lovastatin.

This study presents the long-term safety data from AFCAPS/TexCAPS, the first primary prevention trial to demonstrate that men and women with average levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and below average levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) can significantly benefit from long-term treatment to lower LDL-C; lovastatin 20 to 40 mg/day reduced the risk of a first acute major coronary event (fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or sudden death) by 37% (p = 0.00008). This double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled trial, in 6,605 generally healthy middle-aged and older men and women, had prespecified end point and cancer analyses. All analyses were intention-to-treat. Safety monitoring included history, physical examination, and laboratory studies (including hepatic transaminases and creatine phosphokinase [CPK]). All participants, even those who discontinued treatment, were contacted annually for vital status, cardiovascular events, and cancer history. After an average of 5.2 years of follow-up, there were 157 deaths (80 receiving lovastatin and 77 receiving placebo; relative risk [RR] 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76 to 1.42; p = 0.82); of which 115 were noncardiovascular (RR 1.21; CI 0.84 to 1.74; p = 0.31), and of these, 82 were due to cancer (RR 1.41; CI 0.91 to 2.19; p = 0.13). There were no significant differences between treatment groups in overall cancer rates, discontinuations for noncardiovascular adverse experiences, or clinically important elevations of hepatic transaminases or CPK. Among those who used cytochrome P450 isoform (CYP3A4) inhibitors, there were no treatment group differences in the frequency of clinically important muscle-related adverse events. Treatment with lovastatin 20 to 40 mg daily for primary prevention of coronary heart disease was well tolerated and reduced the risk of first acute coronary events without increasing the risk of either noncardiovascular mortality or cancer.

Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS): efficacy and tolerability of long-term treatment with lovastatin in women.

The Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS) is the first coronary heart disease (CHD) primary prevention trial of the cholesterol-reducing agents called "statins" to include women. For 5608 men and 997 postmenopausal women without clinical evidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) who had average low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and below average high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), 20-40 mg/day lovastatin reduced first acute major coronary events (AMCEs) 37% (for those receiving placebo and lovastatin, respectively, 183 and 116 first AMCEs defined as fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI], unstable angina, or sudden cardiac death; relative risk [RR] 0.63; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.50, 0.79; p < 0.001). Statistically significant reductions in prespecified secondary end points (coronary revascularizations, unstable angina, MI, cardiovascular end point events, and coronary end point events) were also associated with lovastatin treatment in the overall cohort. This paper provides results in women, a prespecified subgroup. Among women, 20-40 mg/day lovastatin reduced LDL-C 25% and increased HDLC 9% (p < 0.001). A prespecified analysis revealed consistency with the overall results regardless of gender (i.e., there were no statistical differences between men and women in risk reduction for first AMCEs with lovastatin). However, the number of women who had an AMCE was small, and there was insufficient power to detect a treatment group difference among women (7 of 499 vs. 13 of 498 first AMCEs in those receiving lovastatin and placebo, respectively; RR 0.54; 95% CI 0.22, 1.35; p = 0.183). Numerical reductions in all prespecified secondary end points were observed for women treated with lovastatin, but again, the numbers of events were small and the differences were not statistically significant. Chronic long-term treatment with lovastatin was well tolerated, with no treatment group differences in the frequency of cancer, muscle symptoms, and clinically important liver enzyme elevations. In AFCAPS/TexCAPS, a consistent pattern of numerical reductions in all prespecified primary and secondary cardiovascular end points was observed in women treated with lovastatin for primary prevention of CHD. However, because of the small number of events, there was insufficient power to detect significant treatment group differences. Lovastatin treatment was associated with statistically significant decreases in LDL-C and increases in HDL-C, and chronic long-term treatment with 20-40 mg/day lovastatin was well tolerated in women.

Application of the National Cholesterol Education Program and joint European treatment criteria and clinical benefit in the Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS).

AIMS: The Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study reported that diet with lovastatin, 20-40 mg daily, reduced the risk for a first coronary event by 37%. Because only 17% of this cohort would have qualified for drug therapy according to current U.S. guidelines, we assessed clinical benefit by risk categories. METHODS AND RESULTS: The main outcome measures were event rates of first acute major coronary events stratified by National Cholesterol Education Program and European criteria and target goal. Both those who would and would not be eligible for drug therapy, according to National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines, benefited from intervention. As expected, drug-eligible participants (event rate: lovastatin 1%/year, placebo 1.87%/year [relative risk 0.53, 95% confidence interval: 0.33, 0.84]) were at greater absolute risk for acute major coronary events than non-eligible participants (lovastatin 0.62%/year, placebo 0.93%/year [relative risk 0.67, 95% confidence interval: 0.51, 0.88]). Similar results were found using European guidelines for coronary risk management. Treatment to a target goal suggested a non-significant trend to greater benefit. CONCLUSIONS: The consistent relative benefit across risk categories suggests that it may be possible to improve identification of at-risk persons who would benefit from primary prevention, and to recommend appropriate goals of such treatment.

Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS): baseline characteristics and comparison with USA population.

BACKGROUND: Results of the Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS) demonstrated that treatment with lovastatin, in addition to modifications of diet and lifestyle, reduced the rate of first acute major coronary events compared with placebo in a cohort that included participants with average to mildly elevated total levels of cholesterol, and below average levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, women, and elderly subjects. OBJECTIVE: To describe the baseline characteristics of the study's cohort. DESIGN: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, primary-prevention trial in which Americans with average to mildly elevated total levels of cholesterol [4.65-6.83 mmol/l (180-264 mg/dl)] and no clinical evidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease were randomly allocated either 20-40 mg/day lovastatin or placebo in addition to a low-saturated fat, low-cholesterol diet. Baseline characteristics of the study cohort are described, and the characteristics of a USA reference population based upon NHANES III data are provided for comparison. RESULTS: The study includes 5608 men (85%) and 997 women (15%) with mean total cholesterol level 5.71 +/- 0.54 mmol/l (221 +/- 21 mg/dl), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level 3.88 +/- 0.44 mmol/l (150 +/- 17 mg/dl), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol 0.96 +/- 0.15 mmol/l (37 +/- 6 mg/dl), and median triglyceride level 1.78 +/- 0.86 mmol/l (158 +/- 76 mg/dl). The mean age is 58 years (ranges 45-73 years for men and 55- 73 years for women). The participants are 89% white, 7% Hispanic, and 3% black. CONCLUSION: Results from AFCAPS/TexCAPS will be applicable to large segments of populations; in the USA alone, eight million share the demographic and baseline-lipid-level characteristics of the study cohort.

Relation between baseline and on-treatment lipid parameters and first acute major coronary events in the Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS).

BACKGROUND: The Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS) is the first primary-prevention study in a cohort with average total cholesterol (TC) and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and below-average HDL cholesterol (HDL-C). Treatment with lovastatin (20 to 40 mg/d) resulted in a 25% reduction in LDL-C and a 6% increase in HDL-C, as well as a 37% reduction in risk for first acute major coronary event (AMCE), defined as fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or sudden cardiac death. This article describes the relation between baseline and on-treatment lipid and apolipoprotein (apo) parameters and subsequent risk for AMCEs. METHODS AND RESULTS: With all available data from the entire 6605-patient cohort, a prespecified Cox backward stepwise regression model identified outcome predictors, and logistic regression models examined the relation between lipid variables and AMCE risk. Baseline LDL-C, HDL-C, and apoB were significant predictors of AMCE; only on-treatment apoB and the ratio of apoB to apoAI were predictive of subsequent risk; on-treatment LDL-C was not. When event rates were examined across tertiles of baseline lipids, a consistent benefit of treatment with lovastatin was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Persons with average TC and LDL-C levels and below-average HDL-C may obtain significant clinical benefit from primary-prevention lipid modification. On-treatment apoB, especially when combined with apoAI to form the apoB/AI ratio, may be a more accurate predictor than LDL-C of risk for first AMCE.

Effects of simvastatin and pravastatin on gonadal function in male hypercholesterolemic patients.

Inhibition of cholesterol biosynthesis by hydroxymethyl glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors could, in theory, adversely affect male gonadal function because cholesterol is a precursor of steroid hormones. The objective of this randomized double-blind trial was to compare the effects of simvastatin, pravastatin, and placebo on gonadal testosterone production and spermatogenesis. After a 6-week placebo and lipid-lowering diet run-in period, 159 male patients aged 21 to 55 years with type IIa or IIb hypercholesterolemia, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol between 145 and 240 mg/dL, and normal basal levels of testosterone were randomly assigned to treatment with simvastatin 20 mg (n = 40), simvastatin 40 mg (n = 41), pravastatin 40 mg (n = 39), or placebo (n = 39) once daily. After 24 weeks of treatment, mean total cholesterol levels were decreased 24% to 27% and mean LDL cholesterol was decreased 30% to 34% in the 3 active-treatment groups (P < .001 for all comparisons to placebo). At 24 weeks, there were no statistically significant differences between the placebo group and any of the active-treatment groups for the change from baseline in testosterone, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)stimulated testosterone, free testosterone index, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), or sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG). Moreover, there were no statistically significant differences at week 12 or week 24 for the change from baseline in sperm concentration, ejaculate volume, or sperm motility for any active treatment relative to placebo. Both simvastatin and pravastatin were well tolerated. In summary, we found no evidence for clinically meaningful effects of simvastatin or pravastatin on gonadal testosterone production, testosterone reserve, or multiple parameters of semen quality.

Primary prevention of acute coronary events with lovastatin in men and women with average cholesterol levels: results of AFCAPS/TexCAPS. Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study.

CONTEXT: Although cholesterol-reducing treatment has been shown to reduce fatal and nonfatal coronary disease in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), it is unknown whether benefit from the reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in patients without CHD extends to individuals with average serum cholesterol levels, women, and older persons. OBJECTIVE: To compare lovastatin with placebo for prevention of the first acute major coronary event in men and women without clinically evident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with average total cholesterol (TC) and LDL-C levels and below-average high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels. DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient clinics in Texas. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 5608 men and 997 women with average TC and LDL-C and below-average HDL-C (as characterized by lipid percentiles for an age- and sex-matched cohort without cardiovascular disease from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES] III). Mean (SD) TC level was 5.71 (0.54) mmol/L (221 [21] mg/dL) (51 st percentile), mean (SD) LDL-C level was 3.89 (0.43) mmol/L (150 [17] mg/dL) (60th percentile), mean (SD) HDL-C level was 0.94 (0.14) mmol/L (36 [5] mg/dL) for men and 1.03 (0.14) mmol/L (40 [5] mg/dL) for women (25th and 16th percentiles, respectively), and median (SD) triglyceride levels were 1.78 (0.86) mmol/L (158 [76] mg/dL) (63rd percentile). INTERVENTION: Lovastatin (20-40 mg daily) or placebo in addition to a low-saturated fat, low-cholesterol diet. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: First acute major coronary event defined as fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or sudden cardiac death. RESULTS: After an average follow-up of 5.2 years, lovastatin reduced the incidence of first acute major coronary events (1 83 vs 116 first events; relative risk [RR], 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.79; P<.001), myocardial infarction (95 vs 57 myocardial infarctions; RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43-0.83; P=.002), unstable angina (87 vs 60 first unstable angina events; RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49-0.95; P=.02), coronary revascularization procedures (157 vs 106 procedures; RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52-0.85; P=.001), coronary events (215 vs 163 coronary events; RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.92; P =.006), and cardiovascular events (255 vs 194 cardiovascular events; RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62-0.91; P = .003). Lovastatin (20-40 mg daily) reduced LDL-C by 25% to 2.96 mmol/L (115 mg/dL) and increased HDL-C by 6% to 1.02 mmol/L (39 mg/dL). There were no clinically relevant differences in safety parameters between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Lovastatin reduces the risk for the first acute major coronary event in men and women with average TC and LDL-C levels and below-average HDL-C levels. These findings support the inclusion of HDL-C in risk-factor assessment, confirm the benefit of LDL-C reduction to a target goal, and suggest the need for reassessment of the National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines regarding pharmacological intervention.

Design & rationale of the Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS).

The Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled primary prevention trial. It is designed to test the hypothesis that in addition to a lipid-lowering diet, treatment with lovastatin is more effective than placebo in reducing acute major coronary events (i.e., sudden cardiac death, fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction, and unstable angina) in a cohort with normal to mildly elevated total (180 to 264 mg/dl) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (130 to 190 mg/dl) and low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (< or =45 mg/dl for men and < or =47 mg/dl for women). Two sites in Texas, Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio and the University of North Texas Health Science Center in Fort Worth, will conduct the study. After at least 12 weeks of an American Heart Association Step 1 diet and 2 weeks placebo run-in, 6,605 men and women, ages 45 to 73 and 55 to 73 years, respectively, without clinical evidence of coronary heart disease, are randomized in equal numbers to either lovastatin (20 mg/day) or placebo. Study procedures maintain the blind, allowing titration of lovastatin from 20 to 40 mg/day to achieve an LDL cholesterol goal of < or = 110 mg/dl. All participants are followed until study completion, when 320 participants have had a primary end point or a minimum of 5 years after the last participant is randomized, whichever occurs last. All end points are adjudicated by an independent committee using prespecified criteria. Unique features of this trial are (1) the inclusion of unstable angina in the primary end point to reflect the increasing trend to treat coronary heart disease aggressively before a myocardial infarction has occurred, (2) aggressive pharmacologic intervention, with titration, to attain an LDL cholesterol goal less than the current National Cholesterol Education Panel guidelines for primary prevention, and (3) a cohort that includes women, the elderly, and those with mild to moderate hyperlipidemia and low HDL cholesterol. Compared with earlier studies, results will be applicable to a broader population and may help clarify the role of aggressive LDL cholesterol reduction measures in primary prevention. Treatment of this population is likely to realize the greatest cumulative long-term benefit in the prevention of acute major coronary events.

Prevention of nonvertebral fractures by alendronate. A meta-analysis. Alendronate Osteoporosis Treatment Study Groups.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of treatment with alendronate sodium, a potent aminobisphosphonate, on the incidence of nonvertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. DATA SOURCES: Published data and data on file at Merck Research Laboratories. STUDY SELECTION: All completed prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled alendronate trials of at least 2 years' duration (5 studies). DATA EXTRACTION: All subjects were women with osteoporosis between the ages of 42 and 85 years, postmenopausal at least 4 years, with lumbar spine bone mineral density (measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry) at least 2.0 SD below the mean for young adult women. All women randomized to treatment with placebo or alendronate at a dose higher than 1 mg per day for at least 2 years were included. DATA SYNTHESIS: In the placebo group (n=590), 60 women reported nonvertebral fractures during 1347 patient-years at risk (overall rate, 4.45 women with fractures per 100 patient-years at risk). In the alendronate group (n = 1012), 73 women reported nonvertebral fractures during 2240 patient-years-at risk (overall rate, 3.26 women with fractures per 100 patient-years at risk). The estimated cumulative incidence of nonvertebral fractures after 3 years was 12.6% in the placebo group and 9.0% in alendronate group. The relative risk for nonvertebral fracture estimated using the Cox proportional hazards model was 0.71 (95% confidence interval,0.502-0.997) (P=.048). A reduction in risk was consistent across each of the studies and at each major site of osteoporotic fracture, including the hip and wrist. CONCLUSION: In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, treatment with alendronate reduces the risk of nonvertebral fractures over at least 3 years.

Effects of simvastatin versus gemfibrozil on lipids and glucose control in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. NIDDM Study Group.

The objective of this study was to compare the lipid-altering efficacy and safety of simvastatin with that of gemfibrozil in hypercholesterolemic patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). The study was a 24-week, double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial conducted at clinics and hospitals in the United States, Austria, Germany, Brazil, and New Zealand. The study population included 168 men and women aged 34 to 78 years with NIDDM and primary hypercholesterolemia (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] level at screening was > or = 4.9 mmol/L with no other risk factor or > or = 4.1 mmol/L with one or more other risk factors). All patients had been under moderate-to-good diabetic control (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] < or = 10.0%) for at least 6 months with diet alone, oral hypoglycemic agents, or insulin therapy. Patients meeting eligibility criteria were randomized to receive either simvastatin 10 mg (titrated up to 40 mg to achieve an LDL-C level < 3.4 mmol/L) once in the evening or gemfibrozil 600 mg twice daily. There were 81 patients in the simvastatin group and 87 patients in the gemfibrozil group. After 17 weeks of treatment, simvastatin significantly reduced levels of total cholesterol, LDL-C, and very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C) by approximately 25%, 33%, and 20%, respectively (P < or = 0.001), and triglycerides by about 9% (P < or = 0.05). The drug increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels by about 6% (P < 0.01). Gemfibrozil significantly reduced total cholesterol, VLDL-C, and triglyceride levels by approximately 8%, 38%, and 27%, respectively (P < 0.001); it significantly increased HDL-C values by about 12% (P < 0.001). Gemfibrozil lowered LDL-C levels by 4% but not significantly. The decreases in total cholesterol and LDL-C were significantly greater (P < 0.001) in the simvastatin group, and decreases in VLDL-C and triglycerides were significantly greater in the gemfibrozil group (P < 0.01). The changes in HDL-C were not significantly different between groups. LDL-C values of < 3.4 mmol/L were achieved in 60% of the simvastatin patients and 14% of the gemfibrozil patients. There were no significant between-group differences in fasting serum glucose or HbA1c at any time point. Glycemic profiles (performed at baseline and after 17 weeks of treatment) and glucose area under the curve (at baseline and after 17 weeks of treatment) were not significantly different between treatment groups. Both drugs were generally well tolerated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Severe ocular trauma without corneal rupture after radial keratotomy: case reports.

The vulnerability of the ocular coat to trauma following radial keratotomy is an issue of concern to both patients and physicians. Herein, we report two cases of eyes which were exposed to severe trauma after previously undergoing radial keratotomy procedures. In the first case, a woman sustained multiple facial bone fractures in a fatal airplane crash. In the second case, a man was involved in a case of blunt ocular trauma involving a high velocity racquetball. Rupture of the ocular coat did not occur in either case.

Phacoemulsification after T-hex keratotomy.

T-hex keratotomy surgically corrects manifest hyperopia. The typical patient presenting for this surgery is a presbyope who develops symptoms from latent hyperopia. These patients are older than typical radial keratotomy patients and are thus likely to develop senile cataracts sooner. The exact surgical approach to cataract surgery in such patients is unknown. We report a patient who had successful cataract extraction by phacoemulsification with implantation of a posterior chamber lens after a previous routine T-hex keratotomy. The preoperative workup and the surgical technique did not require modification.

Radial keratotomy in intact epikeratoplasty graft.

BACKGROUND: Epikeratoplasty can be used to flatten the cornea in keratoconus but is not a satisfactory tool to correct refractive errors in this setting. Radial and astigmatic keratotomy are unpredictable in keratoconus but can be used in an eye which has previously undergone epikeratoplasty for keratoconus. METHODS: We report a case of a pseudophakic eye with Keratoconus which received epikeratoplasty and subsequently underwent radial and astigmatic keratotomy in the graft. RESULTS: Before the refractive keratotomy, the patient had a refraction of -8.00 + 3.25 x 25. At 5 months after radial and astigmatic keratotomy, the patient had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/60+ with a refraction of -0.50 + 2.00 x 28. CONCLUSIONS: This case demonstrates how different types of refractive corneal surgery can be combined to improve visual acuity in an individual patient. Whether the specific combination of epikeratoplasty and refractive keratotomy can be advocated in the treatment of keratoconus requires more experience with a greater number of patients.

Comparative effects of simvastatin and lovastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia. The Simvastatin and Lovastatin Multicenter Study Participants.

The efficacy, safety profile, and tolerability of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors simvastatin and lovastatin were compared in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study in patients with moderate hypercholesterolemia. Commonly prescribed doses of these two drugs were used by 544 men and women, who followed an American Heart Association phase I diet during a 6-week baseline period and for the 24 weeks of active treatment. Simvastatin 10 mg and lovastatin 20 mg produced statistically significant reductions in total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Patients receiving simvastatin 10 mg once daily and lovastatin 20 mg once daily experienced similar reductions in LDL-C and total cholesterol; however, simvastatin 20 mg was statistically superior to lovastatin 40 mg in decreasing these lipid fractions. For all treatment groups, increases in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were inversely related to baseline levels. Moderate decreases in triglycerides occurred with all doses. Lipoprotein(a) levels, measured in a subset of patients, were similar before and after treatment. Both drugs were well tolerated.

Transverse astigmatic keratotomy. An integral part of small incision cataract surgery.

Transverse astigmatic keratotomy (TAK) is used with an astigmatically neutral wound to control against-the-rule astigmatism. Previously both wound manipulation and TAK have been used to alter astigmatism, but with the advent of astigmatically neutral small incision surgery, astigmatism control involves TAK alone. This paper discusses the TAK approach to astigmatism control and includes a nomogram for incision size.