Measurement of offline exhaled nitric oxide in a study of community exposure to air pollution.

As part of a large panel study in Seattle, Washington, we measured levels of exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) in children's homes and fixed-site particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters of 2.5 micro m or less (PM(2.5)) outside and inside the homes as well as personal PM(2.5) during winter and spring sessions of 2000-2001. Nineteen subjects 6-13 years of age participated; 9 of the 19 were on inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy. Exhaled breath measurements were collected offline into a Mylar balloon for up to 10 consecutive days. Mean eNO values were 19.1 (SD +/- 11.4) ppb in winter sessions and 12.5 +/- 6.6 ppb in spring sessions. Fixed-site PM(2.5) mean concentrations were 10.1 +/- 5.7 microg/m(3) outside homes and 13.3 +/- 1.4 inside homes; the personal PM(2.5) mean was 13.4 +/- 3.2 microg/m(3). We used a linear mixed-effects model with random intercept and an interaction term for medications to test for within-subject-within-session associations between eNO and various PM(2.5) values. We found a 10 microg/m(3) increase in PM(2.5) from the outdoor, indoor, personal, and central-site measurements that was associated with increases in eNO in all subjects at lag day zero. The effect was 4.3 ppb [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.4-7.29] with the outdoor monitor, 4.2 ppb (95% CI, 1.02-7.4) for the indoor monitor, 4.5 ppb (95% CI, 1.02-7.9) with the personal monitor, and 3.8 ppb (95% CI, 1.2-6.4) for the central monitors. The interaction term for medication category (ICS users vs. nonusers) was significant in all analyses. These findings suggest that eNO can be used as an assessment tool in epidemiologic studies of health effects of air pollution.

Once-daily budesonide inhalation powder (Pulmicort Turbuhaler) maintains pulmonary function and symptoms of asthmatic children previously receiving inhaled corticosteroids.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of pediatric asthma has increased dramatically over the past few decades, with approximately 5% of American children affected by the disease. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily budesonide Turbuhaler with placebo in asthmatic children previously treated with orally inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter (17 centers) study included 274 male and female children (aged 6 to 17 years) with a history of asthma for at least the previous 6 months. Patients received placebo or budesonide Turbuhaler (200 microg or 400 microg) once daily for 12 weeks. Efficacy variables included mean changes from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), AM and PM peak expiratory flow rates (PEFRs), nighttime and daytime asthma symptom severity scores, patient discontinuations, use of beta2-agonists as breakthrough medication, forced vital capacity (FVC), and midexpiratory flow rate between 25% and 75% of FVC (FEF25%-75%). Safety was evaluated by adverse events, physical examinations, vital signs, and laboratory tests. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable among treatment groups. Percentage of predicted FEV1 at baseline was 76.6 +/- 6.9 for placebo, 77.5 +/- 7.1, and 77.0 +/- 7.8 for the budesonide Turbuhaler 200 microg and 400 microg groups, respectively. Significantly (P < or = 0.024) more placebo patients (24%) discontinued treatment because of disease deterioration or no improvement than budesonide Turbuhaler 200 microg (11%) or 400 microg patients (10%). Patients receiving budesonide Turbuhaler experienced significant improvements in FEV1 compared with patients receiving placebo (P < or = 0.015). Significant (P < or = 0.041) improvements over placebo also were observed in AM and PM PEFRs, FVC, FEF25%-75%, nighttime and daytime asthma symptoms, and amount of beta2-agonist used in both budesonide Turbuhaler groups. Adverse events were generally mild or moderate in intensity and similar among treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily budesonide Turbuhaler is effective and safe in children with persistent asthma previously maintained on at least twice-daily dosing regimens of inhaled corticosteroids.

Effects of ambient air pollution on symptoms of asthma in Seattle-area children enrolled in the CAMP study.

We observed a panel of 133 children (5-13 years of age) with asthma residing in the greater Seattle, Washington, area for an average of 58 days (range 28-112 days) during screening for enrollment in the Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) study. Daily self-reports of asthma symptoms were obtained from study diaries and compared with ambient air pollution levels in marginal repeated measures logistic regression models. We defined days with asthma symptoms as any day a child reported at least one mild asthma episode. All analyses were controlled for subject-specific variables [age, race, sex, baseline height, and FEV(1) PC(20) concentration (methacholine provocative concentration required to produce a 20% decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec)] and potential time-dependent confounders (day of week, season, and temperature). Because of variable observation periods for participants, we estimated both between- and within-subject air pollutant effects. Our primary interest was in the within-subject effects: the effect of air pollutant excursions from typical levels in each child's observation period on the odds of asthma symptoms. In single-pollutant models, the population average estimates indicated a 30% [95% confidence interval (CI), 11-52%] increase for a 1-ppm increment in carbon monoxide lagged 1 day, an 18% (95% CI, 5-33%) increase for a 10-microg/m(3) increment in same-day particulate matter < 1.0 microm (PM(1.0)), and an 11% (95% CI, 3-20%) increase for a 10-microg/m(3) increment in particulate matter < 10 microm (PM(10)) lagged 1 day. Conditional on the previous day's asthma symptoms, we estimated 25% (95% CI, 10-42%), 14% (95% CI, 4-26%), and 10% (95% CI, 3-16%) increases in the odds of asthma symptoms associated with increases in CO, PM(1.0), and PM(10), respectively. We did not find any association between sulfur dioxide (SO(2)) and the odds of asthma symptoms. In multipollutant models, the separate pollutant effects were smaller. The overall effect of an increase in both CO and PM(1. 0) was a 31% (95% CI, 11-55%) increase in the odds of symptoms of asthma. We conclude that there is an association between change in short-term air pollution levels, as indexed by PM and CO, and the occurrence of asthma symptoms among children in Seattle. Although PM effects on asthma have been found in other studies, it is likely that CO is a marker for vehicle exhaust and other combustion by-products that aggravate asthma.

House dust mite avoidance for children with asthma in homes of low-income families.

BACKGROUND: Home exposure to high levels of house dust mite allergen has been shown to aggravate airways reactivity and asthma. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether specific house dust mite control measures could reduce exposure levels and asthma severity. METHODS: This double-blinded, randomized trial compared asthma progression over 1 year in children whose homes received standard environmental control intervention with those whose homes received aggressive intervention for dust mite elimination. The primary end point was doubling in PD20 methacholine. RESULTS: Symptom scores and quality-of-life scores were similar for the standard and aggressive intervention groups. PD20 methacholine doubling occurred in 9 members of the aggressive intervention group vs 4 control patients (P <.05). Dust mite levels decreased in the aggressive intervention homes compared with the standard intervention homes (P <.05). CONCLUSION: Aggressive dust mite intervention decreased dust mite levels and improved bronchial hyperresponsiveness.

Montelukast once daily inhibits exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in 6- to 14-year-old children with asthma.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, attenuates exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in 6- to 14-year-old children with asthma. STUDY DESIGN: Double-blind, multicenter, 2-period crossover study. Children (n = 27) with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) > or =70% of the predicted value and a fall in FEV1 > or =20% after exercise on 2 occasions. Patients received montelukast (5-mg chewable tablet) or placebo once daily in the evening for 2 days in crossover fashion (at least 4 days between treatment periods). Standardized exercise challenges were performed 20 to 24 hours after the last dose in each period. End points included area above the postexercise percent fall in FEV1 versus time curve (AAC0-60 min), maximum percent fall in FEV1 from pre-exercise baseline, and time to recovery of FEV1 to within 5% of pre-exercise baseline. RESULTS: Montelukast significantly reduced AAC0-60 min (265 vs 590% x min for montelukast and placebo, respectively, P < or = .05; approximately 59% protection relative to placebo) and the maximum percent fall (18% vs 26% for montelukast and placebo, respectively, P < or = .05). Montelukast treatment resulted in a shorter time to recovery (18 vs 28 minutes for montelukast and placebo, respectively, P = .079). CONCLUSIONS: Montelukast attenuates EIB at the end of the dosing interval in 6- to 14-year-old children with asthma.

Intranasal flunisolide spray as an adjunct to oral antibiotic therapy for sinusitis.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of sinusitis is difficult and there are few controlled studies of customary therapies. In particular, the possible role of topical intranasal steroid as an adjunct to antibiotic treatment has not been evaluated. METHODS: The study was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel trial in which patients aged 14 years or older were recruited from allergy practices. All patients had maxillary sinusitis documented by radiographs. Treatment consisted of amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium 500 mg combined with nasal spray of either 100 micrograms flunisolide or placebo to each nostril three times a day for 3 weeks (phase I) followed by administration of flunisolide or placebo nasal spray alone three times a day for 4 weeks (phase II). RESULTS: Clinical symptoms and signs decreased significantly in both treatment groups during phase I (p < 0.01). There was a trend to greater improvement in the patients treated with flunisolide, but only the decrease in turbinate swelling/obstruction was statistically significant at the end of phase I when compared with placebo (p = 0.041). Patients' global assessment of overall effectiveness of treatment was higher for flunisolide than placebo after phase I (p = 0.007) and after phase II (p = 0.08). Maxillary sinus radiographs showed improvement in both treatment groups during phase I (p < 0.004) with somewhat greater regression of abnormal findings in patients treated with flunisolide after phase II (p = 0.066). However, 80% of radiographs were still abnormal at the end of phase I. All types of inflammatory cells were significantly decreased in nasal cytograms in patients treated with flunisolide in comparison with those treated with placebo. Flare-up of sinusitis during phase II occurred in 26% of with those treated with placebo. Flare-up of sinusitis during phase II occurred in 26% of patients treated with flunisolide and 35% of those treated with placebo and tended to be more severe in the latter, although these differences were not statistically significant. Adverse events, mainly gastrointestinal symptoms and headache, were similar in both groups and more frequent in phase I than in phase II, (42 vs 15 patients); these side effects were probably due to the antibiotic. CONCLUSION: The addition of flunisolide topical nasal spray as an adjunct to antibiotic therapy was most effective in global evaluations, tended to improve symptoms, to decrease inflammatory cells in nasal cytograms, to normalize ultrasound scans, and to aid regression of radiographic abnormalities compared with placebo spray.

Cromolyn versus triamcinolone acetonide for youngsters with moderate asthma.

Although both cromolyn (C) and inhaled corticosteroids are anti-inflammatory therapies for childhood asthma, there are few controlled comparisons of these medications for asthma therapy in children. None were conducted in the United States, and none specifically study triamcinolone acetonide (T) versus C. This 12-week evaluation followed 31 youths, aged 8 to 18 years, with moderate asthma who were assigned to receive C or T according to a prerandomized and blinded code. Patients were instructed to take two inhalations from the study metered-dose inhaler (active T or placebo) and to inhale the contents of one study-provided ampule (C, 20 mg, or placebo) from a compressor-driven home nebulizer three times per day. Patients also used albuterol, two inhalations from a metered-dose inhaler, three times a day (before study medication) and, additionally, if needed. Patients maintained a daily diary, recording extra medication use, adverse experiences, peak flow rates morning and night, and asthma symptom scores. Laboratory assessment of pulmonary function was done at 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Cosyntropin challenge and methacholine bronchoprovocation challenge were performed at the beginning and end of the study. C and T provided similar, adequate asthma control. Symptoms of wheezing, cough, and chest tightness decreased, and daily peak expiratory flow rate increased with both regimens compared to during a 2-week baseline when patients received medication only as needed. There was no significant change in methacholine sensitivity and no change in endocrine function, as measured with fasting plasma control before and after administration of cosyntropin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Clinical evaluation of triamcinolone acetonide nasal aerosol in children with perennial allergic rhinitis.

Triamcinolone acetonide aerosol (TAA), a topical corticosteroid, now available for intranasal use, has been shown to be highly effective in the treatment of both seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) in adults. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TAA in children, 210 patients (ages 4 to 12 years) with PAR were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups (placebo, TAA 82.5 micrograms/day, or TAA 165 micrograms/day). Medication was given tid over 12 weeks in a double-blind fashion. Response to medication was evaluated using symptom scoring, physician evaluation, and, in 44 patients, nasal airflow determinations by anterior rhinomanometry. The higher dose of TAA (165 micrograms/day) significantly improved rhinitis symptoms relative to placebo: the total nasal symptom score and most individual symptom scores (eg, nasal stuffiness, itch, sneezing) were significantly better, duration of rhinitis symptoms (hours per day) was significantly reduced, and nasal airflow in a subset of patients showed significant improvement. The lower dose of TAA (82.5 micrograms/day) was superior to placebo by the same parameters as the higher dose, but this improvement was not as consistently significant as the higher dose. There were no clinically significant adverse events; nasal irritation and epistaxis were rare with a similar incidence among treatment groups. In conclusion, TAA at 165 micrograms/day was effective in controlling the symptoms of PAR and in improving nasal airflow in pediatric patients; the lower dose (82.5 micrograms/day) was marginally effective. Both doses were safe and well-tolerated in the children studied.

Intraoperative cardiovascular collapse secondary to latex allergy.

An apparent allergic reaction has been noted in children undergoing open urological surgery. This condition is characterized by precipitous hypotension, tachycardia and upper body flushing, and it often causes termination of the procedure. Latex allergy has been identified as the possible inciting event. Contact of latex rubber gloves with intra-abdominal structures (handling bowel) appears to be the most dramatic trigger mechanism for this reaction. We report on 10 patients with latex allergy, 6 of whom have myelomeningocele, who have undergone reconstructive surgery. Severe anaphylactic shock developed intraoperatively in 5 patients and during a barium enema performed with a latex catheter in 1 patient. These 6 patients had previous allergic reactions to latex material, which was not detected preoperatively. In the remaining 4 patients latex allergy was diagnosed preoperatively. A total of 6 patients agreed to a skin prick test to liquid latex. Three patients reacted with a wheal size greater than or equal to a histamine control at a dilution of 1:1,000 and 3 patients at 1:100. In contrast, none of the 5 normal controls reacted to any of the concentrations including full strength latex. A history of exposure to latex products (balloons, surgical gloves, catheters, condoms and so forth) with allergic reactions should heighten surgeon awareness of a potentially severe intraoperative reaction. Furthermore, a skin prick test may be used to screen high risk patients such as those with myelomeningocele. A protocol involving preoperative corticosteroid and antihistamine therapy is recommended.

Comparison of albuterol and metaproterenol syrup in the treatment of childhood asthma.

This study compared the acute and chronic effects of albuterol syrup (2 mg) and metaproterenol syrup (10 mg) three times a day over 28 days in 65 children, aged 6 to 9 years, with mild to moderate asthma. Wright peak flow, symptom scores, and rescue medication use were recorded twice daily during the 28 days; the acute cardiopulmonary effects of these syrups were compared over 8 hours on treatment days 1 and 28. Albuterol syrup produced a significantly greater peak magnitude of bronchodilation than metaproterenol, 29% vs 20% above baseline, respectively, on treatment day 1. Albuterol syrup had a duration of action of at least 8 hours and produced greater bronchodilation than metaproterenol syrup from 2 to 8 hours on both treatment days 1 and 28. The chronotropic effect of metaproterenol was greater than that of albuterol at 1 to 1 1/2 hours postdose on treatment days 1 and 28. There was a trend toward higher morning and evening Wright peak flow measurements during 28 days of treatment in the albuterol group. Side effects of both drugs were comparable. These findings imply therapeutic advantages of albuterol syrup over metaproterenol syrup in currently recommended doses with respect to improvement in pulmonary function, chronotropic effects, and frequency of dosing required to maintain optimum bronchodilation over a 24-hour period.

Immunologic defects in patients with refractory sinusitis.

Sixty-one patients with chronic sinusitis who were referred for an allergy evaluation were evaluated for immunologic competence including assessment of quantitative serum immunoglobulin levels, IgG subclass levels, and response to pneumococcal and Haemophilus influenzae vaccines. In addition to chronic sinus disease, recurrent otitis media and asthma exacerbation were common problems in this group. Five patients had an elevated age-adjusted IgE level and 22 patients had positive prick tests to one or more environmental inhalants; these findings suggest an allergic component in this subgroup. Twelve additional patients had highly reactive intradermal tests to common environmental allergens, which also may be clinically significant for underlying atopy. Eleven patients had low immunoglobulin levels, 6 had low immunoglobulin levels and vaccine hyporesponsiveness, and 17 had poor vaccine response only. Thus, 34 of 61 patients with refractory sinusitis had abnormal results on immune studies, with depressed IgG3 levels and poor response to pneumococcal antigen 7 being most common. In addition to allergy, immunologic incompetence may be an important etiologic factor in patients with chronic, refractory sinusitis.

Bronchoprovocation in children.

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) is a major feature of asthma that is determined by both genetic and environmental factors. The assessment of BHR can be a valuable means of assessing asthma severity and also response to therapy. BHR can be measured with a variety of provocative agents including exercise, methacholine, histamine, hypotonic and hypertonic saline and cold air. Methacholine and histamine challenges have been well studied and standardized. They are extremely sensitive indicators of BHR, but this is not synonymous with asthma. This requires that the physician interprets the clinical significance of test results with caution.

Effects of albuterol and procaterol on exercise-induced asthma.

Procaterol and albuterol, beta agonists, were studied using a placebo-controlled, repeated exercise challenge design in order to assess their duration of effectiveness in both bronchodilation and in modifying exercise-induced asthma (EIA). Fifty-three subjects aged 12 to 50 years who had at least a 20% drop in FEV1 during a screening exercise tolerance test were entered. Subjects took two inhalations of procaterol (10 micrograms/inhalation), albuterol (90 micrograms/inhalation), or placebo. Thirty minutes later they exercised on a treadmill at a workload sufficient to induce greater than or equal to 80% aerobic O2 consumption for six minutes. Pulmonary function was measured before and serially for 30 minutes after exercise. The same exercise challenge was repeated three, six, and nine hours after drug administration. Both procaterol and albuterol bronchodilated and modified EIA at 30 minutes and three hours, mean drops in FEV1 being 8.2 and 9.7% respectively at 30 minutes and 16.8 and 16.3% at three hours. This was compared with placebo falls of 30% and 26%. At six hours the subjects' response was similar after both procaterol and albuterol, and fewer subjects had a 20% fall in FEV1 than with placebo, although protection afforded by both beta agonists was substantially less than at three hours. Both drugs were tolerated well.