Impact of Statin Therapy on Diabetes Incidence: Implications for Primary Prevention.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The present review aims to summarize current evidence, explore underlying mechanisms, and help guide clinicians regarding statin therapy and diabetes risk in primary prevention. RECENT FINDINGS: The observational and genetic epidemiology, as well as evidence from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses, illustrate a modest, dose-dependent increase in risk of diabetes from statin therapy. Risk of new onset diabetes from statins appears to be greatest in those near the diagnostic threshold for diabetes or with diabetes risk factors prior to statin initiation. The risk of incident diabetes is vastly offset by the cardiovascular protection offered from statin therapy and should not deter guideline recommended statin initiation in primary prevention.

Therapeutic Gene Editing in Dyslipidemias.

Dyslipidemia, characterized by abnormal lipid levels in the blood, significantly escalates the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and requires effective treatment strategies. While existing therapies can be effective, long-term adherence is often challenging. There has been an interest in developing enduring and more efficient solutions. In this context, gene editing, particularly clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) technology, emerges as a groundbreaking approach, offering potential long-term control of dyslipidemia by directly modifying gene expression. This review delves into the mechanistic insights of various gene-editing tools. We comprehensively analyze various pre-clinical and clinical studies, evaluating the safety, efficacy, and therapeutic implications of gene editing in dyslipidemia management. Key genetic targets, such as low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), angiopoietin-like protein 3 (ANGPTL3), apolipoprotein C3 (APOC3), and lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)), known for their pivotal roles in lipid metabolism, are scrutinized. The paper highlights the promising outcomes of gene editing in achieving sustained lipid homeostasis, discusses the challenges and ethical considerations in genome editing, and envisions the future of gene therapy in revolutionizing dyslipidemia treatment and cardiovascular risk reduction.

Bempedoic Acid in Secondary Prevention.

•Bempedoic acid has been shown to reduce major adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients unable to take statins due to statin-associated side effects.•Analysis of CLEAR Outcomes trial data reveals possible differences in baseline characteristics between the primary and secondary prevention subgroups.•Further research is needed to optimize use of bempedoic acid and clarify its impact on cardiovascular outcomes in diverse patient populations.

Low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and subclinical coronary atherosclerosis in a middle-aged asymptomatic U.S. population: The Miami Heart Study at Baptist Health South Florida.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We aimed to investigate the interplay between low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) and coronary plaque in asymptomatic cohorts undergoing coronary tomography angiography (CCTA) assessment in the United States. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from 1808 statin-naïve participants in the Miami Heart Study was conducted. We assessed CCTA-detected atherosclerosis (any plaque, noncalcified plaque, maximal stenosis ≥50%, high-risk plaque) across LDL-C levels, coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores (0, 1-99, ≥100), and 10-year cardiovascular risk categories. RESULTS: Atherosclerosis presence varied across LDL-C levels: 40% of those with LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL had no coronary plaque, while 33% with LDL-C <70 mg/dL had plaque (22.4% with noncalcified plaque). Among those with CAC 0, plaque prevalence ranged from 13.2% (LDL-C <70 mg/dL) to 28.2% (LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL), noncalcified plaque from 13.2% to 25.6%, stenosis ≥50% from 0 to 2.6%, and high-risk plaque from 0 to 5.1%. Conversely, with CAC ≥100, all had coronary plaque, with noncalcified plaque prevalence ranging from 25.0% (LDL-C <70 mg/dL) to 83.3% (LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL), stenosis ≥50% from 25.0% to 50.0%, and high-risk plaque from 0 to 66.7%. Among low-risk participants, 76.7% had CAC 0, yet 31.5% had any plaque and 18.3% had noncalcified plaque. Positive trends between LDL-C and any plaque (17.9%-45.2%) or noncalcified plaque (12.8%-23.8%) were observed in the low-risk group, but no clear trends were seen in higher-risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneity exists in subclinical atherosclerosis across LDL-C, CAC, and estimated cardiovascular risk levels. The value of CCTA in risk-stratifying asymptomatic adults should be further explored.

Self-rated health and risk of incident cardiovascular events among individuals with hypertension.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between self-rated health (SRH) and cardiovascular events in individuals with hypertension, but without diabetes mellitus, is understudied. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of data from SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial). SRH was categorized into excellent, very good, good and fair/poor. Using multivariable Cox regression, we estimated hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association of SRH with both all-cause mortality and a composite of cardiovascular events (the primary outcome), which was defined to include myocardial infarction (MI), other acute coronary syndromes, stroke, acute decompensated heart failure, and cardiovascular death. RESULTS: We included 9319 SPRINT participants (aged 67.9 ±â€Š9 years, 35.6% women) with a median follow-up of 3.8 years. Compared with SRH of excellent, the risk [hazard ratio (95% CI)] of the primary outcome associated with very good, good, and fair/poor SRH was 1.11(0.78-1.56), 1.45 (1.03-2.05), and 1.87(1.28-2.75), respectively. Similarly, compared with SRH of excellent, the risk of all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (95% CI)] associated with very good, good, and fair/poor SRH was 1.13 (0.73-1.76), 1.72 (1.12-2.64), and 2.11 (1.32-3.38), respectively. Less favorable SRH (LF-SRH) was also associated with a higher risk of each component of the primary outcome and serious adverse events (SAE). CONCLUSION: Among individuals with hypertension, SRH is independently associated with the risk of incident cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, and SAE. Our study suggest that guidelines should consider the potential significance of including SRH in the clinical history of patients with hypertension.

Relationship between epicardial adipose tissue and coronary atherosclerosis by CCTA in young adults (18-45).

Objective: Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is implicated in the pathogenesis and progression of coronary artery disease (CAD). Limited data exists on the interplay between EAT and atherosclerosis in young individuals. Our study aims to explore the relationship between EAT and CAD in a young cohort. Methods: All young (18-45 years) patients without prior CAD, referred for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) from 2016 to 2022 were included. EAT volume and coronary artery calcium (CAC) were calculated from dedicated non-contrast scans. Coronary plaque presence, extent, and volume were quantified from CCTA. Multivariable logistic regression models for the presence of CAD, defined as any coronary atherosclerosis, were performed. Results: Overall, 712 patients (39±4.8 years, 54 % female) with 45 % Hispanic, and 21 % non-Hispanic Black were included. Patients with CAD had higher EAT volume than those without (80.80 mL ± 36.00 vs 55.16 mL ± 27.92; P < 0.001). In those with CAC=0, higher EAT was associated with the presence of CAD compared to lower EAT volume (P < 0.001). An EAT volume >76 mL was associated with higher CAC (P < 0.001), segment involvement score (P < 0.001), and quantitative total, non-calcified, and low-attenuation plaque volumes (P < 0.002). At multivariable analysis, EAT volume (per 10 mL, OR: 1.21; 95 %CI: 1.12-1.30; P < 0.0001) was independently associated with the presence of CAD. Conclusion: In a diverse cohort of young adults without history of CAD and undergoing a clinically indicated CCTA, EAT volume was independently associated with the presence of CAD. Our findings highlight EAT potential as a novel marker for CAD risk-assessment and a potential therapeutic target in young patients.

Aggressive Onset of a Progressive FEVR Phenotype in a Child With Novel Mutations in LRP5 and TSPAN12.

Purpose: To describe a patient with familial exudative vitreoretinopathy (FEVR) and the treatment course. Methods: A case was evaluated. Results: A 3-year-old boy presented with severe onset of FEVR, with a subhyaloid hemorrhage in 1 eye and tractional retinal detachment (TRD) in the fellow eye. Aggressive treatment with retinal photocoagulation and repeated injections of intravitreal bevacizumab resulted in stability of the retinal disease. Lens-sparing vitrectomy was performed for the TRD. The treatment effect was durable, and the patient retained useful vision in the better eye at 19 years of age. A subsequent genetic analysis showed 2 novel heterozygous missense mutations in LRP5 and TSPAN12. Conclusions: The presence of 2 novel mutations associated with severe FEVR identified in our patient is in agreement with in vitro studies showing that a more severe reduction in Norrin/ß-catenin signal activity occurs with the combination of 2 mutations.

Global burden of metabolic diseases, 1990-2021.

BACKGROUND: Common metabolic diseases, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), hypertension, obesity, hypercholesterolemia, and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), have become a global health burden in the last three decades. The Global Burden of Disease, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) data enables the first insights into the trends and burdens of these metabolic diseases from 1990 to 2021, highlighting regional, temporal and differences by sex. METHODS: Global estimates of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and deaths from GBD 2021 were analyzed for common metabolic diseases (T2DM, hypertension, obesity, hypercholesterolemia, and MASLD). Age-standardized DALYs (mortality) per 100,000 population and annual percentage change (APC) between 1990 and 2021 were estimated for trend analyses. Estimates are reported with uncertainty intervals (UI). RESULTS: In 2021, among five common metabolic diseases, hypertension had the greatest burden (226 million [95 % UI: 190-259] DALYs), whilst T2DM (75 million [95 % UI: 63-90] DALYs) conferred much greater disability than MASLD (3.67 million [95 % UI: 2.90-4.61]). The highest absolute burden continues to be found in the most populous countries of the world, particularly India, China, and the United States, whilst the highest relative burden was mostly concentrated in Oceania Island states. The burden of these metabolic diseases has continued to increase over the past three decades but has varied in the rate of increase (1.6-fold to 3-fold increase). The burden of T2DM (0.42 % [95 % UI: 0.34-0.51]) and obesity (0.26 % [95 % UI: 0.17-0.34]) has increased at an accelerated rate, while the rate of increase for the burden of hypertension (-0.30 % [95 % UI: -0.34 to -0.25]) and hypercholesterolemia (-0.33 % [95 % UI: -0.37 to -0.30]) is slowing. There is no significant change in MASLD over time (0.05 % [95 % UI: -0.06 to 0.17]). CONCLUSION: In the 21st century, common metabolic diseases are presenting a significant global health challenge. There is a concerning surge in DALYs and mortality associated with these conditions, underscoring the necessity for a coordinated global health initiative to stem the tide of these debilitating diseases and improve population health outcomes worldwide.

Relationship between race, income-level, and Cardiovascular Disease.

AIM: To study the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and associated risk factors among different races/ethnicities across different income groups. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2005-2018. Adults >20 years who identified as non-Hispanic (NH) White, NH Black, or Hispanic were included. Family income-to-poverty ratio (PIR) was calculated by dividing family income by poverty guidelines specific to the survey year and divided into four quartiles. Weighted logistic regression was performed to estimate adjusted odds ratios to determine association of race/ethnicity and CVD in each PIR quartile. Models were adjusted for age, sex, race, health insurance, marital status, citizenship status, education level, and PIR. RESULTS: We included 31,884 adults that corresponded to ∼191.3 million weighted, nationally representative participants. Of these, 8,009, 7,967, 7,944, and 7,964 participants belonged to 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quartiles, respectively. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, coronary artery disease (CAD), congestive heart failure (CHF), and stroke decreased with each successive PIR quartile. NH Black participants had higher prevalence odds of DM, hypertension, obesity, CHF, and stroke compared to NH White participants. The difference in prevalence odds between NH White adults and NH Black adults was greater for obesity (p-interaction=0.002), DM (p-interaction=0.027), and stroke (p-interaction=0.053) in the 4th PIR quartile (highest income) compared to the 1st PIR quartile (lowest income). CONCLUSION: Racial and ethnic disparities in the risk of CVD persists across income levels, with a greater difference in prevalence of select CVD and risk factors between NH Black and NH White participants in the highest income quartile compared to the lowest income quartile.

Associations Between Social Determinants of Health and Cardiovascular Health of U.S. Adult Cancer Survivors.

Background: Relationships between the social determinants of health (SDOH) and cardiovascular health (CVH) of cancer survivors are underexplored. Objectives: This study sought to investigate associations between the SDOH and CVH of adult cancer survivors. Methods: Data from the U.S. National Health Interview Survey (2013-2017) were used. Participants reporting a history of cancer were included, excluding those with only nonmelanotic skin cancer, or with missing data for any domain of SDOH or CVH. SDOH was quantified with a 6-domain, 38-item score, consistent with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations (higher score indicated worse deprivation). CVH was quantified based on the American Heart Association's Life's Essential 8, but due to unavailable detailed dietary data, a 7-item CVH score was used, with a higher score indicating worse CVH. Survey-specific multivariable Poisson regression was used to test associations between SDOH quartiles and CVH. Results: Altogether, 8,254 subjects were analyzed, representing a population of 10,887,989 persons. Worse SDOH was associated with worse CVH (highest vs lowest quartile: risk ratio 1.30; 95% CI: 1.25-1.35; P < 0.001), with a grossly linear relationship between SDOH and CVH scores. Subgroup analysis found significantly stronger associations in younger participants (P interaction = 0.026) or women (P interaction = 0.001) but without significant interactions with race (P interaction = 0.051). Higher scores in all domains of SDOH were independently associated with worse CVH (all P < 0.001). Higher SDOH scores were also independently associated with each component of the CVH score (all P < 0.05 for highest SDOH quartile). Conclusions: An unfavorable SDOH profile was independently associated with worse CVH among adult cancer survivors in the United States.

Prediction of Time to Hemodynamic Stabilization of Unstable Injured Patient Encounters Using Electronic Medical Record Data.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to predict time to patient hemodynamic stabilization during trauma resuscitations of hypotensive patient encounters using electronic medical records (EMR) data. METHODS: This observational cohort study leveraged EMR data from a nine-hospital academic system composed of Level I, Level II and non-trauma centers. Injured, hemodynamically unstable (initial systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg) emergency encounters from 2015-2020 were identified. Stabilization was defined as documented subsequent systolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg. We predicted time to stabilization testing random forests, gradient boosting and ensembles using patient, injury, treatment, EPIC Trauma Narrator and hospital features from the first four hours of care. RESULTS: Of 177,127 encounters, 1347 (0.8%) arrived hemodynamically unstable; 168 (12.5%) presented to Level I trauma centers, 853 (63.3%) to Level II, and 326 (24.2%) to non-trauma centers. Of those, 747 (55.5%) were stabilized with a median of 50 minutes (IQR 21-101 min). Stabilization was documented in 94.6% of unstable patient encounters at Level I, 57.6% at Level II and 29.8% at non-trauma centers (p < 0.001). Time to stabilization was predicted with a C-index of 0.80. The most predictive features were EPIC Trauma Narrator measures; documented patient arrival, provider exam, and disposition decision. In-hospital mortality was highest at Level I, 3.0% vs. 1.2% at Level II, and 0.3% at non-trauma centers (p < 0.001). Importantly, non-trauma centers had the highest re-triage rate to another acute care hospital (12.0%) compared to Level II centers (4.0%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Time to stabilization of unstable injured patients can be predicted with EMR data.

Advances in targeting LDL cholesterol: PCSK9 inhibitors and beyond.

There is a direct relationship between the duration and level of exposure to low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels over one's lifespan and cardiovascular events. Early treatment to lower elevated LDL-C is crucial for better outcomes with multiple therapies currently available to reduce atherogenic lipoproteins. Statins remain the foundation of LDL-C lowering therapy as one of the most cost-effective drugs to reduce atherosclerotic events (ASCVD) and mortality. Nonetheless, LDL-driven goal attainment remains suboptimal globally, highlighting a considerable need for non-statin therapies to address residual risk related to statin intolerance, non-adherence, and inherited lipoprotein disorders. LDL-C lowering interventions beyond statins include ezetimibe, PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies, inclisiran and bempedoic acid with specific guideline recommendations as to when to consider each. For patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia requiring more advanced therapy, lomitapide and evinacumab are available, providing mechanisms that are not LDL receptor dependent. Lipoprotein apheresis remains an effective option for clinical familial hypercholesterolemia as well as elevated lipoprotein (a). There are investigational therapies being explored to add to our current armamentarium including CETP inhibitors, a third-generation PCSK9 inhibitor (small recombinant fusion protein oral PCSK9 inhibitor) and gene editing which aims to directly restore or disrupt genes of interest at the DNA level. This article is a brief review of the pharmacotherapy options beyond statins for lowering LDL-C and their impact on ASCVD risk reduction. Our primary aim is to guide physicians on the role these therapies play in achieving appropriate LDL-C goals, with an algorithm of when to consider each based on efficacy, safety and outcomes.

Lipoprotein(a) and Coronary Plaque in Asymptomatic Individuals: The Miami Heart Study at Baptist Health South Florida.

BACKGROUND: Elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) are independently associated with an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events. However, the mechanisms driving this association are poorly understood. We aimed to evaluate the association between Lp(a) and coronary plaque characteristics in a contemporary US cohort without clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography, the noninvasive gold standard for the assessment of coronary atherosclerosis. METHODS: We used baseline data from the Miami Heart Study-a community-based, prospective cohort study-which included asymptomatic adults aged 40 to 65 years evaluated using coronary computed tomography angiography. Those taking any lipid-lowering therapies were excluded. Elevated Lp(a) was defined as ≥125 nmol/L. Outcomes included any plaque, coronary artery calcium score >0, maximal stenosis ≥50%, presence of any high-risk plaque feature (positive remodeling, spotty calcification, low-attenuation plaque, napkin ring), and the presence of ≥2 high-risk plaque features. RESULTS: Among 1795 participants (median age, 52 years; 54.3% women; 49.6% Hispanic), 291 (16.2%) had Lp(a) ≥125 nmol/L. In unadjusted analyses, individuals with Lp(a) ≥125 nmol/L had a higher prevalence of all outcomes compared with Lp(a) <125 nmol/L, although differences were only statistically significant for the presence of any coronary plaque and ≥2 high-risk features. In multivariable models, elevated Lp(a) was independently associated with the presence of any coronary plaque (odds ratio, 1.40, [95% CI, 1.05-1.86]) and with ≥2 high-risk features (odds ratio, 3.94, [95% CI, 1.82-8.52]), although only 35 participants had this finding. Among participants with a coronary artery calcium score of 0 (n=1200), those with Lp(a) ≥125 nmol/L had a significantly higher percentage of any plaque compared with those with Lp(a) <125 nmol/L (24.2% versus 14.2%; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary analysis, elevated Lp(a) was independently associated with the presence of coronary plaque. Larger studies are needed to confirm the strong association observed with the presence of multiple high-risk coronary plaque features.

Efficacy of Aspirin for primary prevention among adults with high-risk type 2 diabetes in the ACCORD trial.

AIM: To assess the efficacy of aspirin use for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) with incident atherosclerotic CVD and mortality in high-risk type 2 diabetes. METHODS: In this post hoc analysis, we included participants in the ACCORD trial without CVD at baseline. The association between aspirin use and the primary outcome (a composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke or cardiovascular [CV] death) and all-cause mortality was evaluated using Cox proportional hazard analysis adjusting for demographics, CV risk factors and comorbidities. RESULTS: Eligible participants (n = 6330) were aged 62.8 ± 5.9 years at baseline, 43.8% of the participants were female, and 3026 (47.8%) used aspirin. Over a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 4.9 (4.1-5.7) years, the number (%) of primary outcome and all-cause mortality events in those who used aspirin (vs. those who did not), was 196 (6.5) versus 229 (6.9) and 146 (4.8) versus 147 (4.5), respectively. The adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) associated with aspirin use for the primary outcome and all-cause mortality were 0.94 (0.77-1.14) and 1.08 (0.85-1.36), respectively. CONCLUSION: In high-risk individuals with type 2 diabetes, the use of aspirin for primary prevention was not associated with a decreased risk of incident CVD or all-cause mortality.

Achievement of LDL-C <55 mg/dL among US adults: Findings from the cvMOBIUS2 registry.

BACKGROUND: Reflecting clinical trial data showing improved outcomes with lower LDL-C levels, guidelines across the globe are increasingly recommending a goal of LDL-C <55 mg/dL in persons with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). What proportion of patients with ASCVD are already meeting those goals in the US remains understudied. METHODS: Using electronic health record data from 8 large US health systems, we evaluated lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), LDL-C levels, and factors associated with an LDL-C <55 mg/dL in persons with ASCVD treated between 1/1/2021-12/31/2021. Multivariable modeling was used to evaluate factors associated with achievement of an LDL-C <55 mg/dL. RESULTS: Among 167,899 eligible patients, 22.6% (38,016) had an LDL-C <55 mg/dL. While 76.1% of individuals overall were on a statin, only 38.2% were on a high-intensity statin, 5.9% were on ezetimibe, and 1.7% were on a PCSK9i monoclonal antibody (mAb). Factors associated with lower likelihood of achieving an LDL-C <55 mg/dL included: younger age (odds ratio [OR] 0.91 per 10y), female sex (OR 0.69), Black race (OR 0.76), and noncoronary artery disease forms of ASCVD including peripheral artery disease (OR 0.72) and cerebrovascular disease (OR 0.85), while high-intensity statin use was associated with increased odds of LDL-C <55 mg/dL (OR 1.55). Combination therapy (statin+ezetimibe or statin+PCSK9i mAb) was rare (4.4% and 0.5%, respectively) and was associated with higher odds of an LDL-C <55 mg/dL (OR 1.39 and 3.13, respectively). CONCLUSION: Less than a quarter of US patients with ASCVD in community practice are already achieving an LDL-C <55 mg/dL. Marked increases in utilization of both high intensity statins and combination therapy with non-statin therapy will be needed to achieve LDL-C levels <55 mg/dL at the population level in secondary prevention.